OBJECTIVE: Chromosome conformation-based karyotype analysis (C-MoKa) technology was used to test a couple who had experienced multiple adverse pregnancies in order to provide them with genetic counseling and reproductive guidance. METHODS: A couple presented at the Reproductive Medicine Center of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University in 2023 was selected as the study subject. Through C-MoKa testing, copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq), and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), it was found that the couple's repeatedly miscarried fetuses and abnormal embryos exhibited highly similar chromosomal structural abnormalities. Using C-MoKa, the potential genetic abnormalities in both partners were traced, and reproductive guidance was provided based on the result. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Hospital (Ethics No.: LDYYSZLLKH2025-09). RESULTS: CNV-seq analysis of the couple's miscarriage fetal chorionic villi showed del(18)(q21.2q23)(28.90 Mb) and dup(13)(q31.2q34)(26.26 Mb). Chromosomal karyotyping analysis of both partners showed no abnormality. From 2024 to 2025, the couple underwent three rounds of PGT-A assisted reproduction. The first embryo test showed del(13)(q31.2q34)(26.77 Mb) and dup(18)(q21.2q23)(29.08 Mb). The second embryo test showed dup(13)(q31.2q34)(26.26 Mb) and del(18)(q21.2q23)(28.90 Mb). And the third embryo test results showed complex chromosomal abnormalities. In 2025, after genetic counseling, the couple had opted C-MoKa test, which has detected no abnormality in the wife, but a balanced 46,XY,t(13;18)(q31.2;q21.2) translocation in the husband. CONCLUSION As a high-throughput sequencing method based on the three-dimensional conformation of chromatin, C-MoKa has the advantages of high resolution and high accuracy, and can accurately detect balanced translocations with similar banding patterns. It has therefore offered a powerful new tool for chromosomal analysis.
Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pregnancy ; Abortion, Habitual/genetics* ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; Karyotyping/methods* ; Preimplantation Diagnosis ; Translocation, Genetic

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the genetic mechanism for adverse pregnancies due to submicroscopic chromosomal structural variants in two cases, and to provide a precise guidance for preimplantation genetic testing. METHODS: Two families who had visited Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital for reproduction guidance due to recurrent miscarriages, adverse pregnancy history and abnormal genetic testing of the offspring in June and December 2023 were selected as the study subjects. Chromosomal karyotyping and optical genome mapping (OGM) were carried out on peripheral blood samples from the two couples, and preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) were performed on the blastocyst trophoblasts. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Hospital (Ethic No.: 2023-23). RESULTS: No abnormality was found on the G-banded karyotyping analysis for both couples. The OGM results revealed that the female partner of couple 1 had a translocation between 4pter-p16.3 (3.99 Mb) and 11pter-p15.4 (2.66 Mb), whilst no abnormality was found in the male partner. Similarly, the male partner of couple 2 had a translocation between 19q13.43-qter (1.90 Mb) and 22q13.31-qter (3.34 Mb). No abnormality was found in the female partner of couple 2. Neither breakpoints nor the adjacent region had involved an OMIM gene, except the formation of a fusion gene ZIM2-AS1-Z82186.1 (Both genes are non-coding, and the fusion gene was deemed as variant of unknown significance). PGT-SR of 11 blastocysts derived from couple 1 revealed that one embryo was suitable for priority transfer, three embryos were suitable for transfer, one embryo was recommended for genetic counselling, and six embryos were unsuitable for the transfer. For couple 2, six blastocysts were tested, of which only one embryo was deemed suitable for transfer. CONCLUSION When genetic testing of offspring indicates copy number variations such as deletions, duplications or mosaicism, the high-resolution OGM technique can be selected to screen parents for submicroscopic chromosomal structural variations. The result can facilitate accurate assessment for the risk of recurrence in offspring, selection of suitable method for reproduction, and identifying targets for PGT.
Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Adult ; Male ; Karyotyping ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Abortion, Habitual/genetics* ; Preimplantation Diagnosis ; Genetic Testing

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted chromosomal karyotype analysis in the diagnosis of prenatal chromosomal mosaicism. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis at the Department of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2019 and December 2024. All cases whose fetuses were diagnosed with chromosomal mosaicism via karyotype analysis and stratified into two groups based on the analytical software employed: the conventional analysis group (n = 70), which utilized Leica analysis software for karyotype image recognition and cell counting; and the AI-assisted analysis group (n = 102), which utilized AI-assisted software for the same procedures. The clinical performance of AI-assisted karyotype analysis in diagnosing chromosomal mosaicism was comprehensively evaluated by comparing the types of mosaic karyotypes, distribution of mosaic ratios, and verification outcomes of different detection modalities between the two groups. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Ethics No.: 2024-406-01). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics (maternal age, gestational week, and indications for prenatal diagnosis) between the two groups. Regarding the detection efficacy for numerical and structural mosaicisms, no significant difference was found in the detection of numerical mosaicism. However, the conventional analysis group exhibited a significantly higher detection rate of autosomal structural mosaicism compared to the AI-assisted group (11.43% vs. 0.98%, P < 0.05). Numerical mosaicism cases were further verified using copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The AI-assisted group demonstrated a significantly lower inconsistency rate (5.56% vs. 20.41%, P < 0.05) compared to the conventional group. For low-proportion (< 10%) chromosomal mosaicism, the AI-assisted group had a significantly lower detection rate (13.25% vs. 29.69%, P < 0.05). Subsequent validation of low-proportion mosaicism by CNV-seq and/or FISH showed a higher consistency rate in the AI-assisted group (81.82% vs. 54.55%), though the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.360). CONCLUSION For the karyotyping analysis of prenatal chromosomal mosaicism, AI-assisted karyotype analysis shows high accuracy and consistency in identifying numerical chromosomal mosaicism, particularly in reducing the detection of low-proportion (< 10%) mosaicism while improving verification accuracy. AI-assisted analysis can significantly improve the detection accuracy of numerical mosaicism and mitigate the risk of misclassification for low-proportion (< 10%) mosaicism, thereby providing more precise clinical evidence for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicisms.
Humans ; Female ; Mosaicism ; Pregnancy ; Karyotyping/methods* ; Artificial Intelligence ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; Adult ; Retrospective Studies ; Chromosome Disorders/genetics* ; Amniocentesis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the detection patterns, clinical phenotypic characteristics, and differences in diagnostic timeliness of Klinefelter syndrome (KS) across prenatal and postnatal stages, with an aim to provide a basis for optimizing strategies for early screening, diagnosis, and intervention. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze data from two phases. The prenatal diagnosis group included 33,302 pregnant women who underwent amniocytic karyotyping due to advanced maternal age, abnormal ultrasound findings, or high-risk non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The postnatal diagnosis group included 52,101 patients who underwent peripheral blood karyotyping due to primary infertility, abnormal external genitalia, or growth and developmental abnormalities. Additionally, medical histories of adult diagnosed patients were reviewed retrospectively to identify early occult symptoms. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital (Ethics No.: LCYJ-2025-030). RESULTS: In the prenatal group, 96 cases of KS were detected (detection rate 0.29%). The primary indications for referral were NIPT indicating sex chromosome abnormalities (45.83%), advanced maternal age (16.66%), and ultrasound abnormalities (17.70%). In the postnatal group, 128 cases of KS were detected (detection rate 0.25%). Clinical presentations were primarily primary infertility/azoospermia (77.34%), and the patients were predominantly adults (84.40%). Retrospective analysis revealed that adult patients presented with specific physical signs that had been overlooked during childhood. CONCLUSION As KS lacks typical early clinical manifestations, diagnosis is often delayed until adulthood when reproductive needs arise, showing a pattern of "passive detection" and resulting in missed opportunities for optimal intervention. By conducting a comparative analysis of prenatal diagnostic data and postnatal retrospective data, a risk association model linking prenatal screening indications with childhood-specific signs was developed. This study has provided empirical evidence for establishing a multidisciplinary, full life-cycle management system of "screening ~ diagnosis ~ monitoring ~ intervention" helping to shift from "passive detection in adulthood" to "proactive management across the entire life course," and laid a foundation for improving early diagnosis rate and long-term quality of life for patients.
Humans ; Klinefelter Syndrome/genetics* ; Female ; Adult ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; Male ; Phenotype ; Karyotyping ; Young Adult ; Adolescent ; Middle Aged

OBJECTIVE: To understand clinical and laboratory characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplasia-related (AML-MR). METHODS: Blood sample of one patient with AML-MR admitted to our hospital in September 2021 was collected and synthetically analyzed by using techniques including complete blood cell count, peripheral blood and bone marrow cell morphology, bone marrow pathology and immunohistochemistry, hematology examination, flow cytometry (FCM), chromosome karyotype analysis and molecular pathology. The clinical and laboratory characteristics of AML-MR were analyzed and summarized according to the World Health Organization (WHO) standards. RESULTS: The patient showed pancytopenia and increased proportion of blasts in smear of peripheral blood cells. Bone marrow cytology and pathological examination showed significant proliferation of hematopoietic cells. Pathological immunohistochemistry showed increased expression of CD61, CD34, and CD117, while MPO, CD13, and CD33 were positive. FCM showed that abnormal myeloid progenitor cells accounted for approximately 18.61% of the total number of nuclear cells, with expression of CD34, CD13, CD117, HLA-DR, and CD33 (small amount). Additionally, 36.34% of the cells were primitive/immature red blood cells which expressed CD36, CD71, and CD117 (small amount). Chromosome karyotype analysis and molecular pathology detected three kinds of abnormalities including -5 and two kinds of TP53 related gene mutation, respectively. CONCLUSION AML-MR patient shows pancytopenia and increased proportion of blasts in smear of peripheral blood cells. Bone marrow cytology and pathological examination show significant proliferation of hematopoietic cells. FCM can detect myeloid progenitor cells and primitive/immature red blood cells, while chromosome karyotype analysis can detect three abnormal karyotypes.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis* ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes ; Flow Cytometry ; Karyotyping ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation

BACKGROUND

Turner syndrome (TS) is the most common sex chromosomal abnormality in females resulting from a missing X chromosomal material. This in turn results in a range of clinical manifestations. This study aimed to provide the data on the cases of TS confirmed via chromosomal analysis in a cytogenetics laboratory in the Philippines as well as the role of genetic counseling.

A review of the karyotyping results of the Cytogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippine Manila from 1991 to 2020.

TS accounted for 2.64% of all the samples received from 1991 to 2020. For 30 years, the most common karyotype in TS was the classical TS or the standard monosomy 45, X noted in 195 patients or 37.69% of all patients diagnosed with TS. Mosaicism with a normal female karyotype was noted in 50 patients (9.62%). For the TS variants, the most common is isochromosome Xq seen in 125 patients (24.04%). This is followed by TS with marker chromosome in 55 patients (10.58%) and ring X chromosome in 23 patients (4.42%). Deletion Xp and deletion Xq were noted in 22 patients (4.23%) and 20 patients (3.85%), respectively.

From this study, it can be noted that chromosomal analysis or standard karyotyping is a vital and useful diagnostic tool in TS. The information obtained from it may be useful in clinical decision-making of families and healthcare providers. Its importance in providing adequate genetic counseling cannot be overemphasized.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic characteristics of a Chinese pedigree with rare mosaic 11q partial duplication and its pathogenetic mechanisms. METHODS: A pedigree which underwent prenatal diagnosis at Wenzhou Central Hospital between September 25, 2015 and November 30, 2023 was selected for the study. Clinical data were collected from the pedigree. Peripheral blood samples from the parents, amniotic fluid from the fetus, and peripheral blood sample from the neonate were obtained. Genetic testing was carried out by using G-banded chromosomal karyotyping and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) technology. Relevant literature was searched in the CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and PubMed databases to summarize the clinical phenotypes of patients with 11q partial duplication. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Wenzhou Central Hospital (Ethics No. L2024-07-080). RESULTS: The pregnant woman (G₃) had a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes. During her first pregnancy (G₁), prenatal ultrasound indicated intrauterine growth restriction and a Dandy-Walker variant. Follow-up at 8 years of age showed developmental delays and mild intellectual disability. During her second pregnancy (G₂), prenatal ultrasound revealed nasal bone hypoplasia, and the pregnancy was terminated at 23rd gestational week. During her third pregnancy (G₃), all prenatal tests were normal, and the neonate showed normal growth and development at 4 months of age. The karyotype of amniotic fluid of her first pregnancy was 46,X?, and the SNP-array analysis of neonatal peripheral blood showed arr[GRCh37/hg19]11q13.4q25(70432450_134607121)×2~3, with a mosaicism rate being approximately 40%. The karyotype for her second pregnancy was 46,X?,rec(11)dup(11q)inv(11)(p15q13)dmat[6]/46,X?[27], and the SNP-array result was arr[GRCh38]11q13.4q25(71406636_135067522)×2~3, with a mosaicism rate being approximately 75%. The karyotype for her third pregnancy was 46,X?,inv(11)(p15q13)mat, and the SNP-array result was arr(XN)×1,(1~22)×2. The karyotype of the woman was 46,XX,inv(11)(p15q13), and that of her husband was 46,XY. A review of 12 similar cases (including G₁) from the literature revealed that the common clinical phenotypes of 11q partial duplication included intellectual disability (12/12), developmental delay (12/12), ear abnormalities (12/12), microcephaly (10/12), seizures (8/12), hypotonia (8/12), and congenital heart malformations (7/12). CONCLUSION Mosaic partial duplication of 11q may underlie the genetic etiology of this pedigree. The pregnant woman is a carrier of an inversion on chromosome 11, which might have formed the mosaic 11q partial duplication through meiotic errors and mitotic trisomy rescue mechanisms during reproduction.
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pregnancy ; China ; Chromosome Duplication ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics* ; East Asian People/genetics* ; Karyotyping ; Mosaicism ; Pedigree ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Prenatal Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To explore the molecular cytogenetic characteristics of three fetuses with psu idic(Y)(q11.22) using a combination of multiple methods. METHODS: A total of 11 000 pregnant women who underwent prenatal diagnosis at the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Taizhou City from January 2019 to October 2024 were selected as the study subjects. Chromosome karyotype analysis (G-banding) and copy number variation analysis based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed on the amniotic fluid/cord blood samples of the 11 000 fetuses. For cases suspected of Y chromosome abnormalities, C-banding and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and AZF microdeletion testing were additionally conducted. This study has been reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang Province (Ethics No. KL20240860). RESULTS: Among the 11,000 prenatal samples undergoing concurrent karyotype and copy number variation analysis, two fetuses with 45,X/46,X,psu idic(Y)(q11.22) mosaicism and one fetus with 46,X,psu idic(Y)(q11.22) were detected. FISH detection indicated that approximately 66.7% of the cells in fetus 2 exhibited a dicentric Y chromosome, and the metaphase karyotype supported the presence of a pseudodicentric chromosome. AZF testing revealed complete deletion of the AZFb+AZFc regions in fetus 2 and fetus 3. CONCLUSION Conventional G-banding karyotype analysis for psu idic(Y)(q11.22) is prone to misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis. The combined application of chromosome karyotype analysis (G+C banding), copy number variation analysis, and FISH detection in clinical practice can accurately diagnose fetuses with psu idic(Y).
Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics* ; Adult ; Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics* ; Karyotyping ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Cytogenetic Analysis/methods* ; Fetus ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Male

