1.Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study
Haoran LI ; Yangyang PANG ; Xi CHENG
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(1):8-
Chemoradiotherapy
;
Cohort Studies
;
Epidemiology
;
Gynecology
;
Humans
;
Joints
;
Methods
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Obstetrics
;
Population Characteristics
;
Propensity Score
;
Proportional Hazards Models
;
Prospective Studies
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Survival Rate
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
2.Shear-Wave Elastography of the Breast: Added Value of a Quality Map in Diagnosis and Prediction of the Biological Characteristics of Breast Cancer
Xueyi ZHENG ; Yini HUANG ; Yubo LIU ; Yun WANG ; Rushuang MAO ; Fei LI ; Longhui CAO ; Jianhua ZHOU
Korean Journal of Radiology 2020;21(2):172-180
Area Under Curve
;
Breast Neoplasms
;
Breast
;
Diagnosis
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Elasticity Imaging Techniques
;
Estrogens
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Population Characteristics
;
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
;
Receptors, Progesterone
;
ROC Curve
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Ultrasonography
4.Performance and Impact of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Based Diagnostics in the Management of Men with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer and its Role in Salvage Lymph Node Dissection
Marieke J KRIMPHOVE ; Lena H THEISSEN ; Alexander P COLE ; Felix PREISSER ; Philipp C MANDEL ; Felix K H CHUN
The World Journal of Men's Health 2020;38(1):32-47
7.Lacrimal Sac Metastasis from Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast
Seong Ho KIM ; Lucia KIM ; Sung Mo KANG
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2020;34(1):85-87
No abstract available.
Breast
;
Nasolacrimal Duct
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Phyllodes Tumor
8.Significance of elevated SCC-Ag level on tumor recurrence and patient survival in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine cervix following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a multi-institutional analysis.
Kyu Hye CHOI ; Sea Won LEE ; Mina YU ; Songmi JEONG ; Jeong Won LEE ; Jong Hoon LEE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2019;30(1):e1-
OBJECTIVE: There is no definitive guideline for the significance and cut-off value of squamous-cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) in cervical cancer. Thus, we analyzed the significance and optimal cut-off value of SCC-Ag for predicting tumor recurrence and patient survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. METHODS: From January 2010 to October 2016, we enrolled 304 cervical cancer patients with squamous-cell carcinoma staging International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Ib–IVa and treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by intra-cavitary radiotherapy (ICR). The cut-off value of SCC-Ag level for tumor recurrence was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the significance of SCC-Ag level. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value of SCC-Ag level for predicting tumor recurrence was calculated and set at 4.0 ng/mL in the ROC curve. After a median follow-up period of 36.5 months, the 3-year RFS (56.6% vs. 80.2%, p < 0.001) and OS (72.1% vs. 86.8%, p=0.005) were significantly lower in SCC-Ag ≥4 ng/mL arm than in < 4 ng/mL arm. The 3-year locoregional recurrence (17.6% vs. 7.0%, p=0.012), distant metastasis (20.4% vs. 6.9%, p=0.002), and para-aortic recurrence (9.4% vs. 2.1%, p=0.012) rates were significantly higher in SCC-Ag ≥4 ng/mL arm than in SCC-Ag < 4 ng/mL arm. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment SCC-Ag level higher than 4 ng/mL may be a useful predictor of tumor recurrence in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine cervix treated with definitive CRT and ICR.
