1.Improved visibility of palisade vessels within Barrett’s esophagus using red dichromatic imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Japan
Chise UEDA ; Shinwa TANAKA ; Tetsuya YOSHIZAKI ; Hirofumi ABE ; Masato KINOSHITA ; Hiroya SAKAGUCHI ; Hiroshi TAKAYAMA ; Hitomi HORI ; Ryosuke ISHIDA ; Shinya HOUKI ; Hiroshi TANABE ; Eri NISHIKAWA ; Madoka TAKAO ; Toshitatsu TAKAO ; Yoshinori MORITA ; Takashi TOYONAGA ; Yuzo KODAMA
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(2):269-277
Background/Aims:
Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI).
Methods:
Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed.
Results:
Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006).
Conclusions
RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.
2.Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using articulating laparoscopic instruments in older adults with gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data
Seohee CHOI ; Takahiro KINOSHITA ; Kazutaka OBAMA ; Katsunobu SAKURAI ; Naoshi KUBO ; Naruhiko IKOMA ; Ali GUNER ; Hyoung-Il KIM
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2025;108(2):86-92
Purpose:
As the number of older adults with gastric cancer requiring gastrectomy has increased, it has become increasingly important to use techniques that enhance surgical safety and reduce postoperative complications in this vulnerable patient population. Articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALIs) may improve maneuverability and precision, leading to better outcomes in older patients. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of older adults undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using conventional versus ALIs.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 147 older patients (aged ≥70 years) who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2017 and 2024. Surgery was performed using conventional laparoscopic instruments in 61 patients and ALIs in 86 patients. The median follow-up period was 20 months.
Results:
Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the articulating group than in the conventional group (4.6 ± 2.0 days vs. 5.4 ± 2.4 days, P = 0.030). Time to first flatus was also significantly shorter in the articulating group (2.4 ± 0.7 days vs. 2.8 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.022). However, there were no significant differences in overall complications, major (≥grade III) complications (conventional, 1.2% vs. articulating, 0%; P = 0.398) overall survival, or recurrence-free survival between groups.
Conclusion
The use of articulating instruments in older adults undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stays and faster recovery of bowel function, with no apparent detrimental effects on complications, recurrence, or survival. These findings suggest that ALIs enhance recovery and possibly overall surgical outcomes in this patient population.
3.Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using articulating laparoscopic instruments in older adults with gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data
Seohee CHOI ; Takahiro KINOSHITA ; Kazutaka OBAMA ; Katsunobu SAKURAI ; Naoshi KUBO ; Naruhiko IKOMA ; Ali GUNER ; Hyoung-Il KIM
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2025;108(2):86-92
Purpose:
As the number of older adults with gastric cancer requiring gastrectomy has increased, it has become increasingly important to use techniques that enhance surgical safety and reduce postoperative complications in this vulnerable patient population. Articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALIs) may improve maneuverability and precision, leading to better outcomes in older patients. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of older adults undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using conventional versus ALIs.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 147 older patients (aged ≥70 years) who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2017 and 2024. Surgery was performed using conventional laparoscopic instruments in 61 patients and ALIs in 86 patients. The median follow-up period was 20 months.
Results:
Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the articulating group than in the conventional group (4.6 ± 2.0 days vs. 5.4 ± 2.4 days, P = 0.030). Time to first flatus was also significantly shorter in the articulating group (2.4 ± 0.7 days vs. 2.8 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.022). However, there were no significant differences in overall complications, major (≥grade III) complications (conventional, 1.2% vs. articulating, 0%; P = 0.398) overall survival, or recurrence-free survival between groups.
Conclusion
The use of articulating instruments in older adults undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stays and faster recovery of bowel function, with no apparent detrimental effects on complications, recurrence, or survival. These findings suggest that ALIs enhance recovery and possibly overall surgical outcomes in this patient population.
4.Improved visibility of palisade vessels within Barrett’s esophagus using red dichromatic imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Japan
Chise UEDA ; Shinwa TANAKA ; Tetsuya YOSHIZAKI ; Hirofumi ABE ; Masato KINOSHITA ; Hiroya SAKAGUCHI ; Hiroshi TAKAYAMA ; Hitomi HORI ; Ryosuke ISHIDA ; Shinya HOUKI ; Hiroshi TANABE ; Eri NISHIKAWA ; Madoka TAKAO ; Toshitatsu TAKAO ; Yoshinori MORITA ; Takashi TOYONAGA ; Yuzo KODAMA
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(2):269-277
Background/Aims:
Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI).
Methods:
Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed.
Results:
Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006).
Conclusions
RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.
6.Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using articulating laparoscopic instruments in older adults with gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data
Seohee CHOI ; Takahiro KINOSHITA ; Kazutaka OBAMA ; Katsunobu SAKURAI ; Naoshi KUBO ; Naruhiko IKOMA ; Ali GUNER ; Hyoung-Il KIM
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 2025;108(2):86-92
Purpose:
As the number of older adults with gastric cancer requiring gastrectomy has increased, it has become increasingly important to use techniques that enhance surgical safety and reduce postoperative complications in this vulnerable patient population. Articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALIs) may improve maneuverability and precision, leading to better outcomes in older patients. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of older adults undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using conventional versus ALIs.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 147 older patients (aged ≥70 years) who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2017 and 2024. Surgery was performed using conventional laparoscopic instruments in 61 patients and ALIs in 86 patients. The median follow-up period was 20 months.
Results:
Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the articulating group than in the conventional group (4.6 ± 2.0 days vs. 5.4 ± 2.4 days, P = 0.030). Time to first flatus was also significantly shorter in the articulating group (2.4 ± 0.7 days vs. 2.8 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.022). However, there were no significant differences in overall complications, major (≥grade III) complications (conventional, 1.2% vs. articulating, 0%; P = 0.398) overall survival, or recurrence-free survival between groups.
Conclusion
The use of articulating instruments in older adults undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stays and faster recovery of bowel function, with no apparent detrimental effects on complications, recurrence, or survival. These findings suggest that ALIs enhance recovery and possibly overall surgical outcomes in this patient population.
7.Improved visibility of palisade vessels within Barrett’s esophagus using red dichromatic imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Japan
Chise UEDA ; Shinwa TANAKA ; Tetsuya YOSHIZAKI ; Hirofumi ABE ; Masato KINOSHITA ; Hiroya SAKAGUCHI ; Hiroshi TAKAYAMA ; Hitomi HORI ; Ryosuke ISHIDA ; Shinya HOUKI ; Hiroshi TANABE ; Eri NISHIKAWA ; Madoka TAKAO ; Toshitatsu TAKAO ; Yoshinori MORITA ; Takashi TOYONAGA ; Yuzo KODAMA
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(2):269-277
Background/Aims:
Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett’s esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI).
Methods:
Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients. Visibility was rated on a 4-point scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor. The color difference between the most recognizable PV spots and surrounding areas with undetectable blood vessels was also analyzed.
Results:
Mean visibility scores were 2.6±0.7, 2.3±0.6, and 3.4±0.4 for WLI, NBI, and RDI, respectively. The RDI scores were significantly higher than the WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p<0.001) scores. These differences were recognized by trainees and expert endoscopists. Color differences in PVs were 7.74±4.96 (WLI), 10.43±5.09 (NBI), and 15.1±6.54 (RDI). The difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (p<0.001) and NBI (p=0.006).
Conclusions
RDI significantly improved PV visibility compared to WLI and NBI based on objective and subjective measures.
9.Impact of adaptive radiotherapy on survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Yusuke UCHINAMI ; Koichi YASUDA ; Hideki MINATOGAWA ; Yasuhiro DEKURA ; Noboru NISHIKAWA ; Rumiko KINOSHITA ; Kentaro NISHIOKA ; Norio KATOH ; Takashi MORI ; Manami OTSUKA ; Naoki MIYAMOTO ; Ryusuke SUZUKI ; Keiji KOBASHI ; Yasushi SHIMIZU ; Jun TAGUCHI ; Nayuta TSUSHIMA ; Satoshi KANO ; Akihiro HOMMA ; Hidefumi AOYAMA
Radiation Oncology Journal 2024;42(1):74-82
Purpose:
To investigate the clinical significance of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Materials and Methods:
Eligible patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using IMRT. Planning computed tomography in ART was performed during radiotherapy, and replanning was performed. Since ART was started in May 2011 (ART group), patients who were treated without ART up to April 2011 (non-ART group) were used as the historical control. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). LRFS for the primary tumor (LRFS_P) and regional lymph node (LRFS_LN) were also studied for more detailed analysis. Statistical significance was evaluated using the log-rank test for survival.
Results:
The ART group tended to have higher radiation doses. The median follow-up period was 127 months (range, 10 to 211 months) in the non-ART group and 61.5 months (range, 5 to 129 months) in the ART group. Compared to the non-ART group, the ART group showed significantly higher 5-year PFS (53.8% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.015) and LRFS (61.2% vs. 85.3%, p = 0.024), but not OS (80.7% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.941) and DMFS (84.6% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.255). Five-year LRFS_P was higher in the ART group (61.3% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.005), but LRFS_LN did not show a significant difference (91.9% vs. 96.2%, p = 0.541).
Conclusion
Although there were differences in the patient backgrounds between the two groups, this study suggests the potential effectiveness of ART in improving locoregional control, especially in the primary tumor.
10.Current Status and Influencing Factors of the Stockpiling of Regular Medicines for Disasters in Patients with Chronic Disease
Akira MITOYA ; Ryota KUMAKI ; Ryoo TANIGUCHI ; Mitsuhiro SOMEYA ; Ryuichi KINOSHITA ; Tomoyuki SUZUKI ; Seiichi FURUTA ; Keiko AKAGAWA ; Keiko KISHIMOTO
Japanese Journal of Social Pharmacy 2024;43(1):2-11
To promote the stockpiling of regular medicines for disasters (SMD), we investigated SMD rates and clarified the relationship between SMD status (Yes or No) and the characteristics of patients with chronic diseases. A survey was provided to patients visiting the pharmacies in Hokkaido. SMD was defined as a patient having a supply of regular medicine for 7 days or more and replacing with new medicine within one year. Of a total of 537 participants (51.0% male; mean age 65.8 years), 61.1% had experienced a major disaster. The SMD rate was extremely low at 15.3%. The median score for a patient’s understanding of the regular medicine names (5-point scale: 1=hardly understood, 5=almost understood) was 2. The median number of monthly pharmacy visits was 0.8. 5.4% were recommended SMD by physicians or pharmacists. Results from multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that positive patient characteristics included age (OR=1.154, 95%CI [1.026-1.298], P=0.017), understanding of the regular medicine names (1.724, [1.039-2.859], P=0.035), and recommendation of SMD by physicians or pharmacists (5.991, [2.616-13.722], P<0.001). A negative patient characteristic was the number of pharmacy visits (0.587, [0.383-0.899], P=0.014). The most influential positive factor was the recommendation of SMD by physicians or pharmacists; however, only 5.4% of the participants had experienced this. The findings of this study indicated important that health care providers and the government to work together to devise easy-to-understand measures to inform local residents about the importance of SMD and how to them, conduct educational activities.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail