Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD)has become the most prevalent chronic liver disease worldwide,and China is facing a severe challenge of rapidly increasing MASLD burden.Beverages,as an important modifiable factor,have become a research focus for primary prevention and lifestyle management of MASLD.This article reviews beverage consumption trends,provides an in-depth analysis of the mechanisms and health effects of sugar-sweetened beverages,alcoholic drinks,coffee,and tea on MASLD,summarizes their potential pathogenic and protective pathways,and explores comprehensive strategies including beverage intervention,lifestyle coordination,functional beverage development,psychological and behavioral mechanism regulation,and targeted population prevention.The aim is to provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for the localized and precise prevention and control of MASLD.

Objective To analyze the effect of diltiazem on blood concentration of tacrolimus(TAC)retrospectively,and to provide reference for individual administration of tacrolimus in patients with nephrotic syndrome(NS).Methods The patients with NS who were treated in the outpatient/inpatient department of our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were collected,and the general information,combined drug use,blood drug concentration and other information of the patients were recorded.The patients were divided into two groups according to whether diltiazem was used or not:TAC group alone and TAC group combined with diltiazem.The effect of diltiazem on tacrolimus concentration was analyzed.Results A total of 45 patients with NS were included in this study,and 21 patients in the TAC group were treated with TAC alone.The mean blood concentration of TAC after medication was(5.77±2.87)ng·mL-1,which reached the effective therapeutic concentration range.The average blood concentration of TAC+Diltiazem group in the 24 patients was(2.90±1.29)ng·mL-1 before combined treatment,and increased to(5.74±2.46)ng·mL-1 after combined with diltiazem,with a growth rate of(127.34±119.57)％.The increase range was from 10％to 288％,and there was significant difference(P＜0.05).According to the observation within 6 months after the combination of the two drugs,the average blood concentration of TAC continued to increase,especially in the 5th month after the administration of TAC,and the concentration tended to be stable after 5 months.By compare with the effect of diltiazem dosage on the blood concentration of TAC,90 mg·d-1 and 180 mg·d-1 had little difference in improving the blood concentration of TAC.At the same time,the combination of the two drugs did not cause adverse reactions.Conclusion A daily dose of 90 mg of Diltiazem can significantly increase the TAC blood concentration in patients with NS who cannot reach the effective therapeutic concentration with conventional doses.It can reach the effective clinical therapeutic concentration without increasing the dose of tacrolimus.The combination of the two drugs were generally safe and effective.

Objective To analyze the effect of diltiazem on blood concentration of tacrolimus(TAC)retrospectively,and to provide reference for individual administration of tacrolimus in patients with nephrotic syndrome(NS).Methods The patients with NS who were treated in the outpatient/inpatient department of our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were collected,and the general information,combined drug use,blood drug concentration and other information of the patients were recorded.The patients were divided into two groups according to whether diltiazem was used or not:TAC group alone and TAC group combined with diltiazem.The effect of diltiazem on tacrolimus concentration was analyzed.Results A total of 45 patients with NS were included in this study,and 21 patients in the TAC group were treated with TAC alone.The mean blood concentration of TAC after medication was(5.77±2.87)ng·mL-1,which reached the effective therapeutic concentration range.The average blood concentration of TAC+Diltiazem group in the 24 patients was(2.90±1.29)ng·mL-1 before combined treatment,and increased to(5.74±2.46)ng·mL-1 after combined with diltiazem,with a growth rate of(127.34±119.57)％.The increase range was from 10％to 288％,and there was significant difference(P＜0.05).According to the observation within 6 months after the combination of the two drugs,the average blood concentration of TAC continued to increase,especially in the 5th month after the administration of TAC,and the concentration tended to be stable after 5 months.By compare with the effect of diltiazem dosage on the blood concentration of TAC,90 mg·d-1 and 180 mg·d-1 had little difference in improving the blood concentration of TAC.At the same time,the combination of the two drugs did not cause adverse reactions.Conclusion A daily dose of 90 mg of Diltiazem can significantly increase the TAC blood concentration in patients with NS who cannot reach the effective therapeutic concentration with conventional doses.It can reach the effective clinical therapeutic concentration without increasing the dose of tacrolimus.The combination of the two drugs were generally safe and effective.

