BACKGROUND<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">Granulomatous mastitis (GM) of the breast has long posed a clinical dilemma in terms of diagnosis and management. GM can range from acute to chronic inflammations, which will have treatment implications. Inflammation of the breast may clinically mimic breast carcinomas and pyogenic abscesses. Thus, in the absence of known etiology, such as trauma or breastfeeding, GM may be difficult to diagnose. Currently, the incidence of GM is 2.4 per 100,000 women and 0.37% of the total population in the US. The rarity of GM contributes to it being a poorly understood disease. It has no definite clinical features and is often confused with a neoplasm or infection clinically and radiologically.p>OBJECTIVE<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">The study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of GM seen in the Breast Care Clinic in the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) from January 2015 to June 2019. This study would initially provide institutional data on GM that is relevant in the Philippines.p>METHODS<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">This is a retrospective observational study of patients with GM seen in the Philippine General Hospital, a national tertiary referral hospital, from January 2015 to June 2019.p>RESULTS<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">A total of 43 patients with pathological findings of GM from January 1, 2015 to June 15, 2019 were recorded. Among these 43 patients, 98% were female. The median age was 38.9 ± 11.3 years old. In 60.5% (26 out of 43) of patients, the initial impression was breast malignancy. The most common clinical presentation in 69.8% (30 out of 43) of the subjects was a breast mass. In more than 50% of the patients, breast ultrasonography was the initial imaging performed. The histopathologic profile of the patients showed inflammation, of which, the greatest were that of chronic granulomatous inflammation (46.5%, n-20). Treatment options performed were tended more medical (53.5%, n-23) than surgical (16.3%, n-7).Among those who received medical treatment, the therapeutics given were antitubercular medications (34.9%, n-15) and antibiotics (16.3%, n-7), while the others had a combination of antitubercular and antibiotic regimen medications (2.3%, n-1); unknown treatment (25.6%, n-11) and none (11.6%, n-5). For patient outcomes, no mortalities were recorded during the study period. However, most patients had inconsistent followups. Approximately 7%-23% of the patients who had followed up within the six months showed improvement or resolution of symptoms.p>CONCLUSION<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">This study assessed the clinical profiles of patients with GM in a national tertiary referral hospital. Internationally, there is still no consensus on the algorithm and management of GM patients. However, the authors recommend a close follow-up every two weeks to re-evaluate patient response to the medical regimen being administered. The authors recommend a prospective study with a longer follow-up period to gain a deeper understanding of GM in Filipinos.p>
Human ; Female ; Granulomatous Mastitis ; Asian

BACKGROUND<p>Primary invasive mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). According to the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, the invasive patterns of MOC are classified into two categories: Infiltrative and expansile invasion. Studies examining the relationship between expansile and infiltrative primary MOCs are limited. In our local setting, there are no published studies to determine the impact of classifying primary MOCs between the two subtypes to treatment outcomes. This study, therefore, aims to determine the prevalence of primary MOC subtypes, their clinical and demographic characteristics, and clinical outcomes.p>MATERIALS AND METHODS<p>This is a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with MOCs for a 5-year period from January 2013 to December 2017 in a public end-referral tertiary hospital. A pathological review was conducted using the 2020 WHO classification to determine the pattern of invasion. Demographic data were obtained and the treatment outcome of infiltrative invasion and expansile invasion of ovarian mucinous carcinoma were compared. Log–rank test was used to determine the overall survival (OS) with the specific type of MOCs.p>RESULTS<p>A total of 29 cases were included in this study wherein 79.3% were expansile MOC type and 20.7% were infiltrative. Most of the patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IA (27.6%). All patients had laparotomy and half of the patients received adjuvant therapy, 47.8% and 50% in expansile and infiltrative type, respectively. The factors associated with overall mortality were MOC type: expansile, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07–0.91, P = 0.047, and infiltrative, HR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.1–13.5, P = 0.047. Median OS was significantly higher in patients with expansile compared to infiltrative type (42 vs. 25 months, P = 0.039).p>CONCLUSION<p>Infiltrative invasion was observed to be a prognostic factor showing worse outcomes for ovarian mucinous carcinoma compared to expansile invasion.
p>
Human ; Prognosis

