BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Oral ivermectin is recommended as an alternative to topical permethrin in Japanese, European, and CDC-STI guidelines for treating classic scabies. The combination of oral ivermectin and topical permethrin is also used in some settings. Partial economic evaluations conducted in India and Egypt have conflicting results, and no cost-effectiveness analysis in the Philippines has compared ivermectin-based regimens to permethrin for scabies treatment. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, compared to permethrin, in the treatment of Filipino adult patients with classic scabies.

We used a decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two regimens, oral ivermectin alone or in combination with permethrin, compared with permethrin to treat adults and children aged five years and older with classic scabies in the outpatient setting from the household perspective in the Philippines. We estimated total costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a one-month follow-up. Input parameters were obtained from secondary data, such as effect estimates for probabilities of clinical outcomes from a network meta-analysis, DALYs from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, and prevailing market cost in the Philippines (DPRI 2022 with recommended markup by DOH, and leading drugstores) as of August 2022. We computed for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to determine which of the interventions are cost-effective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty.

Ivermectin-based regimens are suggested to be likely cost-saving compared to permethrin in the Philippine outpatient setting. Base case analysis showed that oral ivermectin had higher cost-savings (change in cost, -1,039.31; change in DALYS, 0.00027), while combination oral ivermectin/permethrin had higher DALYs averted (change in cost, PhP -1,019.78; change in DALYs, 0.00045), compared to permethrin. Combination oral ivermectin/permethrin (56%) was the most cost-effective, followed by oral ivermectin (44%) compared to permethrin (0%) through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Estimates for ivermectin were sensitive to risk of cure for ivermectin vs permethrin using 1-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. Oral ivermectin was favored over combination oral ivermectin/permethrin at all thresholds based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Both ivermectin-based regimens seem to be cost-saving compared to permethrin in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine outpatient setting. Clinicians may consider oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin as an alternative first-line or second-line treatment depending on patient preference, adverse event risk profile, availability, and economic capacity. This needs to be confirmed using primary data from Filipino patients to enhance the robustness of the findings and support evidence-based local decision-making in different settings. Less uncertainty in modelled parameters can give greater confidence in the results, which can be adopted for budget impact analysis and allow more rational resource allocation. Value of information analysis can be done to determine whether the expense of future RCTs or surveys in Filipinos to collect primary data is worth it. The cost of reducing uncertainty, if deemed worth the cost of further studies, may facilitate population-level decision-making and budget planning. Findings may further inform practice guideline development, coverage decisions, and national control program planning by providing the most cost-effective scabies intervention.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Scabies is the second most common cause of disability due to skin disease in the Philippines. However, there were no cited studies in Global Burden of Disease 2019 and the disability-adjusted life years (DALY) computations were most likely based on statistical modelling. The Philippine Department of Health has embarked on a program to estimate the disease burden of priority diseases in the country, which include scabies. The last nationwide prevalence survey was 23 years ago. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence or incidence of scabies in the Philippines.

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Herdin, and Philippine Health Research Registry (search date October 2022) for studies on prevalence/incidence (including systematic reviews, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, case series, registry or census studies) of patients diagnosed with scabies in the Philippines. We excluded narrative reviews, commentaries, and conference proceedings or abstracts. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed full text reports for eligibility, appraised the quality of included studies, and collected data using a pretested data extraction form. We did not pool studies due to clinical heterogeneity but plotted the individual studies in a forest plot with prevalence estimates and confidence intervals. We reported the median and interquartile range for entire group or relevant subgroups (age, setting) of studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

We included nine studies (N=79,065). Most were clinic-based prevalence studies, retrospective chart reviews, conducted in dermatology outpatient clinics, Metro Manila area, and on pediatric populations. Prevalence of scabies was moderate (i.e., between 2 and 10%), ranging from 2.75% (national prevalence survey) to 6.8% (communitybased review), to high (> 10%) among pediatric patients in clinic-based retrospective chart reviews (29 to 36%) and institution-based surveys (39.0% to 45%), and a tertiary government university training hospital dermatology clinic (22.9%). The most affected age group was from 0 to 14 y/o, while males tended to have a higher prevalence than females. The cooler month of January had higher prevalence than the hotter month of June in one study.

