Introduction: Accurate preoperative localization is essential for the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Although ultrasound, technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy, and 4D-CT provide high localization rates, a subset of patients have non-localizing or discordant imaging. Selective parathyroid venous sampling (PVS) is an invasive adjunct that measures regional parathyroid hormone (PTH) gradients to aid localization in challenging cases. We present a threepatient case series demonstrating the utility of PVS in diagnostically complex PHPT. Cases: We retrospectively reviewed three female patients (ages 44–63) with biochemically confirmed PHPT who underwent selective PVS following negative or discordant imaging. Venous sampling was performed via femoral access with catheterization of bilateral internal jugular, brachiocephalic, and bilateral thyroidal veins. PTH levels were measured at each site and compared to peripheral levels to identify regional gradients. Surgical findings, intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring (IOPTH), histopathology, and postoperative biochemical outcomes were recorded. All patients had non-localizing or discordant preoperative imaging (USG, sestamibi, 4D-CT). PVS identified significant PTH gradients, guiding focused parathyroidectomy. IOPTH monitoring confirmed successful excision in all operated patients. Histopathology confirmed parathyroid adenoma in two cases; in the third case, the parathyroid tissue was identified within the thyroid gland. Postoperative PTH levels suppressed (range 0.79–1.48 pg/mL) in keeping with successful parathyroidectomy. Conclusion PVS effectively lateralized disease in imaging-negative PHPT and directly guided surgical management. When conventional imaging fails, PVS combined with intraoperative PTH monitoring enables targeted surgery and favorable biochemical outcomes.
Humans

Introduction: Hemorrhagic suprarenal masses presenting with hypertensive emergency pose a significant diagnostic challenge, particularly when biochemical and radiological findings are inconclusive. The clinical presentation may mimic catecholamine-secreting tumors, necessitating consideration of a broad differential diagnosis, including pheochromocytoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, and hematological-related extramedullary lesions. Accurate diagnosis is essential, as management strategies differ significantly. Case: We report a 48-year-old male smoker with no known prior medical illness who presented with sudden left-sided chest pain radiating to the epigastrium, associated with vomiting. On arrival, he was markedly hypertensive (207/131 mmHg). He reported a 1-year history of paroxysmal palpitations, headaches, migraines, and intermittent diaphoresis. Computed tomography angiography excluded aortic dissection but demonstrated a left retroperitoneal hemorrhage with non-visualization of the adrenal gland, suggestive of adrenal or tumor-related hemorrhage. He was initially managed empirically as a pheochromocytoma while undergoing biochemical evaluation; however, urinary metanephrines were only mildly elevated. Repeat imaging demonstrated interval enlargement of a non-enhancing suprarenal mass, raising concern for tumor-related hemorrhage. Subsequent ultrasonography, however, favored a liquefied hematoma, and percutaneous drainage yielded 750 mL of sanguineous fluid, resulting in marked clinical improvement. Notably, an elevated hematocrit prompted further evaluation for erythrocytosis. Subsequent testing confirmed JAK2 mutation-positive polycythemia rubra vera, providing a unifying explanation for both the erythrocytosis and spontaneous adrenal hemorrhage. The patient was commenced on hydroxyurea and referred for hematology follow-up. Conclusion Adrenal hemorrhage may closely mimic pheochromocytoma in hypertensive emergencies. A systematic, multidisciplinary approach integrating clinical, biochemical, and imaging findings is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and guide appropriate management, particularly in patients with underlying hematological disorders.
Hypertensive Crisis ; Pheochromocytoma ; Polycythemia Vera ; Hematoma

Introduction: Primary adrenal lymphoma (PAL) is a rare extranodal lymphoma, accounting for less than 1% of cases. It often presents with non-specific constitutional symptoms and features of adrenal insufficiency. The absence of pathognomonic findings frequently leads to delayed diagnosis, by which time the disease is often advanced, contributing to poor prognosis. Case: A 59-year-old male with type 2 diabetes mellitus and previously treated pulmonary tuberculosis presented with 1 month of lethargy, anorexia, weight loss, and abdominal pain. He was cachectic but hemodynamically stable (BP 120/81 mmHg; glucose 5.1 mmol/L), with otherwise unremarkable systemic examination. Laboratory evaluation revealed hyponatremia (120 mmol/L), hyperkalemia (6.0 mmol/L), and severe hypercalcemia (4.4 mmol/L). A short Synacthen test confirmed adrenal insufficiency. Computed tomography demonstrated marked bilateral adrenal enlargement with bulky masses (8.9 × 8.7 × 8.7 cm right; 9.9 × 7.6 × 10.2 cm left), suggestive of malignant infiltration. Adrenal protocol imaging revealed indeterminate lesions with attenuation >40 Hounsfield Unit and relative washout <40%. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of the right adrenal gland was performed. The patient was discharged on hydrocortisone replacement with plans for early follow-up. One week later, he presented again in adrenal crisis with severe hypoglycemia (1.1 mmol/L) and cardiovascular collapse. Despite resuscitative efforts, he succumbed. Histopathology subsequently confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, activated B-cell subtype, consistent with PAL. Conclusion This case highlights the diagnostic pitfalls of PAL, particularly when constitutional symptoms mimic chronic infections such as tuberculosis. It underscores the need for high clinical suspicion in patients with bilateral adrenal masses and adrenal insufficiency. Early recognition, adequate steroid replacement including mineralocorticoid therapy, and prompt tissue diagnosis are critical to prevent rapid deterioration and improve outcomes.
Lymphoma

