[摘 要] 目的：探究西贝素通过调控Cyclin D1介导的CDK4/6-Rb-E2F1信号轴对人胃腺癌细胞（AGS）的增殖抑制效果及其分子机制。方法：利用不同浓度的西贝素处理AGS和人正常胃黏膜上皮细胞（GES-1），通过CCK-8检测和结晶紫染色实验确定西贝素的最适抑制剂量和作用时间；采用划痕实验和Transwell迁移实验与侵袭实验检测西贝素对AGS细胞迁移与侵袭能力的影响；利用流式细胞术和WB检测西贝素对AGS细胞周期及细胞周期相关蛋白表达的影响；利用质粒过表达Cyclin D1，并通过WB检测、结晶紫染色实验、划痕实验和Transwell迁移实验与侵袭实验进一步明确西贝素的抑制机制；构建AGS移植瘤裸鼠模型，采用免疫荧光染色法和免疫组化检测Cyclin D1、CDK4、CDK6、Rb、p-Rb、E2F1的表达水平。结果：与对照组相比，西贝素药物浓度为100 μg/mL时，对GES-1细胞的增殖无影响（P > 0.05），但能够显著性抑制AGS细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭能力（P < 0.01），并诱导AGS细胞周期G0/G1期阻滞，显著抑制周期相关蛋白Cyclin D1、CDK4、CDK6、p-Rb、E2F1的表达水平（P < 0.05或P < 0.01）；Cyclin D1过表达能够显著降低西贝素对AGS细胞的抑制效果（P < 0.05或P < 0.01）；荷瘤裸鼠实验结果显示，西贝素能够抑制AGS移植瘤的增殖，影响肿瘤组织中Cyclin D1、CDK4、CDK6、p-Rb、E2F1的表达（P < 0.01）。结论：西贝素可能通过下调Cyclin D1介导的CDK4/6-Rb-E2F1信号轴活化抑制AGS增殖。

[摘 要] 目的：探讨贝母素乙对结肠癌HCT116细胞增殖的抑制作用及其分子机制。方法：利用不同浓度的贝母素乙处理人结肠癌细胞HCT116和正常结肠上皮细胞CCD841 CON，通过CCK-8法和结晶紫染色法检测贝母素乙对HCT116和CCD841 CON细胞增殖活力的影响，流式细胞术和WB法检测贝母素乙对HCT116细胞周期及其细胞周期相关蛋白表达的影响。构建HCT116移植瘤裸鼠模型和AOM/DSS结肠癌小鼠模型，观察贝母素乙对小鼠模型肿瘤生长和OS的影响，免疫组化法和WB法检测对移植瘤或肿瘤组织中细胞周期相关蛋白CDK4、CDK6和cyclin D1表达的影响。结果：贝母素乙可显著抑制结肠癌HCT116细胞的增殖能力（P<0.01），诱导HCT116细胞周期G0/G1期阻滞（P<0.01），降低CDK4、CDK6和cyclin D1的蛋白表达水平（均P<0.01）。荷瘤小鼠实验结果显示，贝母素乙（0.75 mg/kg）显著抑制HCT116细胞移植瘤的生长并延长荷瘤裸鼠的OS（P<0.05或P<0.01），降低AOM/DSS模型小鼠的体质量、延长OS、减少癌变肠组织的肿瘤个数和肿瘤体积，下调肿瘤组织中CDK4、CDK6和cyclin D1的蛋白表达（P<0.01或P<0.05）。结论：贝母素乙通过下调CDK4、CDK6和cyclin D1的表达水平，引起细胞周期G0/G1期阻滞，从而抑制结肠癌HCT116细胞的增殖。

Objective: To explore the difference in the proliferation inhibition of doxorubicin and dual specific oncolytic adenoviruses (Ad-VT, Ad-T, Ad-VP3 and d-Mock) on breast cancer cells and normal mammary cells. Methods: The proliferation inhibition rates of doxorubicin and recombinant adenovirus(Ad-VT, Ad-T, Ad-VP3and Mock) on breast cancer cells were detected through WST-1 experiment, and the effects of two drugs on the inhibitory rates of normal mammary epithelial cells were also detected. Moreover, the apoptosis rates of doxorubicin and oncolytic adenoviruses on breast cancer cells and normal mammary epithelial cells were evaluated by Annexin V flow cytometry, Hoechst and JC-1 staining, and the difference in the apoptosis rates were also compared. Results: All the recombinant adenovirus could effectively suppress the proliferation of breast cancer cells (P<0.05 or P<0.01), the inhibition effects followed the order ofAd-VT>Ad-T>Ad-VP3>Ad-MOCK, and the inhibition effect was positively correlated with time. Doxorubicin could also effectively suppress the proliferation of breast cancer cells (P<0.05 or P<0.01), and the inhibition effect was markedly enhanced with the increases in does and time. However, doxorubicin also showed strong inhibition effect on the normal mammary epithelial cells, and the inhibition rate achieved 80% under 72 h and 5 ug/ml doxorubicin, while that of oncolytic adenovirus Ad-VT on MCF-10A was 20% at 72 h. The apoptosis effects of oncolytic adenoviruses-induced breast cancer cellwere increased with time, and the apoptosis rate efficiency followed the order of Ad-VT>Ad-T>Ad-VP3>Ad-MOCK, but they displayed low ability to induce normal mammary cell apoptosis. The apoptosis effects of doxorubicin-induced breast cancer cell were similar to that of the normal mammary epithelial cell (P <0.05 or P<0.01), which followed the dose of 0.05<0.5<5 μg/ml. Conclusion: Dual specific oncolytic adenoviruses can effectively suppress the proliferation of breast cancer cells, but they have low inhibition on normal mammary cells, which have displayed superior safety and provide a new method for the biotherapy of tumor.