OBJECTIVE To establish the precise management model for the centralized preparation of cytotoxic drugs in pharmacy intravenous admixture services （PIVAS）， and evaluate the effects of its application. METHODS Pharmacists in PIVAS established the precise management model by soliciting clinical opinions and consulting literature on the centralized preparation of cytotoxic drugs and continuously refining every step of the preparation of cytotoxic drugs， based on data feedback from the information closed-loop management system and the limit of stability time of finished solutions. The indicators such as the preparation time， delivery time， the storage time of finished infusion solutions after preparation， and the completion rate of infusion within the stability time limit were analyzed before the implementation （January to December 2023） and after the implementation （January to December 2024） of this model， to evaluate its application effectiveness. RESULTS The overall framework for the precise management model included upgrading the functions of the prescription review system， improving the prescription review database， providing specialized training for PIVAS pharmacists， managing dynamic batch decision for drug preparation， managing special drugs， managing finished infusion distribution， and establishing a continuous improvement mechanism. Compared with before implementation， the average preparation time of the second and third batches of cytotoxic drugs with more concentrated morning preparation tasks in this model was significantly shorter than before implementation （P＜0.05）； the delivery time of finished infusion after implementation （[ 11.49±2.92） min] was significantly shorter than the delivery time before implementation （[ 22.11±5.03） min] （P＜0.001）； the storage time of some drugs with shorter stable time limit and carboplatin in combination regimens （paclitaxel or docetaxel+carboplatin） was significantly shortened compared to before implementation （P＜0.05）， and the completion rate of infusion within the stability time limit was significantly improved compared to before implementation （P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS Our hospital has successfully established a precise management model for the centralized preparation of cytotoxic drugs in PIVAS. This mode can significantly shorten the preparation time of each batch of PIVAS in the morning， make batch decisions more reasonable and improve the infusion completion rate within the stable time limit of the finished product.

Objective: The use and effect of nitrous oxide sedation techniques in oral clinics were analyzed retrospectively. Methods: Patients who were treated with nitrous oxide inhalation sedation in the clinic of the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2018, were examined. Age and gender of the patients, dental treatments involved, reasons for nitrous oxide inhalation, sedative effects and adverse reactions were compiled. Results : A total of 1 429 cases were examined, comprising 587 males and 842 females, and the average age was 32.64±16.34 years old. Among the patients who underwent nitrous oxide inhalation sedation in the oral clinic, 79.98% needed tooth extraction, and 79.50% had a dental fear of procedures. The patients were divided into following 7 age groups: 5-15 years old, 16-25 years old, 26-35 years old, 36-45 years old, 46-55 years old, 56-65 years old and > 65 years old. The sedation satisfaction rate of the 5-15-year-old group was 45.71%, and the sedation satisfaction rate of the other 6 age groups was 90.83%- 96.20% (P < 0.001). The incidence of total adverse reactions was 5.39%; the incidence was higher in females than in males, and the incidence was higher in the 16-25 age group than in the other age groups (P < 0.05). The most frequent adverse reaction was vertigo (81.82%). Conclusion Among the four common oral outpatient treatment programs including the extraction of teeth, dental implants, pulp treatment and periodontal treatment, patients undergoing inhalation sedation of nitrous oxide in the dental extraction most. The most common reason for requiring sedation is dental fear, and the sedative effect of the 5-15-year-old group was significantly worse than that of the other age groups. The incidence of adverse reactions of nitrous oxide sedation was low and manageable.