Brain-computer interface (BCI) has high application value in the field of healthcare. However, in practical clinical applications, convenience and system performance should be considered in the use of BCI. Wearable BCIs are generally with high convenience, but their performance in real-life scenario needs to be evaluated. This study proposed a wearable steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based BCI system equipped with a small-sized electroencephalogram (EEG) collector and a high-performance training-free decoding algorithm. Ten healthy subjects participated in the test of BCI system under simplified experimental preparation. The results showed that the average classification accuracy of this BCI was 94.10% for 40 targets, and there was no significant difference compared to the dataset collected under the laboratory condition. The system achieved a maximum information transfer rate (ITR) of 115.25 bit/min with 8-channel signal and 98.49 bit/min with 4-channel signal, indicating that the 4-channel solution can be used as an option for the few-channel BCI. Overall, this wearable SSVEP-BCI can achieve good performance in real-life scenario, which helps to promote BCI technology in clinical practice.
Brain-Computer Interfaces ; Humans ; Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology* ; Electroencephalography ; Wearable Electronic Devices ; Algorithms ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Adult ; Male

AIM:To analyze the reasons for screening failure and explore the influencing fac-tors in clinical trial in healthy volunteers,guidance was provided to improve the success rate of screen-ing in the future.clarify the reasons for the failure in healthy subjects(HS)screening,and to provide guidance for screening in phase Ⅰ clinical trials.METHODS:We performed a retrospective study that described the process of HS screening in phase Ⅰ clinical trials carried out in department of clinical pharmacology lab,Nanjing First Hospital be-tween 2019 and 2022.We analyzed the reasons for screening failure and their impact on the failure rate.A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of subjects who participated in drug clinical trial screening 2019 to 2022.The reasons for screening failure were analyzed,and statistical methods were used to explore the independent factors that led to screening failure.RESULTS:A to-tal of 11 clinical trials were included in this study,and 502 out of 1 582 participants(31.7％)passed the screening.The analysis of the remaining 1 080 subjects showed that the items that did not pass the screening were laboratory examinations(631 cases,58.4％),abnormal vital signs results(228 cas-es,21.1％),intolerance to blood drawn(86 cases,8.0％),sufficient subjects(62 cases,5.7％),with-drawal at the screening(54 cases,5.0％),demogra-phy(54 cases,5.0％),urinary cotinine examination(42 cases,3.9％),imaging examination(31 cases,2.9％),electrocardiogram(24 cases,2.2％),inquiry(medical inquiry 19 cases,1.8％,smoking inquiry 2 cases,0.2％,alcohol inquiry 2 cases,0.2％)and identity verification(17 cases,1.8％).In the popula-tion with a body mass index(BMI)of 19.0 to 26.0,an increase in BMI is an independent factor signifi-cantly associated with screening failure(P＜0.000 1,OR=0.890 4,95％CI 0.841 9-0.941 3).The impact of different examination items on the screening fail-ure rate varies.CONCLUSION:In clinical trials of healthy subjects,laboratory tests,vital signs and in-tolerance to blood drawn are the main reasons for screening failure.Lowering the upper limit of BMI when recruiting subjects may increase the success rate of screening.Laboratory examinations,vital signs,intolerance to blood drawn are the most im-portant three reasons for screening failure,and im-provements can be made to reduce the screening failure rate of phase Ⅰ clinical trials in response to the main screening failure reasons.

Objectives:To analyze the clinical characteristics of upper cervical vertebrae with dumbbell schwannoma,and to explore its clinical symptoms,imaging features,and treatment plans.Methods:A retro-spective analysis was performed on 14 patients with upper cervical intra-and extraspinal dumbbell-shaped schwannoma admitted to the Spinal Surgery Department of Southern Theater General Hospital from January 2022 to June 2024,including 9 males and 5 females,aged 43.64±11.96 years(25-61 years).According to the location,size,scope of the tumor,and relationship with the surrounding important tissue structure in upper cervical spine,the relevant clinical treatment data were analyzed and the surgical treatment plan was dis-cussed.Cervical X-ray,CT and MRI examinations were regularly performed after surgery to evaluate the con-ditions of complete resection of tumor and recurrence,the stability of the upper cervical spine and whether the internal fixation was loose or broken.The recovery of spinal nerve function and pain improvement were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)and visual analogue scale(VAS)scores.Results:All the patients underwent complete tumor resection in one stage,and the postoperative JOA score(10.14±1.55 vs 13.86±1.06,P=0.005)and VAS score(2.42±1.29 vs 0.64±0.71,P=0.000)were statistically different from those before surgery.Postoperative tumor histopathology was confirmed as schwannoma in all the 14 patients.The follow-up time was 6 months to 2 years.No recurrence of tumor was found,neurological symptoms were significantly improved,and no upper cervical instability appeared.Conclusions:For patients with intra-and extra-spinal dumbbell-shaped schwannoma in the upper cervical spine,complete resection of the tumor in one stage of posterior approach can be given priority.If the important stable tissue structure of the upper cervical spine is destroyed,upper cervical spine fixation and fusion should be performed to ensure the stabil-ity of upper cervical spine after tumor resection.

Reporting guidelines are structured checklists for researchers to follow when reporting spe-cific types of studies.As researches conducted in real-world settings to address practical issues,implementa-tion research has stringent requirements for the replicability of result and the transparency of reporting,making its reporting guidelines particularly important.This paper systematically introduces the reporting guidelines in the field of implementation science,outlines their classification systems and scopes of applica-tion,and focuses on explaining the core characteristics and functions of five key reporting guidelines,inclu-ding the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies(StaRI),Reporting guidelines for implementation and operational research,the Template for Intervention Description and Replication(TIDieR),the Frame-work for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced(FRAME),and recommendations for specifying and reporting implementation strategies.Furthermore,combined with the PEDALs research paradigm in im-plementation science,this paper further clarifies the specific application pathways for reporting guidelines and discusses directions for refinement,aiming to provide references for researchers to select appropriate reporting guidelines.

The concept of competency-based standardized residency training is gaining global popularity. However, the process of assessing, continuously evaluating, and conducting final competency evaluations remains challenging. The Milestones 2.0 system, developed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, provides a framework for evaluating competencies in radiation oncology residents. The core objective of this system is to assess sub-competencies within core competencies, categorizing them from novice to expert across 5 levels. Evaluation occurs every 6 months, with the expectation that all residents reach level 4 in all sub-competencies by the end of their training. This approach aims to enhance the standardization of residency evaluations across the United States. This article aims to analyze the Milestones 2.0 competency framework and explore its potential applicability and reference value for standardized radiation oncology residency training in China.

Reporting guidelines are structured checklists for researchers to follow when reporting spe-cific types of studies.As researches conducted in real-world settings to address practical issues,implementa-tion research has stringent requirements for the replicability of result and the transparency of reporting,making its reporting guidelines particularly important.This paper systematically introduces the reporting guidelines in the field of implementation science,outlines their classification systems and scopes of applica-tion,and focuses on explaining the core characteristics and functions of five key reporting guidelines,inclu-ding the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies(StaRI),Reporting guidelines for implementation and operational research,the Template for Intervention Description and Replication(TIDieR),the Frame-work for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced(FRAME),and recommendations for specifying and reporting implementation strategies.Furthermore,combined with the PEDALs research paradigm in im-plementation science,this paper further clarifies the specific application pathways for reporting guidelines and discusses directions for refinement,aiming to provide references for researchers to select appropriate reporting guidelines.

Objectives:To analyze the clinical characteristics of upper cervical vertebrae with dumbbell schwannoma,and to explore its clinical symptoms,imaging features,and treatment plans.Methods:A retro-spective analysis was performed on 14 patients with upper cervical intra-and extraspinal dumbbell-shaped schwannoma admitted to the Spinal Surgery Department of Southern Theater General Hospital from January 2022 to June 2024,including 9 males and 5 females,aged 43.64±11.96 years(25-61 years).According to the location,size,scope of the tumor,and relationship with the surrounding important tissue structure in upper cervical spine,the relevant clinical treatment data were analyzed and the surgical treatment plan was dis-cussed.Cervical X-ray,CT and MRI examinations were regularly performed after surgery to evaluate the con-ditions of complete resection of tumor and recurrence,the stability of the upper cervical spine and whether the internal fixation was loose or broken.The recovery of spinal nerve function and pain improvement were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)and visual analogue scale(VAS)scores.Results:All the patients underwent complete tumor resection in one stage,and the postoperative JOA score(10.14±1.55 vs 13.86±1.06,P=0.005)and VAS score(2.42±1.29 vs 0.64±0.71,P=0.000)were statistically different from those before surgery.Postoperative tumor histopathology was confirmed as schwannoma in all the 14 patients.The follow-up time was 6 months to 2 years.No recurrence of tumor was found,neurological symptoms were significantly improved,and no upper cervical instability appeared.Conclusions:For patients with intra-and extra-spinal dumbbell-shaped schwannoma in the upper cervical spine,complete resection of the tumor in one stage of posterior approach can be given priority.If the important stable tissue structure of the upper cervical spine is destroyed,upper cervical spine fixation and fusion should be performed to ensure the stabil-ity of upper cervical spine after tumor resection.

AIM:To analyze the reasons for screening failure and explore the influencing fac-tors in clinical trial in healthy volunteers,guidance was provided to improve the success rate of screen-ing in the future.clarify the reasons for the failure in healthy subjects(HS)screening,and to provide guidance for screening in phase Ⅰ clinical trials.METHODS:We performed a retrospective study that described the process of HS screening in phase Ⅰ clinical trials carried out in department of clinical pharmacology lab,Nanjing First Hospital be-tween 2019 and 2022.We analyzed the reasons for screening failure and their impact on the failure rate.A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of subjects who participated in drug clinical trial screening 2019 to 2022.The reasons for screening failure were analyzed,and statistical methods were used to explore the independent factors that led to screening failure.RESULTS:A to-tal of 11 clinical trials were included in this study,and 502 out of 1 582 participants(31.7％)passed the screening.The analysis of the remaining 1 080 subjects showed that the items that did not pass the screening were laboratory examinations(631 cases,58.4％),abnormal vital signs results(228 cas-es,21.1％),intolerance to blood drawn(86 cases,8.0％),sufficient subjects(62 cases,5.7％),with-drawal at the screening(54 cases,5.0％),demogra-phy(54 cases,5.0％),urinary cotinine examination(42 cases,3.9％),imaging examination(31 cases,2.9％),electrocardiogram(24 cases,2.2％),inquiry(medical inquiry 19 cases,1.8％,smoking inquiry 2 cases,0.2％,alcohol inquiry 2 cases,0.2％)and identity verification(17 cases,1.8％).In the popula-tion with a body mass index(BMI)of 19.0 to 26.0,an increase in BMI is an independent factor signifi-cantly associated with screening failure(P＜0.000 1,OR=0.890 4,95％CI 0.841 9-0.941 3).The impact of different examination items on the screening fail-ure rate varies.CONCLUSION:In clinical trials of healthy subjects,laboratory tests,vital signs and in-tolerance to blood drawn are the main reasons for screening failure.Lowering the upper limit of BMI when recruiting subjects may increase the success rate of screening.Laboratory examinations,vital signs,intolerance to blood drawn are the most im-portant three reasons for screening failure,and im-provements can be made to reduce the screening failure rate of phase Ⅰ clinical trials in response to the main screening failure reasons.

The concept of competency-based standardized residency training is gaining global popularity. However, the process of assessing, continuously evaluating, and conducting final competency evaluations remains challenging. The Milestones 2.0 system, developed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, provides a framework for evaluating competencies in radiation oncology residents. The core objective of this system is to assess sub-competencies within core competencies, categorizing them from novice to expert across 5 levels. Evaluation occurs every 6 months, with the expectation that all residents reach level 4 in all sub-competencies by the end of their training. This approach aims to enhance the standardization of residency evaluations across the United States. This article aims to analyze the Milestones 2.0 competency framework and explore its potential applicability and reference value for standardized radiation oncology residency training in China.

Objective·To investigate the current situation and distribution characteristics of chronic comorbidities,and to provide reference for further improving the self-management of comorbidities and implementing the whole course and all-round management of comorbidity.Methods·Two thousand and forty-five inpatients in the Department of Geriatrics,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were enrolled in this study from December 2020 to February 2023.The general vital signs,routine laboratory examination and disease status were collected.The epidemiological distribution characteristics of chronic diseases and comorbidities were analyzed.Results·The incidence of chronic diseases in the surveyed population was 99.6％,and the incidence of comorbidities was 94.2％.The top 5 chronic diseases were hypertension(43.68％),diabetes mellitus(24.81％),malignant tumor(21.48％),hyperlipidemia(18.38％)and coronary heart disease(11.99％).The detection rates of hypertension,diabetes mellitus,coronary heart disease,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,stoke and chronic kidney disease in males were significantly higher than those in females(P＜0.05).The proportion of patients with 5 chronic diseases was the highest(11.99％),followed by 7 chronic diseases(10.26％)and 6 chronic diseases(10.04％).Among the patients of different ages,the comorbidity rate was the highest in the patients aged 50-59 years(27.78％).In different age groups,patients aged 50 to 59 with 2 chronic diseases had the highest incidence of comorbidity,which was as high as 40.82％.Although the overall proportion of comorbidities among male patients(95.37％)was higher than that among females(93.77％),there was no statistically significant difference(P=0.125).However,the proportions of male patients with 2 and 5 chronic diseases were 70.41％and 60.63％,respectively,which were significantly higher than those of female patients(29.59％and 39.37％).The correlations between coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus,hypertension and coronary heart disease,hypertension and diabetes mellitus were higher(r=0.24,r=0.27,r=0.35,all P＜0.05).Conclusion·The prevalence of chronic diseases and comorbidities is high in the middle-aged and elderly population,and the number of comorbidities increases significantly with the increase of age.