1.Current status and influencing factors of kinesiophobia in patients with lumbar disc herniation after lumbar fusion surgery.
Lianlian CHEN ; Zhangying CAI ; Linna YE ; Jie LI
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2025;57(2):317-322
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the current status of kinesiophobia after lumbar fusion surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and to analyze its influencing factors.
METHODS:
A total of 489 LDH patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 and effectively filled out the tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK) and other questionnaires on the first day after surgery were collected as the study subjects, the current status of kinesiophobia in LDH patients after lumbar fusion surgery were investigated using the TSK. The LDH patients were grouped into a kinesiophobia group (n=221) and a non kinesiophobia group (n=268) based on whether there was kinesiophobia after lumbar fusion surgery. The self-designed general data questionnaires were used to collect data, and Logistic regression was applied to analyze independent risk factors for kinesiophobia after lumbar fusion surgery in the LDH patients.
RESULTS:
In the study, 221 out of the 489 LDH patients (45.19%) had kinesiophobia after lumbar fusion surgery. Univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between the phobic group and the non phobic group in terms of gender, education level, course of disease, whether there was hypoproteinemia, pain level, self-efficacy, social support, whether there was anxiety, and whether there was depression (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of age, body mass index, monthly family income, marital status, residence, medical expense payment form, whether there was hypertension, whether there was diabetes, whether there was cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, whether there was respiratory disease, whether there was surgery experience, whether there was anemia, work conditions, and responsibility segments (P>0.05). Male (95%CI: 3.289-10.586, P < 0.001), education level below undergraduate level (95%CI: 6.533-45.162, P < 0.001), severe pain (95%CI: 10.348-72.025, P < 0.001), moderate pain (95%CI: 6.247-37.787, P < 0.001), low self-efficacy (95%CI: 4.238-15.095, P < 0.001), and medium self-efficacy (95%CI: 2.804-8.643, P < 0.001) were influencing factors for kinesiophobia after lumbar fusion surgery in the patients with LDH (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The incidence of kinesiophobia after lumbar fusion surgery in patients with LDH is high, and its influencing factors include gender, education level, pain level, and self-efficacy.
Humans
;
Spinal Fusion/psychology*
;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/psychology*
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Male
;
Female
;
Middle Aged
;
Phobic Disorders/etiology*
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
;
Adult
;
Risk Factors
;
Aged
;
Fear
;
Kinesiophobia
2.Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted single-position OLIF with lateral plate combined with posterior unilateral fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis.
Yuekun FANG ; Zhilin YANG ; Haotian LI ; Weizhou WANG ; Hangchuang BI ; Bing WANG ; Junjie DONG ; Jin YANG ; Zhiqiang GONG ; Lingqiang CHEN
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2025;50(1):119-129
OBJECTIVES:
Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) has become a well-established treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) due to its advantages of being minimally invasive, effective, and associated with fewer complications. However, relying solely on lateral fixation provides limited strength and uneven load distribution. Conventional posterior bilateral fixation after OLIF typically requires intraoperative repositioning, increases fluoroscopy frequency, and involves extensive dissection of posterior muscles and soft tissues, resulting in greater trauma, blood loss, and risks of dural tear, nerve root injury, and persistent postoperative low back pain. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted single-position OLIF with lateral plating and posterior unilateral fixation, OLIF with lateral fixation alone, and OLIF combined with posterior bilateral fixation for treating single-segment LSS, and to explore how to enhance fixation stability, reduce trauma, and achieve precise minimally invasive outcomes without changing patient positioning.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data from patients treated for single-segment LSS between January 2020 and June 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Robot group (robot-assisted single-position OLIF with lateral plate and posterior unilateral fixation, 33 cases), lateral group (OLIF with lateral fixation alone, 52 cases), and combined group (OLIF with posterior bilateral fixation, 45 cases). Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, hospital stay, pedicle screw placement accuracy, and complication rates were recorded. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Radiological evaluations (X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) measured interbody disc height (IDH), intervertebral foraminal height (IFH), and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dural sac. Differences between pre- and postoperative imaging indices were statistically analyzed, and complication rates, fusion rates, and cage subsidence rates were recorded.