Arm
;
Cervix Uteri*
;
Chemoradiotherapy*
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Gynecology
;
Humans
;
Methods
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Obstetrics
;
Radiotherapy
;
Recurrence*
;
ROC Curve
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
9.The detrimental effect of adopting interval debulking surgery in advanced stage low-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Giorgio BOGANI ; Umberto LEONE ROBERTI MAGGIORE ; Biagio PAOLINI ; Antonino DIITO ; Fabio MARTINELLI ; Domenica LORUSSO ; Francesco RASPAGLIESI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2019;30(1):e4-
OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes of patients having treatments for newly diagnosed advanced stage low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series of women affected by advanced stage (stage IIIB or more) LGSC undergoing surgery in a single oncologic center between January 2000 and December 2017. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. RESULTS: Data of 72 patients were retrieved. Primary cytoreductive surgery was attempted in 68 (94.4%) patients: 19 (27.9%) had residual disease (RD) >1 cm after primary surgery. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) was attempted in 15 of these 19 (78.9%) patients and the remaining 4 patients having not primary debulking surgery. Twelve out of 19 (63.1%) patients having IDS had RD. After a mean (±standard deviation) follow-up was 61.6 (±37.2) months, 50 (69.4%) and 22 (30.5%) patients recurred and died of disease, respectively. Via multivariate analysis, non-optimal cytoreduction (hazard ratio [HR]=2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16–6.70; p=0.021) and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (FIGO) stage IV (HR=3.15; 95% CI=1.29–7.66; p=0.011) were associated with worse disease-free survival. Via multivariate analysis, absence of significant comorbidities (HR=0.56; 95% CI=0.29–1.10; p=0.093) and primary instead of IDS (HR=2.95; 95% CI=1.12–7.74; p=0.027) were independently associated with an improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: LGSC is at high risk of early recurrence. However, owing to the indolent nature of the disease, the majority of patients are long-term survivors. Further prospective studies and innovative treatment modalities are warranted to improve patients care.
Comorbidity
;
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Drug Therapy
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Obstetrics
;
Ovarian Neoplasms*
;
Proportional Hazards Models
;
Prospective Studies
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Survivors
10.The prognostic significance of estrogen and progesterone receptors in grade I and II endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: hormone receptors in risk stratification.
Jun GUAN ; Liying XIE ; Xuezhen LUO ; Bingyi YANG ; Hongwei ZHANG ; Qin ZHU ; Xiaojun CHEN
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2019;30(1):e13-
OBJECTIVES: Although patients with grade I and II endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA) are considered with good prognosis, among them 15%–25% died in 5 years. It is still unknown whether integrating estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) into clinical risk stratification can help select high-risk patients with grade I–II EEA. This study was to investigate the prognostic value of ER and PR double negativity (ER/PR loss) in grade I–II EEA, and the association between ER/PR loss and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification. METHODS: ER and PR were assessed by immunohistochemistry on hysterectomy specimens of 903 patients with grade I–II EEA. ER and PR negativity were determined when < 1% tumor nuclei were stained. Gene expression data were obtained from the TCGA research network. RESULTS: Compared with ER or PR positive patients (n=868), patients with ER/PR loss (n=35) had deeper myometrial infiltration (p=0.012), severer FIGO stage (p=0.004), and higher rate of pelvic lymph node metastasis (p=0.020). In univariate analysis, ER/PR loss correlated with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR]=5.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.21–12.52) and overall survival (OS; HR=7.59; 95% CI=2.55–22.60). In multivariate analysis, ER/PR loss independently predicted poor PFS (HR=3.77; 95% CI=1.60–10.14) and OS (HR=5.56; 95% CI=1.37–22.55) for all patients, and poor PFS for patients in stage IA (n=695; HR=5.54; 95% CI=1.28–23.89) and stage II–IV (n=129; HR=5.77; 95% CI=1.57–21.27). No association was found between ER/PR loss and TCGA classification. CONCLUSION: Integrating ER/PR evaluation into clinical risk stratification may improve prognosis for grade I–II EEA patients.
Adenocarcinoma*
;
Carcinoma, Endometrioid
;
Classification
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Endometrial Neoplasms
;
Estrogens*
;
Female
;
Gene Expression
;
Genome
;
Humans
;
Hysterectomy
;
Immunohistochemistry
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Progesterone*
;
Prognosis
;
Receptors, Progesterone*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail