Artificial chord is a mature mitral valve repair technique, especially in adult mitral valve repair. It is still challenging to repair mitral valve in children with artificial chords because the quality of mitral valve is soft and immature. There are some differences in the methods of suture, the choice of suture size and the number of artificial chords. Although the artificial chords could not grow naturally, we found through the long-term research that most children did not have mitral valve restriction or even chords rupture due to itself can compensate through the growth of the flap and papillary muscle. This article summarizes the recent research progress on the treatment of mitral valve insufficiency in children with artificial chords, providing reference for clinical treatment.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

Objective The study analyzed and identified the components in Shangketianshao Gel by LC-Q-TOF/MS.Methods The analysis was performed on Agilent Eclipse Plus C18(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm)column was applied with methanol and 0.1%formic acid as mobile phase for gradient elution,flow rate was 1 mL·min-1 and column temperature was 30℃.The analytes were determined by positive and negative ion modes with electro-spray ionization source,combined message of standard reference and the literature.Results 103 constituents were identified,all compounds were classified to their medicinal materials derivation.22 compounds from Paeoniae Radix Rubra,33 compounds from Rhei Radix et Rhizoma,20 compounds from Angelicae Dahuricae,23 compounds from Cortex Phellodendr and 14 compounds from Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim.9 components were jointly owned.Conclusion The study provided a suitable way for Chemical fundamentals and quality control of Shangketianshao Gel and laid a foundation for in depth studies of its pharmacodynamics and the quality control.