Objective:To compare the efficacy of lateral placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin versus that of median placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin in the closed reduction of metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 48 patients with metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia who had been admitted to Department of Trauma Orthopaedics, The Second General Hospital of Fuzhou from May 2019 to July 2023. There were 37 males and 11 females, aged (46.0±12.4) years. According to the AO classification, 37 patients were classified as type A1, and 11 ones as type A2. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the distal positioning of the intramedullary nail guide pins during operation. In the lateral placement group of 26 patients, the distal positioning of the guide pins was located at 1/3 lateral to the articular surface of the distal tibia. In the median placement group of 22 patients, the distal positioning of the guide pins was located at the midpoint of the articular surface of the distal tibia. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture healing time and fracture reduction were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and range of motion of the affected ankle were compared between the 2 groups, as well as within the 2 groups. The complications were compared between the 2 groups at the last follow-up.Results:There were no significant differences in the demographic data between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up for (19.6±4.4) months. The operation time [(81.7±17.3) min], intraoperative blood loss [(78.4±12.2) mL], hospital stay [(5.7±2.1) d] and fracture healing time [(4.3±1.1) months] in the lateral placement group were significantly less than those in the median placement group [(103.0±13.4) min, (111.4±11.7) ml, (8.6±3.5) d, and (6.1±1.3) months] ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS pain score between the 2 groups before operation or at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). At the last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score [(93.6±1.6) points], ankle dorsiflexion (17.9°±1.6°) and plantar flexion (41.9°±1.9°) in the lateral placement group were significantly better than those in the median placement group [(87.8±3.2) points, 15.1°±1.2°, and 38.5°±2.7°] ( P<0.05). In both groups, significant improvements were achieved at the last follow-up in VAS pain score, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion compared with the preoperative period ( P<0.05). The incidence of fracture angulation deformity in the lateral placement group (11.5%, 3/26) was lower than that in the median placement group (31.8%, 7/22) ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the lateral placement group (3.8%, 1/26) and the central placement group (18.2%, 4/22) ( P>0.05). Conclusion:In the closed reduction of metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia, compared with median placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin, lateral placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin assisted with a Kirschner wire demonstrates advantages of more rapid and effective closed reduction of the fracture, shortened operation time, reduced intraoperative blood loss and promoted postoperative rehabilitation.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of extended-field versus reduced-field radiotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients after radical operation.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 210 UTUC patients who underwent full-length nephrectomy and received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in Peking University First Hospital from January 2013 to November 2023, and follow-up continued until June 2024. According to the target area of postoperative radiotherapy, patients were divided into the extended-field radiotherapy group (127 cases) and the reduced-field radiotherapy group (83 cases). The overall survival (OS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and adverse reactions were compared. In the same period, 114 patients with recurrent abdominal and pelvic lymph nodes who did not receive adjuvant therapy after surgery for UTUC in our center were prospectively collected, and the coverage of the reduced-field target area was analyzed. Chi square test was used to compare the clinical characteristics, Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival outcomes, log-rank test was used to compare the survival rate, and Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of survival.Results:The median follow-up was 24.5 (range: 3-74) months. There were no significant differences between the extended-field and reduced-field radiotherapy groups in terms of 2-year LRFS (93.3% vs. 98.1%, P=0.156), 2-year DMFS (84.8% vs. 91.2%, P=0.176), and 2-year OS (90.4% vs. 90.7%, P=0.707). The most common toxicities of adjuvant radiotherapy were nausea and leukopenia, with significantly higher grade 1-2 incidence in the extended-field group compared to the reduced-field group ( P<0.05). According to the analysis of patients with retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence after surgery, the reduced-field target designed according to the location of the primary tumor can cover more than 90% of the postoperative metastatic lymph node area Multivariate analysis revealed that variant histology ( HR=2.180,95% CI: 1.021-4.658, P=0.044) was an independent predictor of worse DMFS, while variant histology ( HR=3.825,95% CI: 1.514-9.662, P=0.005) and T 3-4 stage ( HR=4.452,95% CI: 1.025-19.339, P=0.046) were independent predictors of poorer OS. Conclusions:Compared with extended-field radiotherapy, reduced-field radiotherapy designed based on primary tumor location significantly reduced treatment-related toxicities without compromising postoperative therapeutic efficacy, and the reduced-field can cover more than 90% of local recurrent lesions.