Drugs under special management include narcotic drugs,psychotropic drugs,toxic drugs for medical use,radiopharmaceuticals,and pharmaceutical precursor chemicals.Supervising and guiding the clinical use of drugs under special management is one of the important responsibilities of the Pharmaceutical Management and Drug Therapy Committee(Group)of medical institutions.The standard for drugs under special management is led by the Pharmaceutical Professional Committee of the China Hospital Association,which standardizes 16 key elements of organizational management,process management,and quality control management drugs under special management in medical institutions.It can guide the standardized implementation of Pharmaceuticals under special control work in various levels and types of medical institutions.This article elaborates on the methods and contents of formulating standards for Pharmaceuticals under special management,to provide reference and inspiration for medical institutions to carry out special drug drug management and daily related work.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new combination treatment of vinorelbine and pyrotinib in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and provide higher level evidence for clinical practice. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial conducted at three institutions in China. Patients with HER2-positive MBC, who had previously been treated with trastuzumab plus a taxane or trastuzumab plus pertuzumab combined with a chemotherapeutic agent, were enrolled between March 2020 and December 2021. All patients received pyrotinib 400 mg orally once daily plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenously or 60-80 mg/m2 orally on day 1 and day 8 of 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, and safety. Results: A total of 39 patients were enrolled. All patients had been pretreated with trastuzumab and 23.1% (n=9) of them had accepted trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. The median follow-up time was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3 to 27.2), and the median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 8.8). The ORR was 43.6% (95% CI, 27.8% to 60.4%) and the DCR was 84.6% (95% CI, 69.5% to 94.1%). The median PFS of patients with versus without prior pertuzumab treatment was 4.6 and 8.3 months (p=0.017). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea (28.2%), neutrophil count decreased (15.4%), white blood cell count decreased (7.7%), vomiting (5.1%), and anemia (2.6%). Conclusion Pyrotinib plus vinorelbine showed promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity as second-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive MBC.

Guided by the emphasis on learning process, the educational reform has designed a "trinity" comprehensive evaluation system (quantitative clinical practice, in-class medical record analysis, and staged comprehensive written test) as the formative evaluation of the course. Through this assessment system, students' self-learning potential is stimulated, clinical skills practice is strengthened, and "taking exams to promote learning and taking exams to promote teaching" is realized. In the practice of teaching reform, it has been found that compared with the conventional teaching class, the students in the teaching reform class have higher participation and are more satisfied with the process assessment of the "trinity" comprehensive evaluation system.

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) has become the standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations. However, acquired resistance cannot be avoided during the targeted treatment of EGFR-TKI, which may lead to the progression of NSCLC. Among them, approximately 50% of patients present with primary lung lesions and/or initial metastastic lesion progression. As a major local treatment, radiation therapy plays an irreplaceable role in the management of patients with advanced cancer. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which is implemented with the Cyberknife, is the most advanced radiation therapy technology to better meet clinical needs. In recent years, based on the abovementioned patterns of tumor recurrence, the treatment mode of pulmonary-lesion SBRT combined with EGFR-TKI can improve the tumor-free survival in advanced NSCLC patients, which has attracted widespread attention. In this article, the clinical research progresses on this combined therapeutic strategy were reviewed.

Objective:To evaluate the cost effectiveness of primary prophylaxis (PP) with pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), PP with recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) and no prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer in China.Methods:Two phase Markov models were constructed for a hypothetical cohort of patients aged 45 with stage Ⅱ breast cancer. The first phase modelled costs and outcomes of 4 cycles docetaxel combined with cyclophosphamide [TC×4, febrile neutropenia (FN) risk>20%] chemotherapy, which assumptions based on literature reviews, including FN rates [base-case (deterministic sensitivity analysis range), 0.29 (0.24-0.35)] and related events [FN case-fatality, 3.4 (2.7-4.1)]. Second phase modelled the long term survival which was link with the relative dose intensity (RDI) [mortality hazard ratio ( HR) of RDI < 85% vs ≥85%, 1.45 (1.00-2.32)]. Clinical effectiveness, therapeutic costs, and economic utilities were estimated from peer-reviewed publications and expert opinions in case of unavailability of published evidences. Results:Compared to rhG-CSF PP and no prophylaxis, the cost of PEG-rhG-CSF PP increased to 5 208.19 RMB and 5 222.73 RMB, respectively. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) enhanced to 0.066 and 0.297, respectively. Accordingly, the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are 79 146.3 RMB and 17 558.77 RMB per QALY, which were both below the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of three times GDP per capita (18, 000 RMB) recommended by the WHO. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the more clinically effective the primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF is, the more cost-effective primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF will be. And the lower the mortality HR of RDI<85% vs ≥85% is, the more cost-effective primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF will be. Conclusion:Although the cost of PP PEG-rhG-CSF is higher, considering the additional benefits, the administrating of PP PEG-rhG-CSF is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to PP rhG-CSF and no prophylaxis in patients with early stage breast cancer whose FN risks are more than 20% in China.

Objective:To evaluate the cost effectiveness of primary prophylaxis (PP) with pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), PP with recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) and no prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer in China.Methods:Two phase Markov models were constructed for a hypothetical cohort of patients aged 45 with stage Ⅱ breast cancer. The first phase modelled costs and outcomes of 4 cycles docetaxel combined with cyclophosphamide [TC×4, febrile neutropenia (FN) risk>20%] chemotherapy, which assumptions based on literature reviews, including FN rates [base-case (deterministic sensitivity analysis range), 0.29 (0.24-0.35)] and related events [FN case-fatality, 3.4 (2.7-4.1)]. Second phase modelled the long term survival which was link with the relative dose intensity (RDI) [mortality hazard ratio ( HR) of RDI < 85% vs ≥85%, 1.45 (1.00-2.32)]. Clinical effectiveness, therapeutic costs, and economic utilities were estimated from peer-reviewed publications and expert opinions in case of unavailability of published evidences. Results:Compared to rhG-CSF PP and no prophylaxis, the cost of PEG-rhG-CSF PP increased to 5 208.19 RMB and 5 222.73 RMB, respectively. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) enhanced to 0.066 and 0.297, respectively. Accordingly, the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are 79 146.3 RMB and 17 558.77 RMB per QALY, which were both below the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of three times GDP per capita (18, 000 RMB) recommended by the WHO. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the more clinically effective the primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF is, the more cost-effective primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF will be. And the lower the mortality HR of RDI<85% vs ≥85% is, the more cost-effective primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF will be. Conclusion:Although the cost of PP PEG-rhG-CSF is higher, considering the additional benefits, the administrating of PP PEG-rhG-CSF is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to PP rhG-CSF and no prophylaxis in patients with early stage breast cancer whose FN risks are more than 20% in China.

OBJECTIVETo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture on diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the past five years.

METHODSOnline databases, including CNKI, VIP, WANFANG, PubMed, CBM, ScienceDirect OnSite, Cochrane Library, etc. were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for diarrhea-predominant IBS. Retrieval time was from January of 2011 to January of 2016. According to modified Jadad standard, the bias risk and quality assessment of each RCT included were evaluated by two researchers. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for the meta-analysis.

RESULTSTotally 17 RCTs were included with 1 333 patients. The result of meta-analysis indicated the total effective rate of clinical symptoms improvement in the acupuncture group or acupuncture combined with western medicine group was superior to that in the western medicine group (=3.92, 95%:2.83~5.43,<0.01), and the funnel plot was basically symmetry. The result of meta-analysis showed 3-month recurrence rate:=0.22, 95%:0.12~0.41 (<0.01), indicating the recurrence rate in the acupuncture group was lower than that in the western medicine group in three month.

CONCLUSIONSAcupuncture for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome is superior to conventional treatment of western medication, which can improve the clinical symptoms and reduce the recurrence rate of patients.