Child ; Humans ; Manometry ; Esophagus/physiology*

In recent years, colonic manometry has been gradually introduced into clinical practice. It helps clinicians to gain a better understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology of colonic contractile activity in healthy adults and patients with colonic dysfunction. More and more patterns of colonic motility are being discovered with the help of colonic manometry. However, the clinical significance of these findings still needs to be further investigated. This review enhances our understanding of colonic motility and the current state of development and application of colonic manometry, as well as the limitations, future directions and potential of the technique in assessing the impact of treatment on colonic motility patterns, by analyzing and summarizing the literature related to colonic manometry.
Humans ; Adult ; Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology* ; Colon/physiology* ; Colonic Diseases ; Manometry/methods* ; Clinical Relevance ; Constipation

Humans ; Esophagus ; Manometry ; Botulinum Toxins/therapeutic use* ; Prostheses and Implants ; Treatment Outcome ; Larynx, Artificial

Colonic and anorectal manometry includes anorectal manometry and colonic manometry. Anorectal manometry is a common method to evaluate anorectal function, which can objectively reflect the pathological and physiological abnormalities of outlet obstructive constipation and fecal incontinence, as well as the impact of anorectal surgery on continence. Colonic manometry is a new type of colon motility detection method developed in recent years. It can record the peristalsis and contraction of the whole colon through a pressure measuring catheter, which helps physicians further evaluate various colonic diseases. However, various factors such as testing equipment, operating standards, and evaluation parameters are difficult to unify. There is no consensus on the operation and interpretation of colorectal anal pressure measurement. Under the guidance of the Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, in collaboration with Clinical Guidelines Committee, Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Anorectal motility disorders Committee , Colorectal Surgeons Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Colonic Branch of China international exchange and promotive association for medical and healthcare, Tianjin Union Medical Center is leading the organization of domestic experts in this field. Based on searching relevant literature and combining clinical experience at home and abroad, after multiple discussions, the "Chinese expert consensus on colonic and anorectal manometry" has been prepared. This consensus discusses the indications, contraindications, pre examination management and technical procedures, treatment of complications, and interpretation of examination reports for colonic and anorectal manometry , aiming to guide the standardized clinical practice of colonic and anorectal manometry.
Humans ; Rectum ; Consensus ; Constipation ; Anal Canal ; Rectal Diseases ; Fecal Incontinence ; Manometry/methods* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/complications*

Fecal incontinence is one of the common diseases in the field of colorectal and anal surgery. Its etiology is complex, the treatment response is suboptimal, and there are controversies in clinical care. There is no consensus on the clinical practice of fecal incontinence in China currently. Launched by Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Expert Committee on Anorectal Disease of Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and Clinical Guidelines Committee of Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and organized by the editorial board of Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chinese experts on this field were convened to write the Chinese expert consensus on clinical practice of fecal incontinence based on relevant references. After rounds of discussion, the final consensus combines the latest evidence and experts' clinical experience. This expert group suggested that a comprehensive assessment of fecal incontinence should be conducted before treatment, including medical history, relevant scales, physical examination and special examinations. Special examinations include anorectal endoscopy, anorectal manometry, transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance, rectal sensation and compliance, balloon ejection test, pelvic floor electromyography, defecography, colonoscopy and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Treatment methods include life style modification, medication, surgery, traditional Chinese medicine and other treatments. This consensus aims to standardize the algorithm of fecal incontinence management and improve therapeutic efficacy.
Humans ; Fecal Incontinence/etiology* ; East Asian People ; Manometry/adverse effects* ; Rectal Diseases/complications* ; Anal Canal/innervation*

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to provide a practical and evidence-based guide on the indications, performance and reporting of high-resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM) and ambulatory pH monitoring (PHM) in adult patients in Singapore. METHODS: The guideline committee comprised local gastroenterologists from public and private sectors with particular expertise in aspects of HRM and PHM, and it was tasked to produce evidence-based statements on the indications, performance and reporting of these tests. Each committee member performed literature searches to retrieve relevant articles within the context of domains to which they were assigned. RESULTS: Twelve recommendation statements were created and summarised. CONCLUSION Standardising key aspects of HRM and PHM is imperative to ensure the delivery of high-quality care. We reported the development of recommendations for the performance and interpretation of HRM and ambulatory reflux monitoring in Singapore.
Adult ; Esophageal pH Monitoring ; Esophagus ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Manometry ; Singapore

PURPOSE: The Oral-anal Transit Test (OTT) is a simple method of obtaining information about colonic transit. We aim to assess the correlation of OTT with the neuromuscular integrity of the colon determined by colonic manometry (CM).METHODS: All patients who had OTT followed by CM were evaluated. Less than 6 of 24 markers remaining on OTT was considered normal. CM was performed per previously published guidelines. A normal CM was defined as at least one High Amplitude Propagating Contraction progressing from the most proximal sensor through the sigmoid colon.RESULTS: A total of 34 patients underwent both OTT and CM (44% male, age 4–18 years, mean 11.5 years, 97% functional constipation +/− soiling, Hirschsprung's Disease). Of normal and abnormal OTT patients, 85.7% (6/7) and 18.5% (5/27) respectively had normal CM. When all markers progressed to at least the sigmoid colon, this was 100% predictive against colonic inertia. Greater than 50% of patients with manometric isolated sigmoid dysfunction had markers proximal to the recto-sigmoid.CONCLUSION: OTT and CM are both valuable studies that assess different aspects of colonic function. OTT can be used as a screening test to rule out colonic inertia. However, the most proximal extent of remaining markers does not predict the anatomical extent of the manometric abnormality, particularly in isolated sigmoid dysfunction.
Child ; Colon ; Colon, Sigmoid ; Constipation ; Fecal Incontinence ; Humans ; Male ; Manometry ; Mass Screening ; Methods ; Soil

