1.Exploration of clear surgical margin in human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery.
Hongli GONG ; Chengzhi XU ; Chunping WU ; Pengyu CAO ; Yongzheng CHEN ; Jianfang WU ; Meiqin SHI ; Ming ZHANG ; Liang ZHOU ; Lei TAO
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(11):1016-1027
Objective:To analyze the relationship between the optimal surgical margin value and clinical prognosis of transoral robotic surgery(TORS) in treating human papillomavirus(HPV) -positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods:A single-center, prospective, observational cohort study was conducted, enrolling patients with early and moderated stage(≤T3 stage) oropharyngeal carcinoma undergoing TORS between July 2020 and April 2024. The proposed optimal surgical margin cutoff value for TORS was set as 2 mm. The primary objectives were to evaluate the optimal clear margin for TORS and its association with overall survival(OS) and progression-free survival(PFS). Logistic regression was used to analyze correlations between surgical margins and clinical variables, while Cox regression models assessed the impact of surgical margins on OS and PFS. Results:A total of 90 patients(60 males, 66.7%) were included, all had squamous cell carcinoma, with a mean age of 58.0±9.0 years(range: 39-84 years) old. The 1, 2 and 3-year OS rates were 92.3%, 89.9% and 85.0%, respectively, while the 1, 2 and 3-year PFS rates were all 90.1%. For surgical margins ≤2 mm, the 1, 2 and 3-year OS rates were 80.8%, 69.3% and 69.3%, respectively, and PFS rates were 77.9% across three time points. For surgical margins>2 mm, the 1, 2 and 3-year OS rates were 96.5%, 96.5% and 90.6%, respectively, with PFS rates of 94.6%. Logistic regression showed no correlation between surgical margins and tumor type, T/N stage, smoking, alcohol use, or gender(P>0.05). Cox analysis identified surgical margins>2 mm as a significant factor improving PFS(HR=0.14, 95%CI 0.02-0.90, P=0.038). Conclusion:This systematic analysis suggests setting a 2 mm and longer as clear surgical margin for TORS. Margins>2 mm are associated with superior postoperative PFS rate and prolonged PFS time in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology*
;
Human Papillomavirus Viruses/isolation & purification*
;
Margins of Excision
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology*
;
Papillomavirus Infections/virology*
;
Prognosis
;
Prospective Studies
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*
2.Application of domestic jingfeng single-port robotic-assisted surgery in multisite diseases of oropharyngeal-head and neck region: case series.
Ping HAN ; Faya LIANG ; Peiliang LIN ; Junyu CHEN ; Jingyi WANG ; Yanke LIU ; Xiaoming HUANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(11):1048-1056
Objective:To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and technical advantages of the domestic Jingfeng single-port robotic surgical system in transoral and transaxillary approach surgeries for multisite diseases. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 6 patients who underwent Jingfeng SP1000 single-port robotic-assisted surgery at our hospital from June 2025 to July 2025. They were divided into the transoral robotic surgery group(4cases) and the transaxillary approach thyroid cancer radical resection group(2cases) based on surgical approaches. The transoral robotic surgery group included extended resection of right tonsillar cancer with cervical lymph node dissection, epiglottic cyst resection, extended resection of right pyriform sinus cancer with cervical lymph node dissection, and surgery for epiglottic cyst and obstructive sleep apnea(OSA). For each case, parameters including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications, robotic operation performance, and postoperative recovery were recorded. Results:All 6 surgeries were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery or system failure. In the transoral robotic surgery group, the mean robotic operation time was(60.00±34.88) minutes, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 20.00(5.75,20.00)mL. In the transaxillary robotic surgery group, the robotic operation time was respectively 60.00 and 40.00 minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 10.00 and 5.00 mL, respectively. One case of minor perioperative complication(in the flap dissection area) occurred, with no severe complications reported. All patients recovered smoothly after surgery, with a median follow-up of 1.9 months showing no residual lesions, recurrence, or functional impairment. Conclusion:This case series confirms the safety and feasibility of the domestic Jingfeng single-port robot in transoral and axillary approach surgeries in oropharyngeal-head and neck surgery. Its single-port design reduces trauma and the risk of robotic arm collision, adapts to minimally invasive needs, and its domestic production attribute lowers costs to facilitate popularization, providing a new option for such patients.
Humans
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Operative Time
;
Middle Aged
;
Male
;
Female
;
Neck/surgery*
;
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery*
;
Adult
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Oropharynx/surgery*
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery*
3.Management and consideration of positive surgical margins in locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with oral robotic surgery.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2025;39(11):1061-1067
Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) still faces several critical clinical challenges in the treatment of locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-OPSCC),with core controversies focusing on the selection of surgical indications, strategies for improving the RO resection rate, and the impact of margin status on prognosis. Based on current evidence-based medical data and our team's experience with surgical difficulties encountered in TORS for LA-OPSCC, particularly regarding preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies for managing positive margins, this article systematically presents clinical insights and proposed solutions, aiming to provide valuable references for peers in diagnosis and treatment.
Humans
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Margins of Excision
;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery*
;
Prognosis
4.Clinical characteristics and efficacy of oropharyngeal carcinoma with secondary primary tumor.
Meilin HE ; Runye WU ; Ye ZHANG ; Xiaodong HUANG ; Kai WANG ; Xuesong CHEN ; Jingbo WANG ; Yuan QU ; Jingwei LUO ; Junlin YI
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2023;37(9):721-728
Objective:To analysis the clinical features and prognosis in oropharyngeal carcinoma with secondary primary tumor. Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 468 pathologically confirmed oropharyngeal cancer as the primary tumor patients with p16 status, excluded distant metastasis, and admitted to the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2010 to December 2020. The clinical features and prognosis of the secondary primary tumor were analyzed. Results:Among 468 patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated at initial diagnosed, 222 cases were P16-negative. With a median follow-up time of 64.3 months, 66 cases developed second primary cancer, with an incidence of 29.3%, among which 63.6%(42/66) were synchronous and 36.4%(24/66) were heterochronous, esophagus was the most commonly involved site. The 5-year OS of p16-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma with synchronous second primary cancer, without second primary cancer and with heterogeneous second primary cancer were 26.3% and 57.3% and 73.2%(P=0.001); The second primary cancer accounted for 11.2%(12/107) of the deaths in the whole group, among them, the heterochronous second primary accounted for 75.0%(9/12). There were 246 patients with p16 positive, with a median follow-up time of 52.4 months, 20 patients developed second primary cancer(8.1%). Among them, 65.0%(13/20) were synchronous and 35.0%(7/20) were heterochronous. Esophagus was the most commonly involved site. The 4-year OS of p16-positive with synchronous, heterochronous and non-second primary cancer group were 51.9%, 80.7% and 83.3%. Secondary primary cancer accounted for 3.8%(2/52) of all deaths in p16 positvie group. Conclusion:The incidence of second primary cancer of p16 positive and negative oropharyngeal carcinoma were different. The esophagus was the most commonly involved site regardless of p16 status. Regardless of p16 status, the survival of patients with synchronous second primary cancer was worse than those without second primary cancer. For p16-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma, the prognosis was better in patients with heterogeneous second primary cancer, the second primary cancer is one of the main causes of death.
Humans
;
Carcinoma/diagnosis*
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnosis*
5.Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2023;37(9):734-739
Oropharyngeal carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors of head and neck. In recent years, the incidence of Human papilloma virus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma(HPV-OPSCC) has been increasing year by year. With the advancement of minimally invasive surgical techniques, the wide application of intensity modulated radiation therapy, and the demand of patients for organ function protection and higher quality of life, the unique biological behavior and better prognosis of HPV-OPSCC have led to the exploration of a series of attenuated treatment modes. This article reviews the diagnosis and treatment status of oropharyngeal cancer and related research progress based on relevant reports.
Humans
;
Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis*
;
Quality of Life
;
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy*
;
Head
;
Human Papillomavirus Viruses
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms
6.Research progress on the treatment improvement of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2023;37(9):740-747
The number of new cases of oropharyngeal cancer is increasing year by year among the world, and HPV infection is one of the risk factors for this malignant tumor. Compared with HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer, HPV-positive patients are more sensitive to radiotherapy and have a better prognosis, but there is no accepted treatment for HPV-positive patients. Reducing treatment intensity moderately and exploring the best option to minimize side effects of treatment are urgent issues to be addressed. This article reviews the research progress on the treatment improvement of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer in recent years.
Humans
;
Papillomavirus Infections
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Risk Factors
7.Infection of human papillomavirus and head and neck cancer.
Cheng SONG ; Shao Kai ZHANG ; You Lin QIAO
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2023;45(1):39-43
High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers consist of cervical cancer, anal cancer, penile cancer, vulvar cancer, vaginal cancer, and head and neck cancer (HNC). Of these, the disease burden of HNC is second only to cervical cancer. HNC mostly originates from malignant lesions of squamous epithelial cells and mainly includes oral cavity cancer, pharyngeal cancer (including nasopharyngeal cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, and hypopharyngeal cancer), and laryngeal cancer. Tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and HPV infection are three primary risk factors. Recently, there is an upward trend of HNC incidence globally, especially in high-income countries. In China, the disease burden and trends of HPV-related HNC are still not clear. A few small sample size and single-center studies suggest a high HPV prevalence and increasing trend in HNC. Methodological differences in HPV testing and regional variabilities still exist among these studies. Among the anatomic sites, oropharyngeal cancer has been shown to be caused by HPV infection, but the association of HPV with other sites is still under debate. In addition, there is a paucity of relevant studies. Here, this review narrates the association between HPV infection and HNC, compares the differences between global and Chinese studies, and then explores the importance of HPV infection in various anatomical sites. The main objective is to highlight the research on HPV-related HNC and promote relevant prevention and treatment programs.
Female
;
Humans
;
Human Papillomavirus Viruses
;
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control*
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/complications*
;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/complications*
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology*
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology*
;
Papillomaviridae
8.Survival rate and quality of life of human papillomaviruse-negative patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer receiving different treatments.
Jian Cheng LI ; Yun GUO ; Wen Jing CUI ; Yue SUN ; Dong Kun YANG ; Liang LIU ; Zhi Gang WU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2022;42(8):1230-1236
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the survival rates and quality of life of human papillomaviruse (HPV)-negative patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer after different combined treatments with chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy.
METHODS:
We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with oropharyngeal cancer hospitalized in our hospital from January, 2015 to December, 2020, and after case analysis of the clinical, imaging and pathological data, 405 patients were included in this study and grouped according to the treatments they received. Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank analysis were used to calculate the overall survival rate and the survival rate of patients with different treatments. The self-rated quality of life of the tumor-free survivors was assessed using UW-QOL (4) questionnaire and compared among the patients with different treatments.
RESULTS:
Among the 405 patients included in this study, 146 received treatments with chemotherapy+surgery+radiotherapy (CSRT), 138 received surgery+radiotherapy (SRT) and 121 were treated with radiotherapy+chemotherapy (RCT). The overall survival rates of the 3 groups at 1, 3 and 5 years were 85.1%, 67.1% and 56.9%, respectively, and the survival rates of patients receiving CSRT, SRT and RCT did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). A total of 280 UW-QOL (4) questionnaires were distributed and 202 (72.14%) were retrieved. The average total scores decreased in the order of CSRT > SRT > RCT; the scores were significantly higher in CSRT group than in SRT and RCT (P < 0.05), but did not differ significantly between SRT and RCT groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
CSRT, SRT and RCT are all treatment options for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer, but CSRT may achieve better quality of life of the patients than SRT and RCT.
Alphapapillomavirus
;
Humans
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Quality of Life
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Survival Rate
9.Analysis on cancer incidence and mortality attributed to human papillomavirus infection in China, 2016.
Mei Wen YUAN ; Hong Hao WANG ; Ru Fei DUAN ; Kun Peng XU ; Shang Ying HU ; You Lin QIAO ; Yong ZHANG ; Fang Hui ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2022;43(5):702-708
Objective: We aim to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of cancer attributable to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in China in 2016. Methods: Based on the cancer incidence and mortality rates, national population data, and population attributable fraction (PAF) in China, we calculated the number of incidence and death cases attributed to HPV infection in different areas, age groups, and gender in China in 2016. The standardized incidence and mortality rates for cancer attributed to HPV infection were calculated by using Segi's population. Results: In 2016, a total of 124 772 new cancer cases (6.32 per 100 000) were attributed to HPV infection in China, including 117 118 cases in women and 7 654 cases in men. Of these cancers, cervical cancer was the most common one, followed by anal cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, penile cancer, vaginal cancer, laryngeal cancer, oral cancer, and vulvar cancer. A total of 41 282 (2.03 per 100 000) deaths were attributed to HPV infection, of which 37 417 occurred in women and 3 865 in men. Most deaths were caused by cervical cancer, followed by anal cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, penile cancer, laryngeal cancer, vaginal cancer, oral cancer, and vulvar cancer. The incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer increased rapidly with age, peaked in age group 50-54 years, then decreased obviously. The morbidity and mortality rates of non-cervical cancer increased with age. The cancer case and death numbers in rural areas (57 089 cases and 19 485 deaths) were lower than those in urban areas (67 683 cases and 21 797 deaths). However, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) and age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) of cervical cancer were higher in rural areas than in urban areas. There were no significant differences in ASIR and ASMR of non-cervical cancers between urban areas and rural areas. Conclusions: The incidence of cancers attributed to HPV infection in China was lower than the global average, but the number of incidences accounted largely, furthermore there is an increasing trend of morbidity and mortality. The preventions and controls of cervical cancer and male anal cancer are essential to contain the increases in cancer cases and deaths attributed to HPV infection.
China/epidemiology*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Laryngeal Neoplasms
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Mouth Neoplasms
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology*
;
Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology*
;
Penile Neoplasms/epidemiology*
;
Registries
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology*
;
Vaginal Neoplasms
;
Vulvar Neoplasms
10.Application of transoral robotic surgery in treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Xing ZHANG ; Shu Wei CHEN ; Zhong Yuan YANG ; Jing Tao CHEN ; Xuan SU ; An Kui YANG ; Ming SONG
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2022;57(5):545-551
Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic and prognostic outcomes of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Methods: A retrospective study of 99 OSCC patients treated with TORS in Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between April 2017 and May 2021 was conducted. There were 84 males and 15 females, with an age range of 35-85 years. Patients' clinical characteristics, including clinical staging, HPV infection status, perioperative management and postoperative adjuvant treatment, were recorded. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. The survival outcomes were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Results: The hospital stay of OSCC patients with TORS was (5.3±2.9) days and the average time of postoperative nasal feeding tube indwelling was (15.2±10.8) days. Among the 99 patients, 21 (21.2%) received tracheotomy and the average time of tracheotomy tube indwelling was (11.9±11.4) days. The two-year OS and PFS in patients with follow-up over two years were 94.0% and 87.7%, respectively and the three-year OS and PFS of patients with follow-up over three years were 94.0% and 78.9%, respectively. The two-year OS and PFS were respectively 97.4% and 88.9%, for patients with stages I-II and 86.8% and 88.9% for patients with stages III-IV. HPV-negative and HPV-positive patients had respectively two-year OS (100.0% vs. 91.5%) and PFS (88.9% vs. 87.2%). There was no significantly statistical difference in survival between patients with and without adjuvant radiotherapy after TORS (82.6% vs. 90.5%, HR=0.52, 95%CI: 0.12-2.23, P=0.400). Conclusions: TORS is more suitable for the treatment of patients with early (Ⅰ-Ⅱ) or HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, and the recovery after TORS treatment is good.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Papillomavirus Infections/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail