Artificial intelligence(AI)has demonstrated great potential in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.It plays an important role in medical imaging analysis,pathological slide recognition,drug efficacy and prognosis prediction,as well as new drug development by leveraging deep learning algorithms.Despite challenges such as data acquisition and model interpretability,advancements in technology and data sharing are expected to further enhance its role in early screening,personalized treatment,and innovative drug discovery for pancreatic cancer,ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Artificial intelligence(AI)has demonstrated great potential in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.It plays an important role in medical imaging analysis,pathological slide recognition,drug efficacy and prognosis prediction,as well as new drug development by leveraging deep learning algorithms.Despite challenges such as data acquisition and model interpretability,advancements in technology and data sharing are expected to further enhance its role in early screening,personalized treatment,and innovative drug discovery for pancreatic cancer,ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Objective:To observe and summarise the clinical effect of free groin flap in repairing of soft tissue defects in extremities, and to explore the selection of main vessel in a flap.Methods:From January 2018 to January 2021, 146 patients with soft tissue defects in extremities were treated with free groin flaps in the Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Guangxi Guilin Xing'an Jieshou Orthopaedic Hospital. There were 126 patients with traumatic wound and 20 with chronic ulcer. In addition, 86 of the patients with bone fracture and exposure of internal fixator, 18 with tendon, nerve or artery injuries or defects. There were 6 patients with severe infection and other 3 with deep dead space. The sizes of wound ranged from 2.0 cm×3.0 cm to 25.0 cm×6.0 cm. The flap was the same size as the wound and not enlarged. Firstly, the superficial branch of superficial iliac circumflex artery was explored as the axial artery for all the flaps, then the blood supply vessels of the flap were selected according to the availability of the axial artery. The size, course, adjacent and possible length to be freed of the axial artery and the accompanying veins of a flap were recorded. The donor sites were directly sutured and closed. All patients were included in the postoperative follow-up at outpatient clinic.Results:Free groin flap were used to repair the wounds in all patients. However, the main blood supply vessel of the flap was not constant, and it was often required to adjust the way of flap harvesting. Superficial circumflex iliac artery was taken as the axial vessels in 141 patients (96.6%), among them, 133 cases(94.3%) had the superficial branch as the axis and 5 cases (3.6%) had deep branch as the axis. Three patients (2.1%) had the bone and soft tissue defects reconstructed with vascularised iliac mosaic osteocutaneous flap with superficial circumflex iliac artery as axial vessel and 5 cases(3.4%) had the superficial epigastric artery as axial vessel. The axial arteries were measured as follow: the superficial branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery was 0.5-0.9 mm in diameter and 7.0-9.0 cm in length, the outer diameter of the deep branch was 1.2-1.4 mm and 9.0-11.0 cm in length, and the outer diameter of superficial epigastric artery was 1.0-1.6 mm and 8.0-11.3 cm in length. All the flaps survived smoothly after surgery and the follow-up period ranged 6-40 (mean 26) months. The texture of the flaps was soft with good function.Conclusion:Free groin flap can be used to repair soft tissue defects in extremities. The main axial vessel is the superficial branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery, followed by the deep branch or the trunk. The superficial abdominal artery can also be used as an axial vessel. Under the circumstances, the flap design needs to be adjusted without changing the supply area

Because of low incidence, atypical clinical symptom, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNENs) and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) alway have suspected diagnosis and misdiagnosis. This paper aims to improve the diagnosis and treatment of two diseases by a case of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with suspected autoimmune pancreatitis.

Objective:To evaluate the impact of resection margin status within a cut-off 1 mm clearance of cancer on the groove of portal/superior mesenteric vein and/or the top end of the uncinate process bordering on the superior mesenteric artery in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma patients after pancreatoduodenectomy.Methods:The clinical, pathological and followup data of 113 pancreatic head adenocarcinoma patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with or without vascular graft replacement were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Univariate analysis showed that resection margin 1mm clearance, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, T staging, N staging, TNM staging (AJCC), gender, and maximum tumor diameter were risk factors for survival . Multivariate analysis showed that surgical margin 1mm clearance, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and gender were independent prognostic factors. In resection margin >1 mm group(83 cases), the mean survival time was 19.04 months, and the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 78%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. In resection margin ≤1 mm group(30 cases), the mean survival time was 9.42 months, and the 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 61%, 20% and 0, respectively. There was statistical significance between the two groups in survival time ( P=0.018). Conclusion:Resection margins 1 mm clearance of cancer off portal vein/superior mesenteric vein and superior mesenteric artery is independent prognostic factors in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of pancreaticodudenectomy (PD) using anterior approach in situ technique for pancreatic head cancer.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 285 patients with pancreatic head cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from January 2012 to June 2018 were collected. There were 164 males and 121 females, aged from 40 to 76 years, with an average age of 57 years. Of the 285 patients, 196 patients who underwent PD using anterior approach in situ technique were set as anterior approach group, 89 patients who underwent PD using traditional approach were set as traditional approach group. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow-up. Follow-up was performed by outpatient examination, telephone or network interview once every 2 to 3 months to detect tumor recurrence, metastasis and survival of patients up to December 2018. The endpoint of follow-up was death of patients, and the secondary endpoint of follow-up was tumor recurrence or metastasis. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed by the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range), and comparison between groups was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were represented as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed by the chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survial curve and calculate the survival rates. Survival analysis was done by the Log-rank test. Results:(1) Surgical situations: 285 patients underwent surgery successfully. Cases with pylorus-preservaction, cases with superior mesenteric vein/ portal vein (SMV/PV) resection and reconstruction (end to end anastomosis, artificial vascular replacement, lateral wall resection and anastomosis), operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss were 118, 37 (17, 11, 9), (303±107)minutes, 350 mL(range, 100-750 mL) in the anterior approach group, and 48, 9 (7, 1, 1), (335±103)minutes, 400 mL(range, 100-900 mL) in the traditional approach group, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=0.990, 3.474, t=0.722, Z=1.729, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: the rate of R 0 resection, the number of lymph node dissected, the number of positive lymph node dissected, rate of nerve invasion, rate of vascular invasion, cases with postoperative severe complica-tions, the number of perioperative death, cases with postoperative chemotherapy were 93.88%(184/196), 12(range, 5-19), 4(range, 0-15), 45.41%(89/196), 31.12%(61/196), 28, 3, 69 in the anterior approach group, and 85.39%(76/89), 7(range, 4-17), 5(range, 0-13), 32.58%(29/89), 23.60%(21/89), 11, 2, 41 in the traditional approach group, respectively. There were significant differences in the rate of R 0 resection, the number of lymph node dissected, rate of nerve invasion between the two groups ( χ2=5.506, Z=4.637, χ2=4.149, P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the number of positive lymph node dissected, rate of vascular invasion, cases with postoperative severe complications, the number of perioperative death, cases with postoperative chemotherapy between the two groups ( Z=0.052, χ2=1.962, 0.192, 0.001, 3.048, P>0.05). (3) Follow-up: of the 285 patients, 252 and 228 achieved the secondary endpoint and the endpoint of follow-up respectively with the follow-up time of 35 months (range, 6-58 months). There were 181 and 176 of 196 patients in the anterior approach group achieving the secondary endpoint and the endpoint of follow-up respectively with the follow-up time of 38 months (range, 6-58 months). There were 71 and 52 of 89 patients in the traditional approach group achieving the second endpoint and the endpoint of follow-up respectively with the follow-up time of 33 months (range, 7-53 months). The median tumor free survival time and median overall survival time were 31 months and 37 months in the anterior approach group, respectively, versus 24 months and 31 months in the traditional approach group. There was a significant difference in the tumor free survival between the two groups ( χ2=7.646, P<0.05), while no significant difference in the overall survival between the two groups ( χ2=3.265, P>0.05). Conclusion:PD using anterior approach in situ technique is safe and feasible for pancreatic head cancer, which can improve the rate of R 0 resection and prolong the tumor free survival time of patients.