1.Determination of liver function tests and liver ultrasonographic findings in patients with leptospirosis in a Tertiary Hospital
Carlos Rolando G. Cuañ ; o ; Patricia Maria Gregoria M. Cuañ ; o ; Janus P. Ong ; Martin Augustine B. Borlongan ; John Mark K. Torres ; Aylmer Rex B. Hernandez ; Alfredo V. Chua, Jr
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(4):17-25
Introduction:
ILeptospirosis is an important zoonotic disease commonly found in tropical or sub-tropical countries. The most severe form is Weil's syndrome which presents with jaundice, renal failure, and bleeding diatheses. Although jaundice occurs in 38% of patients with leptospirosis, no studies in Asia have focused on the liver biochemical profile of these patients. Characterization of liver biochemical profile and ultrasonographic findings may shed more light on the disease process. Identification of liver biochemical parameters that portend a poor prognosis may also allow for early aggressive intervention.
Objective:
To describe the liver biochemical profile and liver ultrasonographic findings in adult patients with laboratoryconfirmed leptospirosis, admitted at a tertiary hospital in Manila, Philippines. The association of clinical and laboratory features with clinical outcomes (i.e., severe liver injury, Weil’s syndrome, and mortality) was also investigated.
Methods:
This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed all available cases of adult patients with laboratoryconfirmed leptospirosis admitted in the Philippine General Hospital from January 2009 to August 2018. The clinical features, liver biochemical profiles, and ultrasound findings were recorded and analyzed. Comparison between the means of each group based on clinical outcome (i.e., mortality, Weil’s syndrome) was done via Students’ t-test for continuous variables, and calculation of the Odds Ratio for categorical variables.
Results:
Total and direct bilirubin levels were elevated in patients with leptospirosis compared to serum aminotransferases and alkaline phosphatase levels which were only mildly elevated. Abdominal ultrasound showed typically un-enlarged livers with normal parenchymal echogenicity, normal spleens, and non-dilated biliary trees. Dyspnea was associated with an increased odds for mortality. Although jaundice was present in 39.5% of patients and significantly associated with severe liver injury, this was not associated with mortality. Liver biochemical test values did not differ among patients who expired and those who survived to discharge. The presence of myalgia and abdominal pain increased the odds for Weil's syndrome.
Conclusion
To date, no local studies have fully described the liver biochemical profile of patients with leptospirosis. Our findings are compatible with previous studies showing that leptospirosis typically presents with predominantly elevated direct bilirubin from cholestasis and systemic infection. Contrary to previous literature, however, our study found no association between jaundice and mortality.
Leptospirosis
2.Intravenous tocilizumab versus standard of care in the treatment of severe and critical COVID-19-related pneumonia: A single center, double-blind, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial
Eric Jason B. Amante ; Aileen S. David-Wang ; Michael L. Tee ; Felix Eduardo R. Punzalan ; John C. Añ ; onuevo ; Lenora C. Fernandez ; Albert B. Albay Jr. ; John Carlo M. Malabad ; Fresthel Monica M. Climacosa ; A. Nico Nahar I. Pajes ; Patricia Maria Gregoria M. Cuañ ; o ; Marissa M. Alejandrí ; a
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(6):7-13
Background:
Severe and critical COVID-19 disease is characterized by hyperinflammation involving pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6. Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-6 receptors.
Objectives:
This study evaluated the efficacy of tocilizumab in Filipino patients with severe to critical COVID-19 disease.
Methods:
This phase 3 randomized double-blind trial, included patients hospitalized for severe or critical COVID-19 in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tocilizumab plus local standard of care or placebo plus standard of care. Patients were eligible for a repeat IV infusion within 24-48 hours if they deteriorated or did not improve. Treatment success or clinical improvement was defined as at least two categories of improvement from baseline in the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, in an intention-to-treat manner.
Results:
Forty-nine (49) patients were randomized in the tocilizumab arm and 49 in the placebo arm. There was no significant difference in age, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, need for mechanical ventilation, presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, or biomarker levels between groups. Use of adjunctive therapy was similar between groups, with corticosteroid used in 91.8% in tocilizumab group and 81.6% in the placebo group, while remdesivir was used in 98% of participants in both groups. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of treatment success in both the intention-to-treat analysis (relative risk=1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.30) and per-protocol analysis (relative risk=0.98, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.21). There was no significant difference in time to improvement of at least two categories relative to baseline on the 7-point Ordinal Scale of clinical status.
Conclusion
The use of tocilizumab on top of standard of care in the management of patients with severe to critical COVID-19 did not result in significant improvement as defined by the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, nor in significant improvement in incidence of mechanical ventilation, incidence of ICU admission, length of ICU stay, and mortality rate.
COVID-19
;
Interleukin-6
3.Burnout and resilience of internal medicine physician trainees in a tertiary government hospital in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Mixed-method study.
Paula Isabel G. FRANCO ; Lia M. PALILEO-VILLANUEVA ; Patricia Maria Gregoria M. CUAÑ ; O ; Marvin E. MARQUEZ ; Ma. Rosario E. BAYAN ; Jhaki A. MENDOZA
Acta Medica Philippina 2022;56(6):7-16
Objectives: Internal Medicine physician trainees faced unique challenges as the primary frontline physicians at a tertiary COVID-19 government referral center during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined the prevalence of burnout and resilience of these physician trainees during the early period of the pandemic, the determinants of burnout, and their sources of anxiety and coping mechanisms.
Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey to measure burnout and resilience among 196 Internal Medicine physician trainees using the Maslach Burnout Index Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel and the Connor-Davidson Resiliency questionnaires, respectively. We then conducted virtual focus group discussions and in-depth key informant interviews to explore the trainees' sources of anxiety and coping mechanisms until thematic saturation was satisfied.
Results: Out of 146 respondents (from 196 eligible participants, 74% response rate), four percent of physician trainees fit the frank burnout profile, 40% were engaged, while the majority had intermediate profiles (23% ineffective, 28% overextended, and 4% disengaged). The mean resilience score was 72.9 (SD 12.4). Resilience was a significant negative predictor for burnout (Beta Coefficient = -0.73, p<0.001). Its protective effect decreases in those with more exposure to patient deaths (Beta Coefficient = 6.767, p<0.05). Significant sources of anxiety included changes in the practice of medicine (changes in workflow, working in full personal protective equipment, telemedicine and zoom fatigue, constant threat of acquiring the infection) and having competing demands between service and training. Coping mechanisms included preserving a haven, maintaining social relationships, and self-care.
Conclusion: In the largest government hospital in the Philippines, four percent of Internal Medicine physician trainees had burnout, 40% were engaged, and the majority were at-risk for burnout a few months into the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Resilience reduces the risk for burnout. However, its protective effect decreased with exposure to a higher number of patient deaths per week.
Burnout, Psychological ; COVID-19 ; Physicians ; Pandemics
4.Which dialysis method should be used for patients with COVID-19?
Patricia Maria Gregoria Mina-Cuañ ; o ; Cary Amiel G. Villanueva ; John Jefferson V. Besa ; Andrew Rufino M. Villafuerte ; Jayson M. Villavicencio ; Vincent Anthony S. Tang ; Lia M. Palileo-Villanueva
Acta Medica Philippina 2020;54(Rapid Reviews on COVID19):120-124
Key Findings
• Very low-quality evidence from a single retrospective study suggests that continuous renal replacement
therapy (CRRT) may reduce mortality among COVID-19 patients on invasive mechanical ventilation. Guidelines
recommend CRRT for critically ill patients to minimize the risk of possible transmission, if this option is available.
• Although uncommon, acute kidney injury (AKI) can occur in association with coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) and is associated with increased in-hospital mortality.
• There are currently no published or ongoing clinical trials directly comparing dialysis modalities for acute
kidney injury in COVID-19 patients.
• In reducing the risk of transmission during dialysis: currently, there are no studies comparing one dialysis
modality to another. The method of dialysis is still primarily determined by the clinical picture of the patient, the
expertise of the center, and the resources available. The American Society of Nephrology (ASN) recommends
CRRT over intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) for critically ill patients with COVID-19 to minimize patient contact
when it is available, and resources allow. Otherwise, intermittent hemodialysis may be done provided that,
infection control measures are strictly followed.
• Several international and local guidelines recommend strict adherence to infection prevention and control
measures (e.g. hand hygiene, physical distancing, proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and
cohorting of patients) who are undergoing dialysis.
Covid-19


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail