Introduction: Multiple daily insulin injections, while effective for glycemic control, impose considerable costs on healthcare systems and carry inherent risks including hypoglycemia, weight gain, and poor treatment adherence. This study evaluates the glycemic effects of insulin regimen de-escalation from multiple daily injections in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and explores the predictors of successful insulin de-escalation. Methodology: This is a multi-centred, prospective observational study of adult T2DM patients on multiple daily insulin injections with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7–12% who underwent de-escalation to one or two injections. Patients were reassessed at 3 months and 6 months. Primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline. Secondary endpoints were changes in body weight, hypoglycemia frequency, treatment adherence and predictors of successful insulin de-escalation defined by at least a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c while on de-escalated regimen. Results: A total of 80 patients were included. HbA1c improved from 9.23 to 8.52% (p <0.001) with total daily insulin dose reduction from 0.81 + 0.35 units per kg to 0.46 + 0.24 units per kg. Symptomatic hypoglycemia decreased from 22.5 to 5.0%. Insulin adherence improved from 50.0 to 92.3%. Body weight decreased by 1.4 kg. Forty-nine patients (61.3%) were successfully de-intensified. Factors associated with successful insulin de-escalation included a high baseline HbA1c, high fasting blood glucose and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, while increased age, disease duration and being Indian were associated with unsuccessful insulin de-escalation. After adjustment of the confounders, only HbA1c (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.23–3.46, p = 0.006) and the status of being Indian (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05–0.94, p = 0.041) remained as significant positive and negative predictors respectively for successful insulin de-intensification. Conclusion Insulin regimen de-escalation, when combined with optimized oral glucose-lowering agents, improved glycemic control and treatment adherence while reducing hypoglycemia and body weight. These findings support insulin therapy deescalation as a safe, effective strategy for poorly controlled T2DM patients taking multiple daily insulin injections.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Prospective Studies ; Insulins

Introduction: The 2021 IDF-DAR risk calculator had been previously evaluated in multiple studies and subsequently widely accepted and applied in clinical practice as a practical standardized tool for patient risk stratification. Recently updated, the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk calculator enables a more individualized, evidence-related evaluation of patientrelated and disease-related risk factors, incorporating modern diabetes technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, and advanced insulin formulations to enhance risk stratification. This tool allows medical professionals to tailor Ramadan practices based on overall factors toward promoting safe fasting. Methodology: This prospective multicentre observational study recruited adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes attending public hospitals nationwide. People with diabetes (PwD) intending to perform Ramadan fasting were invited to participate and assessed using the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk Calculator in the 6-week pre-Ramadan period between 30th January and 19th March 2026. Results: A total of 458 PwD were evaluated and stratified into low (15.7%), moderate (41%), and high risk (43.3%) categories. Most participants had Type 2 diabetes (83.6%), with 60.3% having a disease duration exceeding 10 years and 43% exhibiting poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >9%). Insulin therapy was used by 76.4% of participants, including two individuals with Type 1 diabetes using AID systems. Most participants reported no recent hypoglycemia (76.4%), 81.0% performed glucose monitoring, and 3.3% used CGM. Severe comorbidities were uncommon, with 1.1% having unstable macrovascular disease and 4.4% advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30). Notably, 72.2% received structured Ramadan education. Conclusion Majority of PwD attending tertiary diabetes clinics were in the moderate- to high-risk category and intended to fast despite medical advice against fasting in some cases. Although most participants were on insulin therapy, hypoglycemia was low in the pre-Ramadan period. Integration of modern technologies, advanced insulin therapies, and structured education may support safer fasting practices.
Risk Assessment ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Hospitals ; Fasting

Introduction. Vitamin B12 deficiency is more common among metformin-treated subjects although the prevalence is variable. Many factors have been associated with this. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency and its associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) who are on metformin. Methodology. A total of 205 patients who fit eligibility criteria were included in the study. A questionnaire was completed, and blood was drawn to study vitamin B12 levels. Vitamin B12 deficiency was defined as serum B12 level of ≤300 pg/ mL (221 pmol/L). Results. The prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency among metformin-treated patients with type 2 DM patients was 28.3% (n=58). The median vitamin B12 level was 419 (±257) pg/mL. The non-Malay population was at a higher risk for metformin-associated vitamin B12 deficiency [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.86, 95% CI: 1.836 to 8.104, p<0.001]. Duration of metformin use of more than five years showed increased risk for metformin-associated vitamin B12 deficiency (adjusted OR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.003 to 4.227, p=0.049). Conclusion. Our study suggests that the prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin in our population is substantial. This is more frequent among the non-Malay population and those who have been on metformin for more than five years.
Vitamin B 12 ; metformin ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2