Scabies is common in the Philippines, especially among children and elderly in institutional settings, and during the month of January. There is a need to do a national prevalence survey to identify high-risk areas and to monitor the prevalence of scabies, especially in crowded settings and vulnerable populations. This information can be used for estimating the burden of disease for scabies and guide appropriate health resource allocation.

BACKGROUND

With the utility of nail dermoscopy to supplement the diagnosis of onychomycosis, studies have been done in describing common findings. However, most of these were based in Europe and the Americas. Given the geographical variation of onychomycosis, a local study is needed.

The general objective of this cross-sectional study is to determine the different patterns among the clinical subtypes of laboratory diagnosed onychomycosis patients seen at the Philippine General Hospital (PGH).

Clinically suspected Filipino onychomycosis patients seen at the PGH - Department of Dermatology, and at the PGH inpatient wards were recruited. All patients underwent the following: direct KOH microscopy, fungal culture studies, and nail clipping with PAS staining.

A total of 75 samples were included; 93.33% of the samples were categorized as DLSO subtype, 5.33% as TDO, and 1.33% as PSO. The three most common onychoscopic patterns were subungual hyperkeratosis (93.33%), chromonychia (85.33%), and longitudinal striae in 81.33%. KOH was positive in 57.33% of the cases, cultures in 38.67% and PAS stain in 80%. Onychoscopic pattern was not associated with clinical type of onychomycosis and causative organism. Negative KOH result was associated with linear edges (p=0.02).

Among patients with clinical and laboratory diagnosed onychomycosis, linear edges and jagged proximal edges were associated with negative KOH microscopy and fungal CS, respectively. Hence, in situations where such examinations are negative despite a strong clinical suspicion of onychomycosis, the above onychoscopic findings can be used for empirical diagnosis.

BACKGROUND

Seborrheic keratosis is a common benign skin tumor treated with invasive methods like electrodessication, cryotherapy, or surgery. Topical therapy with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) may be a cheaper, non-invasive alternative with less complications. While TCA has been studied for other skin conditions, more research is needed on its use for seborrheic keratosis.

To compare the safety and efficacy of one time application of 80% TCA peel to 65% TCA peel in the clearance of raised seborrheic keratosis in Filipino patients.

One hundred one patients were randomized to either 80% or 65% TCA groups. Each participant underwent one session of treatment and was followed up after a month. Pre- and post-test size and thickness of lesions were compared between groups.

Based on Physician’s Lesion Assessment (PLA), both concentrations of TCA achieved high treatment success (TCA80: 66.7%, TCA65: 68%, p-value 0.89). A similar trend was observed based on Subject’s Self-Assessment (TCA80: 74%, TCA65: 74.5%, p-value 0.95). Similar reductions in lesion size and thickness were observed in both concentrations. In terms of safety, pain, pruritus, and erythema were mostly observed during and immediately after treatment, with little to no adverse events observed after 1 month in both groups.

One time application of either 80% or 65% TCA is effective in decreasing the size and thickness of seborrheic keratosis with little to no complications 1 month post- treatment. Both concentrations were safe, causing minimal and non-persistent pain, pruritus, and erythema immediately after application.

Background and Objective: Oral ivermectin is recommended as an alternative to topical permethrin in Japanese, European, and CDC-STI guidelines for treating classic scabies. The combination of oral ivermectin and topical permethrin is also used in some settings. Partial economic evaluations conducted in India and Egypt have conflicting results, and no cost-effectiveness analysis in the Philippines has compared ivermectin-based regimens to permethrin for scabies treatment. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, compared to permethrin, in the treatment of Filipino adult patients with classic scabies. Methods: We used a decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two regimens, oral ivermectin alone or in combination with permethrin, compared with permethrin to treat adults and children aged five years and older with classic scabies in the outpatient setting from the household perspective in the Philippines. We estimated total costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a one-month follow-up. Input parameters were obtained from secondary data, such as effect estimates for probabilities of clinical outcomes from a network meta-analysis, DALYs from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, and prevailing market cost in the Philippines (DPRI 2022 with recommended markup by DOH, and leading drugstores) as of August 2022. We computed for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to determine which of the interventions are cost-effective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty. Results: Ivermectin-based regimens are suggested to be likely cost-saving compared to permethrin in the Philippine outpatient setting. Base case analysis showed that oral ivermectin had higher cost-savings (change in cost, -1,039.31; change in DALYS, 0.00027), while combination oral ivermectin/permethrin had higher DALYs averted (change in cost, PhP -1,019.78; change in DALYs, 0.00045), compared to permethrin. Combination oral ivermectin/permethrin (56%) was the most cost-effective, followed by oral ivermectin (44%) compared to permethrin (0%) through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Estimates for ivermectin were sensitive to risk of cure for ivermectin vs permethrin using 1-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. Oral ivermectin was favored over combination oral ivermectin/permethrin at all thresholds based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Conclusion Both ivermectin-based regimens seem to be cost-saving compared to permethrin in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine outpatient setting. Clinicians may consider oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin as an alternative first-line or second-line treatment depending on patient preference, adverse event risk profile, availability, and economic capacity. This needs to be confirmed using primary data from Filipino patients to enhance the robustness of the findings and support evidence-based local decision-making in different settings. Less uncertainty in modelled parameters can give greater confidence in the results, which can be adopted for budget impact analysis and allow more rational resource allocation. Value of information analysis can be done to determine whether the expense of future RCTs or surveys in Filipinos to collect primary data is worth it. The cost of reducing uncertainty, if deemed worth the cost of further studies, may facilitate population-level decision-making and budget planning. Findings may further inform practice guideline development, coverage decisions, and national control program planning by providing the most cost-effective scabies intervention.
Scabies ; Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Cost-Benefit Analysis

Background and Objective: Scabies is the second most common cause of disability due to skin disease in the Philippines. However, there were no cited studies in Global Burden of Disease 2019 and the disability-adjusted life years (DALY) computations were most likely based on statistical modelling. The Philippine Department of Health has embarked on a program to estimate the disease burden of priority diseases in the country, which include scabies. The last nationwide prevalence survey was 23 years ago. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence or incidence of scabies in the Philippines. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Herdin, and Philippine Health Research Registry (search date October 2022) for studies on prevalence/incidence (including systematic reviews, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, case series, registry or census studies) of patients diagnosed with scabies in the Philippines. We excluded narrative reviews, commentaries, and conference proceedings or abstracts. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed full text reports for eligibility, appraised the quality of included studies, and collected data using a pretested data extraction form. We did not pool studies due to clinical heterogeneity but plotted the individual studies in a forest plot with prevalence estimates and confidence intervals. We reported the median and interquartile range for entire group or relevant subgroups (age, setting) of studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: We included nine studies (N=79,065). Most were clinic-based prevalence studies, retrospective chart reviews, conducted in dermatology outpatient clinics, Metro Manila area, and on pediatric populations. Prevalence of scabies was moderate (i.e., between 2 and 10%), ranging from 2.75% (national prevalence survey) to 6.8% (communitybased review), to high (> 10%) among pediatric patients in clinic-based retrospective chart reviews (29 to 36%) and institution-based surveys (39.0% to 45%), and a tertiary government university training hospital dermatology clinic (22.9%). The most affected age group was from 0 to 14 y/o, while males tended to have a higher prevalence than females. The cooler month of January had higher prevalence than the hotter month of June in one study. Conclusion Scabies is common in the Philippines, especially among children and elderly in institutional settings, and during the month of January. There is a need to do a national prevalence survey to identify high-risk areas and to monitor the prevalence of scabies, especially in crowded settings and vulnerable populations. This information can be used for estimating the burden of disease for scabies and guide appropriate health resource allocation.
Scabies ; Philippines ; Epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Incidence

