BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among Filipinos. The guideline-recommended treatment for AMI includes emergency care, early electrocardiogram, emergent coronary angiogram and angioplasty, intensive care, medical management and cardiac rehabilitation. However, the cost of treatment is very high and not affordable for most Filipinos. To address this, the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) released the ischemic heart disease – acute myocardial infarction (IHD-AMI) Benefits Package under Circular No. 2024-0032 on December 21, 2024. This package significantly increased the insurance coverage for AMI to include invasive procedures and cardiac rehabilitation. The UP-Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) was the first to implement this package. This paper documents the initial planning, system changes and innovations undertaken by UP-PGH to support implementation.

This qualitative descriptive study used retrospective document review to detail revision of the existing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pathway and development of the AMl pathway, restructuring of patient flow and upgrades in infrastructure and hospital capabilities. Meeting minutes from the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and UP-PGH were reviewed to describe the hospital's preparation and implementation process.

UP-PGH established an efficient, evidence-based ACS and AMI pathway. Hospital protocols, staffing, infrastructure and equipment were aligned to implement the PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package. Key steps included resources upgrade, stakeholder consultations, pathway redesign, workflow development, process alignment and monitoring systems.

The PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package can be successfully implemented in a tertiary hospital with catheterization laboratory. The documented process at UP-PGH can serve as a model for other institutions planning to utilize the package.

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among Filipinos. The guideline-recommended treatment for AMI includes emergency care, early electrocardiogram, emergent coronary angiogram and angioplasty, intensive care, medical management and cardiac rehabilitation. However, the cost of treatment is very high and not affordable for most Filipinos. To address this, the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) released the ischemic heart disease – acute myocardial infarction (IHD-AMI) Benefits Package under Circular No. 2024-0032 on December 21, 2024. This package significantly increased the insurance coverage for AMI to include invasive procedures and cardiac rehabilitation. The UP-Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) was the first to implement this package. This paper documents the initial planning, system changes and innovations undertaken by UP-PGH to support implementation.

This qualitative descriptive study used retrospective document review to detail revision of the existing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pathway and development of the AMl pathway, restructuring of patient flow and upgrades in infrastructure and hospital capabilities. Meeting minutes from the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and UP-PGH were reviewed to describe the hospital's preparation and implementation process.

UP-PGH established an efficient, evidence-based ACS and AMI pathway. Hospital protocols, staffing, infrastructure and equipment were aligned to implement the PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package. Key steps included resources upgrade, stakeholder consultations, pathway redesign, workflow development, process alignment and monitoring systems.

The PHIC IHD-AMI Benefit Package can be successfully implemented in a tertiary hospital with catheterization laboratory. The documented process at UP-PGH can serve as a model for other institutions planning to utilize the package.

BACKGROUND: Medical Aid (MA) beneficiaries, belonging to low-income and vulnerable groups, tend to utilize more healthcare services than patients covered by general health insurance. This study aimed to investigate shifts in medical expenses among South Korean MA beneficiaries from 2010 to 2020 in response to changes in health coverage. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study that involved analyzing data from 354,289 MA beneficiaries aged 20 years and older as of 2010 whose healthcare utilization data could be tracked up to 2020. The impact of changes in health coverage of MA beneficiaries on the increase in medical expenses was analyzed with multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The findings revealed that the group maintaining their MA eligibility had a higher rate of increase in medical expenses compared to those transitioning from MA to National Health Insurance (NHI). Even after adjusting for covariates, the likelihood of an increase in total annual medical expenses was more than 1.4 times higher for the MA maintenance group. However, the group that maintained MA also had higher initial healthcare expenses, indicating poorer health status, compared to the group that transitioned to NHI. CONCLUSION In the public healthcare domain, such as MA, it is crucial to enhance access to necessary healthcare services while preventing unnecessary medical treatments. There is a need for systemic improvements to ensure that low-income, medically vulnerable groups can appropriately use the healthcare services they require to achieve high-value health outcomes.
Republic of Korea ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Female ; Poverty/statistics & numerical data* ; Male ; Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data* ; Aged ; Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data* ; Young Adult ; Medical Assistance/statistics & numerical data* ; Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data*

BACKGROUND

PhilHealth serves as the Philippines’ national health insurance provider and is central to implementing the Universal Health Care (UHC) Law. Despite this, existing gaps and ongoing challenges in claims and financial management systems continue to affect public healthcare facilities’ operations and sustainability.

This article examined the effectiveness and challenges of PhilHealth’s claims and financial management systems in public healthcare facilities, focusing on accreditation, claims processing, reimbursements, and financial governance.

A qualitative multiple-case study design was employed in Quezon City and the provinces of La Union, Sorsogon, Leyte, and Bukidnon, with data collected from 2022 to 2023. Prior to data collection, a certificate of exemption was granted by the Department of Health – Single Joint Research Ethics Board (DOH-SJREB). Data were collected through key informant interviews with healthcare facility heads, claims processors, and PhilHealth personnel, supplemented by document reviews and facility observations. Thematic analysis was employed to examine the implementation of national health insurance policies at the facility level.

