This review provides a comprehensive framework for the diagnostic approach and management of Huntington’s disease (HD) tailored to the Korean population. Key topics include genetic counseling, predictive testing, and reproductive options like preimplantation genetic testing. Strategies for assessing disease progression in premanifest HD through laboratory investigations, biofluid, and imaging biomarkers are highlighted. Special considerations for juvenile and late-onset HD, along with associated comorbidities like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular abnormalities, are discussed. The guide emphasizes personalized symptom management, including pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, and nutritional support, while exploring emerging disease-modifying treatments. A multidisciplinary care model is advocated to improve outcomes for HD patients and caregivers in Korea.

This review provides a comprehensive framework for the diagnostic approach and management of Huntington’s disease (HD) tailored to the Korean population. Key topics include genetic counseling, predictive testing, and reproductive options like preimplantation genetic testing. Strategies for assessing disease progression in premanifest HD through laboratory investigations, biofluid, and imaging biomarkers are highlighted. Special considerations for juvenile and late-onset HD, along with associated comorbidities like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular abnormalities, are discussed. The guide emphasizes personalized symptom management, including pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, and nutritional support, while exploring emerging disease-modifying treatments. A multidisciplinary care model is advocated to improve outcomes for HD patients and caregivers in Korea.

This review provides a comprehensive framework for the diagnostic approach and management of Huntington’s disease (HD) tailored to the Korean population. Key topics include genetic counseling, predictive testing, and reproductive options like preimplantation genetic testing. Strategies for assessing disease progression in premanifest HD through laboratory investigations, biofluid, and imaging biomarkers are highlighted. Special considerations for juvenile and late-onset HD, along with associated comorbidities like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular abnormalities, are discussed. The guide emphasizes personalized symptom management, including pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, and nutritional support, while exploring emerging disease-modifying treatments. A multidisciplinary care model is advocated to improve outcomes for HD patients and caregivers in Korea.

Background: and PurposeMonoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP-R) have been widely administered to patients with migraine who show inadequate responses to preventive medications. Among patients in whom a particular anti-CGRP-R mAb is ineffective, switching between different anti-CGRP-R mAbs can be the next option. Few studies have investigated treatment outcomes for antibody switching, especially between mAbs with the same target of the CGRP ligand. We aimed to determine the treatment outcome after switching between two anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab). Methods: We identified migraine patients in a prospective headache clinic registry who received galcanezumab for ≥3 months and were switched to fremanezumab for a further ≥3 months at a single university hospital. We defined a treatment response as a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with a moderate or severe headache at the third month of treatment relative to baseline. The treatment response after switching to fremanezumab was compared with the initial treatment response to galcanezumab. Results: Among 21 patients identified in the registry, 7 (33.3%) were initial responders to galcanezumab. After switching to fremanezumab, 7 (33.3%) showed a treatment response. The treatment response rate was 28.6% in the initial responders and 71.4% in the nonresponders to galcanezumab (p>0.999). Conclusions Switching between anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab) yielded a treatment outcome comparable to that reported previously when switching from an anti-CGRP-R mAb (erenumab) to an anti-CGRP mAb (galcanezumab or fremanezumab). The treatment response to fremanezumab seems to be independent of the prior treatment response to galcanezumab. Our findings suggest that switching to another anti-CGRP mAb can be considered when a particular anti-CGRP mAb is ineffective or intolerable.