BACKGROUND:Electrical stimulation is an effective treatment plan for peripheral nerve injuries,but different frequencies of electrical stimulation have different mechanisms and applications for promoting peripheral nerve recovery.OBJECTIVE:To systematically sort out and summarize the roles and applications of different frequencies of electrical stimulation in the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries,and to deeply analyze the advantages and disadvantages of various methods in order to find the most beneficial treatment strategy for patients'nerve recovery.METHODS:Computer-based searches were conducted in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)and PubMed databases from the inception of the databases to May 2024.The search terms included"peripheral nerve injury,electrical stimulation,low frequency electrical stimulation,medium frequency electrical stimulation,high frequency electrical stimulation,TENS,interfering electricity,short wave,ultrashort wave,frequency"in both English and Chinese.Ultimately,74 relevant documents were included for analysis.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Peripheral nerve injury,a common clinical disease,can cause sensory and motor dysfunction in patients.Low-frequency electrical stimulation can promote cell proliferation and accelerate the expression of nerve growth factor within the cell after electrical stimulation,promote macrophage recruitment and infiltration,accelerate the clearance of myelin debris,and promote myelin regeneration of damaged axons.Medium-frequency electrical stimulation can act on deeper tissues and is better for relieving neuropathic pain.High-frequency electrical stimulation can promote the proliferation of Schwann cells and macrophages,inhibit inflammatory factors,and rapidly recruit cells to the site of nerve injury,accelerating the speed of nerve repair.Different frequencies of electrical stimulation have their own advantages in promoting the recovery of peripheral nerve injuries,but there are still some issues,such as differences in the site of electrical stimulation and the treatment plans for various disease types.

BACKGROUND:Electrical stimulation is an effective treatment plan for peripheral nerve injuries,but different frequencies of electrical stimulation have different mechanisms and applications for promoting peripheral nerve recovery.OBJECTIVE:To systematically sort out and summarize the roles and applications of different frequencies of electrical stimulation in the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries,and to deeply analyze the advantages and disadvantages of various methods in order to find the most beneficial treatment strategy for patients'nerve recovery.METHODS:Computer-based searches were conducted in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)and PubMed databases from the inception of the databases to May 2024.The search terms included"peripheral nerve injury,electrical stimulation,low frequency electrical stimulation,medium frequency electrical stimulation,high frequency electrical stimulation,TENS,interfering electricity,short wave,ultrashort wave,frequency"in both English and Chinese.Ultimately,74 relevant documents were included for analysis.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Peripheral nerve injury,a common clinical disease,can cause sensory and motor dysfunction in patients.Low-frequency electrical stimulation can promote cell proliferation and accelerate the expression of nerve growth factor within the cell after electrical stimulation,promote macrophage recruitment and infiltration,accelerate the clearance of myelin debris,and promote myelin regeneration of damaged axons.Medium-frequency electrical stimulation can act on deeper tissues and is better for relieving neuropathic pain.High-frequency electrical stimulation can promote the proliferation of Schwann cells and macrophages,inhibit inflammatory factors,and rapidly recruit cells to the site of nerve injury,accelerating the speed of nerve repair.Different frequencies of electrical stimulation have their own advantages in promoting the recovery of peripheral nerve injuries,but there are still some issues,such as differences in the site of electrical stimulation and the treatment plans for various disease types.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of lateral placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin versus that of median placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin in the closed reduction of metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 48 patients with metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia who had been admitted to Department of Trauma Orthopaedics, The Second General Hospital of Fuzhou from May 2019 to July 2023. There were 37 males and 11 females, aged (46.0±12.4) years. According to the AO classification, 37 patients were classified as type A1, and 11 ones as type A2. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the distal positioning of the intramedullary nail guide pins during operation. In the lateral placement group of 26 patients, the distal positioning of the guide pins was located at 1/3 lateral to the articular surface of the distal tibia. In the median placement group of 22 patients, the distal positioning of the guide pins was located at the midpoint of the articular surface of the distal tibia. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture healing time and fracture reduction were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and range of motion of the affected ankle were compared between the 2 groups, as well as within the 2 groups. The complications were compared between the 2 groups at the last follow-up.Results:There were no significant differences in the demographic data between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up for (19.6±4.4) months. The operation time [(81.7±17.3) min], intraoperative blood loss [(78.4±12.2) mL], hospital stay [(5.7±2.1) d] and fracture healing time [(4.3±1.1) months] in the lateral placement group were significantly less than those in the median placement group [(103.0±13.4) min, (111.4±11.7) ml, (8.6±3.5) d, and (6.1±1.3) months] ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS pain score between the 2 groups before operation or at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). At the last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score [(93.6±1.6) points], ankle dorsiflexion (17.9°±1.6°) and plantar flexion (41.9°±1.9°) in the lateral placement group were significantly better than those in the median placement group [(87.8±3.2) points, 15.1°±1.2°, and 38.5°±2.7°] ( P<0.05). In both groups, significant improvements were achieved at the last follow-up in VAS pain score, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion compared with the preoperative period ( P<0.05). The incidence of fracture angulation deformity in the lateral placement group (11.5%, 3/26) was lower than that in the median placement group (31.8%, 7/22) ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the lateral placement group (3.8%, 1/26) and the central placement group (18.2%, 4/22) ( P>0.05). Conclusion:In the closed reduction of metaphyseal fracture of the distal tibia, compared with median placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin, lateral placement of the intramedullary nail guide pin assisted with a Kirschner wire demonstrates advantages of more rapid and effective closed reduction of the fracture, shortened operation time, reduced intraoperative blood loss and promoted postoperative rehabilitation.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of extended-field versus reduced-field radiotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients after radical operation.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 210 UTUC patients who underwent full-length nephrectomy and received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in Peking University First Hospital from January 2013 to November 2023, and follow-up continued until June 2024. According to the target area of postoperative radiotherapy, patients were divided into the extended-field radiotherapy group (127 cases) and the reduced-field radiotherapy group (83 cases). The overall survival (OS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and adverse reactions were compared. In the same period, 114 patients with recurrent abdominal and pelvic lymph nodes who did not receive adjuvant therapy after surgery for UTUC in our center were prospectively collected, and the coverage of the reduced-field target area was analyzed. Chi square test was used to compare the clinical characteristics, Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival outcomes, log-rank test was used to compare the survival rate, and Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of survival.Results:The median follow-up was 24.5 (range: 3-74) months. There were no significant differences between the extended-field and reduced-field radiotherapy groups in terms of 2-year LRFS (93.3% vs. 98.1%, P=0.156), 2-year DMFS (84.8% vs. 91.2%, P=0.176), and 2-year OS (90.4% vs. 90.7%, P=0.707). The most common toxicities of adjuvant radiotherapy were nausea and leukopenia, with significantly higher grade 1-2 incidence in the extended-field group compared to the reduced-field group ( P<0.05). According to the analysis of patients with retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence after surgery, the reduced-field target designed according to the location of the primary tumor can cover more than 90% of the postoperative metastatic lymph node area Multivariate analysis revealed that variant histology ( HR=2.180,95% CI: 1.021-4.658, P=0.044) was an independent predictor of worse DMFS, while variant histology ( HR=3.825,95% CI: 1.514-9.662, P=0.005) and T 3-4 stage ( HR=4.452,95% CI: 1.025-19.339, P=0.046) were independent predictors of poorer OS. Conclusions:Compared with extended-field radiotherapy, reduced-field radiotherapy designed based on primary tumor location significantly reduced treatment-related toxicities without compromising postoperative therapeutic efficacy, and the reduced-field can cover more than 90% of local recurrent lesions.

Objective:To construct an evaluation index system of operation quality and effectiveness of compact urban medical groups and provide references for evaluation of compact urban medical groups.Methods:The evaluation index system was constructed by Delphi method,and the weight was determined by analytic hierarchy process.Results:The evaluation index system consisted of 5 primary indexes,12 secondary indexes and 40 tertiary indexes.Providing assessment methods for the construction of medical groups,the evaluation index system is scientific and authoritative.Conclusion:At the initial stage,policy support should be strengthened,innovative governance mechanisms should be explored,and measures such as implementing a community of responsibilities,strengthening information interconnection,and improving profit distribution mechanisms should be taken to gradually promote the construction of close urban medical groups.

Objective:To explore potential predictors of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP) in early stage. Methods:The prospective multicenter study was conducted in Zhejiang, China from May 1 st, 2019 to January 31 st, 2020. A total of 1 428 patients with fever >48 hours to <120 hours were studied. Their clinical data and oral pharyngeal swab samples were collected; Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in pharyngeal swab specimens was detected. Patients with positive Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA results underwent a series of tests, including chest X-ray, complete blood count, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and procalcitonin. According to the occurrence of RMPP, the patients were divided into two groups, RMPP group and general Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (GMPP) group. Measurement data between the 2 groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations between clinical data and RMPP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyse the power of the markers for predicting RMPP. Results:A total of 1 428 patients finished the study, with 801 boys and 627 girls, aged 4.3 (2.7, 6.3) years. Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA was positive in 534 cases (37.4%), of whom 446 cases (83.5%) were diagnosed with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, including 251 boys and 195 girls, aged 5.2 (3.3, 6.9) years. Macrolides-resistant variation was positive in 410 cases (91.9%). Fifty-five cases were with RMPP, 391 cases with GMPP. The peak body temperature before the first visit and LDH levels in RMPP patients were higher than that in GMPP patients (39.6 (39.1, 40.0) vs. 39.2 (38.9, 39.7) ℃, 333 (279, 392) vs. 311 (259, 359) U/L, both P<0.05). Logistic regression showed the prediction probability π=exp (-29.7+0.667×Peak body temperature (℃)+0.004×LDH (U/L))/(1+exp (-29.7+0.667×Peak body temperature (℃)+0.004 × LDH (U/L))), the cut-off value to predict RMPP was 0.12, with a consensus of probability forecast of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.89, and specificity of 0.67; and the area under ROC curve was 0.682 (95% CI 0.593-0.771, P<0.01). Conclusion:In MPP patients with fever over 48 to <120 hours, a prediction probability π of RMPP can be calculated based on the peak body temperature and LDH level before the first visit, which can facilitate early identification of RMPP.

