1.Determinants of glycemic control in the Philippines
Ernesto L. Ang ; Leilani Baldeviso ; Elizabeth Ann F. Catindig ; Richard Elwyn Fernando ; Marcelo A. Lim ; Araceli A. Panelo ; Leorino M. Sobrepena ; Rima T. Tan ; Jose Ronilo G. Juangco
Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine 2025;63(4):61-69
INTRODUCTION:
Glycemic control in the Philippines has increased from 15% in 2008 to 47.4% in 2020. This study aims to identify the determinants of glycemic control in the Philippines.
METHODOLOGY:
This study included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Current glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, medication compliance and adherence, and the clinico-socio-demographic profile of diabetics in the Philippines were recorded.
RESULTS:
There was no significant association between glycemic control and clinico-socio-demographic characteristics or medication compliance. However, the absence of complications showed a statistically significant positive association (odds ratio [OR], 1.65; p=0.02). While intensification of management provided a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c levels, no statistically significant association was observed. There was a statistically significant positive association with a diabetes duration of < 7 years (OR, 2.692; p < 0.0001). Observing a significant positive association would take 9 months of treatment (OR, 1.978; p=0.02).
DISCUSSION
Diabetes duration of < 7 years and absence of complications had a statistically significant impact on improving glycemic control. Although intensifying management led to a notable reduction in HbA1c levels, no statistically significant correlation was observed. The duration of management exhibited a curvilinear relationship with glycemic control, showing optimal glycemic control beginning at 9 months of duration, peaking at 1 year, and declining at 4 years of management.
Human
;
Blood glucose
;
Philippines
2.Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among adult patients in primary care clinics in Laguna, Las Piñas and Parañaque: A cross sectional study
Justin Vincent A. Lim ; Darice E. Casas ; Daisy M. Medina ; Ma. Louella Estrada-Marcelo
The Filipino Family Physician 2022;60(1):98-105
Background:
Since its surfacing in 2019, COVID-19 has spread all over the world and became an international concern. Vaccines against COVID-19 are expected to be the key in controlling this pandemic. To achieve this, studying factors that affect COVID-19 vaccine acceptance is crucial in order to increase the vaccine uptake rate of Filipinos to attain herd immunity.
Objective:
The study aimed to determine the factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among adult patients in primary care clinics in Laguna, Las Piñas and Parañaque.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study was conducted last June 2021 with 137 adult patients from 6 clinics. The participants were given self-administered questionnaires containing items on sociodemographic profile and perception on vaccines. MS Excel and IBM SPSS were used for statistical analysis. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages and continuous variables as means and standard deviations. Chi square was used to compare outcomes. Variables with statistically significant differences (p-value of <0.05) were included in multinomial regression analysis to determine association with vaccine acceptance.
Results:
Residence (p=0.0166), educational level (p=0.017), perceived effectiveness of vaccines to prevent and control COVID-19 (p=0.001), safety (p=0.001), doctor’s recommendation (p=0.039), risk of being infected (p=0.025) and refusal of any type of vaccine in the past (p=0.003) were associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.
Conclusion
Through this study, the authors found that most of the respondents are willing to get vaccinated regardless of their sociodemographic characteristics. Concerns about vaccine availability and accessibility can hinder the promotion of vaccine uptake in the future. This study can be used as a basis for development and planning of COVID -19 vaccination programs.
COVID-19
;
COVID-19 Vaccines
3.A population-based cross-sectional study of the status of Diabetes Care in the Philippines (PhilDiabCare 2020)
Ernesto L. Ang ; Araceli A. Panelo ; Leorino M. Sobrepeñ ; a ; Rima T. Tan ; Richard Elwyn Fernando ; Marcelo A. Lim ; Jose Ronilo G. Juangco
Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine 2022;60(2):132-138
Background:
Worldwide, diabetes mellitus (DM) is a serious health issue with a global prevalence of 9.8% in 2021. According to the latest 2018 Expanded National Health and Nutrition survey done by the DOST-FNRI, the prevalence of diabetes in the Philippines have more than doubled from 3.4% in 2003 to 7.9% in 2018. The latest research conducted regarding diabetes care in the Philippines was in 2008 which showed that 85% of patients with diabetes failed to achieve the HbA1c general target of <7%.
Objectives:
A population-based cross-sectional study to update the current status of diabetes care in the Philippines, specifically to determine glycemic control, trends in DM management, prevalence of complications and lastly their clinico-socio demographic profile.
Methods:
340 patients with diabetes were included from the clinics of the Institute for Studies on Diabetes Foundation,
Inc. physicians. The following data were collected: clinico-socio demographic profile, HbA1C-based glycemic control, trend in the use of glucose lowering agents, and prevalence of diabetes complications.
Results:
The mean age of the 340 patients with diabetes in this study was 62 years old. Almost sixty-seven percent (66.8%) were females. The mean body mass index was 26 kg/m2. The mean duration of diabetes was 12.63 years. Close to sixty- eight percent (67.6%) had tertiary education, 58.8% were unemployed and 65% had above minimum income. The most commonly used single oral agent was biguanide (72.9%), followed by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (64.3%). The most common dual therapy combinations were biguanide plus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (43.2%), biguanide plus sulfonylureas (27.2%), and biguanide plus sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (11.1%). Basal insulin was the most commonly used injectable agent. The present study showed that 47.4% of patients achieved an HbA1c of <7%. For the microvascular complication group alone, most had neuropathy (30.4%) followed by nephropathy (17.3%) and by retinopathy (5.4%). For the macrovascular complication group, the most common was coronary artery disease (82%) followed by peripheral artery disease and DM foot (27%). Overall, the most frequent DM complication identified was neuropathy (30.4%) , nephropathy (17.3%) and coronary heart disease (16.1%).
Discussion
Compared to the 2008 study, oral glucose lowering agents’ usage shifted from sulfonylureas to more use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. There was a decline in the use of thiazolidinediones, α-glucosidase inhibitors and non-use of meglitinides. For insulin use, there was a shift from the use of premixed insulin to more basal insulin usage. There was marked improvement in the diabetes care situation in the Philippines from the 2008 study to the 2020 study. Glycemic control defined as HbA1c level of <7.0 increased from 15% to 47.4%. Coronary artery disease was the most common macrovascular complication while neuropathy was the most common overall and microvascular complication.
Diabetes Complications
;
Glycemic Control

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail