1.An analysis of epidemiological characteristics of influenza-like illness in Hongkou District, Shanghai from 2015 to 2024
Zhenzhen QI ; Tong LI ; Xiaofan REN ; Haiyan WANG ; Jixing YANG
Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine 2025;37(8):649-653
ObjectiveTo explore the epidemic levels and epidemiological characteristics of influenza-like illness (ILI) in Hongkou District of Shanghai, to track the trends in virus mutations, so as to offer a scientific foundation for precisely predicting influenza epidemic trends, providing early alerts, and implementing prompt prevention and control measures. MethodsData on ILI and etiological surveillance from Hongkou District between 2015 and 2024 were collected and statistically analyzed. ResultsThe consultation percentage of ILI (ILI%) in Hongkou District from 2015 to 2024 was 0.58%, and the differences were statistically significant between different years (χ²=19 280.500, P<0.001), with winter and summer being the prevalence peaks. The highest proportion of ILI cases was observed in the 25‒<60 years age group, and the proportion of cases aged ≥60 years showed an increasing trend. The positive rate for influenza viruses was 17.60%, with seasonal influenzaA (H3N2) subtype (49.78%) and influenza A(H1N1) (30.03%) being the predominant strains,and the positive rate was different by years. There was a correlation between ILI% and the positive rate of influenza viruses (r=0.260, P<0.001). The median intensity of influenza activity in 2023‒2024 was 23.09, which was significantly higher than that in 2015‒2019 (H=37.052, P<0.001) and that in 2020‒2022 (H=40.436, P<0.001). ConclusionFrom 2015 to 2022, the ILI% in Hongkou District, Shanghai remained at a relatively low level, but it significantly increased in 2023‒2024, with peaks observed in winter and summer. The predominant influenza virus strains varied and alternated by years. The 2023‒2024 period witnessed an intensified influenza activity. It is necessary to continuously monitor the impact of other respiratory pathogens on influenza epidemic, so as to provide a scientific basis for early warning and prevention and control of influenza.
2.Linagliptin synergizes with cPLA2 inhibition to enhance temozolomide efficacy by interrupting DPP4-mediated EGFR stabilization in glioma.
Dongyuan SU ; Biao HONG ; Shixue YANG ; Jixing ZHAO ; Xiaoteng CUI ; Qi ZHAN ; Kaikai YI ; Yanping HUANG ; Jiasheng JU ; Eryan YANG ; Qixue WANG ; Junhu ZHOU ; Yunfei WANG ; Xing LIU ; Chunsheng KANG
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2025;15(7):3632-3645
The polymerase 1 and transcript release factor (PTRF)-cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) phospholipid remodeling pathway facilitates tumor proliferation in glioma. Nevertheless, blockade of this pathway leads to the excessive activation of oncogenic receptors on the plasma membrane and subsequent drug resistance. Here, CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) was identified through screening of CRISPR/Cas9 libraries. Suppressing PTRF-cPLA2 signaling resulted in the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway through phosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidylcholine remodeling, which ultimately increased DPP4 transcription. In turn, DPP4 interacted with EGFR and prevented its ubiquitination. Linagliptin, a DPP4 inhibitor, facilitated the degradation of EGFR by blocking its interaction with DPP4. When combined with the cPLA2 inhibitor AACOCF3, it exhibited synergistic effects and led to a decrease in energy metabolism in glioblastoma cells. Subsequent in vivo investigations provided further evidence of a synergistic impact of linagliptin by augmenting the sensitivity of AACOCF3 and strengthening the efficacy of temozolomide. DPP4 serves as a novel target and establishes a constructive feedback loop with EGFR. Linagliptin is a potent inhibitor that promotes EGFR degradation by blocking the DPP4-EGFR interaction. This study presents innovative approaches for treating glioma by combining linagliptin with AACOCF3 and temozolomide.
3.Impacts of external fixation of different durations on rehabilitation outcomes after open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture
Yuan CAO ; Xiuzhi LI ; Zengzhen CUI ; Yuliang FU ; Liangyu BAI ; Jixing FAN ; Tengjiao ZHU ; Gao SI ; Yang LYU ; Fang ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2025;41(4):360-368
Objective:To compare the impacts of external fixation of different durations on rehabilitation outcomes after open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture.Methods:A prospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of patients with unilateral acute closed Achilles tendon rupture admitted to Peking University Third Hospital from August 2020 to August 2023. Patients were divided into Group A ( n=96), Group B ( n=347), Group C ( n=346), and Group D ( n=105) based on different postoperative immobilization durations (0, 2, 4 and 6 weeks, respectively). After all the patients received identical open repair procedure, Group A was rehabilitated immediately but the other groups were rehabilitated with the same protocol after removal of the external fixation. Four groups were compared in terms of recovery time of one-leg heel-rise height (OHRH), recovery time of light exercise (LE) in brisk walking and jogging and recovery time of range of motion (ROM). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were also compared at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) and American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores were evaluated at 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 weeks postoperatively. Complications were recorded. Results:A total of 894 patients including 869 males and 25 females were included, aged 18-60 years [(35.0±6.3)years]. All the patients were followed up for 14-25 months [(19.0±3.0)months]. The recovery time of OHRH in Group A and B was 12.0(12.0, 12.0)weeks and 12.0(10.0, 12.0)weeks, shorter than those in Group C [14.0(14.0, 16.0)weeks] and D [14.0(14.0, 14.0)weeks] ( P<0.05), with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05) and between Group C and D ( P>0.05). The recovery time of LE in Group A and B was 18.0(18.0, 18.0)weeks and 18.0(16.0, 18.0)weeks, shorter than those in Group C [20.0(20.0, 20.0)weeks] and D [20.0(20.0, 20.0)weeks] ( P<0.05), with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05) and between Group C and D ( P>0.05). The recovery time of ROM in Group A and B was 6.0(6.0, 6.0)weeks and 6.0(6.0, 6.0)weeks, shorter than those in Group C [8.0(8.0, 10.0)weeks] and D [10.0(10.0, 10.0)weeks)] ( P<0.05), with no significant difference between Group A and B, and between Group C and D ( P>0.05). At 2 weeks postoperatively, the VAS scores were 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points, 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points, and 2.0(1.5, 2.0)points in Group B, C and D, lower than 5.0(5.0, 5.0)points in Group A ( P<0.05), with no significant difference among Group B, C, and D ( P>0.05). At 4 weeks postoperatively, the VAS scores were 1.0(0, 1.0)points, 1.0(0, 1.0)points, and 1.0(0.5, 1.0)points in Group B, C and D, lower than 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points in Group A ( P<0.05), with no significant difference among Group B, C, and D ( P>0.05). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the VAS score was 0(0, 0)points in all the 4 groups, with no significant difference among them ( P>0.05). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the VAS score was 0(0, 0)points, with lower scores in Group A and B than those in Group C and D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and B and between Group C and D ( P>0.05). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS scores were 52.0(52.0, 53.8)points and 52.0(50.0, 53.0)points in Group A and B, higher than 41.0(38.0, 43.0)points and 19.0(18.0, 20.0)points in Group C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS scores were 66.0(66.0, 68.0)points in Group A, higher than 63.0(62.0, 64.0)points, 52.0(50.0, 53.0)points, and 39.0(37.0, 40.0)points in Group B, C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group B than those in Group C and D ( P<0.05) and a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05). At 10 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS score was 75.0(74.0, 76.0)points in Group B, higher than 69.0(69.0, 70.0)points, 72.0(66.0, 74.0)points, and 62.0(58.5, 63.0)points in Group A, C and D ( P<0.05), with higher scores in Group A and C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and C ( P>0.05). At 12 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS score was 84.0(82.0, 85.0)points in Group B, higher than 75.0(75.0, 77.0)points, 79.0(72.0, 81.0)points, and 72.0(71.0, 73.0)points in Group A, C and D ( P<0.05), with higher scores in Group A and C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and C ( P>0.05). At 14 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS score was 87.0(86.0, 87.0)points in Group B, higher than 82.0(82.0, 84.0)points, 83.0(80.0, 85.0)points, and 79.0(77.5, 80.0)points in Group A, C and D ( P<0.05), with higher scores in Group A and C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and C ( P>0.05). At 16 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS scores were 87.0(87.0, 88.0)points and 88.0(87.0, 88.0)points in Group A and B, higher than 86.0(85.0, 87.0)points and 84.0(83.0, 85.0)points in Group C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores were 94.0(94.0, 95.0)points and 95.0(94.0, 96.0)points in Group A and B, higher than 85.0(83.0, 86.0)points and 74.0(72.0, 75.0)points in Group C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores were 100.0(99.0, 100.0)points in Group B, higher than 94.0(94.0, 95.0)points, 92.0(90.0, 93.0)points, and 83.0(82.0, 84.0)points in Group A, C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group A than those in Group C and D ( P<0.05) and a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05). At 10 weeks postoperatively, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 100.0(100.0, 100.0)points in Group B, higher than 98.0(98.0, 98.0)points, 98.0(96.8, 99.0)points, and 96.0(95.0, 97.0)points in Group A, C and D, with higher scores in Group A and C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and C ( P>0.05). At 12 weeks postoperatively, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 100.0(100.0, 100.0)points in both Group A and B, with no significant difference between them ( P>0.05), which was higher than 100.0(98.0, 100.0)points and 99.0(98.0, 99.0)points in Group C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05). At 14 and 16 weeks postoperatively, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 100.0(100.0, 100.0)points, with no significant difference among all the groups ( P>0.05). Superficial wound infection occurred in 12 patients [5.2%(5/96) in Group A, 0.6%(2/347) in Group B, 0.6%(2/346) in Group C and 2.9%(3/105) in Group D] ( P<0.01) while rerupture occurred in 16 [9.4%(9/96) in Group A, 1.2% (4/347) in Group B, 0.9%(3/105) in Group C, and 0 patient in Group D] ( P<0.01). Conclusion:For patients with unilateral acute Achilles tendon rupture, two weeks of postoperative external fixation after open repair can shorten the time of returning sports, alleviate pain, and promote functional recovery, without increasing the risk of complications.
4.Impacts of external fixation of different durations on rehabilitation outcomes after open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture
Yuan CAO ; Xiuzhi LI ; Zengzhen CUI ; Yuliang FU ; Liangyu BAI ; Jixing FAN ; Tengjiao ZHU ; Gao SI ; Yang LYU ; Fang ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2025;41(4):360-368
Objective:To compare the impacts of external fixation of different durations on rehabilitation outcomes after open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture.Methods:A prospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of patients with unilateral acute closed Achilles tendon rupture admitted to Peking University Third Hospital from August 2020 to August 2023. Patients were divided into Group A ( n=96), Group B ( n=347), Group C ( n=346), and Group D ( n=105) based on different postoperative immobilization durations (0, 2, 4 and 6 weeks, respectively). After all the patients received identical open repair procedure, Group A was rehabilitated immediately but the other groups were rehabilitated with the same protocol after removal of the external fixation. Four groups were compared in terms of recovery time of one-leg heel-rise height (OHRH), recovery time of light exercise (LE) in brisk walking and jogging and recovery time of range of motion (ROM). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were also compared at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) and American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores were evaluated at 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 weeks postoperatively. Complications were recorded. Results:A total of 894 patients including 869 males and 25 females were included, aged 18-60 years [(35.0±6.3)years]. All the patients were followed up for 14-25 months [(19.0±3.0)months]. The recovery time of OHRH in Group A and B was 12.0(12.0, 12.0)weeks and 12.0(10.0, 12.0)weeks, shorter than those in Group C [14.0(14.0, 16.0)weeks] and D [14.0(14.0, 14.0)weeks] ( P<0.05), with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05) and between Group C and D ( P>0.05). The recovery time of LE in Group A and B was 18.0(18.0, 18.0)weeks and 18.0(16.0, 18.0)weeks, shorter than those in Group C [20.0(20.0, 20.0)weeks] and D [20.0(20.0, 20.0)weeks] ( P<0.05), with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05) and between Group C and D ( P>0.05). The recovery time of ROM in Group A and B was 6.0(6.0, 6.0)weeks and 6.0(6.0, 6.0)weeks, shorter than those in Group C [8.0(8.0, 10.0)weeks] and D [10.0(10.0, 10.0)weeks)] ( P<0.05), with no significant difference between Group A and B, and between Group C and D ( P>0.05). At 2 weeks postoperatively, the VAS scores were 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points, 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points, and 2.0(1.5, 2.0)points in Group B, C and D, lower than 5.0(5.0, 5.0)points in Group A ( P<0.05), with no significant difference among Group B, C, and D ( P>0.05). At 4 weeks postoperatively, the VAS scores were 1.0(0, 1.0)points, 1.0(0, 1.0)points, and 1.0(0.5, 1.0)points in Group B, C and D, lower than 2.0(1.0, 2.0)points in Group A ( P<0.05), with no significant difference among Group B, C, and D ( P>0.05). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the VAS score was 0(0, 0)points in all the 4 groups, with no significant difference among them ( P>0.05). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the VAS score was 0(0, 0)points, with lower scores in Group A and B than those in Group C and D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and B and between Group C and D ( P>0.05). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS scores were 52.0(52.0, 53.8)points and 52.0(50.0, 53.0)points in Group A and B, higher than 41.0(38.0, 43.0)points and 19.0(18.0, 20.0)points in Group C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS scores were 66.0(66.0, 68.0)points in Group A, higher than 63.0(62.0, 64.0)points, 52.0(50.0, 53.0)points, and 39.0(37.0, 40.0)points in Group B, C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group B than those in Group C and D ( P<0.05) and a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05). At 10 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS score was 75.0(74.0, 76.0)points in Group B, higher than 69.0(69.0, 70.0)points, 72.0(66.0, 74.0)points, and 62.0(58.5, 63.0)points in Group A, C and D ( P<0.05), with higher scores in Group A and C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and C ( P>0.05). At 12 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS score was 84.0(82.0, 85.0)points in Group B, higher than 75.0(75.0, 77.0)points, 79.0(72.0, 81.0)points, and 72.0(71.0, 73.0)points in Group A, C and D ( P<0.05), with higher scores in Group A and C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and C ( P>0.05). At 14 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS score was 87.0(86.0, 87.0)points in Group B, higher than 82.0(82.0, 84.0)points, 83.0(80.0, 85.0)points, and 79.0(77.5, 80.0)points in Group A, C and D ( P<0.05), with higher scores in Group A and C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and C ( P>0.05). At 16 weeks postoperatively, the ATRS scores were 87.0(87.0, 88.0)points and 88.0(87.0, 88.0)points in Group A and B, higher than 86.0(85.0, 87.0)points and 84.0(83.0, 85.0)points in Group C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores were 94.0(94.0, 95.0)points and 95.0(94.0, 96.0)points in Group A and B, higher than 85.0(83.0, 86.0)points and 74.0(72.0, 75.0)points in Group C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and B ( P>0.05). At 8 weeks postoperatively, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores were 100.0(99.0, 100.0)points in Group B, higher than 94.0(94.0, 95.0)points, 92.0(90.0, 93.0)points, and 83.0(82.0, 84.0)points in Group A, C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group A than those in Group C and D ( P<0.05) and a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05). At 10 weeks postoperatively, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 100.0(100.0, 100.0)points in Group B, higher than 98.0(98.0, 98.0)points, 98.0(96.8, 99.0)points, and 96.0(95.0, 97.0)points in Group A, C and D, with higher scores in Group A and C than that in Group D ( P<0.05) but with no significant difference between Group A and C ( P>0.05). At 12 weeks postoperatively, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 100.0(100.0, 100.0)points in both Group A and B, with no significant difference between them ( P>0.05), which was higher than 100.0(98.0, 100.0)points and 99.0(98.0, 99.0)points in Group C and D ( P<0.05), with a higher score in Group C than that in Group D ( P<0.05). At 14 and 16 weeks postoperatively, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 100.0(100.0, 100.0)points, with no significant difference among all the groups ( P>0.05). Superficial wound infection occurred in 12 patients [5.2%(5/96) in Group A, 0.6%(2/347) in Group B, 0.6%(2/346) in Group C and 2.9%(3/105) in Group D] ( P<0.01) while rerupture occurred in 16 [9.4%(9/96) in Group A, 1.2% (4/347) in Group B, 0.9%(3/105) in Group C, and 0 patient in Group D] ( P<0.01). Conclusion:For patients with unilateral acute Achilles tendon rupture, two weeks of postoperative external fixation after open repair can shorten the time of returning sports, alleviate pain, and promote functional recovery, without increasing the risk of complications.
5.Efficacy of a New Intramedullary Fixation System Proximal Femoral Universal Nail in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in Elderly Patients
Yuan CAO ; Jixing FAN ; Zengzhen CUI ; Zhongwei YANG ; Yang LV ; Yun TIAN ; Fang ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2025;25(6):329-334
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of proximal femoral universal nail(PFUN),a new type of intramedullary fixation system,in the treatment of acute unilateral intertrochanteric femoral fracture in elderly patients.Methods From January 2022 to January 2024,200 patients with acute unilateral femoral intertrochanteric fracture were treated in our department.After closed traction reduction,PFUN was implanted with small incisions.Unified rehabilitation plan was adopted after surgery.The functional evaluation was performed by using the Harris hip score system at the last follow-up.Results The operation time was 25-182 min(median,63.0 min).The intraoperative blood loss was 10-750 ml(median,50.0 ml).Intraoperative blood transfusion(suspension of red blood cells)was required in 40 cases(20%).The postoperative hospital stay was 1-15 d(mean,4.0±1.9 d).The postoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was 116.7°-140.1°(mean,132.4°±5.5°).The quality of fracture reduction on the first day after surgery showed 140 cases as excellent,54 cases acceptable,and 6 cases poor.Complications occurred in 13 cases,including superficial wound infection in 2 cases,who were cured by regular wound dressing change and antibiotic treatment,lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in 8 cases,who were given low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation treatment until improvement,pneumonia in 2 cases and urinary tract infection in 1 case,who were cured or improved after specialist treatment.At one month after surgery,the hip joint X-ray showed blurred fracture lines,callus formation at the fracture site,and no internal fixation failure.There was no internal fixation failure within 3 months after surgery.At six months after surgery,all fractures achieved healing without any failure of internal fixation.All the 200 cases were followed up for 12-29 months(mean,16.1±2.7 months).One case experienced internal fixation failure,and underwent head and neck screw resection,internal fixation removal and hip replacement.At the last follow-up,the postoperative recovery was satisfactory.The Harris score of hip joint was 70-94 points(mean,88.8±2.8 points),including 103 cases as excellent,92 cases good,and 5 cases fair,with an excellent and good rate of 97.5%(195/200).Conclusion PFUN is effective in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients,with reliable fixation,rapid postoperative recovery,and low failure rate of internal fixation,especially suitable for unstable cases with internal or external wall fractures.
6.Efficacy of a New Intramedullary Fixation System Proximal Femoral Universal Nail in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in Elderly Patients
Yuan CAO ; Jixing FAN ; Zengzhen CUI ; Zhongwei YANG ; Yang LV ; Yun TIAN ; Fang ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2025;25(6):329-334
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of proximal femoral universal nail(PFUN),a new type of intramedullary fixation system,in the treatment of acute unilateral intertrochanteric femoral fracture in elderly patients.Methods From January 2022 to January 2024,200 patients with acute unilateral femoral intertrochanteric fracture were treated in our department.After closed traction reduction,PFUN was implanted with small incisions.Unified rehabilitation plan was adopted after surgery.The functional evaluation was performed by using the Harris hip score system at the last follow-up.Results The operation time was 25-182 min(median,63.0 min).The intraoperative blood loss was 10-750 ml(median,50.0 ml).Intraoperative blood transfusion(suspension of red blood cells)was required in 40 cases(20%).The postoperative hospital stay was 1-15 d(mean,4.0±1.9 d).The postoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was 116.7°-140.1°(mean,132.4°±5.5°).The quality of fracture reduction on the first day after surgery showed 140 cases as excellent,54 cases acceptable,and 6 cases poor.Complications occurred in 13 cases,including superficial wound infection in 2 cases,who were cured by regular wound dressing change and antibiotic treatment,lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in 8 cases,who were given low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation treatment until improvement,pneumonia in 2 cases and urinary tract infection in 1 case,who were cured or improved after specialist treatment.At one month after surgery,the hip joint X-ray showed blurred fracture lines,callus formation at the fracture site,and no internal fixation failure.There was no internal fixation failure within 3 months after surgery.At six months after surgery,all fractures achieved healing without any failure of internal fixation.All the 200 cases were followed up for 12-29 months(mean,16.1±2.7 months).One case experienced internal fixation failure,and underwent head and neck screw resection,internal fixation removal and hip replacement.At the last follow-up,the postoperative recovery was satisfactory.The Harris score of hip joint was 70-94 points(mean,88.8±2.8 points),including 103 cases as excellent,92 cases good,and 5 cases fair,with an excellent and good rate of 97.5%(195/200).Conclusion PFUN is effective in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients,with reliable fixation,rapid postoperative recovery,and low failure rate of internal fixation,especially suitable for unstable cases with internal or external wall fractures.
7.An outbreak of norovirus diarrhea in a welfare home for the elderly in Shanghai
Wenjia XIAO ; Xiaozhou KUANG ; Jing ZHANG ; Jixing YANG ; Yuan NAN ; Hong YAO ; Zheng TENG ; Sheng LIN ; Xiaohuan GONG ; Xiao YU ; Hao PAN ; Xi ZHANG
Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine 2022;34(8):765-769
ObjectiveTo investigate an outbreak of norovirus diarrhea in a welfare home for the elderly in Shanghai, and to analyze the epidemiology and virus genotype characteristics of the epidemic, thus providing a scientific basis for the prevention and control of norovirus epidemic. MethodsCase definition was clarified. After case definition, a standardized questionnaire was used to carry out case investigation to make comprehensive analysis in combination with field epidemiological investigation and laboratory tests results. ResultsThe epidemic lasted for 14 days, and 23 cases were reported with an incidence rate of 12.37% (23/186), including 3 males and 20 females. There were more cases on the 1st, 4th and 6th floor of the main building in the welfare home, accounting for 52.17% (12/23) of total cases. 19 cases were reported in the main building, with an incidence rate of 11.59% (19/164); 4 cases were reported in the auxiliary building, with an incidence rate of 18.18% (4/22). There was no significant difference in the morbidity between the main building and the auxiliary building (χ2=0.779,P>0.05). The main clinical manifestations were vomiting and diarrhea. There was a significant difference in the incidence of vomiting symptoms among the elderly, nursing staff and other staff in the welfare home (χ2=10.216, P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the incidence of diarrhea among the elderly, nursing staff and other staff (χ2=1.218, P>0.05). Fecal samples were collected from 23 cases, 1 case family member, 68 risk personnel and 14 environmental surface swab samples. Norovirus GⅡ was detected in stool samples of 19 cases, 1 family member and 36 risk personnel. ConclusionOutbreak of norovirus infection is reported in a welfare home in Shanghai. The close contact between the elderly and health workers might lead to the outbreak.
8.Prediction of infection following internal fixation of closed fractures by serum inflammatory factors
Peng YU ; Mingke GUO ; Di YANG ; Chunming HAN ; Jixing ZHU ; Tong BAO ; Yafei DUAN ; Fengliang FAN ; Hongguang ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2018;20(4):356-359
Objective To explore the role of serum inflammatory factors in prediction of infection following internal fixation of closed fractures and its significance for surgical timing and infection prophylaxis.Methods A retrospective study was conducted of the 100 patients who had been treated by internal fixation for closed fracture from January 2014 through July 2016.They were 52 men and 48 women,aged from 24 to 76 years (average,45 years).There were 14 femoral fractures,19 tibial plateau fractures,25 patella fractures,8 pilon fractures,22 tibiofibular shaft fractures,and 12 calcaneal fractures.Of them,21 were inflicted by wound infection.The preoperative and postoperative infection indexes,CRP,ESR,PCT and leukocyte count,were recorded.Logistic regression analysis was conducted to test the correlation between the infection indexes and postoperative infection.The optimal cut-off value was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve.Results CRP showed a significant correlation with postoperative infection while other indexes did not.The optimal cut-off value was 25 mg/L at one day before operation.Conclusions Preoperative determination of CRP may predict the risk of postoperative infection.CRP > 25 mg/L at one day before operation may indicate the following day is not suitable for surgery and active infection prophylaxis should be conducted after surgery.
9.Topical application of sodium hyaluronate for preventing perivascular adhesion of the vein grafts in rabbits: An experimental study
Mingke GUO ; Haijun TIAN ; Chunming HAN ; Jixing ZHU ; Tong BAO ; Di YANG ; Peng YU ; Yafei DUAN ; Fengliang FAN ; Hongguang ZHANG
Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army 2017;42(8):733-736
Objective To explore the effect of topical application of sodium hyaluronate on preventing perivascular adhesion of the vein grafts in rabbits. Methods Thirty-six male New Zealand white rabbits, aged 5 months, were randomly and equally divided into 2 groups: groups A and B. Arterial defect model was established by cutting about 1cm artery from the middle part of the dissected left common carotid artery. A section about 3cm was cut from the right external jugular vein, and the harvested vein was inverted and anastomosed end-to-end to the artery defect. After the anastomosis, the adventitia and two anastomoses of the grafted veins in group A were coated locally with 0.2ml sodium hyaluronate. The grafted veins were obtained 1, 2 and 4 weeks after the operation, with the perivascular adhesion of the vein grafts being examined macroscopically before the resection. HE staining and Masson staining were preformed for histological changes of grafted vein wall and the perivascular adhesion of the vein grafts. At 2, 4 weeks postoperation, the perivascular adhesions of the vein grafts were graded by the grading criteria of adhesion in macroscopic evaluation and histological evaluation. Result At 1, 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively, the macroscopic and histological observation found that the perivascular adhesions in group A were looser than those in group B. The macroscopic grade and histological grade were lower in group A than in group B, there was a significant difference between the two groups at 2 and 4 weeks postoperation (P<0.05). Conclusion Topical application of sodium hyaluronate can reduce the perivascular adhesion and is an ideal treatment strategy for preventing perivascular adhesion of vein grafts.
10.Effects of heat shock protein 70 on mice with traumatic brain injury-related acute gastric mucosal lesions
Guizhong YAN ; Dengfeng WANG ; Wenzhen YANG ; Jixing LIU ; Boru HOU ; Haijun REN
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) 2016;37(4):547-550,589
Objective To explore the protective mechanism of HSP70 protein in traumatic brain injury (TBI)‐related acute gastric mucosal lesions in mice .Methods Forty adult male Balb/c mice were randomly divided into sham (A) ,TBI (B) ,TBI+ geranylgeranylacetone (GGA) (C) ,and TBI+saline (D) groups .TBI was induced via the Feeney impact model .GGA (800 mg/kg) was administered via oral tube beginning before the model was built in group C .The expressions of HSP70 protein in brain and gastric mucosa were determined by immunohistochemistry , and the apoptotic index was detected by TUNEL method .Results The injury area in mouse brain and gastric mucosa was greater in group B than in groups A and C (P<0 .05) .After model induction ,the content of HSP70 protein in group B was markedly higher in the brain and gastric mucosa ,which was notably higher than in group A (P<0 .05) .Obviously apoptotic cells were observed in groups B and D ,which were significantly higher than in groups A and C .GGA pretreatment enhanced the up‐regulated expression of HSP70 and decreased the apoptotic index distinctly ;HSP70 expression was higher in group C than in groups B and D ,but the apoptotic index was lower (P<0 .05) .Conclusion GGA can induce HSP70 protein expression in mouse brain and gastric mucosa .HSP70 is involved in the process of apoptosis inhibition .GGA can be used in the prevention and therapy of TBI‐related acute gastic mucosal lesions .

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail