Objective:To systematically analyze the reasons for delayed medical consultation in cervical cancer patients, providing a reference basis for promoting timely medical consultation and early treatment for cervical cancer patients.Methods:A computer-based search was conducted across various databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library, for qualitative studies on delayed medical consultation in cervical cancer patients. The search covered all available records up to June 30, 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute centre for evidence-based health care qualitative research quality assessment criteria was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and an integrative synthesis method was applied to combine the findings.Results:A total of 11 studies were included, with 36 individual findings. These findings were grouped into 13 new categories. A total of three major synthesized results were identified: insufficient awareness of cervical cancer, barriers to medical consultation behavior, and the influence of social factors.Conclusions:Strengthening the promotion of cervical cancer health knowledge, providing psychosocial support for patients, and establishing robust social support systems are essential strategies to facilitate timely medical consultation and early treatment for cervical cancer patients.

Objective:To systematically analyze the reasons for delayed medical consultation in cervical cancer patients, providing a reference basis for promoting timely medical consultation and early treatment for cervical cancer patients.Methods:A computer-based search was conducted across various databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library, for qualitative studies on delayed medical consultation in cervical cancer patients. The search covered all available records up to June 30, 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute centre for evidence-based health care qualitative research quality assessment criteria was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and an integrative synthesis method was applied to combine the findings.Results:A total of 11 studies were included, with 36 individual findings. These findings were grouped into 13 new categories. A total of three major synthesized results were identified: insufficient awareness of cervical cancer, barriers to medical consultation behavior, and the influence of social factors.Conclusions:Strengthening the promotion of cervical cancer health knowledge, providing psychosocial support for patients, and establishing robust social support systems are essential strategies to facilitate timely medical consultation and early treatment for cervical cancer patients.

In order to prevent the teaching reform of organ system curriculum from fall of teaching quality, the teaching effect of organ system curriculum and subject curriculum system in teaching the basic knowledge of pathophysiology was compared. In organ system curriculum teaching, there was no difference between the grades of students in Batch 2011 and Batch 2012 who conformed to the teaching principle of "gradual improvement" and those of the students taught with subject curriculum system. On the contrary, the students of Batch 2013 and Batch 2014 with insufficient curriculum content integration had a decreasing trend or a significant reduction in the teaching effect of organ system curriculum compared with that of subject curriculum system. After the supplementary for curriculum knowledge was made, the teaching effect of the organ system was significantly improved, which was better than that of the subject curriculum system. In conclusion, we have summarized and reflected on the effectiveness of the teaching reform of organ system curriculum, once again proved that basic medical teaching must also follow the inherent law of medical education, which is the teaching principle of "gradual improvement."

United States is the world's Medical Center, and American medical education is also a typical representative of the western medical education. This study takes the Medical School of Utah University and Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology as an example to analyze and compare the similarities and differences between Chinese and American medi-cal schools in the aspects of subject setting , curriculum planning , teaching method and auxiliary teaching means. The result shows that both are basically the same in the setting of the course of clini-cal medicine, adopt integration module and PBL teaching, but there are fewer subjects of basic course at the school of medicine of Utah university, and online teaching and studying are more commonly used as an auxiliary teaching means.

The integrated course centered on organ system has been implemented for several years in Huazhong university of science and technology.Basic medicine courses were divided into three modules.Medical introduction Ⅰ was the first one which integrated nine basic medicine courses.Reform on teaching methods,teaching content,teacher training and experiment teaching were conducted and initial results were achieved.