Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by flushing, erythema, papules/pustules, and telangiectasia. Several clinical studies have investigated the efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) in the treatment of rosacea, but its mechanism of action remains unclear. Objective: This study aims to examine the potential role of BoNT/A in a mouse model of rosacea-like skin lesions induced by the 37-amino acid C-terminal cathelicidin peptide (LL-37). Methods: Mice were randomly divided into 4 groups: Control, LL-37, LL-37 + BoNT/A, and LL-37 + dexamethasone. Results: BoNT/A treatment alleviated skin damage, reduced skin thickness, and decreased mast cell infiltration. Furthermore, BoNT/A improved redness score severity and redness area while enhancing skin barrier function by suppressing transepidermal water loss and increasing skin hydration. At the molecular level, BoNT/A decreased the mRNA levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α, which are known as pro-inflammatory cytokines. It also downregulated the expression of pyrin domain-containing protein 3, caspase-1, and IL-1 beta in the LL-37-injected dorsal skin. Furthermore, BoNT/A prevented LL-37-mediated upregulation of neurovascular-associated factors, including CD31, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1, calcitonin-related polypeptide alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor, chymase 1, and tryptase alpha/beta 1. Conclusion These results indicate that BoNT/A effectively alleviates inflammatory and vascular responses in a rosacea mouse model, highlighting its potential as a promising preventive approach for rosacea.

Phyllodes tumors are rare biphasic fibroepithelial breast neoplasms classified as benign, borderline, or malignant. Despite their rarity, malignant variants carry higher risks of recurrence and metastasis. This review synthesizes current evidence on their clinical, histopathological, and molecular characteristics, including treatment strategies and prognostic factors, emphasizing tailored management. We performed a comprehensive literature review to summarize knowledge on clinical presentation, imaging, histopathological features, surgical treatment, adjuvant therapy, and outcomes. Recent genomic and molecular research was also evaluated to identify future directions. Persistent challenges include a lack of consensus on optimal surgical margins, adjuvant radiotherapy, and follow-up protocols, highlighting the need for larger, high-quality studies. Advances in molecular profiling suggest potential for targeted therapies, especially in aggressive or metastatic cases. Due to clinical heterogeneity and the limited accuracy of core biopsies, definitive grading based on surgical histopathology remains essential for treatment planning. This review offers an updated perspective on phyllodes tumor management, identifies critical gaps, and suggests priorities for future research.

Objective: To investigate the survival rate of female breast cancer patients in Panyu District, Guangzhou City, so as to provide the basis for improving the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Methods: Basic information including age, clinical stage and surgical treatment of female breast cancer patients registered in Panyu District and diagnosed in 2017 were collected through the Guangzhou Municipal Cancer Registration and Reporting Management System, and were followed up until December 31, 2022. The survival rate was calculated using the life table. Factors affecting survival time among female breast cancer patients were analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: A total of 227 female breast cancer patients were reported in Panyu District in 2017, and had a median age of 51 (interquartile range, 17) years. There were 43 cases (18.94%) in stage Ⅰ, 55 cases (24.23%) in stage Ⅱ, 63 cases (27.75%) in stage Ⅲ, 27 cases (11.89%) in stage Ⅳ, and 39 cases (17.18%) with unknown staging. Surgical treatment was performed in 204 cases (89.87%), and chemotherapy was administered in 73 cases (32.16%). By December 31, 2022, there were 40 deaths and 14 patients lost to follow-up. The one-year, three-year and five-year survival rates were 96.44%, 87.45% and 82.87%, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that older age (HR=1.023, 95%CI: 1.002-1.046), clinical stage Ⅲ (HR=10.050, 95%CI: 1.324-76.270) or IV (HR=42.663, 95%CI: 5.588-325.742) were associated with a higher risk of mortality in female breast cancer patients, while surgical treatment (HR=0.278, 95%CI: 0.130-0.598) was associated with a lower risk of mortality. Conclusions The five-year survival rate of female breast cancer patients in Panyu District was 82.87%. Age, clinical stage and surgical treatment were the main influencing factors for the survival time of female breast cancer patients.