RESULTS:
All patients exhibited good positioning of internal fixation devices and cages, with significant symptom relief and no cases of spinal cord injury or symptom worsening. The follow-up time was (15.2±3.6) months. The operation time of the robot group was (70.62±8.99) min, which was longer than that of the lateral group (45.90±6.09) min and shorter than that of the combined group (110.12±8.44) min. The intraoperative blood loss of the robot group was (44.27±6.87) mL, which was more than that of the lateral group (33.58±9.73) mL and less than that of the combined group (79.19±10.35) mL. The number of intraoperative fluoroscopy times of the robot group was (9.49±2.25), which was comparable to that of the lateral group (7.45±2.02) but less than that of the combined group (12.24±4.25). The hospital stay of the robot group was (9.28±2.10) days, which was longer than that of the lateral group (7.95±1.91) days and shorter than that of the combined group (12.49±5.07) days. The screw placement accuracy of the robot group was 98.48%, which was higher than that of the combined group (90.55%). Postoperative and final follow-up VAS and ODI scores were significantly lower than preoperative scores in all 3 groups (all P<0.05), and there were no significant differences in preoperative VAS and ODI scores among the groups (all P>0.05). Radiologically, IDH, IFH, and CSA at the surgical segment were significantly increased postoperatively and at final follow-up compared to preoperatively and at final follow-up compared to preoperative values (all P<0.05), with no significant differences among the groups postoperatively (all P>0.05). Internal fixation remained stable during the follow-up period, and all cages achieved fusion at final follow-up. The intervertebral fusion rate of the robot-assisted group was 93.40%, which was similar to that of the combined group (95.56%) and higher than that of the lateral approach group (90.34%). The complication rate of the robot-assisted group was 6.1%, which was comparable to that of the combined group (8.9%) and lower than that of the lateral approach group (15.4%) (P<0.05). No cases of fixation loosening or breakage were observed throughout the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS
Robot-assisted single-position OLIF with lateral plate combined with posterior unilateral fixation effectively achieves indirect decompression and excellent spinal stability without the need for intraoperative repositioning. It provides high pedicle screw accuracy, reduces intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, and complication rates, offering a fully minimally invasive new treatment option for single-segment LSS.
Humans
;
Spinal Stenosis/surgery*
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Spinal Fusion/instrumentation*
;
Male
;
Female
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Middle Aged
;
Aged
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Bone Plates
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Adult
3.Guideline for prevention and treatment of common complications in older patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion (2025 edition).
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2025;63(9):771-778
With the aging of the population in China, lumbar degenerative diseases among the older patients have drawn growing attention. Lumbar fusion is an important surgical treatment for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine, which mainly achieves bony fusion between adjacent vertebrae through methods such as bone grafting and internal fixation. Due to the unique physiological and pathological characteristics of the older patients, it often leads to a higher risk of complications associated with lumbar fusion, which affects the patient's prognosis. However, there is still a lack of standards for the prevention and treatment of some common complications associated with lumbar fusion surgery in the older patients. The Chinese Medical Doctor Association Committee of Neural Restoration took the lead in establishing a guideline development group, followed the principles and methods of guideline development, and produced "Guideline for prevention and treatment of common complications in older patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion(2025 edition)", covering ten types of common complications associated with lumbar fusion in the older patients with 20 recommendations for clinical practice reference.
Humans
;
Spinal Fusion/adverse effects*
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Postoperative Complications/therapy*
;
Aged
;
Spinal Diseases/surgery*
4.Short-term effectiveness of uni-portal non-coaxial spinal endoscopic surgery via crossing midline approach in treatment of free lumbar disc herniation.
Zhongfeng LI ; Yandong LIU ; Lipeng WEN ; Bo CHEN ; Ying YANG ; Yurong WANG ; Randong PENG ; En SONG
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2025;39(1):83-87
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the short-term effectiveness of uni-portal non-coaxial spinal endoscopic surgery (UNSES) via crossing midline approach (CMA) in the treatment of free lumbar disc herniation (FLDH).
METHODS:
Between March 2024 and June 2024, 16 patients with FLDH were admitted and treated with UNSES via CMA. There were 9 males and 7 females with an average age of 55.1 years (range, 47-62 years). The disease duration was 8-30 months (mean, 15.6 months). The pathological segments was L 3, 4 in 4 cases, L 4, 5 in 5 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 7 cases. The preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.9±0.9 and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was 57.22%±4.16%. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of complications were recorded. The spinal pain and functional status were evaluated by VAS score and ODI, and effectiveness was evaluated according to the modified MacNab criteria. CT and MRI were used to evaluate the effect of nerve decompression.