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the causes of the esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction (EGJOO) patients, to discuss the differences of the clinical manifestation and esophageal motility characteristics between the anatomic EGJOO (A-EGJOO) and functional EGJOO (F-EGJOO) subgroups, and to search the diagnostic values of the specific metrics for differentiating the subgroups of EGJOO patients. METHODS: For the current retrospective study, all the patients who underwent the esophageal high resonance manometry test were retrospectively analyzed from Jan 2012 to Oct 2018 in Peking University Third Hospital. The EGJOO patients were enrolled in the following research. The clinical characteristics, such as symptoms and causes of the patients were studied. Then the patients were divided into two subgroups as A-EGJOO subgroup and F-EGJOO subgroup. The clinical symptoms and the main manometry metrics were compared between these two subgroups. The significant different metrics between the two groups were selected to draw receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the diagnostic values were analyzed in differentiating the A-EGJOO and F-EGJOO subgroups. RESULTS: The most common symptom of EGJOO was chest pain or chest discomfort (30.63%), then the dysphagia (29.73%), and acid regurgitation/heartburn (27.03%). Non-erosive reflux disease (36.04%) was the most popular cause for EGJOO, then the reflux esophagitis (17.12%). Besides the intra-EGJOO and extra-EGJOO lesions, the connective tissue disease (6.31%) and central nervous diseases (2.70%) were found to be the etiology of EGJOO. The causes of the rest 19 EGJOO were unknown. A-EGJOO patients presented significantly higher intra bolus pressure (IBP) than that of F-EGJOO [6.80 (5.20, 9.20) mmHg vs. 5.10 (3.10, 7.60) mmHg, P=0.016]. The area under curve of IBP was 0.637. When IBP≥5.15 mmHg, the sensitivity was 78.60% and specificity 50.70% to differentiate A- or F-EGJOO. CONCLUSION Chest pain or chest discomfort was the most common symptom in EGJOO patients. Besides the intraluminal structural disorders, the extra-luminal causes were found in EGJOO patients. A-EGJOO presented higher IBP than that of F-EGJOO patients. The cutoff value of IBP to differentiate A-EGJOO from EGJOO was 5.15 mmHg with sensitivity 78.06% and specificity 50.70%. However for the low area under curve, the diagnostic value of IBP was limited.
Deglutition Disorders ; Esophageal Motility Disorders/diagnosis* ; Esophagogastric Junction ; Humans ; Manometry ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: To determine the correlations of intraocular pressure (IOP) with risk factors in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) patients. METHODS: A total of 113 eyes in 113 consecutive patients with RRD were enrolled in this study. IOP was measured using applanation tonometry at the initial visit. Based on the difference in IOP between the affected and unaffected eyes, the subjects were divided into two groups: group 1 (IOP difference ≤ 2 mmHg) and group 2 (IOP difference > 2 mmHg). Correlations between the IOP and RRD morphology, visual acuity (VA), best-corrected VA (BCVA), retinal break size and location, range of retinal detachment, macular involvement, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy were analyzed. RESULTS: The IOP at the initial visit was 12.88 ± 3.2 mmHg in the affected eyes and 14.27 ± 2.5 mmHg in the unaffected eyes. The IOP difference between the affected and unaffected eyes was −1.40 ± 2.82 mmHg. The BCVA and range of retinal detachment showed statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RRD, the IOP difference compared to the unaffected eye was correlated with the extent of area of retinal detachment and decreased BCVA.
Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Manometry ; Retinal Detachment ; Retinal Perforations ; Retinaldehyde ; Risk Factors ; Visual Acuity ; Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although symptoms related to the pelvic floor, such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), are common in patients with chronic constipation (CC), its impact is not clear. Our aims were to investigate the following (1) compare pelvic floor symptom related dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and functional constipation (FC), and (2) symptom correlation with findings on anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with CC undergoing ARM. IBS-C and FC were diagnosed by Rome III criteria. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) was used to measure pelvic floor symptom distress. Constipation Severity Scale was used to assess constipation severity. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients underwent ARM (64 FC, 43 IBS-C). The overall PFDI-20 score in IBS-C was higher compared with FC patients (118.0 vs 79.2, P = 0.001). In those with IBS-C, POP, LUTS, and colorectal symptoms subscales were all higher compared with FC patients (P < 0.05 for each). On multivariable regression, IBS-C (P = 0.001) and higher constipation severity (P = 0.001) were both independently associated with higher PFDI scores. ARM parameters and abnormal balloon expulsion test did not correlate with PFDI scores. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with FC patients, those with IBS-C have significantly higher distress from pelvic floor specific symptoms including POP and LUTS. Higher abdominal pain among IBS-C patients did not entirely explain these findings. A diagnosis of IBS-C and higher constipation severity correlated with PFDI-20 scores, but dyssynergia did not.
Abdominal Pain ; Arm ; Ataxia ; Constipation ; Defecation ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome ; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms ; Manometry ; Pelvic Floor ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse ; Retrospective Studies