Background: Pityriasis versicolor is a common fungal infection of the superficial skin layer caused by Malassezia furfur, a normal commensal in the skin. Keratolytic agents are popular, cheap, and readily available over-the-counter treatments for pityriasis versicolor. Conventional antifungal agents are more expensive, requiring prescription, and may induce resistant strains. However, evidence of their comparative safety and efficacy is still lacking. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of synthetic antifungals compared to keratolytic agents in the topical treatment of pityriasis versicolor through a systematic review. Methods: We searched the following databases: MEDLINE (from 1966) through PubMed, CENTRAL (Issue 9 of 12, September 2021), EMBASE (from 1974), LILACS (from 1987); Herdin (from 1970), www.clinicaltrials.gov, www. isrctn.com, www.trialregister.nl. We contacted researchers in the field, hand searched relevant conference abstracts, and the Journal of the Philippine Dermatological Society 1992-2019. We included all randomized controlled trials involving patients with diagnosed active pityriasis versicolor where topical antifungal was compared with a topical keratolytic for treatment. Two review authors independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane collaboration tool, and extracted data from included studies. We used RevMan 5.3 to pool dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios (RR) and continuous outcomes using the mean difference (MD), using random-effects meta-analysis. We tested for statistical heterogeneity using both the Chi² test and the I² test. We presented results using forest plots with 95% confidence intervals. We planned to create a funnel plot to determine publication bias but were unable to due to few studies. A Summary of Findings table was created using GRADE profile software for the primary outcomes. Results: We included 8 RCTs with a total of 617 participants that compared azole preparations (ketoconazole, bifonazole and econazole) versus keratolytic agents (selenium sulfide, adapalene, salicylic-benzoic acid). Pooled data showed that azoles did not significantly differ from keratolytic agents for clinical cure (RR 0.99, 0.88, 1.12; 4 RCTs, N=274, I2=55%; very low-quality evidence), and adverse events (0.59 [0.17, 2.06]; very low-quality evidence) based on 6 RCTs (N=536). There were two patients given a keratolytic agent (selenium sulfide shampoo) who had acute dermatitis and discontinued treatment. Conclusion It is uncertain whether topical azoles are as effective as keratolytic agents in clinical clearance and occurrence of adverse events in patients with pityriasis versicolor. A wider search of grey literature and local studies are warranted. Larger RCTs with low risk of bias are recommended.
Azoles ; Tinea Versicolor

BACKGROUND

Superficial mycoses are one of the most common skin conditions encountered in the outpatient clinics, causing significant morbidity amongst patients. Since these are highly prevalent diseases of the skin, the general practitioner should be able to manage uncomplicated cases, with no need for evaluation by a specialist.

The study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Filipino medical interns on the management of superficial cutaneous mycoses using a self-administered questionnaire. This may help identify possible gaps in knowledge, as well as obstacles these future clinicians may encounter when managing superficial mycoses. This in turn may assist in the development or improvement of dermatology training among medical students and continuing medical education programs amongst non-dermatologist physicians.

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study among medical interns of the Philippine General Hospital to investigate their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the management of superficial mycoses. Eligible participants were asked to complete an online self-administered survey questionnaire which assessed their capacity to recognize and manage uncomplicated superficial mycoses, and determined their attitudes regarding dermatology training in medical school.

The study included 170 medical interns, with majority having only 1-4 weeks of cumulative duration of dermatology training in medical school. Many of the participants (67.1%) had inadequate overall knowledge scores, but this was not significantly associated with their cumulative duration of dermatology training, as well as with their frequency of encounters with superficial mycosis patients. Most deem dermatology training (92.4%) and learning about the management of superficial mycoses (91.2%) during medical school very important. Majority are interested in attending more courses or training in the subject. Recommendations to improve medical school training on superficial mycoses include more practical approach in dermatology modules, integration of dermatology electives in medical school, and longer duration of dermatology modules/rotations during medical school.

While knowledge scores of medical interns were not significantly associated with the duration of their dermatology training during medical school as well as their encounters with patients with superficial mycoses, it is shown that they have low confidence scores regarding management of superficial mycoses. They deem that learning more about this disease and dermatology in general is vital to their medical education and are desirous of more training in this subject. Recommendations to improve medical school training on superficial mycoses include dermatology modules, rotations or electives in medical school. Additionally, better training during medical school, and formulation of clinical practice guidelines specific to cutaneous mycoses were recommended to improve healthcare delivery for patients with such diseases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Oral ivermectin, a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug, alone or in combination with permethrin, may be a cheaper and more convenient alternative drug to topical permethrin alone in the treatment of classic scabies. There are no previous studies on the treatment acceptability of the three interventions among individual patients with scabies in the Philippines. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences and perceptions on treatment acceptability for oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or combination treatment among patients with scabies using the multiple-case study approach.

We conducted a qualitative multiple case study among adult Filipino patients with classic scabies who were prescribed oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or its combination at a government tertiary hospital dermatology outpatient clinic from December 2022 to September 2023. Semi-structured interviews were used as the primary source of data and analyzed together with chart reviews, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and clinical images. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and triangulated with other secondary data. A three-person research team employed a reflexive and iterative process of familiarization, coding, and thematic analysis using a modified Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to generate case descriptions, within-case analyses, and cross-case syntheses.

The acceptability of scabies treatments (permethrin, ivermectin, and combination therapy) was generally positive. Permethrin, used in three patient cases, was generally perceived as effective but itch relief varied. The burden of whole-body application of permethrin was context-dependent, influenced by living arrangements and family support. Perceived affordability of permethrin was linked to socioeconomic status. Ivermectin, used by one patient case, was perceived as highly effective with no side effects. Its single dose use did not interfere with patient routine. Combination therapy was also considered effective but potential antagonistic effects and the cost of adding permethrin made it less preferred. Reluctance in taking oral pills was noted. All patients valued medical advice and deferred to their physicians for treatment decisions.

All three treatment options were considered effective and safe. Patients generally preferred permethrin over oral ivermectin due to its topical nature and perceived lower side effects. However, affordability and logistical challenges, especially for large households and low-income families, were noted with permethrin. Oral ivermectin elicited hesitation due to its controversial role in COVID-19 and veterinary use. Concerns about added costs and potential antagonism in combination therapy were raised. Despite these considerations, patients ultimately relied on physicians for treatment decisions. This study underscores the importance of understanding patient perspectives, experiences, and the patient-physician relationship in choosing scabies interventions. Addressing patient concerns, providing education, and ensuring ease of use and affordability can enhance treatment acceptability and adherence for better outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Psychodermatology is a field that focuses on the interaction of the skin and the mind. Psychodermatology patients are often challenging to manage because they often lack insight and are not amenable to psychiatric treatment or referral. Therefore, it is important that dermatologists become aware of the psychosocial impact of cutaneous disease and be knowledgeable in the fundamentals of psychodermatologic diagnosis and therapy. However, studies done in several countries report a general lack of perceived knowledge, awareness, and confidence in the management of psychodermatology disorders among dermatologists.

This study aims to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Filipino dermatologists towards psychodermatology using a self-administered questionnaire.

This is a mixed methods study using qualitative and quantitative measures. A self-administered questionnaire was validated and disseminated among the dermatologists in the country. Descriptive analysis was done.

Of the 153 participating dermatologists, majority (70.59%) reported psychodermatologic patients comprised < 10% of their practice. While more than half (56.2%) have a clear understanding of psychodermatology and are comfortable (57.52%) in approaching patients with these conditions, only 58 (37.91%) participants are able to demonstrate adequate knowledge on psychodermatology. Patients with primary psychiatric disorders are less frequently encountered than dermatologic disorders with psychiatric component or secondary psychiatric disorders. Most commonly prescribed medications are anti-histamines. Other psychotropic medications are rarely or never prescribed by the participants. All participants agree that psychodermatology is important in the practice of dermatology; 127 (62.1%) have attended at least one Continuing Medical Education (CME) on psychodermatology and 114 (74.51%) expressed willingness to attend CME training in psychodermatology. One hundred nine (71.24%) participants think that the best practice approach is a multidisciplinary approach to psychodermatology. The top recommendations for better healthcare delivery in psychodermatology were better access to mental health specialists (86.27%), more training opportunities and better training during residency (75.16%), and increase collaboration with psychiatrists (71.9%). The knowledge score was found to be associated with the duration of dermatology practice and attendance in CME proceedings but was not associated with the perceived adequacy of knowledge gained during training. Longer duration of practice may be associated with the knowledge score owing to the greater exposure to cases and more access to training opportunities.

There are many challenges to providing psychodermatologic care in the Philippines but the positive attitude towards psychodermatology, coupled with increased access to education and training opportunities, and the multidisciplinary approach to these cases may improve the quality of dermatologic care that we provide.