RESULTS:
All 16 patients underwent operation successfully without any complications. The operation time was 63-81 minutes (mean, 71.0 minutes). The intraoperative bleeding volume was 47.3-59.0 mL (mean, 55.0 mL). The length of hospital stay after operation was 3-4 days (mean, 3.5 days). All patients were followed up 1-3 months, with 15 cases followed up for 2 months and 14 cases for 3 months. The VAS score and ODI gradually decreased over time after operation, and there were significant differences between different time points ( P<0.05). At 3 months after operation, the effectiveness was rated as excellent in 12 cases and good in 2 cases according to the modified MacNab criteria, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. CT and MRI during follow-up showed a significant increase in the diameter and cross-sectional area of the spinal canal, indicating effective decompression of the canal.
CONCLUSION
When using UNSES to treat FLDH, choosing CMA for nerve decompression has the advantages of wide decompression range, large operating space, and freedom of operation. It can maximize the preservation of the articular process, avoid fracture and breakage of the isthmus, clearly display the exiting and traversing nerve root, and achieve good short-term effectiveness.
Humans
;
Male
;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnostic imaging*
;
Middle Aged
;
Female
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Endoscopy/methods*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Operative Time
;
Pain Measurement
;
Length of Stay
5.Short-term effectiveness of anterior and middle columns repair and reconstruction with whole autogenous spinous process-laminar bone through posterior approach in thoracolumbar tuberculosis.
Hongwei CHEN ; Tao LI ; Hua CHEN ; Peng XIU
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2025;39(2):201-208
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the short-term effectiveness of the anterior and middle columns in thoracolumbar tuberculosis reconstructed with whole autogenous spinous process-laminar bone through posterior approach.
METHODS:
The retrospective study included 78 patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis who underwent posterior approach surgery and anterior and middle column bone graft reconstruction between January 2012 and May 2023. Based on the type of autogenous bone graft used, patients were divided into group A (whole autogenous spinous process-laminar bone graft, 38 cases) and group B (autogenous structural iliac bone graft, 40 cases). There was no significant difference of baseline data, such as age, gender, disease duration, involved segment of spinal tuberculosis, and preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, segmental kyphotic angle, and intervertebral height between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, hospital stays, ESR, CRP, VAS score, ODI, bone fusion time, ASIA grade for neurological status valuation, postoperative complications, change of segmental kyphotic angle, change of intervertebral height were recorded and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS:
The operation time in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and hospital stays between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients in the two groups were followed up 14-110 months (mean, 64.1 months); there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The ESR, CRP, ODI, and VAS score at each time point after operation in both groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and further improved with the extension of time, the differences were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) except that the VAS score of group A was significantly better than that of group B at 3 days after operation ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in fusion time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The neurological function of most patients improved after operation, and there was no significant difference in ASIA grade between the two groups at last follow-up ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in segmental kyphosis angle and intervertebral height between the two groups at each time point ( P>0.05), and no significant difference in segmental kyphosis angle, intervertebral height correction and loss were found between the two groups ( P>0.05). In group A, there was 1 case of incision fat liquefaction and 1 case of incision infection; in group B, there was 1 case of deep venous thrombosis, 2 cases of pleural effusion, and 10 cases of pain in bone harvesting area; in both groups, there were 2 cases of gout caused by hyperuricemia. There was a significant difference in the incidence of pain in bone harvesting area between the two groups ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications between the two groups ( P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Whole autogenous spinous process-laminar bone grafting is equivalent to structural iliac bone graft in reconstruction of the anterior and middle columns in thoracolumbar tuberculosis through posterior approach, effectively supporting the stability of the anterior and middle columns of the spine, while resulting in shorter operation time and less postoperative pain in bone harvesting area.
Humans
;
Tuberculosis, Spinal/surgery*
;
Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Bone Transplantation/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Male
;
Female
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods*
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Transplantation, Autologous
;
Operative Time
;
Ilium/transplantation*
6.Unilateral biportal endoscopy-assisted decompression strategy for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis.
Xuyang XU ; Zhiqiang ZHANG ; Zijie WANG ; Liang ZHANG ; Jun CAI ; Xinmin FENG ; Yu DING ; Yi ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2025;39(5):612-619
OBJECTIVE:
To explore decompression strategies for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis under unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) assistance.
