Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bronchial artery chemoembolization (BACE) combined with anlotinib (BACE+A) versus BACE alone in patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:A total of 94 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at six interventional centers between November 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into the BACE+A group ( n=46) and the BACE alone group ( n=48) based on treatment regimen. Baseline and perioperative clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. Treatment response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 1, 6, and 12 months after the first BACE procedure. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to compare median OS and PFS between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing OS and PFS. Results:The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median OS was significantly longer in the BACE+A group (18.8 months, 95% CI 16.3-21.3) than in the BACE group (13.4 months, 95% CI 11.6-15.2) ( P=0.001). The median PFS was also significantly longer in the BACE+A group (9.0 months, 95% CI 7.3-10.7) compared to the BACE group (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.9-7.3) ( P=0.001). At 6 and 12 months post-first BACE, the ORR (43.5%, 40.0%) and DCR (89.1%, 83.3%) were significantly higher in the BACE+A group than in the BACE group (ORR: 20.8%, 14.8%; DCR: 66.7%, 59.3%) (all P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.72, P=0.002), tumor stage ( HR=1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.07, P=0.031), presence of pre-existing complications requiring intervention ( HR=2.72, 95% CI 1.65-4.50, P<0.001), and >2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.68, P=0.003) as independent factors influencing OS. Treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.76, P=0.001), tumor stage ( HR=1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, P=0.025), multi-arterial tumor blood supply ( HR=2.76, 95% CI 1.76-4.31, P<0.001), and>2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.71, P=0.002) were independent factors influencing PFS. There was no significant difference in BACE-related adverse events between the two groups (all P>0.05). Hypertension, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, and anorexia were common anlotinib-specific adverse reactions in the combination group, but no grade 4 or higher adverse reactions were observed. Conclusions:BACE combined with anlotinib demonstrates superior efficacy compared to BACE alone in treating advanced NSCLC, significantly prolonging OS and PFS. The safety profile is manageable, with adverse events remaining within tolerable limits.

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bronchial artery chemoembolization (BACE) combined with anlotinib (BACE+A) versus BACE alone in patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:A total of 94 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at six interventional centers between November 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into the BACE+A group ( n=46) and the BACE alone group ( n=48) based on treatment regimen. Baseline and perioperative clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. Treatment response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 1, 6, and 12 months after the first BACE procedure. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to compare median OS and PFS between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing OS and PFS. Results:The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median OS was significantly longer in the BACE+A group (18.8 months, 95% CI 16.3-21.3) than in the BACE group (13.4 months, 95% CI 11.6-15.2) ( P=0.001). The median PFS was also significantly longer in the BACE+A group (9.0 months, 95% CI 7.3-10.7) compared to the BACE group (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.9-7.3) ( P=0.001). At 6 and 12 months post-first BACE, the ORR (43.5%, 40.0%) and DCR (89.1%, 83.3%) were significantly higher in the BACE+A group than in the BACE group (ORR: 20.8%, 14.8%; DCR: 66.7%, 59.3%) (all P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.72, P=0.002), tumor stage ( HR=1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.07, P=0.031), presence of pre-existing complications requiring intervention ( HR=2.72, 95% CI 1.65-4.50, P<0.001), and >2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.68, P=0.003) as independent factors influencing OS. Treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.76, P=0.001), tumor stage ( HR=1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, P=0.025), multi-arterial tumor blood supply ( HR=2.76, 95% CI 1.76-4.31, P<0.001), and>2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.71, P=0.002) were independent factors influencing PFS. There was no significant difference in BACE-related adverse events between the two groups (all P>0.05). Hypertension, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, and anorexia were common anlotinib-specific adverse reactions in the combination group, but no grade 4 or higher adverse reactions were observed. Conclusions:BACE combined with anlotinib demonstrates superior efficacy compared to BACE alone in treating advanced NSCLC, significantly prolonging OS and PFS. The safety profile is manageable, with adverse events remaining within tolerable limits.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel domestic pulmonary thromoboectomy system Tendvia TM in the treatment for high-risk patients complicated with acute pulmonary embolization (APE). Methods:The study was designed as a prospective single-center clinical trial. Twenty-four high-risk patients with APE were recruited and underwent percutaneous mechanical thromoectomy (PMT) with the Tendvia TM pulmonary thromoboectomy system. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction of RV/LV ratio at the post-operative 48 h. The secondary efficacy endpoints included technical success rate, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), arterial PaO 2 and the instant post-operative thrombus clearance rate. The evaluation of the safety included the intraoperative complications and related complications during the follow-up period associated with the PMT operation and the major adverse event (MAE) rate within the post-operative 48 h. The pre-and post-operative data were compared with paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tendvia TM pulmonary thromoboectomy system. Results:The technical success rate of PMT with Tendvia TM pulmonary thromoboectomy system was 100% (24/24). The 48 h pre-operative RV/LV ratio was 1.19±0.25 and the post-operative RV/LV ratio was 0.82±0.16. The mean RV/LV ratio of the patients was decreased by 0.37±0.25 at post-operative 48 h with significant statistical difference ( t=7.03, P<0.001). The 48 h pre-operative mPAP was (31.09±6.09) mmHg and the post-operative mPAP was (25.91±4.36) mmHg. The mPAP of the patients was reduced by 5.18 mmHg at post-operative 48 h with significant statistical difference ( t=6.73, P<0.001). The pre-operative PaO 2 was (74.66±11.28) mmHg and the post-operative PaO 2 was (88.01±10.57) mmHg. The pressure of oxygen in artery was increased by 13.36 mmHg. The differences were statistically significant( t=-4.08, P<0.001). The rate of thrombus removal was 68.17%±22.66%. 87.5% (21 cases) of patients achieved a thrombus removal greater than grade Ⅱ. One patient underwent catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) after PMT based on the evaluation of operator. The patient′s thrombus removal achieved grade Ⅲ after 48 h and the CDT was ceased. Hemoptysis occurred intra-operatively in one case underwent PMT and the symptom of the patient was alleviated with conservative medication. The MAE incidence within the post-operative 48 h was 4.17% (1/24). No device-related mortality or all-cause mortality occurred in the trial. Conclusions:The Tendvia TM pulmonary thromoboectomy system is a safe and effective device to remove the pulmonary arterial thrombus for the treatment of patients with APE. The Tendvia TM pulmonary thromoboectomy system can be a new choice in the treatment for the patients with APE.

Objective To investigate the correlation between the level change of serum homocysteine (HCY) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with the degree of the coronary artery stenosis in the patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) .Methods A total of 157 ACS patients were divided into the ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) group ,non‐ST el‐evation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) group and unstable angina pectoris(UA) group based on the symptoms ,cardiac enzymes level and electrocardiogram changes .The cases were induded into the mild ,moderate and severe stenosis lesion groups according to the coronary arteriography examination;meanwhile the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the change of the serum VEGF concentration .The HCY level was determined by enzymatic cycling methods with the biochemical analyzer (BXC800 ,Beckman ,USA) .The differences in the concentrations of VEGF and HCY compared among different groups .Results The VEGF level had statistical differences among the mild ,moderate and sever stenosis groups(F=39 .9 ,P=0 .00) ,and between the UA group with the NSTEMI group and STEMI group(F=123 .3 ,P=0 .00) .The HCY level had statistically significant differ‐ence between the severe stenosis group with the mild and moderate stenosis groups (F=39 .7 ,P=0 .00);the HCY level had statis‐tically significant difference among the UA group ,NSTEMI group and STEMI group(F=102 .65 ,P=0 .00) .The VEGF and HCY levels in the mild stenosis group ,different degrees of coronary stenosis groups and different clinical diagnosis groups were positively correlated with the Gensini scores(r=0 .723 ,0 .716) .Conclusion The serum VEGF and HCY levels are correlated with the degree of the coronary artery lesion and myocardial necrosis in ACS patients ,furthermore are related with the Gensini scores .

The onset of hepatocelluar carcinoma, one of the serious complications of primary Budd-Chiari syndrome, is associated with poor prognosis.Although so, the diagnosis and treatment of such disease has still not been standardized at recent.In this paper, we overviewed the recent advances on Budd-Chiari syndrome associated with hepatocelluar carcinoma.