The lack of clear definition and classification for “moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)” creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.

The lack of clear definition and classification for “moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)” creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.

The lack of clear definition and classification for “moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)” creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.

Ulcerative colitis(UC)is a chronic and prolonged condition spanning multiple disciplines.Standardized diagnostics and treatment are paramount for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy and improving the prognosis of UC.In the last a couple of years,substantial progress has been achieved in both basic and clinical research on UC in our country.The integration of novel diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms,new treatment modalities,have necessitated the update of consensus on UC management,offering imperative,evidence-based guidelines for health providers.This guideline,collaboratively developed by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Group of Chinese Society of Gastroenterology,Chinese Medical Association,and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality Control Center of China,incorporates the latest international consensus,domestic research findings,and practical considerations,as an update based on the 2018 Chinese consensus on diagnosis and treatment in inflammatory bowel disease.The formulation of this guideline aims to reflect the latest concepts and research findings in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of UC,providing standardized guidance for the clinical management of UC.

Crohn's disease(CD)is a complex condition spanning multiple disciplines.Standardized diagnostics and treatment are paramount for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy and improving the prognosis of CD.In recent years,substantial progress has been achieved in both basic and clinical research on CD in China.The integration of novel diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms,new treatment modalities,have necessitated the update of consensus on CD management,offering imperative,evidence-based guidelines for health providers.This guideline,collaboratively developed by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Group of Chinese Society of Gastroenterology,Chinese Medical Association,and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality Control Center of China,incorporates the latest international consensus,domestic research findings,and practical considerations,as an update based on the 2018 Chinese consensus on diagnosis and treatment in inflammatory bowel disease.The formulation of this guideline aims to reflect the latest concepts and research findings in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CD,providing standardized guidance for the clinical management of CD.

Background:Therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM)has emerged as the important method for managing loss of response to infliximab.The effect of reactive and proactive TDM on clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)is uncertain.Aims:To evaluate the effect of proactive and reactive TDM of infliximab on the prognosis of patients with IBD.Methods:Clinical data of 99 IBD patients treated with IFX from January 2017 to October 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University were retrospectively analyzed,including 34 patients with proactive TDM and 65 patients with reactive TDM.The rate of treatment failure,IBD-related surgery or hospitalization were compared between the two groups.Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors of treatment failure.Results:The median follow-up of the patients was 21(13,32)months.The rate of treatment failure,IBD-related hospitalization rate of proactive TDM group were significantly lower than those of reactive TDM group(P<0.05),however,no significant difference in IBD-related surgery rate was found between two groups(P=0.081).Univariate analysis showed that ileocolonic resection before TDM,antibodies to infliximab(ATI)and reactive TDM might be correlated with treatment failure(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that reactive TDM(OR=5.829,95%CI:1.070-31.754,P=0.042)was the risk factor of treatment failure,and ileocolonic resection before TDM(OR=0.119,95%CI:0.019-0.736,P=0.022)was the protective factor of treatment failure.Conclusions:Compared with reactive TDM group,proactive TDM can significantly decrease the rate of treatment failure and IBD-related hospitalization rate.Reactive TDM is the risk factor of treatment failure,and ileocolonic resection before TDM is the protective factor of treatment failure.

Objective:To investigate the effects of biologics on psychological status and quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Methods:A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 42 hospitals in 22 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) from September 2021 to May 2022. General clinical information and the use of biologics were obtained from adult patients diagnosed with IBD who voluntarily participated in the study. Psychological status was evaluated using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) assessment tools. Counts were analyzed via the Chi-square test, and datasets that were not normally distributed were analyzed via nonparametric tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 2 478 valid questionnaires were collected. The GAD-7 score of the biologics group was significantly lower than that of the non-use group [6 (2, 9) vs. 7 (3, 10), Z=-3.49, P<0.001]. IBDQ scores [183 (158, 204) vs. 178 (152, 198), Z=-4.11, P<0.001], intestinal symptom scores [61 (52, 67) vs. 58 (49, 65), Z=-5.41, P<0.001], systemic symptom scores [28 (24, 32) vs. 27 (23, 31), Z=-2.37, P=0.018], emotional ability scores [69 (58, 77) vs. 67 (56, 75), Z=-3.58, P<0.001] and social ability scores [26 (22, 29) vs. 25 (22, 29), Z=-2.52, P=0.012] in the biologics group were significantly higher than in the non-use group. GAD-7 scores [5 (2, 9) vs. 6 (3, 10), Z=-3.50, P<0.001] and PSQI scores [6 (4, 9) vs. 6 (4, 9), Z=-2.55, P=0.011] were significantly lower in the group using infliximab than in the group not using it. IBDQ scores were significantly higher in patients using vedolizumab than in those not using it [186 (159, 205) vs. 181 (155, 201), Z=-2.32, P=0.021] and were also significantly higher in the group treated with adalimumab than in the group not treated with adalimumab [187 (159, 209) vs. 181 (155, 201), Z=-2.16, P=0.030]. However, ustekinumab had no significant effect on any of the scores. Conclusion:The use of biologics is strongly associated with improvements in anxiety status and quality of life in IBD patients.

Background: The efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been affirmed abroad, but its efficacy and safety have not been reported in China due to its short term of use. Aims: To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of UST in the treatment of IBD. Methods: The clinical data of IBD patients treated with UST from November 2020 to June 2022 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. Results: A total of 46 patients with IBD treated with UST were enrolled, including 41 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 5 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). At the 8

Behçet’s syndrome is a kind of chronic systemic vasculitis with involvement of multiple organs. Intestinal involvement of Behçet’s syndrome is presently named as intestinal Behçet’s syndrome (disease). Recently, there is considering another kind of disease type with only typical intestinal ulcers. Since it is difficult to differentiate intestinal Behçet’s syndrome from Crohn’s disease, intestinal tuberculosis, intestinal lymphoma, as well as intestinal manifestations of many other autoimmune diseases, and there is limited evidence for the therapy of intestinal Behçet’s syndrome, proposing diagnosis and treatment recommendations for intestinal Behçet’s syndrome through evidence-based judgment will be of great significance for clinical practice.

Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) significantly increase the risk of gastric cancer. Blocking the development of CAG and GIM would help to decrease the incidence of gastric cancer. It was revealed that eradication of Helicobacter pylori could reverse gastric mucosa atrophy. Recent studies reported that GIM could also be reversed to a certain extent. Clinical studies demonstrated that Lamb’s tripe extract and vitamin B12 capsule exhibited significant reversal effect on GIM. The present study systemically reviewed the diagnosis and treatment of CAG and clinical application of Lamb’s tripe extract and vitamin B12 capsule, and established the specialist instruction that would guide the reversal treatment of CAG and GIM.