Objective:To systematically observe the location and severity of perineal lacerations during childbirth and explore the relationship between the length/depth and the degrees of perineal lacerations.Methods:This prospective study recruited full-term singleton cephalic pregnant women planning vaginal delivery at the Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang from March 2023 to July 2023. Before the second stage of labor, the perineal body length (PBL) was measured. After delivery, the locations of all birth canal lacerations, the perineal skin lacerations length (PSLL), and the perineal lacerations depth (PLD) were measured and recorded. A magnifying glass was used to identify the layers of the skin and photographs were taken if necessary. Statistical methods such as t-test, rank-sum test, and Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) were used to compare the basic conditions and birth canal lacerations between primiparous and multiparous women. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of PSLL, PLD, and the PSLL/PBL ratio. Results:During the study period, 200 women were included, of which 189 had vaginal deliveries (173 primiparous and 16 multiparous) and 11 had emergency cesarean sections (10 primiparous and one multiparous). Among the 173 primiparous women with vaginal deliveries, 33 (19.1%) underwent episiotomy, and the other 140 (80.9%) had perineal lacerations. Among these cases of perineal lacerations, nine were complicated by vaginal wall lacerations, 20 by labial lacerations, and four by clitoral and urethral lacerations. There were 32 (22.9%) primiparous women with first-degree perineal lacerations and 108 (77.1%) with second-degree perineal lacerations. Among the 16 multiparous women who delivered vaginally, two had intact birth canals without lacerations, and 14 had perineal lacerations (eight with first-degree and six with second-degree perineal lacerations). Besides, none of them underwent episiotomy or assisted vaginal delivery. The rates of episiotomy and second-degree perineal lacerations were higher in primiparous women than in multiparous women [19.1% (33/173) vs. 0/16, 77.1% (108/173) vs. 6/14, Fisher's exact test, both P<0.05). The PSLL, PLD, and PSLL/PBL ratio were significantly lower in the primiparous women with first-degree perineal lacerations than in the primiparous women with second-degree perineal lacerations [0.0 mm (0.0-10.0 mm) vs. 30.0 mm (25.5-40.0 mm), 5.0 mm (1.5-10.0 mm) vs. 14.0 mm (10.0-15.0 mm), 0.0 mm (0.0-21.1 mm) vs. 63.6 mm (50.0-77.3 mm); Z values were－8.04,－6.46, and－7.75, respectively, all P<0.05]. The optimal cut-off values of PSLL, PLD, and PSLL/PBL ratio for differentiating between first-degree and second-degree perineal lacerations were 15 mm, 9 mm, and 33.33%, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.965, 0.869, and 0.951 and the sensitivity of 91.67%, 91.67%, and 89.81%, respectively. The AUC of PSLL was significantly greater than that of PLD ( Z=2.55, P=0.011), but the AUC of PSLL/PBL ratio showed no significant difference with that of PSLL or PLD ( Z=1.18 and 1.89, both P>0.05). Conclusions:It is difficult for full-term primiparas to maintain perineal integrity during vaginal delivery. Measuring the PSLL, PLD, and PSLL/PBL ratio of primiparous women will be useful for distinction between first- and second-degree perineal lacerations.

Patients with severe trauma require an extremely timely treatment and transfusion plays an irreplaceable role in the emergency treatment of such patients. An increasing number of evidence-based medicinal evidences and clinical practices suggest that patients with severe traumatic bleeding benefit from early transfusion of low-titer group O whole blood or hemostatic resuscitation with red blood cells, plasma and platelet of a balanced ratio. However, the current domestic mode of blood supply cannot fully meet the requirements of timely and effective blood transfusion for emergency treatment of patients with severe trauma in clinical practice. In order to solve the key problems in blood supply and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma, Branch of Clinical Transfusion Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Group for Trauma Emergency Care and Multiple Injuries of Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Young Scholar Group of Disaster Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts of blood transfusion medicine and trauma treatment to jointly formulate Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients ( version 2024). Based on the evidence-based medical evidence and Delphi method of expert consultation and voting, 10 recommendations were put forward from two aspects of blood support mode and transfusion strategies, aiming to provide a reference for transfusion resuscitation in the emergency treatment of severe trauma and further improve the success rate of treatment of patients with severe trauma.