INTRODUCTION

Epidermal inclusion cysts require surgical intervention to prevent recurrence and symptoms. Elliptical excision is definitive but results in longer scar, while minimal incision techniques offer better cosmetic outcomes despite higher recurrence rates probably due to incomplete excision. To date, there are currently no local studies published.

METHODOLOGY

A randomized controlled trial was conducted from October 2023 to May 2024 at a dermatology center in the Philippines. Patients were randomly assigned to minimal incision or elliptical excision techniques. Key metrics included operation time, scar length, post-operative complications, Hollander wound evaluation score (HWES), and histopathological completeness of excision.

RESULTS

Median operation duration was 31.86 minutes, with no significant difference between techniques (p = 0.5795). Post-operative scars were longer in the excision group (mean: 2.38 ± 0.66 cm) versus the minimal incision group (p < 0.001). Completeness of excision was higher in the excision group (83%) compared to the minimal incision group (27%) (p = 0.0123). Follow-up scar length was shorter in the minimal incision group (mean: 0.44 ± 0.21 cm) versus the excision group (mean: 2.1 ± 0.63 cm) (p < 0.001). HWES scores showed no significant difference in wound healing and aesthetic satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Minimal incision technique results in shorter scars but lower completeness of excision compared to elliptical excision. Both techniques have similar long-term outcomes in wound healing and aesthetic satisfaction, with no recurrences or complications beyond two weeks. The choice should balance scar length and completeness of cyst removal, considering patient-specific factors.

Human ; Cicatrix ; Cysts ; Cosmetics

BACKGROUND

Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used as an adjunct treatment for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). PRP preparation involves anticoagulant tubes, such as PRP kits or regular tubes such as EDTA. Studies have shown that platelet concentration in PRP correlates with the growth factors present. However, there is limited data regarding the platelet yield across different anticoagulant tubes. This study will aid in the use of EDTA tube as an alternative to the commercially available PRP kits.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the platelet concentration level obtained in EDTA tubes versus the commercially available PRP kit in patients with AGA.

METHODOLOGY

This was a cross-sectional, quantitative study in 27 adult males with AGA. The venous blood extracted were placed in EDTA and PRP kit tubes and were centrifuged. A hemoanalyzer was used to obtain the platelet concentration levels. Statistical analyses using paired t-test was performed using the STATA MP Software.

RESULTS

Comparative analyses indicated that the mean difference in platelet concentration between the PRP kit and EDTA was -472.67 (95% Cl = -575.40 to - 369.93). Thus, the mean platelet concentration (t=-9.46, p=0.001) was statistically different between the two groups with a significantly higher mean platelet concentration with EDTA as compared to the PRP kit.

CONCLUSION

The platelet concentration levels obtained from the EDTA tubes were higher than the PRP kit. Thus, the EDTA tube may be a good alternative to the costly commercially available PRP kit.

Human ; Platelet-rich Plasma ; Edta ; Edetic Acid ; Alopecia ; Androgenetic Alopecia

Cutaneous tuberculosis, a rare dermatologic condition with a wide spectrum of clinical findings depending on the source and immune status of patient. The common subtype is Lupus Vulgaris which is extremely chronic and progressive type
Case Management ; Lupus Vulgaris ; Tuberculosis