Purpose: Cystic duct cancers (CDCs) have been classified as extrahepatic bile duct cancers or gallbladder cancers (GBCs); however, it is unclear whether their clinical behavior is similar to that of distal extrahepatic bile duct cancers (DBDCs) or GBCs. Materials and Methods: T category of the CDCs was classified using current T category scheme of the GBCs and DBDCs, and clinicopathological factors were compared among 38 CDCs, 345 GBCs, and 349 DBDCs. We modified Nakata’s classifications (type 1, confined within cystic duct [CD]; combined types 2-4, extension beyond CD) and compared them. Results: No significant overall survival (OS) difference was observed between the patients with CDC, GBC, and DBDC. The T category of GBC staging was more accurate at distinguishing OS in patients with CDC than the DBDC staging. Patients with T3 CDC and GBC showed a significant OS difference when using the T category for GBC staging, while those with T1-T2 CDC and GBC showed no significant difference. In contrast, the T category of DBDC staging did not show any significant OS difference between patients with T1-T2 CDC and DBDC or T3 CDC and DBDC. Patients with type 1 CDC had significantly better OS than those with combined types. Conclusion Unlike GBCs and DBDCs, CDCs exhibit distinct clinicopathological characteristics. The OS is better when the CDC confines within the CD, compared to when it extends beyond it. Therefore, we propose a new T category scheme (T1, confined to CD; T2, invaded beyond CD) for better classifying CDCs.

Purpose: Cystic duct cancers (CDCs) have been classified as extrahepatic bile duct cancers or gallbladder cancers (GBCs); however, it is unclear whether their clinical behavior is similar to that of distal extrahepatic bile duct cancers (DBDCs) or GBCs. Materials and Methods: T category of the CDCs was classified using current T category scheme of the GBCs and DBDCs, and clinicopathological factors were compared among 38 CDCs, 345 GBCs, and 349 DBDCs. We modified Nakata’s classifications (type 1, confined within cystic duct [CD]; combined types 2-4, extension beyond CD) and compared them. Results: No significant overall survival (OS) difference was observed between the patients with CDC, GBC, and DBDC. The T category of GBC staging was more accurate at distinguishing OS in patients with CDC than the DBDC staging. Patients with T3 CDC and GBC showed a significant OS difference when using the T category for GBC staging, while those with T1-T2 CDC and GBC showed no significant difference. In contrast, the T category of DBDC staging did not show any significant OS difference between patients with T1-T2 CDC and DBDC or T3 CDC and DBDC. Patients with type 1 CDC had significantly better OS than those with combined types. Conclusion Unlike GBCs and DBDCs, CDCs exhibit distinct clinicopathological characteristics. The OS is better when the CDC confines within the CD, compared to when it extends beyond it. Therefore, we propose a new T category scheme (T1, confined to CD; T2, invaded beyond CD) for better classifying CDCs.

Purpose: Cystic duct cancers (CDCs) have been classified as extrahepatic bile duct cancers or gallbladder cancers (GBCs); however, it is unclear whether their clinical behavior is similar to that of distal extrahepatic bile duct cancers (DBDCs) or GBCs. Materials and Methods: T category of the CDCs was classified using current T category scheme of the GBCs and DBDCs, and clinicopathological factors were compared among 38 CDCs, 345 GBCs, and 349 DBDCs. We modified Nakata’s classifications (type 1, confined within cystic duct [CD]; combined types 2-4, extension beyond CD) and compared them. Results: No significant overall survival (OS) difference was observed between the patients with CDC, GBC, and DBDC. The T category of GBC staging was more accurate at distinguishing OS in patients with CDC than the DBDC staging. Patients with T3 CDC and GBC showed a significant OS difference when using the T category for GBC staging, while those with T1-T2 CDC and GBC showed no significant difference. In contrast, the T category of DBDC staging did not show any significant OS difference between patients with T1-T2 CDC and DBDC or T3 CDC and DBDC. Patients with type 1 CDC had significantly better OS than those with combined types. Conclusion Unlike GBCs and DBDCs, CDCs exhibit distinct clinicopathological characteristics. The OS is better when the CDC confines within the CD, compared to when it extends beyond it. Therefore, we propose a new T category scheme (T1, confined to CD; T2, invaded beyond CD) for better classifying CDCs.