METHODS:
A clinical data of 86 patients with lateral lumbar stenosis treated with UBE-assisted intervertebral decompression between September 2022 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 42 males and 44 females with an average age of 63.6 years (range, 45-79 years). The disease duration ranged from 6 to 14 months (mean, 8.5 months). Surgical levels included L 2, 3 in 3 cases, L 3, 4 in 26 cases, L 4, 5 in 42 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 15 cases. According to Lee's grading system, there were 21 cases of grade 1, 37 cases of grade 2, and 28 cases of grade 3 for lumbar spinal stenosis. Based on the location of stenosis and clinical symptoms, the 33 cases underwent interlaminar approach, 7 cases underwent interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, 26 cases underwent contralateral inclinatory approach, and 20 cases underwent paraspinal approach; then, the corresponding decompression procedures were performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate lower back/leg pain before operation and at 1 and 3 months after operation, while Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate spinal function. At 3 months after operation, the effectiveness was evaluated using the modified MacNab evaluation criteria. The spinal stenosis and decompression were evaluated based on Lee's grading system using lumbar MRI before operation and at 3 months after operation.
RESULTS:
All procedures were successfully completed with mean operation time of 95.1 minutes (range, 57-166 minutes). Dural tears occurred in 2 cases treated with interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 3-10 months (mean, 5.9 months). The clinical symptoms of the patients relieved to varying degrees. The VAS scores and ODI of lower back and leg pain at 1 and 3 months after operation significantly improved compared to preoperative levels ( P<0.05), and the indicators at 3 months significantly improved than that at 1 month ( P<0.05). According to the modified MacNab evaluation criteria, the effectiveness at 3 months after operation was rated as excellent in 52 cases, good in 21 cases, and poor in 13 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.9%. No lumbar instability was detected on flexion-extension X-ray films during follow-up. The Lee's grading of lateral lumbar stenosis at 2 days after operation showed significant improvement compared to preoperative grading ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
For lateral lumbar spinal stenosis, UBE-assisted decompression of the spinal canal requires the selection of interlaminar approach, interlaminar approach with auxiliary third incision, contralateral inclinatory approach, and paraspinal approach based on preoperative imaging findings and clinical symptoms to achieve better effectiveness.
Humans
;
Spinal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging*
;
Female
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Decompression, Surgical/methods*
;
Aged
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Endoscopy/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
7.Early effectiveness of posterior 180-degree decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with MSU-1 lumbar disc herniation.
Feiyu ZHAO ; Xiaoting QIU ; Jie YUAN ; Ruxing LIU ; Xinyuan WEI ; Wei ZHAO ; Yongfeng WANG
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2025;39(6):735-740
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate early effectiveness of posterior 180-degree decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) combined with Michigan State University (MSU)-1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 33 patients with LSS combined with MSU-1 LDH, who met selection criteria and were treated between March 2022 and January 2024. All patients underwent UBE-assisted 180-degree spinal canal decompression. The cohort comprised 17 males and 16 females, aged 37-82 years (mean, 67.1 years). Preoperative presentations included bilateral lower limbs intermittent claudication and radiating pain, with disease duration ranging from 5 to 13 months (mean, 8.5 months). Affected segments included L 3, 4 in 4 cases, L 4, 5 in 28 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 1 case. LSS was rated as Schizas grade A in 4 cases, grade B in 5 cases, grade C in 13 cases, and grade D in 11 cases. LDH was categorized as MSU-1A in 24 cases, MSU-1B in 2 cases, and MSU-1AB in 7 cases. Intraoperative parameters (operation time, blood loss) and postoperative hospitalization length were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to assess the lower limb pain and functional outcomes after operation. Clinical efficacy was evaluated at last follow-up via modified MacNab criteria. Quantitative radiological assessments included dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) measurements and spinal stenosis grading on lumbar MRI. Morphological classification of lumbar canal stenosis was determined according to the Schizas grading, categorized into four grades.
RESULTS:
The operation time was 60.4-90.8 minutes (mean, 80.3 minutes) and intraoperative blood loss was 13-47 mL (mean, 29.9 mL). The postoperative hospitalization length was 3-5 days (mean, 3.8 days). All patients were followed up 12-16 months (mean, 13.8 months). The VAS score and ODI improved at immediate and 3, 6, and 12 months after operation compared to before operation, and the differences between different time points were significant ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the clinical efficacy assessed by the modified MacNab criteria were graded as excellent in 23 cases, good in 9 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 96.97%. Postoperative lumbar MRI revealed the significant decompression of the dural sac in 32 cases, with 1 case showing inadequate dural expansion. DSCA measurements confirmed progressive enlargement and stenosis reduction over time. The differences were significant ( P<0.05) before operation, immediately after operation, and at 6 months after operation. At 6 months after operation, Schizas grading of spinal stenosis improved to grade A in 27 cases and grade B in 6 cases.
CONCLUSION
Posterior 180-degree decompression via UBE is a safe and feasible strategy for treating LSS combined with MSU-1 LDH, achieving effective neural decompression while preserving intervertebral disc integrity.
Humans
;
Spinal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging*
;
Male
;
Female
;
Aged
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Middle Aged
;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/complications*
;
Decompression, Surgical/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Endoscopy/methods*
;
Adult
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Treatment Outcome
8.Clinical study of percutaneous short-segment injured vertebra pedicle screw fixation combined with bone grafting in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.
Long JIA ; Xiangqian LI ; Yadong QIAN ; Mingji CHEN
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2025;39(10):1310-1317
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous short-segment injured vertebra pedicle screw fixation combined with bone grafting versus percutaneous short-segment injured vertebra pedicle screw fixation alone for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.
METHODS:
The clinical data of 54 patients with single-level thoracolumbar fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2023 and February 2024 were retrospectively analysed. Based on whether bone grafting was performed on the injured vertebra, the patients were divided into a control group (28 cases, percutaneous short-segment injured vertebra pedicle screw fixation alone) and a study group (26 cases, percutaneous short-segment injured vertebra pedicle screw fixation combined with bone grafting using a self-made minimally invasive bone grafting funnel). No significant difference was observed between the two groups ( P>0.05) in baseline data, including age, gender, surgical segment, cause of injury, AO classification, and preoperative anterior-vertebral height compression ratio, mid-vertebral height compression ratio, Cobb angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing status, removal time of internal fixator, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Effectiveness was assessed using anterior-vertebral height compression ratio, mid-vertebral height compression ratio, Cobb angle, VAS scores, and ODI taken preoperatively, at 1 week postoperatively, and at last follow-up.
RESULTS:
All patients in both groups successfully underwent surgery. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the control group were significantly less than those in the study group ( P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the follow-up time between the study group [(14.46±2.00) months] and control group [(14.36±1.83) months] ( P>0.05). The fracture healing time of the study group was significantly shorter than that of the control group ( P<0.05). One patient in the study group was found to have bilateral titanium rod breakage by X-ray reexamination at 8 months after operation, and there was no subsequent vertebral height collapse occurred, and the internal fixator was removed following complete fracture healing. The other patients had no complication such as spinal cord injury, internal fixator loosening and breakage. There was no significant difference in the removal time of internal fixator between the two groups ( P<0.05). The anterior-vertebral height compression ratio, mid-vertebral height compression ratio, Cobb angle, VAS score, and ODI significantly improved in both groups at 1 week after operation and at last follow-up ( P<0.05). Among them, the VAS score, and ODI further improved at last follow-up when compared with at 1 week after operation, Cobb angle lost a little at 1 week after operation, while anterior-vertebral height compression ratio and mid-vertebral height compression ratio slightly increased when compared with 1 week after operation, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in Cobb angle at last follow-up, VAS score and ODI at 1 week after operation ( P>0.05), while the other indicators in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group at all time points ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Compared to percutaneous short-segment injured vertebra pedicle screw fixation alone, the technique combined with intravertebral bone grafting can shorten fracture healing time, effectively restore and maintain vertebral body height, correct kyphotic deformity, and improve clinical outcomes for patients with thoracolumbar fractures.
Humans
;
Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Pedicle Screws
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Spinal Fractures/surgery*
;
Bone Transplantation/methods*
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation*
;
Male
;
Female
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Operative Time
;
Aged
9.Comparison of side-opening and front-opening approach bone cement injectors in percutaneous kyphoplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Wei-Xin DONG ; Zhen-Tao CHU ; Yong HU ; Ou-Jie LAI ; Zhen-Shan YUAN ; Xiao-Yang SUN
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2025;38(2):128-133
OBJECTIVE:
To compare clinical efficacy between side-opening and front-opening bone cement injectors in percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP) for the management of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs).
METHODS:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comprising 62 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar OVCFs (T11-L2), who underwent bilateral PKP at our department during the period from June 2020 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the specific bone cement injector employed during the surgical procedure: the side-opening group (n=29) and the front-opening group (n=33). Among them, the side-opening group consisted of 6 male and 23 female patients, with a mean age of (73.32±9.11) years. The front-opening group included 7 male and 26 female patients, with a mean age of (71.29±10.39) years. The variables encompassed essential patient characteristics were recorded, such as gender, age, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture level (T11-L2), as well as procedural aspects, including operation duration, cement injection volume, cement distribution type (lobular or diffuse), occurrence of cement leakage, pre-and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and vertebral compression ratio.
RESULTS:
All patients underwent successful surgery, with a mean follow-up duration of (15.37±3.03) months. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, BMD, fracture level, preoperative vertebral compression degree, and VAS scores between the side-opening group and the front-opening group (P>0.05). The operation time, the mean cement injection volumes, the distribution of bone cement within the vertebrae has no statistically significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). Both the side-opening and front-opening groups showed significant improvements in VAS scores at 3 days and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at both 3 days and 6 months after the operation (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Side-opening bone cement injectors in bilateral PKP surgery for single-segment thoracolumbar OVCF achieve similar clinical efficacy as front-opening injectors, without significant improvement in cement distribution and containment.
Humans
;
Female
;
Male
;
Kyphoplasty/instrumentation*
;
Aged
;
Bone Cements
;
Fractures, Compression/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spinal Fractures/surgery*
;
Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries*
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries*
;
Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery*
;
Middle Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
10.Comparison of the efficacy of unilateral nailing combined with bone cement reinforcement and bilateral nailing in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures.
Yu-Liang LOU ; Guo-Ying CHEN ; Can-Feng WANG ; Hui FEI ; Guan-Rong SUN ; Ren-Fu QUAN ; Wei LI ; Feng HONG
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2025;38(2):134-149
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw combined with unilateral nail placement combined with bone cement strengthening and bilateral nail placement in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar fractures.
METHODS:
A retrospective case-control study was used to analyze the clinical data of 78 patients with osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar fractures admitted from October 2017 to May 2019. According to the surgical method, it was divided into percutaneous pedicle screw combined with unilateral nail placement combined with unilateral bone cement strengthening group(bone cement group) and percutaneous pedicle screw combined with bilateral nail placement(screw group). In the bone cement group, 40 patients included 16 males and 24 females, with a mean age of (62.1±8.1) years old. In the screw group, 38 patients included 18 males and 20 females with a mean age of (65.1±9.3) years old. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications were compared between two groups. The kyphosis Cobb angle, anterior edge height ratio, central height ratio and pain visual analogue score(VAS) were compared.
RESULTS:
All patients were followed up for 25 to 36 months. The operation time (70.1±17.3) min of the cement group was shorter than that of the screw group (78.6±18.2) min(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay(P>0.05). The VAS in the cement group 1 year 1.5±0.5 and the latest follow-up 0.5±0.3 after operation were lower than 1 year 1.8±0.3 and the latest follow-up 0.8±0.4 in the screw group(P<0.05). The kyphosis Cobb angle, anterior edge height ratio, central height ratio in bone cement group, 1 year (6.2±1.2)°, (86.6±3.5)%, (91.1±2.5)%, the last follow-up (6.4±0.7)°, (85.5±3.3)%, (90.5±6.3)% were better than that of the screw group 1 year (6.8±1.4)°, (83.1±2.4)%, (89.9±3.4)% and the latest follow-up (7.1±1.1)°, (82.6±4.1)%, (87.6±5.9)%(P<0.05). There were 3 cases of bone cement leakage in the cement group, all of which had no clinical symptoms;and 2 cases of pedicle screws were extracted in the screw group, and the screws were removed at the last follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Percutaneous pedicle screw combined with unilateral nail placement combined with bone cement strengthening and bilateral nail placement in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar compression fractures in the elderly can achieve satisfactory efficacy and effectively relieve the pain of patients, but the former internal fixation system is more stable, and the long-term follow-up can effectively maintain the height of the anterior middle column and the correction of kyphosis deformity, and the incidence of chronic low back pain is lower.
Humans
;
Male
;
Female
;
Aged
;
Bone Cements
;
Middle Aged
;
Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spinal Fractures/surgery*
;
Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery*
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Bone Nails
;
Pedicle Screws

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail