Major depressive disorder with mixed features is a common, complex, and challenging-to-treat subtype of depression that poses significant difficulties for clinicians in practice. This review synthesizes the latest research, international guidelines, and expert consensus to provide clinical treatment references for managing patients with major depressive disorder with mixed features.

Major depressive disorder with mixed features is a common, complex, and challenging-to-treat subtype of depression that poses significant difficulties for clinicians in practice. This review synthesizes the latest research, international guidelines, and expert consensus to provide clinical treatment references for managing patients with major depressive disorder with mixed features.

Objective:To describe functional disability rate of anxiety disorders in Chinese community adults and explore related risk factors of functional disability.Methods:To conduct in-depth data analysis on China Mental Health Survey(CMHS).The diagnostic tool for anxiety disorders was the Composite International Diagnostic Inter-view-3.0,according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders,Fourth Edition(DSM-Ⅳ).The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule,2nd edition,was the functional disability assessment standard for anxiety disorders.Weighted 12-month functional disability rate of DSM-Ⅳ anxiety disorder with co-morbidities and only anxiety disorder in population and those in patients,as well as days of partial disability were calculated.The effects of anxiety disorders comorbid other mental disorders and physical diseases and demographic factors on the severity and occurrence of functional disability were analyzed by multiple linear regression and logis-tic regression.Results:The functional disability rate of anxiety disorder with comorbidities in population was 1.7％,and 42.2％in patients,in which constituent rate of grade-four disability was the highest as 84.1％.The functional disability rate of only anxiety disorder in population was 0.3％,and 17.8％in patients.The medians of days of partial disability days in the past 30 days were from 0 to 14.42.Multiple linear regression showed a positive association between comorbid anxiety disorder with other mental disorders and physical diseases(β=0.24),comor-bid other mental disorders and physical diseases(β=0.21),physical diseases(β=0.18),comorbid anxiety disor-der and physical diseases(β=0.15),comorbid anxiety disorder with other mental disorders(β=0.08),other men-tal disorders(β=0.07),only anxiety disorder(β=0.06),lower education level(β=0.12),lower economic status(β=0.08),older age(β=0.06),non-marital status(β=0.06),male(β=0.02)and the severity of functional dis-ability.Logistic regression showed that comorbid anxiety with other mental disorders and physical diseases(OR=64.07),comorbid anxiety disorders with other mental disorders(OR=36.75),comorbid other mental disorders with physical diseases(OR=20.60),comorbid anxiety with physical diseases(OR=18.88),anxiety disorder(OR=9.20),other mental disorders(OR=6.65),physical diseases(OR=4.00),65 years old and over(OR=4.40),50 to 64 years old(OR=2.33),low economic status(OR=2.10),illiterate and below primary school educational level(OR=1.89),middle economic status(OR=1.70),elementary school educational level(OR=1.59),non-marital status(OR=1.47),male(OR=1.16)were the risk factors of the occurrence of functional disability.Conclusion:Comorbidity of anxiety disorders and other mental disorders,and physical diseases increases severity and occurrence of functional disability.Comorbidity,male,gender,older age,lower economic and educa-tional level and non-marital are risk factors of anxiety disorder functional disability.

Objective:To describe disability rates of dementia in community residents aged 65 years and over in China,and explore related risk factors of disability.Methods:This study conducted an in-depth data analysis of the China Mental Health Survey.World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)was used to assess dementia disability,Community Screening Interview for Dementia(CSID)and Geriatric Mental Status Examination(GMS)were used for dementia screening and diagnosing.Univariate analysis was used to calcu-late the weighted disability rates of dementia in population and in patients,and their population distribution.Multiple linear regression and logistic regression were used to analyze the risk factors of the occurrence of dementia disability and its severity.Results:The weighted disability rate of dementia was 2.1％in population,and 38.6％in pa-tients.The disability rates of comorbid dementia in population and in patients were higher than those of patients with only dementia.Female,older age,lower education level,lower economic status,and lower cognitive test scores in CSID had higher disability rates of dementia in population.Female and urban resident had higher disability rates of dementia in patients.Multiple linear regression showed economic status(β=0.11),gender(β=0.11),age(β=0.10),and treatment in the last 12 months(β=-0.20)were statistically associated with WHODAS 2.0 scores.Multiple logistic regression showed female(OR=2.81)and treatment in the last 12 months(OR=2.38)were statistically associated with disability.Conclusions:Persons with low economic status,female and elderly peo-ple are the high-risk groups for dementia disability.It should be paid attention to prevent dementia and its conse-quential disabilities.

For mental disorders, identifying biomarkers with high specificity, sensitivity, and validity is an essential way to overcome systemic limitations of the diagnostic system based on clinical phenomenology and achieve precise treatment. In a nutshell, we pinpoint the primary reasons for the current delays in biomarker research for mental disorders and the main confusion and propose strategies to address the existing challenges. Integrating innovative approaches, new methods, and novel technologies will bolster the progress in this domain.