Introduction: The 2021 IDF-DAR risk calculator had been previously evaluated in multiple studies and subsequently widely accepted and applied in clinical practice as a practical standardized tool for patient risk stratification. Recently updated, the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk calculator enables a more individualized, evidence-related evaluation of patientrelated and disease-related risk factors, incorporating modern diabetes technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, and advanced insulin formulations to enhance risk stratification. This tool allows medical professionals to tailor Ramadan practices based on overall factors toward promoting safe fasting. Methodology: This prospective multicentre observational study recruited adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes attending public hospitals nationwide. People with diabetes (PwD) intending to perform Ramadan fasting were invited to participate and assessed using the 2026 IDF-DAR Risk Calculator in the 6-week pre-Ramadan period between 30th January and 19th March 2026. Results: A total of 458 PwD were evaluated and stratified into low (15.7%), moderate (41%), and high risk (43.3%) categories. Most participants had Type 2 diabetes (83.6%), with 60.3% having a disease duration exceeding 10 years and 43% exhibiting poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >9%). Insulin therapy was used by 76.4% of participants, including two individuals with Type 1 diabetes using AID systems. Most participants reported no recent hypoglycemia (76.4%), 81.0% performed glucose monitoring, and 3.3% used CGM. Severe comorbidities were uncommon, with 1.1% having unstable macrovascular disease and 4.4% advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30). Notably, 72.2% received structured Ramadan education. Conclusion Majority of PwD attending tertiary diabetes clinics were in the moderate- to high-risk category and intended to fast despite medical advice against fasting in some cases. Although most participants were on insulin therapy, hypoglycemia was low in the pre-Ramadan period. Integration of modern technologies, advanced insulin therapies, and structured education may support safer fasting practices.
Risk Assessment ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Hospitals ; Fasting

Introduction: Osteoporosis is associated with increased fracture risk, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Despite established clinical guidelines, a substantial gap remains between recommended and actual prescribing practices. Patients at very high fracture risk have poorer outcomes and are recommended to receive anabolic or parenteral antiresorptive therapies. However, access to these treatments is limited in Malaysian government hospitals due to cost constraints. Methodology: This retrospective clinical audit evaluated osteoporosis treatment prescriptions among very high-risk patients attending the Osteoporosis Endocrine Clinic at Hospital Queen Elizabeth II from 2020 to 2025. Very high fracture risk was defined according to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists criteria, including recent fractures, fractures on therapy, multiple fractures, high fall risk, glucocorticoid use, very high FRAX probability (>30% major osteoporotic fracture or >4.5% hip fracture), or very low bone mineral density (T-score <−3.0). Results: A total of 120 patients were included, with a median age of 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 62–73). Most were of Chinese ethnicity (60%, n = 72), with a median body mass index of 22.6 kg/m² (IQR 19.6–26). Secondary osteoporosis was present in 70% of patients, commonly due to aromatase inhibitor use (45%), glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (13.3%), thyroid disorders (10.8%), and vitamin D insufficiency (9.2%). Only 12% of patients (n = 14) received anabolic or parenteral antiresorptive therapy, while 88% (n = 106) were treated with oral alendronate. Among those on alendronate, 19.8% (n = 21) developed adverse outcomes, including treatment failure (n = 13), gastrointestinal side effects (n = 6), and atypical femoral fractures (n = 2). Conclusion The uptake of guideline-recommended therapy in very high-risk osteoporosis patients remains low. A notable proportion of patients treated with oral alendronate experienced adverse outcomes or suboptimal responses. Addressing financial and systemic barriers is crucial to improving access to advanced therapies and optimizing patient outcomes.
Prescriptions ; Osteoporosis

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

We describe the updated Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of cervical cancer, version 5.1. The KSGO announced the fifth version of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer in March 2024. The selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on data available up to December 2022. Between 2023 and 2024, substantial findings from large-scale clinical trials and new advancements in cervical cancer research remarkably emerged. Therefore, based on the existing version 5.0, we updated the guidelines with newly accumulated clinical data and added 4 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of cervical cancer. For each question, recommendation was formulated with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

Background: and Purpose Tenecteplase is a thrombolytic agent with pharmacological advantages over alteplase and has been shown to be noninferior to alteplase for acute ischemic stroke in randomized trials. However, evidence pertaining to the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients from different ethnic groups is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to investigate ethnicity-specific differences in the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Following an International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)- registered protocol (CRD42023475038), three authors conducted a systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases for articles comparing the use of tenecteplase with any thrombolytic agent in patients with acute ischemic stroke up to November 20, 2023. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Two independent authors extracted data onto a standardized data collection sheet. A pairwise meta-analysis was conducted in risk ratios (RR). Results: From 34 studies (59,601 participants), the rate of complete recanalization was significantly higher (P<0.01) in Asian (RR: 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30 to 2.80) versus Caucasian patients (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.14). However, Asian patients (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.62) had significantly higher (P=0.01) rates of mortality compared with Caucasian patients (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.22). Caucasian patients were also more likely to attain a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at follow-up (RR: 1.14, 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.19) compared with Asian (RR: 1.00, 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.05) patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.20) and any intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.83) between Asian and Caucasian patients. Conclusion Tenecteplase was associated with significantly higher rates of complete recanalization in Asian patients compared with Caucasian patients. However, tenecteplase was associated with higher rates of mortality and lower rates of mRS 0 to 2 in Asian patients compared with Caucasian patients. It may be beneficial to study the variations in response to tenecteplase among patients of different ethnic groups in large prospective cohort studies.