Accreditation standards are uniformly defined, yet compliance varies widely, directly influencing reimbursement outcomes. Facilities with compliance gaps often face provisional accreditation, downgrades, or suspension, resulting in reduced revenue. Although the Universal Health Care (UHC) Law guarantees patient access to PhilHealth benefits, the efficiency of claims processing remains uneven and highly dependent on administrative capacity, staffing adequacy, and digital infrastructure. Systemic inefficiencies at both PhilHealth and facility levels contribute to delays and claim denials. Reimbursements are further constrained by outdated case rate ceilings, inconsistent financial practices, inadequate recordkeeping, weak information systems, and poor storage conditions—particularly in lower-level hospitals and rural health units.

Reforms in claims processing workflows, information system integration, and financial management capacities are crucial to enhance reimbursement efficiency. Strengthening these systems is fundamental for supporting sustainable, equitable, and high-quality healthcare delivery in the public sector within the Universal Health Care (UHC) framework.

OBJECTIVES

The burden of oral diseases is high in the Philippines. The global burden of disease study in 2019 estimated that 44 million Filipinos are affected by oral disorder. More specifically, 29 million Filipinos have untreated dental caries. Outpatients' dental health services are not covered by PhilHealth benefit package. There is a need to include key oral health interventions such as basic prevention and treatment in PhilHealth benefit package to be delivered at the primary health care settings (WHO TSA 153980). The study aimed to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of a set of oral health care services to be delivered at different levels of health care within a comprehensive PhilHealth benefit package.

This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of including basic oral health services in the PhilHealth benefit package using a Markov modelling approach. The target population consists of Filipino adults and children at risk for dental diseases who are potential beneficiaries of PhilHealth. The intervention under consideration includes dental consultation, oral prophylaxis, topical fluoride application, silver diamine fluoride application, dental filling, and tooth extraction. The comparator is the current standard of care, which involves out-of-pocket payments for oral health services or limited access to subsidized dental care. The primary outcomes assessed include the incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. A Markov model was constructed with a time horizon of 50 years to simulate the lifespan of Filipinos up to the average life expectancy of 70 years old, using a cycle length of one year to reflect disease progression and treatment effects overtime. Model parameters were derived from literature and expert opinion. Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, were conducted to assess uncertainty in model inputs. The analysis was carried out from a societal perspective incorporating direct medical and non-medical costs, and indirect costs.

A Markov model showed that a subsidized package is a cost-effective approach compared to the current situation of no subsidy, with an ICER of PhP 75,636 (1,535.76 USD) per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted. The computed ICER was considered good value for money as it was below 2021 GDP per capita of the Philippines of PhP 174,286 (3,538.80 USD). One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of preventive treatment had the most significant impact on the model, and a price threshold of greater than PhP 3,062 (62.17 USD) for preventive treatment will render the subsidized package no longer cost-effective. The budget impact analysis showed a 1.63% increase in budget annually with the current situation of no subsidy. Rolling out a subsidized oral health package will entail a significant increase in government expenses during the first year but a decreasing trend of 1-2% annually for the following years as the program takes its effect.

A subsidized oral health package is a costeffective approach from a societal perspective. It will entail a significant increase in government expenditure during the start of its roll out but will eventually result in a decreasing trend of expenses as the years progress.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the clinical profile and incidence of in-hospital outcomes of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) under the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (Philhealth) Z Benefit Package (PZBP).

A retrospective descriptive cohort study. A review of medical records was done from July 2017 to October 2023 to collect data and in-hospital outcomes of patients who underwent CABG surgery under Z benefit package.

One hundred twenty-six patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 60 years and majority of them were male and came from NCR. Hypertension was the leading cause of comorbidity. The top two most common in-hospital outcomes were hospital-acquired pneumonia and postoperative atrial fibrillation. Most commonly observed caused of increased length in hospitalization was pneumonia. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) (operative mortality) and Euro scores were 1.04 ± 0.82 and 0.88 ± 0.56, respectively. All patients had successful surgical outcome with no mortality and an average length of stay in the hospital of six days.

This study will serve as a future reference to enhance screening criteria and improved in-hospital outcomes for those who will undergo CABG under Z benefit package. The study also showed insights on clinical profile and in-hospital outcomes of patients who underwent CABG in our own institution and this may give way to a larger scale of study involving multiple centers who also offer the said program.

Objective: This study aims to explore and analyze the modern contraceptive use of National Health Insurance (NHI) participants before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Methods: This research is an ecological study using aggregated data from 13 Districts/Cities in South Kalimantan. This study used secondary data in 2018-2020 from the official website of the National Population and Family Planning Agency. Spatial analysis and paired T-test were used. Results: There were 30.7% of Districts/Cities in stagnation and 30.7% in the decline of modern contraception use during the pandemic (2019-2020). In addition, the study showed that there were differences in the use of modern contraception before (2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) among active family planning acceptors of NHI participants (p=0.048). Conclusion The existence of NHI, especially recipients of contribution assistance, can increase the use of modern contraception in South Kalimantan. There are differences in the use of modern contraception before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among NHI participants.
National Health Programs ; National Health Insurance ; COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The Philippine Primary Care Studies (PPCS) is a network of pilot studies that developed, implemented, and tested strategies to strengthen primary care in the country. These pilot studies were implemented in an urban, rural, and remote setting. The aim is to use the findings to guide the policies of the national health insurance program (PhilHealth), the main payor for individualized healthcare services in the country.

The objective of this report is to compare baseline outpatient benefit utilization, hospitalization, and health spending, including out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, in three health settings (urban, rural, and remote). These findings were used to contextualize strategies to strengthen primary care in these three settings.

Cross-sectional surveys were carried out using an interviewer-assisted questionnaire on a random sample of families in the urban site, and a stratified random sample of households in the rural and remote sites. The questionnaire asked for out-patient and hospitalization utilization and spending, including the OOP expenses.

A total of 787 families/households were sampled across the three sites. For outpatient benefits, utilization was low in all sites. The remote site had the lowest utilization at only 15%. Unexpectedly, the average annual OOP expenses for outpatient consults in the remote site was PhP 571.92/per capita. This is 40% higher than expenses shouldered by families in the rural area, but similar with the urban site. For hospital benefits, utilization was lowest in the remote site (55.7%) compared to 75.0% and 78.1% for the urban and rural sites, respectively. OOP expenses per year were highest in the remote site at PhP 2204.44 per capita, probably because of delay in access to healthcare and consequently more severe conditions. Surprisingly, annual expenses per year for families in the rural sites (PhP 672.03 per capita) were less than half of what families in the urban sites spent (PhP 1783.38 per capita).

Compared to families in the urban site and households in the rural sites, households in remote areas have higher disease rates and consequently, increased need for outpatient and inpatient health services. When they do get sick, access to care is more difficult. This leads to lower rates of benefit utilization and higher out-of-pocket expenses. Thus, provision of “equal” benefits can inadvertently lead to “inequitable” healthcare, pushing disadvantaged populations into a greater disadvantage. These results imply that health benefits need to be allocated according to need. Families in poorer and more remote areas may require greater subsidies.

BACKGROUND

Polyphenol intake is associated with reduced cardiometabolic risk factors such as dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and obesity. Pigmented rice varieties such as red, purple, and black rice contain polyphenols; however, are not commonly consumed. Apart from price and sensory properties, awareness of its availability, perception of health benefits, and intent to purchase may influence consumer preference and consumption.

This study aimed to develop and validate a short questionnaire designed to determine awareness of the availability, perception of health benefits, and intent to purchase pigmented rice.

The study included three phases: (1) tool development, (2) expert validation, and (3) reliability testing. Questions were initially evaluated for clarity and relevance by two Nutritionist-Dietitians and then by seven lay individuals through a focus group discussion. Following the revision, seven food and nutrition experts evaluated the face and content validity of the questionnaire. Validity was assessed via computation of Item and scale content validity indices and kappa statistics. The validated tool was then tested for internal consistency and parallel form reliability of English and Filipino versions among lay individuals (n=31) and then evaluated for reliability based on Cronbach’s alpha and Intraclass correlation coefficients.

The questionnaire was found to have an acceptable face (I-CVI: 1.00; S-CVI/UA: 1.00; K=1.00) and content validity (I-CVI: 0.86-1.00; S-CVI/UA: 0.96-1.00; K= 0.85-1.00) and reliability (α=0.96-1.00).

The developed questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing awareness of the availability, perception of health benefits, and intent to purchase pigmented rice.

Objective: To compare PhilHealth case rate versus actual charge of hospitalization of common general surgery procedures in a Level 3 government hospital from 2017-2019. Methods: The five most common procedures were determined and records were reviewed. Hospital bills and professional fees (PF) were compared to the PhilHealth rates using t-test. The range of perceived acceptable PF was determined by an online survey. Results: The most common procedures were open appendectomy, open cholecystectomy, initial repair of inguinal hernia, total thyroidectomy and modified radical mastectomy. The study included 1934 charts. For service cases, the hospital bill for appendectomy was significantly lower than the PhilHealth institutional fee, while the rest were significantly higher. For private cases, hospital bills for open cholecystectomy and modified radical mastectomy were significantly higher, while that of open appendectomy was lower. The average PF of private patients in all procedures were significantly higher than the PhilHealth rate, also reflected on the survey. Conclusion The significant discrepancies between the actual charges and the PhilHealth case rates showed that the PhilHealth rates were insufficient for the five most common general surgery procedures in a Level 3 government hospital.
Philippines ; Insurance