In recent years, the worldwide incidence rate of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases has increased year by year, significantly increasing the cardiovascular mortality and incidence rate of the whole population. In the past, peripheral arterial and aortic diseases were often more prone to missed diagnosis and delayed treatment compared to coronary artery disease. The 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases for the first time combines peripheral arterial and aortic diseases, integrating and updating the 2017 guidelines for peripheral arterial disease and the 2014 guidelines for aortic disease. The aim is to provide standardized recommendations for the management of systemic arterial diseases, ensuring that patients can receive coherent and comprehensive diagnosis and treatment, thereby improving prognosis. This article interprets the main content of the guideline in order to provide reference and assistance for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases in China at the current stage.

Objectives:To evaluate the safety and feasibility of endovascular aortic repair without contrast agent under branch artery guidewire marking(FLARE technique).Methods:The clinical data of 7 patients who underwent contrast-free endovascular aortic repair with branch artery guidewire marking in Fuwai Hospital from 2024 to 2025 were retrospectively analyzed.The criteria for patient selection included renal insufficiency,history of contrast agent allergy,high risk of high-pressure angiography due to extensive calcification of the aortic arch,and patients'strong personal wishes,all patients merited with anatomically friendly and anchored area criteria.The patients were evaluated by preoperative computed tomography or color Doppler ultrasound,and the occlusive stent anchor point was located by branch artery guidewire marking combined with bone marking during surgery.The primary endpoints were early stage of postoperative renal function changes(comparison of preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine)and surgical technique success rate,and the secondary endpoints included the incidence of internal leakage,re-intervention rates,and incidence of aneurysm and kidney-related adverse events during follow-up.Results:Among the seven patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair without contrast using a branch artery guidewire,four were male,with an average age of(72.0±5.9)years.Six of these patients had infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms,two of them with bilateral renal artery severe stenosis and renal insufficiency underwent renal artery stenting combined with endovascular aortic repair,one patient had isolated chronic renal insufficiency,one had a history of iodine contrast skin allergy,and the remaining two cases wished this surgery option.The seventh patient had a penetrating ulcer in the aortic arch and descending aorta,along with extensive thrombosis and calcification in the ascending aorta,aortic arch and descending aorta.All the patients achieved surgical technique success.No iodine contrast agent was used during the procedure for endovascular aortic repair.In patients with chronic renal insufficiency and renal artery stenosis before surgery,serum creatinine levels were significantly improved after surgery.All patients did not need hemodialysis,there was no allergic reaction,and no graft-related or perioperative complications.The average follow-up was(5.8±3.0)months,all patients recovered well without re-intervention or complications.The creatinine levels did not fluctuate significantly after surgery.Conclusions:Branch artery guidewire marked contrast-free aortic endovascular repair may be a safe and feasible treatment option in selected patients,especially in patients with contraindications to contrast agents.

Objectives:To evaluate the safety and feasibility of endovascular aortic repair without contrast agent under branch artery guidewire marking(FLARE technique).Methods:The clinical data of 7 patients who underwent contrast-free endovascular aortic repair with branch artery guidewire marking in Fuwai Hospital from 2024 to 2025 were retrospectively analyzed.The criteria for patient selection included renal insufficiency,history of contrast agent allergy,high risk of high-pressure angiography due to extensive calcification of the aortic arch,and patients'strong personal wishes,all patients merited with anatomically friendly and anchored area criteria.The patients were evaluated by preoperative computed tomography or color Doppler ultrasound,and the occlusive stent anchor point was located by branch artery guidewire marking combined with bone marking during surgery.The primary endpoints were early stage of postoperative renal function changes(comparison of preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine)and surgical technique success rate,and the secondary endpoints included the incidence of internal leakage,re-intervention rates,and incidence of aneurysm and kidney-related adverse events during follow-up.Results:Among the seven patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair without contrast using a branch artery guidewire,four were male,with an average age of(72.0±5.9)years.Six of these patients had infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms,two of them with bilateral renal artery severe stenosis and renal insufficiency underwent renal artery stenting combined with endovascular aortic repair,one patient had isolated chronic renal insufficiency,one had a history of iodine contrast skin allergy,and the remaining two cases wished this surgery option.The seventh patient had a penetrating ulcer in the aortic arch and descending aorta,along with extensive thrombosis and calcification in the ascending aorta,aortic arch and descending aorta.All the patients achieved surgical technique success.No iodine contrast agent was used during the procedure for endovascular aortic repair.In patients with chronic renal insufficiency and renal artery stenosis before surgery,serum creatinine levels were significantly improved after surgery.All patients did not need hemodialysis,there was no allergic reaction,and no graft-related or perioperative complications.The average follow-up was(5.8±3.0)months,all patients recovered well without re-intervention or complications.The creatinine levels did not fluctuate significantly after surgery.Conclusions:Branch artery guidewire marked contrast-free aortic endovascular repair may be a safe and feasible treatment option in selected patients,especially in patients with contraindications to contrast agents.

Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using self-radiopaque marker guided physician modified fenestration with stent-graft in situ fenestration technology with or without the implantation of branch stents for the treatment of aortic arch diseases.Methods:The clinical data of 653 patients with aortic arch diseases who underwent TEVAR using fenestration from Dec 2015 to Jun 2023 at two vascular surgery centers were retrospectively analyzed.Results:A total of 454 patients received branch stent implantation, while 199 did not. The incidence of non-aortic-related complications within 30 days post-operation was higher in the branch stent implantation group compared to the non-implantation group (8.6% vs. 3.5%, P=0.020). The overall follow-up rate was 93.8%, with median follow-up time of 37 months and 52 months for the branch stent implantation group and non-implantation group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant statistical difference between the two groups in terms of cumulative all-cause survival ( P=0.223), free from endoleak ( P=0.106), and free from branch artery occlusion ( P=0.130). Conclusions:The implantation of branch stents following in situ fenestration with stent-graft technology in TEVAR did not significantly affect overall survival, endoleak incidence, or branch artery occlusion rates in patients with aortic arch diseases. Therefore, the decision to implant branch stents should be tailored according to the specific pathology and anatomical characteristics of the aortic arch.

Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using self-radiopaque marker guided physician modified fenestration with stent-graft in situ fenestration technology with or without the implantation of branch stents for the treatment of aortic arch diseases.Methods:The clinical data of 653 patients with aortic arch diseases who underwent TEVAR using fenestration from Dec 2015 to Jun 2023 at two vascular surgery centers were retrospectively analyzed.Results:A total of 454 patients received branch stent implantation, while 199 did not. The incidence of non-aortic-related complications within 30 days post-operation was higher in the branch stent implantation group compared to the non-implantation group (8.6% vs. 3.5%, P=0.020). The overall follow-up rate was 93.8%, with median follow-up time of 37 months and 52 months for the branch stent implantation group and non-implantation group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant statistical difference between the two groups in terms of cumulative all-cause survival ( P=0.223), free from endoleak ( P=0.106), and free from branch artery occlusion ( P=0.130). Conclusions:The implantation of branch stents following in situ fenestration with stent-graft technology in TEVAR did not significantly affect overall survival, endoleak incidence, or branch artery occlusion rates in patients with aortic arch diseases. Therefore, the decision to implant branch stents should be tailored according to the specific pathology and anatomical characteristics of the aortic arch.

With the population aging, the prevalence rate of cardiovascular diseases in China continues to rise, among which, the mortality rate of aortic diseases is high, the treatment is difficult, and the risk is high. In recent years, the surgical treatment of aortic diseases in China has developed rapidly, and the overall scale has been increasing. This paper introduces the current status of treatment of aortic diseases in China, analyzes the medical quality of endovascular surgery and open surgery, including the number of operations, patient characteristics, mortality, readmission rate and other indicators, and compares the differences among different regions. In addition, advances in the treatment of aortic disease are discussed, including surgical methods, evaluation of effectiveness, and application of new technologies. Overall, China has made some progress in the treatment of aortic diseases, but it still faces the challenge of uneven distribution of medical resources and improvement of medical quality.

Objective:To compare the effect of self-radiopaque markers guiding physician-modified fenestration, chimney technique and hybrid Ⅳb technique on reconstruction of left subclavian artery (LSA) in endovascular treatment of aortic dissection (TEVAR).Methods:The clinical and follow-up data of 312 TEVAR patients treated with LSA blood supply reconstruction technology from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019 at Fuwai hospital were retrospectively analyzed.Results:There were 35 patients in the hybrid Ⅳb technique group, 93 in the chimney technique group, and 184 in the in vitro fenestration group. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 24 months. No artificial blood vessel and stent occlusion occurred in all patients during follow-up, and the LSA blood flow was unobstructed. A total of 19 patients had endoleak by the last follow-up, and there was no statistical difference between the three groups. Eleven patients underwent reintervention surgery, all were from chimney technique group and in vitro fenestration group, with no statistical difference ( P>0.05). Severe complications occurred in 28 patients during hospitalization, and the incidence of complications was the highest in the hybrid Ⅳb technique group ( P<0.01). During follow-up, 4 patients died in the bypass group, 6 died in the external window group, and 8 died in the chimney group, with no significant difference ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The safety and efficacy of the left subclavian artery flow reconstruction by in vitro fenestration and chimney technique were similar. The occurrences of early complications were lower than that of the hybrid Ⅳb technique, but the reintervention rate of endoleak was higher.

Objective    To explore the treatment outcome of carotid endarterectomy combined with vertebral artery transposition in patients with severe stenosis to occlusion of the vertebral artery V1 segment and the ipsilateral carotid artery. Methods    From June 2017 to September 2020, patients with severe stenosis to occlusion of the vertebral artery V1 segment and the ipsilateral carotid artery treated with carotid endarterectomy combined with vertebral artery transposition in Fuwai Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results    Finally 12 patients were enrolled, including 10 males and 2 females with an average age of 67.8±6.0 years. Twelve patients were successfully operated and the follow-up time was 1-3 years. The stenosis degree of the V1 segment of the vertebral artery decreased from 83.5%±11.8% to 24.9%±14.3% (P<0.001). The stenosis degree of carotid artery decreased from 85.6%±11.0% to 0% (P<0.001). Postoperative follow-up showed that the symptoms of symptomatic patients before surgery improved. The 1-year and 3-year patency rates were 100.0%, and there were no peripheral nerve injury complications, perioperative deaths or strokes. Conclusion    Carotid endarterectomy combined with vertebral artery transposition can treat ipsilateral carotid artery  stenosis and vertebral artery stenosis at the same time, improve blood supply to the brain, improve patients' symptoms and has high promotion value.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world. However, current treatment modalities mainly relieve pain and inhibit cartilage degradation, but do not promote cartilage regeneration. In this study, we show that G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member B (GPRC5B), an orphan G-protein-couple receptor, not only inhibits cartilage degradation, but also increases cartilage regeneration and thereby is protective against OA. We observed that Gprc5b deficient chondrocytes had an upregulation of cartilage catabolic gene expression, along with downregulation of anabolic genes in vitro. Furthermore, mice deficient in Gprc5b displayed a more severe OA phenotype in the destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) induced OA mouse model, with upregulation of cartilage catabolic factors and downregulation of anabolic factors, consistent with our in vitro findings. Overexpression of Gprc5b by lentiviral vectors alleviated the cartilage degeneration in DMM-induced OA mouse model by inhibiting cartilage degradation and promoting regeneration. We also assessed the molecular mechanisms downstream of Gprc5b that may mediate these observed effects and identify the role of protein kinase B (AKT)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-autophagy signaling pathway. Thus, we demonstrate an integral role of GPRC5B in OA pathogenesis, and activation of GPRC5B has the potential in preventing the progression of OA.

Objective    To investigate the treatment of modified vertebral-carotid transposition (VCT) in patients with severe stenosis or occlusion at V1 segment of vertebral artery. Methods    A retrospective study of 13 patients with severe stenosis or occlusion at V1 segment of vertebral artery treated by modified VCT in our hospital from October 2016 to December 2018 was done. There were 10 males and 3 females with an average age of 70.5±7.1 years. Results    The operation was successful in this series of patients. The follow-up duration was 1-3 years. The stenosis degree of the V1 segment of the vertebral artery decreased from 86.8%±7.5% to 17.4%±14.5%. All patients achieved remission of symptoms after the surgery. Temporary peripheral nerve injury occurred in 6 patients. Four patients with neurological complications relieved during follow-up. The patency rate was 100.0% at postoperative 1 and 3 years. There was no perioperative death, stroke or re-intervention. Conclusion    Modified VCT can precisely restore the distal blood flow of patients with severe stenosis or occlusion at V1 segment of vertebral artery, and relieve their symptoms.