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs) are a group of heterogeneous tumors,including functional and nonfunctional ones.With the enhancement of clinicians' awareness about this disease and the improvement of imaging diagnostic techniques,the incidence of P-NETs has obviously increased in the past years.Based on the mitotic counting and Ki-67 positive index,the grading classification is of great value for the diagnosis,treatment and even prognosis of P-NETs.P-NETs are a group of malignant tumors with inert biological behaviors,whose surgical resection rate and long-term survival is much better than those of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.P-NETs have different malignant potentials.Clinicians need to develop a comprehensive treatment plan in combination with the patient's symptoms,tumor grading classification and TNM staging information.Surgery is the only curable way to cure P-NETs.Even if radical resection is not suitable,palliative surgery may alleviate the patients,symptoms,and even prolong their survival time.According to the tumor location,size,quantity,degree of grading,local invasion and distant metastasis,different surgical procedures should be selected.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (p-NET) is a kind of neoplasm originating from neuroendocrine cell of pancreas.The morbidity of p-NET increased 5 times in the past 40 years and threatened people's life.However,the key points of diagnosis and treatment for p-NET are still unclear.There were no special and easy blood tests or imaging scanning for p-NET.The TNM classification remains controversial.Surgery is the most effective method to cure p-NET.But we still need to clarify which is the best time or method for surgery.In this review,we try to answer above questions based on our experiences and studies.

Objective To analyze the viability of extended distal pancreatectomy and the associated prognostic factors.Methods The data of 57 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent standard distal pancreatectomy (DP) or extended distal pancreatectomy (EDP) from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively.Thirty-five patients were performed with DP and 22 with EDP.Operation safety and survival benefit between DP and EDP were compared by t-test or x2 test.Cox regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic indicators.Results Compared to DP group,operation time((255 ±91)min vs.(208 ±80)min)(t =2.066,P =0.044) and ratio of blood transfusion (50.0％ vs.17.1％) (x2 =12.836,P =0.008) were greater in EDP group,respectively.There were no significant differences in amount of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative duration of hospitalization.Delayed gastric emptying was greater in EDP(22.7％ vs.2.9％) (Z =-2.251,P =0.027),while other complications had no differences.Mortality and ratio of relaparotomy also showed no differences.Median survival following DP was 13.1 months compared to 8.2 months following EDP.There was no difference in survival between DP and EDP.According to the results of multivariate analysis,tumor size (RR =1.275,P =0.03) and perioperative blood transfusions(RR =2.673,P =0.04) were independent prognostic factors.Conclusions Though patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who undergo EDP have a worse pathologic staging,they will gain a comparable long-term survival to the patients undergo DP.Tumor size and perioperative blood transfusions are independent prognostic factors.

Objective To analyze the viability of extended distal pancreatectomy and the associated prognostic factors.Methods The data of 57 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent standard distal pancreatectomy (DP) or extended distal pancreatectomy (EDP) from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively.Thirty-five patients were performed with DP and 22 with EDP.Operation safety and survival benefit between DP and EDP were compared by t-test or x2 test.Cox regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic indicators.Results Compared to DP group,operation time((255 ±91)min vs.(208 ±80)min)(t =2.066,P =0.044) and ratio of blood transfusion (50.0％ vs.17.1％) (x2 =12.836,P =0.008) were greater in EDP group,respectively.There were no significant differences in amount of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative duration of hospitalization.Delayed gastric emptying was greater in EDP(22.7％ vs.2.9％) (Z =-2.251,P =0.027),while other complications had no differences.Mortality and ratio of relaparotomy also showed no differences.Median survival following DP was 13.1 months compared to 8.2 months following EDP.There was no difference in survival between DP and EDP.According to the results of multivariate analysis,tumor size (RR =1.275,P =0.03) and perioperative blood transfusions(RR =2.673,P =0.04) were independent prognostic factors.Conclusions Though patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who undergo EDP have a worse pathologic staging,they will gain a comparable long-term survival to the patients undergo DP.Tumor size and perioperative blood transfusions are independent prognostic factors.