For mental disorders, identifying biomarkers with high specificity, sensitivity, and validity is an essential way to overcome systemic limitations of the diagnostic system based on clinical phenomenology and achieve precise treatment. In a nutshell, we pinpoint the primary reasons for the current delays in biomarker research for mental disorders and the main confusion and propose strategies to address the existing challenges. Integrating innovative approaches, new methods, and novel technologies will bolster the progress in this domain.

OBJECTIVES: Shelter hospital was an alternative way to provide large-scale medical isolation and treatment for people with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to various reasons, patients admitted to the large shelter hospital was reported high level of psychological distress, so did the healthcare workers. This study aims to introduce a comprehensive and multifaceted psychosocial crisis intervention model. METHODS: The psychosocial crisis intervention model was provided to 200 patients and 240 healthcare workers in Wuhan Wuchang shelter hospital. Patient volunteers and organized peer support, client-centered culturally sensitive supportive care, timely delivery of scientific information about COVID-19 and its complications, mental health knowledge acquisition of non-psychiatric healthcare workers, group activities, counseling and education, virtualization of psychological intervention, consultation and liaison were exhibited respectively in the model. Pre-service survey was done in 38 patients and 49 healthcare workers using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item (PHQ-2) scale, and the Primary Care PTSD screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (PC-PTSD-5). Forty-eight healthcare workers gave feedback after the intervention. RESULTS: The psychosocial crisis intervention model was successfully implemented by 10 mental health professionals and was well-accepted by both patients and healthcare workers in the shelter hospital. In pre-service survey, 15.8% of 38 patients were with anxiety, 55.3% were with stress, and 15.8% were with depression; 16.3% of 49 healthcare workers were with anxiety, 26.5% were with stress, and 22.4% were with depression. In post-service survey, 62.5% of 48 healthcare workers thought it was very practical, 37.5% thought more practical; 37.5% of them thought it was very helpful to relief anxiety and insomnia, and 27.1% thought much helpful; 37.5% of them thought it was very helpful to recognize patients with anxiety and insomnia, and 29.2% thought much helpful; 35.4% of them thought it was very helpful to deal with patients' anxiety and insomnia, and 37.5% thought much helpful. CONCLUSIONS Psychological crisis intervention is feasible, acceptable, and associated with positive outcomes. Future tastings of this model in larger population and different settings are warranted.
Humans ; COVID-19 ; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders ; Crisis Intervention ; Psychosocial Intervention ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Mental Health ; Depression/epidemiology* ; Health Personnel/psychology* ; Anxiety/etiology*

Aiming to improve the standardized screening, diagnosis, and treatment of depressive disorders in China, promote the standardization of clinical practice, and enhance the prevention and intervention of depressive disorders in China, the Chinese Society of Psychiatry of the Chinese Medical Association, and the National Center for Mental Disorders & the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders(affiliated with The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University)have jointly initiated the Chinese Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Depressive Disorders: 2024 Edition. The Peking University Center for Evidence-Based Medical and Clinical Research will provide methodological support. The Guidelines Development Committee will follow international standards for developing and reporting guidelines, build a multidisciplinary team of experts, and adopt the GRADE method to develop an evidence-based guideline for the prevention and management of depressive disorders in China. This proposal introduces the significance and purpose of developing a new edition of the guideline, the methods of evidence retrieval and quality evaluation, the process of guideline development, and the plan for publication, implementation, and dissemination of the guideline.

To standardize clinical treatment decisions and improve the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder in China, the Psychiatric Branch of the Chinese Medical Association initiated the Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Bipolar disorder in China (2025 edition). This protocol summary describes the background and purpose of the guideline, the formulation method, working group members, division of responsibilities, guideline registration, conflicts of interest, collection and selection of clinical issues, the evidence-based foundation of the guideline, writing and external review, as well as publishing, dissemination, and other aspects.

Aiming to improve the standardized screening, diagnosis, and treatment of depressive disorders in China, promote the standardization of clinical practice, and enhance the prevention and intervention of depressive disorders in China, the Chinese Society of Psychiatry of the Chinese Medical Association, and the National Center for Mental Disorders & the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders(affiliated with The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University)have jointly initiated the Chinese Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Depressive Disorders: 2024 Edition. The Peking University Center for Evidence-Based Medical and Clinical Research will provide methodological support. The Guidelines Development Committee will follow international standards for developing and reporting guidelines, build a multidisciplinary team of experts, and adopt the GRADE method to develop an evidence-based guideline for the prevention and management of depressive disorders in China. This proposal introduces the significance and purpose of developing a new edition of the guideline, the methods of evidence retrieval and quality evaluation, the process of guideline development, and the plan for publication, implementation, and dissemination of the guideline.