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for the detection of low-level mosaicisms in amniotic fluid samples, and to retrospectively analyze the rare cases of mosaicisms. METHODS: Chromosomal karyotype of the fetus was determined by G-banding analysis of cultured amniotic fluid cells. CMA was used to detect copy number variation of fetal chromosomes, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to determine the proportion of fetal chromosomal mosaicisms in uncultured amniotic fluid cells. RESULTS: Among 825 prenatal samples, 4 cases of true fetal mosaicisms were detected, which yielded an incidence of 0.48%. Two cases were sex chromosomal mosaicisms, and two were autosomal mosaicisms, which involved chromosomes 8 and 9, respectively. All cases were verified by G-banding analysis of cultured amniotic fluid cells, CMA, and/or FISH. CONCLUSION CMA has a great value for detecting low-level mosaicisms in amniotic fluid samples, though the positive results need to be verified by other techniques and should be interpreted with caution. The review of rare cases can provide a basis for prenatal genetic counseling.
Humans ; Female ; Amniotic Fluid/metabolism* ; Pregnancy ; Mosaicism/embryology* ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; Adult ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Microarray Analysis/methods* ; Karyotyping ; Retrospective Studies ; Male

OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic etiology of two fetuses with Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome (MVA) in a pedigree. METHODS: A 30-year-old pregnant woman, who presented at the Center for Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis of Shandong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital on November 16, 2023, was enrolled. Clinical data of the pedigree were collected, and peripheral blood samples from the parents and amniotic fluid samples from the two fetuses were obtained for genomic DNA extraction. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on both fetuses, followed by Sanger sequencing for familial validation and pathogenicity analysis of candidate variants. Chromosomal karyotyping of the parents was conducted to quantify the proportion of premature chromatid separation (PCS). This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shandong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethics No. 2024-034). RESULTS: Both fetuses exhibited structural brain anomalies and developmental delays during the second trimester. Amniocyte karyotyping revealed low-level mosaic aneuploidy involving multiple chromosomes, while chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) showed no abnormalities. Pregnancy termination was performed for fetus 1. WES identified compound heterozygous variants in BUB1B, i.e., c.2363_2364del (p.S788Cfs*29) and ss804270619: G>A, in both fetuses. Sanger sequencing confirmed paternal inheritance of c.2363_2364del and maternal inheritance of ss804270619:G>A. According to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants, the c.2363_2364del variant was classified as likely pathogenic (PVS1 + PM2_Supporting). Parental karyotyping demonstrated PCS traits, with a higher proportion of abnormal metaphases in the father. CONCLUSION The compound heterozygous variants c.2363_2364del (p.S788Cfs*29) and ss804270619: G>A in BUB1B may constitute the genetic etiology of the two MVA fetuses in this pedigree.
Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Adult ; Mosaicism ; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics* ; Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis* ; Pedigree ; Heterozygote ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Aneuploidy ; Male ; Fetus ; Karyotyping