BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Philippine Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions (PhilPEN) was introduced by the Department of Health through AO 2012-0029. This is anchored to WHO PEN, a prioritized set of cost-effective interventions that can be carried out to provide an acceptable standard of care at the primary health care level, even in low-resource settings. The study aims to evaluate the availability and adequacy of primary health care facilities in providing the PhilPEN package of interventions using the WHO assessment tool.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 25 randomly selected primary health care facilities in Metro Manila. Data were collected through structured interviews with facility staff and direct observation using a standardized questionnaire aligned with PhilPEN and WHO PEN guidelines. The tool assessed PhilPEN inputs (infrastructure, human resources, basic tools and equipment, essential medicines, record-keeping, financing) and services (risk assessment and screening, early diagnosis and monitoring, treatment and follow-up, counseling, referral of patients).

All facilities met the basic standards for infrastructure, human resources, record keeping, and financing. However, only 40% had all essential medicines, and just 16% had complete tools, including urine ketone/protein test strips. Risk assessment and patient counseling were consistently implemented, but early diagnosis and follow-up services were inconsistent due to training and supply gaps.

Primary health care centers in Metro Manila demonstrate partial readiness for PhilPEN implementation. Gaps in tools, medicines, and protocol availability should be addressed to optimize NCD service delivery.

INTRODUCTION: The study objective was to determine the levels of self-care and health literacy (HL) and their associations among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study conducted in a public primary care setting in Singapore. A total of 289 participants aged 21-80 years with hypertension were recruited. Self-care profiles were measured using the Hypertension Self-Care Profile (HTN-SCP; range 0-240, domain range 0-80). Health literacy was measured using the Short-Form Health Literacy Scale (HLS-SF12; range 0-50, limited literacy ≤33). RESULTS: The mean self-care score was 182.7 (standard deviation [SD] 23.2). The median HL score was 34.7 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.9-40.3), and 31.1% of participants had limited HL. Self-care was not associated with age, CKD status, household income and education, but was associated with gender and HL score. In the final regression model, lower HL scores (adjusted β = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7 to 1.36, P < 0.001) and male gender (adjusted β = -5.29, 95% CI -10.56 to -0.03, P = 0.049) were associated with lower self-care scores. The HL scores were associated with self-care domains of self-efficacy (HL: β = 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.42, P < 0.001), motivation (HL: β = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.53, P < 0.001) and behaviour (HL: β = 0.38, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.50, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Thirty-one percent of the participants had limited HL. Self-care was not associated with age, race, CKD status, household income or education. Male gender and limited HL were associated with lower self-care. Self-care was associated with self-efficacy, motivation and behaviour. Future research could focus on more targeted approaches to improve self-care and HL among patients with CKD.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Health Literacy ; Middle Aged ; Self Care ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Aged ; Adult ; Primary Health Care ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy* ; Singapore ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Aged, 80 and over ; Young Adult ; Hypertension/therapy*

INTRODUCTION: As the population ages, patient complexity is increasing, intensifying the demand for well-resourced, coordinated care. A deeper understanding of the factors contributing to this complexity is essential for optimising resource allocation. This study evaluates the prevalence of complex care needs in Singapore's primary care settings and identifies the factors associated with these needs. METHOD: Using a qualitative study design, we developed a patient complexity questionnaire to assess how Singapore family physicians recognise patient complexity. Sixty-nine experienced primary care physicians applied this tool to assess patient encounters, categorising each as "routine care" (RC), "medically challenging" (MC), or "complex care" (CC). We compared the care needs across these categories and used mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to determine the independent predictors of complexity. RESULTS: Of the 4327 encounters evaluated, 15.0% were classified as CC, 18.5% as MC, and 66.4% as RC. In both CC and MC encounters, the most common medical challenges were polypharmacy (66.2% in CC, 44.9% in MC); poorly controlled chronic conditions (41.3% in CC, 24.5% in MC); and treatment interactions (34.4% in CC, 26.0% in MC). Non-medical issues frequently identified included low health literacy (32.6% in CC, 20.8% in MC); limited motivation for healthy lifestyle behaviours (27.2% in CC, 16.6% in MC); and the need for coordinated care with hospital specialists (24.7% in CC, 17.1% in MC). The top 3 independent predictors of complexity included mobility limitations requiring assistance (odds ratio [OR] for requiring wheelchair/trolley: 7.14 for CC vs RC, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.74-10.74); longer consultation times with physicians (OR for taking >20 minutes for doctor's consultation: 3.96 for CC vs RC, 95% CI 2.86-5.48); and low socioeconomic status (OR for living in 1- or 2-room HDB flats: 2.98 for CC vs RC, 95% CI 1.74-5.13). CONCLUSION High care needs, encompassing both CC and MC encounters, were prevalent in primary care interactions. These findings highlight that relying solely on chronic disease count is insufficient to capture the full spectrum of patient complexity.
Singapore/epidemiology* ; Humans ; Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Adult ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Prevalence ; Polypharmacy ; Qualitative Research ; Chronic Disease/therapy* ; Logistic Models

Obesity is a significant public health problem in China. The development of a proactive and effective model to combat the obesity epidemic could alleviate the disease burden, improve population health, and ultimately support the achievement of the Healthy China goals. Obesity research has made significant progress domestically and internationally, resulting in continuous improvements in basic public health services within primary care. Therefore, the National Office of Basic Public Health Service Program for Primary Diabetes Care has organized experts to issue the National Guidelines for the Integrated Management of Obesity in Primary Care (2025). The aim of this guide is to assist primary care physicians with evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and evaluating obesity, promoting standardized and integrated management for patients with obesity. It includes essential guidelines for patient management, an overview of obesity, diagnostic and evaluation criteria, integrated management strategies, and protocols for follow-up and referral.
Humans ; Primary Health Care ; Obesity/therapy* ; China ; Practice Guidelines as Topic

In China, the prevalence of diabetes has increased significantly, and rigorous challenges exist in diabetes prevention and glycemic control, especially in primary medical care. Under the guidance of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China and the Chinese Medical Association, the Office for Primary Diabetes Care of the National Basic Public Health Service Program issued the "National guidelines for the prevention and control of diabetes in primary care (2018)" in 2018. The present guideline, which incorporates the latest advances in diabetes research and practice from the 2018 and 2022 editions, aims to improve primary health facilities and provide standardized basic public health and medical services throughout China. It applies to healthcare providers who provide primary care to patients with type 2 diabetes aged 18 or older. It primarily includes basic management requirements; workflow of health management; diagnosis; classification; monitoring, screening, and assessment; treatment; identification and management of diabetic acute and chronic complications; traditional Chinese medicine; referral; health management; and health education.
Humans ; Primary Health Care ; China ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy* ; Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & control* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic

BACKGROUND

Public health nurses (PHNs) are a significant cadre of the primary healthcare workforce working toward achieving universal health care (UHC). Exploring their work activities is integral to understanding how UHC is implemented better.

To describe and explore the work activities, roles, and functions of the PHNs in rendering primary care services in the context of UHC.

Key informant interviews were conducted with 12 PHNs in Tarlac Province who were working with permanent status in their respective rural health units (RHUs) for at least 1 year. They were selected through selection criteria. Data were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis.

Data analysis led to the emergence of 4 themes and 11 subthemes. The four themes were: (a) evolving scope and nature of work, (b) work challenges and barriers toward UHC implementation, (c) UHC outcomes, impact, and insights, and (d) communication and health promotion.

The study underscores the importance of exploring the PHNs’ roles and functions, as it offers a window on how they fulfill their duties toward achieving the goals of UHC. From the viewpoint of the interviewed PHNs, several elements and issues need to be addressed. Consequently, some positive impact on their work activities and functions emerged. Their nature of work brought them professional development and fulfillment as they render primary care and value-driven services despite the challenges and struggles they encountered in public health.

Human ; Delivery Of Health Care ; Primary Health Care

Human ; Primary Health Care ; Outpatients

Human ; Delivery Of Health Care ; Primary Health Care

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of hospitalization, heart failure-related readmission, poor quality of life, and mortality. It also poses a substantial economic burden. The heart failure clinical practice guideline (HFCPG) was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and management of chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) among adult Filipino patients in the outpatient setting for primary care physicians.

The GRADE approach and an Evidence-to-Decision framework were used to evaluate the evidence and formulate recommendations. The strength and direction of each recommendation were determined through voting, with consensus reached if 75% of all CP members agreed.

The HFCPG provides 19 recommendations and one good practice statement in response to 14 identified clinical questions. Careful history-taking and physical examination, use of chest x-ray to detect cardiomegaly and/or pulmonary congestion, two-dimensional echocardiography for HF diagnosis, and baseline determination of serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine to guide management have been highly recommended; however, the 12-lead electrocardiogram should not be solely used for HF diagnosis. Judicious use of diuretics to relieve congestion, use of selected beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors are strongly recommended for the treatment of HFrEF.

HFrEF is a complex condition that requires early recognition and careful management. Guideline-directed medical therapies, particularly the evidence-based pillars of treatment, are recommended, as well as early discussion of palliative care, timely determination of advanced heart failure and the need for referral to higher levels of care.