A 57-year-old woman with a 2-year history of a left infra-auricular mass with no associated symptoms presented with a 6.0 cm ´ 4.0 cm ´ 3.0 cm firm, non-tender, movable mass. No imaging was done. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) revealed sheets of epithelial cells that had abundant dense grayish-blue cytoplasm in a mucinous background with abundant lymphocytes (Figure 1), suggestive of salivary gland neoplasm with oncocytic or oncocytoid features (Category IVB, Salivary Gland Neoplasm of Uncertain Malignant Potential).Total parotidectomy revealed a 4.3 X 3.2 X 3.0 cm deep lobe lesion with a tan-grey to dark brown, smooth and dull external surface. Cut sections showed a cream-white to pink, lobulated, heterogenous cut surfaces. Microscopically, the lesion was unencapsulated with poorly demarcated borders. The neoplastic cells were arranged in haphazard sheets and surrounded by abundant lymphocytes. The tumor cells had abundant eosinophilic and granular cytoplasm compatible with oncocytes with mild to moderate nuclear atypia. There were occasional cystic spaces that contained mucin though mucocytes were not readily apparent. (Figure 2) Necrosis, perineural and lymphovascular space invasion or anaplasia were not evident.
Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid ; Salivary Gland Neoplasms ; Parotid Gland

A 63-year old Filipino female presented with epistaxis of undisclosed duration. Examination showed a vascular, pulsating, rubbery intranasal mass involving both nasal cavities. The clinical impression was that of a nasal hemangioma. She underwent excision of the tumor and the specimen was sent for histopathologic evaluation. The specimen consisted of several tan-brown irregular tissue fragments with an aggregate diameter of 2 cm. Microscopic examination showed a cellular spindle cell tumor underneath the respiratory mucosa. (Figure 1) The tumor cells formed a syncytial pattern arranged in whorls that were separated by thin fibrovascular bands. (Figure 2) The cells had round to oval nuclei with nuclear clearing and moderate amount of syncytial cytoplasm compatible with a meningothelial derivation. (Figure 3) There was absence of nuclear atypia, significant mitotic activity, and necrosis. Immunohistochemistry studies showed positivity for Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA) and Progesterone Receptors (PR), and absence of reaction for Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA) and CD34. (Figure 4) Our diagnosis was sinonasal tract meningioma. Primary extracranial meningioma of the sinonasal cavity is rare and thus secondary extension from a primary intracranial tumor should be ruled out. It involves a wide age range with no striking gender predilection.1,2 Most common symptoms include nasal obstruction, epistaxis, exophthalmos, and a mass. Etiogenesis is not completely established and is postulated to arise from meningocytes that are entrapped during closure of midline structures, very similar to the development of meningoceles.3 Histopathologic examination discloses a spindle cell tumor arranged predominantly in whorls composed of cells showing meningothelial differentiation. Most are histologically grade 1 tumors. Grade 2 and 3 sinonasal tract meningiomas are rare.4 Histologic differential diagnoses include a glomangiopericytoma, leiomyosarcoma, and a solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma. Close histologic evaluation with appropriate immunohistochemistry studies point to the correct diagnosis. Meningioma shows strong diffuse positivity with EMA and PR, and is usually negative for other immunohistochemistry markers such as muscle actins (for glomangiopericytoma and leiomyosarcoma), and CD34 (for solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma).1,3 A diagnosis of primary sinonasal meningioma should not be made if an intracranial mass is identified.4 Sinonasal meningiomas are benign tumors with no documented distant metastases.1,2 Although recurrences occur in about 30% (mostly due to incomplete excision), metastasis and malignant transformation has not been reported.
Human ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Meningioma ; Epistaxis ; Nasal Cavity ; Mucin-1 ; Immunohistochemistry ; Receptors, Progesterone ; Actins ; Meningeal Neoplasms ; Nose ; Hemangioma ; Respiratory Mucosa ; Muscle, Smooth