Abstract Background: Optimal mucosal visibility during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is critical for diagnostic accuracy but is often impaired by the presence of mucus and bubbles. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of four premedication regimens for mucosal visualization during sedated EGD. Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Endoscopy Unit of Dr. Zainoel Abidin General Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, from January to December 2024. Patients scheduled for elective diagnostic EGD were randomly assigned to: Group 1 (simethicone 40 mg at 30 minutes before the procedure), Group 2 (simethicone 40 mg + 100 mL 5% sodium bicarbonate at 2 hours), Group 3 (simethicone 40 mg + N-acetylcysteine 600 mg in 100 mL water at 2 hours), or Group 4 (all three agents at 2 hours). Primary outcomes were mucosal visibility (6-site, 3-point scoring system with lower scores indicating superior mucosal visibility); procedural metrics (irrigation volume and duration); and safety (the lowest recorded SpO₂%). Data were analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis for continuous variables, and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, with post hoc testing as applicable. Results: A total of 168 patients were randomized into four groups (n=42 each). Groups 3 and 4 showed superior mucosal visibility compared to Groups 1 and 2 (p=0.004), with no significant difference between Groups 3 and 4. Irrigation volume differed significantly (p=0.018), lowest in Group 4. Group 3 had the shortest procedure time (3.1 ± 1.2 minutes), significantly more efficient than Groups 1 and 2, but similar to Group 4. Oxygen saturation was slightly lower in Group 3 (p<0.005), though all groups remained within safe clinical limits. Conclusions: Simethicone and N-acetylcysteine given two hours before endoscopy effectively enhanced mucosal visibility and procedural efficiency without compromising safety, offering a practical alternative to more complex regimens.
esophagogastroduodenoscopy ; mucosa visibility ; premedication ; simethicone ; N-acetylcysteine

BACKGROUND

Tobacco smoking remains a primary health concern, more significantly in developing countries and continuously exerts a huge impact on global health. Available treatments for smoking cessation are often associated with adverse side effects, thus there is a great need for new therapies for smoking cessation. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is a widely available and well tolerated drug that would increase the intracellular levels of glutathione which modulates oxidative, immune-inflammatory, glutamatergic and neurotrophic pathways. There is suggestive evidence for the use of NAC in smoking cessation. Despite promising preclinical and preliminary clinical findings, randomised controlled trials which aim to evaluate NAC’s efficacy for smoking cessation and substance use disorders have shown mixed outcomes. With this gap in literature this study aims to determine the effect of NAC as an adjunctive treatment for smoking cessation.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of NAC as an adjunctive treatment for smoking cessation

METHOD

The study covered randomised clinical trials published in peer-reviewed journals registered in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed. Study population in the selected studies had patients 18-65 of age years and with tobacco-use disorder or patients who smoke an average of 5 sticks per day. The primary outcome would be the effect of NAC on smoking cessation. The researcher utilised Review Manager 5.4.1 for the analysis of this study.

RESULTS

Initial Search in PubMed and Cochrane Library identified 23 clinical trials (6 PubMed, 17 Cochrane Library). 3 articles were included in the analysis. A total of 238 participants were enrolled in the studies, with 121 enrolled in the treatment group (NAC) and 106 were in the placebo group. The mean age of participants is 36.59 years and treatment duration vary up with the shortest duration of 1 month and longest duration of 3 months. Pooled odds ratio (2.41) shows that the true population odds of smoking cessation were between 1.32 and 4.41 in favor to the participants in the NAC group with 95% confidence interval. Measurement of secondary outcomes showed a significant reduction on carbon monoxide exhaled in the NAC group compared to the placebo group (P-0.0001, MD (95CI) -2.04 (3.09,-0.99). Pooled odds ratio (3.4) shows that there is a higher odds of adverse events between 1.72 and 6.90 higher in the NAC group with 95% confidence interval.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed a favourable effect of NAC as an adjunctive treatment for smoking cessation. NAC has shown a great potential to address the limited access to therapy due to its good safety profile and its wide availability.

Human ; N-acetylcysteine ; Acetylcysteine ; Smoking Cessation