Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including hypertensive disorders, caesarean delivery, macrosomia, and increased lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes. Despite its clinical importance, considerable international variation exists in GDM screening and diagnostic criteria. Multiple frameworks are currently used, including those from the World Health Organization (WHO), International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups, Carpenter and Coustan, and the National Diabetes Data Group. Differences in glucose thresholds, testing protocols (one-step versus two-step), and universal versus risk-based screening contribute to heterogeneity in reported prevalence and healthcare burden. In multi-ethnic, middle-income settings such as Malaysia, identifying an evidence-informed and contextappropriate diagnostic approach is critical. Methodology: This scoping review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect will be searched for English-language studies, reviews, guidelines, and consensus statements reporting GDM diagnostic criteria. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies. Results: Data will be charted on country, study type, diagnostic criteria, gestational age at screening, and reported challenges. Findings will be synthesized descriptively and presented in tables and figures. No formal risk-of-bias assessment will be conducted. Conclusion This review will provide a comprehensive overview of global diagnostic practices, highlight variations and gaps, and support evidence-based selection of a suitable GDM screening and diagnostic strategy for Malaysia.
Diabetes, Gestational ; Malaysia ; Policy ; Review Literature as Topic

BACKGROUND

The relationship between pandemics and climate change has emerged as a critical area of study, particularly underscored by the COVID-19 pandemic, which exposed vulnerabilities in global health systems and environmental governance. Although direct evidence linking climate change to the spread of COVID-19 remains limited, rising global temperatures and ecosystem disruptions have intensified human–wildlife interactions, increasing the risk of zoonotic disease emergence.

This study aims to synthesize existing research on the interconnections between climate change and emerging infectious diseases, identify key knowledge gaps, and provide insights to guide integrated health and environmental policy development.

A systematic literature review was conducted using peer-reviewed articles published within the past two decades. Relevant studies were identified through scientific databases, focusing on evidence linking climate variability, ecosystem shifts, and zoonotic transmission dynamics.

Findings indicate that climate-induced changes—such as rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and habitat disruption—affect vector ecology and wildlife migration, facilitating conditions for pathogen spillover. However, existing research remains fragmented, with limited longitudinal analyses and region-specific data to quantify these associations.

The interconnectedness of human health, environmental health, and biodiversity underscores the need for a holistic One Health approach. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration and integrating climate resilience into public health strategies are vital to addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by climate change and emerging pandemics.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Stigma remains a profound barrier to public health, particularly in managing diseases such as Hepatitis B, which is highly prevalent in hyperendemic regions like the Philippines. The social stigma associated with such health conditions can severely limit access to care and hinder adherence to treatment, exacerbating the overall disease burden. Despite the critical impact of stigma on health outcomes, there is a notable gap in the systematic evaluation of the tools used to measure stigma related to health conditions like Hepatitis B. This study aims to fill this gap by reviewing existing instruments for their methodologies, reliability, and validity to inform the development of a refined tool tailored to the Philippine context.

A systematic search was conducted across six databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Open Grey, DissOnline, Philippine Health Research Registry (PHRR), and Health Research and Development Information Network (HERDIN), following PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy focused on identifying quantitative and mixed-methods studies using questionnaires to measure HBV-related stigma and discrimination. Studies published between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2023, were considered. The selection process involved screening for duplicates, reviewing titles and abstracts, and performing a full-text review based on predetermined eligibility criteria.

The initial search yielded 1,198 articles, with 24 duplicates removed. After title and abstract screening, 28 articles were considered for full-text review, resulting in 17 relevant articles in the final analysis with 15 unique instrumentations. The majority of studies employed cross-sectional designs (n=8), with a significant concentration in Asian countries (n=11), indicating a regional focus in HBV stigma research. The review identified a range of questionnaire methodologies, but most studies lacked specificity regarding the type of stigma measured. The Likert Scale was the most commonly used measurement tool, yet few studies provided cut-off values for stigma levels. Validity and reliability testing was reported in 12 articles, including pilot studies, Cronbach’s alpha, and factor analysis.

The lack of a universal methodology and specificity in existing instruments underscores the importance of developing a refined tool that can accurately capture the nuances of stigma and discrimination associated with HBV. The urgent need for standardized, reliable, and culturally sensitive questionnaires is evident, underscoring their importance in developing effective public health strategies and improving treatment outcomes for individuals living with HBV, especially in the Philippines.

There are inconsistencies in treatment outcomes, measurement instruments, and criteria for assessing clinical effectiveness in studies related to distal radius fractures (DRF), resulting in potential biases and failing to provide high-quality clinical evidence. To address these challenges, international researchers have reached a consensus on developing the core outcome indicator set for distal radius fractures(COS-DRF). However, it's important to note that the existing COS-DRF framework could not reflect the unique characteristics of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) treatment. Currently, there are no established standards for treatment outcomes and measurement instruments specific to TCM clinical research, nor has a COS-DRF been established for TCM clinical studies in China. In light of these gaps, our research team aims to construct a core set of treatment outcomes for TCM clinical research on distal radius fractures. This involves compiling a comprehensive list of treatment outcomes and measurement instruments, initially derived from a thorough literature review and expert consensus, which will then undergo further refinement and updates based on real-world clinical experiences, incorporating feedback from 2 to 3 rounds of expert consensus or Delphi questionnaire surveys. Our goal is to establish a COS-DRF or CMS-DRF that aligns with the principles and practices of TCM, and provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice.
Humans ; China ; Consensus ; East Asian People ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Wrist Fractures/therapy* ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Review Literature as Topic ; Fracture Fixation/standards*

Scoping reviews are a useful approach to synthesizing research evidence although the objectives and methods are different to that of systematic reviews, yet some confusion persists around how to plan and prepare so that a completed scoping review complies with best practice in methods and meets international standards for reporting criteria. This paper describes how to use available guidance to ensure a scoping review project meets global standards, has transparency of methods and promotes readability though the use of innovative approaches to data analysis and presentation. We address some of the common issues such as which projects are more suited to systematic reviews, how to avoid an inadequate search and/or poorly reported search strategy, poorly described methods and lack of transparency, and the issue of how to plan and present results that are clear, visually compelling and accessible to readers. Effective pre-planning, adhering to protocol and detailed consideration of how the results data will be communicated to the readership are critical. The aim of this article is to provide clarity about what is meant by conceptual clarity and how pre-planning enables review authors to produce scoping reviews which are of high quality, reliability and readily publishable.
Comprehension ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Methods ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Review Literature as Topic ; Statistics as Topic

The paper aims to provide a state-of-the-art review of methods for evaluating the effectiveness and effect of unloader knee braces on the knee joint and discuss their limitations and future directions. Unloader braces are prescribed as a non-pharmacological conservative treatment option for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis to provide relief in terms of pain reduction, returning to regular physical activities, and enhancing the quality of life. Methods used to evaluate and monitor the effectiveness of these devices on patients' health are categorized into three broad categories (perception-, biochemical-, and morphology-based), depending upon the process and tools used. The main focus of these methods is on the short-term clinical outcome (pain or unloading efficiency). There is a significant technical, research, and clinical literature gap in understanding the short- and long-term consequences of these braces on the tissues in the knee joint, including the cartilage and ligaments. Future research directions may complement existing methods with advanced quantitative imaging (morphological, biochemical, and molecular) and numerical simulation are discussed as they offer potential in assessing long-term and post-bracing effects on the knee joint.
Braces ; Cartilage ; Complement System Proteins ; Humans ; Joints ; Knee Joint ; Knee ; Ligaments ; Methods ; Motor Activity ; Osteoarthritis, Knee ; Quality of Life ; Review Literature as Topic

Hyperammonemia syndrome (HS) is a comparatively rare but often fatal clinical syndrome characterized by progressive respiratory alkalosis and abrupt mental status alteration associated with markedly elevated plasma ammonium levels. Although the exact mechanism of HS remains unclear, infection with urease producing microbes is proposed as the main etiology of HS recently. A patient with HS after repeated autologous skin transplantation was admitted to Tianjin First Center Hospital in March 2018, presented with fever, coma and epilepsy. The infection of Mycoplasma hominis was confirmed in blood sample by high throughput gene detection. The patient was survived after multimodal management including antimicrobial treatment, aggressive ammonia removal by continuous renal replacement therapy in combination with lactulose, and mechanical ventilation. She was successfully discharged from intensive care unit (ICU) with clear consciousness, normal temperature and smooth breath. In view of the experience of the case treatment, a review of literature was conducted to discuss the epidemiology and clinical characteristics, possible etiologies and mechanisms, and outcomes with emphasis on treatment strategies of HS and to promote more clinicians to recognize this rare disease.
Female ; Humans ; Hyperammonemia/therapy* ; Intensive Care Units ; Review Literature as Topic ; Skin Transplantation/adverse effects* ; Treatment Outcome

Varicocele is the dilatation of the scrotal portion of pampiniform plexus and the internal spermatic venous system. About 15% of men suffer from scrotal varicocele and 2% to 10% of them complain of pain. The probable mechanisms for pain include compression of the surrounding neural fibers by the dilated venous complex, elevated testicular temperature, increased venous pressure, hypoxia, oxidative stress, hormonal imbalances, and the reflux of toxic metabolites of adrenal or renal origin. Testicular pain associated with varicoceles is typically described as a dull, aching, or throbbing pain in the testicle, scrotum, or groin; rarely, it can be acute, sharp, or stabbing. The management of testicular pain associated with varicocele starts with a conservative, non-surgical approach and a period of observation. Varicocelectomy in carefully selected candidates with clinically palpable varicocele resolves nearly 80% of all cases of testicular pain. Microsurgical techniques for varicocelectomy have gained popularity with minimal complication rates and favorable outcomes. The grade of varicocele, the nature and duration of pain, body mass index, prior conservative management, and the type of surgical method used, are predictors for the success of varicocelectomy.
Anoxia ; Body Mass Index ; Dilatation ; Groin ; Humans ; Male ; Methods ; Oxidative Stress ; Review Literature as Topic ; Scrotum ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Testis ; Varicocele* ; Venous Pressure

PURPOSE: Even though advanced heart failure (HF) severely affects the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), there is little information regarding this issue. This review is aimed to describe the relevant clinical characteristics of patient with advanced HF and identify factors influencing HRQoL in these patients. METHODS: Empirical articles were searched from electronic databases issued from January 2000 to June 2018 with using the key terms ‘heart failure’ and ‘quality of life’. There were a total of 22 articles that met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for this study. RESULTS: First, nine studies among 22 studies clearly stated that their participants were samples of patients with advanced HF. Most reviewed studies showed the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class as the criteria for identifying advanced HF. Second, the level of HRQoL varied depending on the measurement tools utilized by the researchers. Third, the NYHA class, gender, and symptoms were mainly associated with HRQoL in patients with advanced HF. Also, nurse- or physician-led intervention, exercise, spiritual-focused intervention, and palliative care improved the HRQoL of the patients with advanced HF. CONCLUSION: This study found that the clear application of criteria for advanced HF and the development of advanced HF-specific HRQoL measurement was needed. Prospective studies should be considered for identifying differences in the levels and factors influencing HRQoL in patients with early stage or advanced HF to design patient-centered care.
Heart Failure ; Heart ; Humans ; Palliative Care ; Patient-Centered Care ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Review Literature as Topic

The burgeoning wealth of available scientific information – aided in part by (a) expansion in the definition of “literature”, (b) dramatic increase in the scientific output available for the scientific community's perusal, and (c) ease of access afforded by various databases and search engines – poses several challenges to researchers and to the credibility of their research findings. One method to discourage reference to “fraudulent, incomplete, or obsolete data” in the literature is citations searching. This paper presented a short overview of citations searching, its advantages and disadvantages, as well as its implications for stakeholders in the academic community.
Information Storage and Retrieval ; Research Design ; Review Literature as Topic