1.Research progress of big language models in critical care nursing
Xu LI ; Huiting XU ; Zhiang SUN ; Jingjing HE ; Pin YU ; Hailing JU
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2025;31(15):2090-2094
This paper reviews the current application status of big language model in nursing, the needs for information technology development in critical care nursing, the current application status of and future development direction of big language model in critical care nursing, as well as the risks and challenges faced, with a view to providing a reference for promoting the application of big language model in critical care nursing.
2.Prognostic value of ultrasound carotid plaque length in patients with coronary artery disease.
Wendong TANG ; Zhichao XU ; Tingfang ZHU ; Yawei YANG ; Jian NA ; Wei ZHANG ; Liang CHEN ; Zongjun LIU ; Ming FAN ; Zhifu GUO ; Xianxian ZHAO ; Yuan BAI ; Bili ZHANG ; Hailing ZHANG ; Pan LI
Chinese Medical Journal 2025;138(14):1755-1757
3.Retrospective study on the treatment of chemotherapy intolerance B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children with Blinatumomab
Min HE ; Xinyu HE ; Hailing LIU ; Ding DING ; Man XU ; Guoli LIAN ; Zhigang LIU
Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine 2025;32(10):743-747
Objective:To assess the safety and efficacy of Blinatumomab in treating children with acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia(B-ALL).Methods:The clinical data of 10 B-ALL children who were admitted to the Department of Pediatrics,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from May 2022 to April 2024 and treated with Blinatumomab were analyzed retrospectively.Results:All the 10 cases had a complete remission of bone marrow and all minimal residual disease(MRD)were negative. Serious adverse events were reported after chemotherapy,including intracranial venous sinus thrombosis with acute cerebral infarction,acute pancreatitis,paralytic ileus,syndrome of abnormal secretion of antidiuretic hormone,severe pneumonia,liver injury,sepsis(β-lactamase resistant Escherichia coli,Pseudomonas aeruginosa),oral mucositis,persistent agranulocytosis with bloodstream infection. All patients interrupted chemotherapy and received Blinatumomab injections for 14 days. During treatment,there was hematological toxicity,which resulted in grade 3-4 neutropenia in 5 cases within the first 7 days. Transient low-grade fever was observed in 4 cases of non-hematological toxicity during days 1-3 of treatment. One patient experienced a headache on the 7th day of treatment,which worsened on the 14th day,but it improved with mannitol treatment. Mild liver injury was present in 3 cases. Interleukin-6 reached a peak of 71.86 pg/mL on the second day of treatment in one case,whereas it was normal in others. All patients were found to be free of cytokine release syndrome. T lymphocyte count increased in 5 patients after 14 days of Blinatumomab treatment,but B lymphocyte count and serum immunoglobulin levels declined in 10 patients. Hypogammaglobulinemia was observed in 3 of these patients. The median follow-up time was 7.8(3.0-24.0)months. All patients achieved MRD-negative complete remission and 6-month overall survival rate and progression-free survival were both 100%.Conclusion:Children with B-ALL can benefit from using Blinatumomab,which is safer than conventional chemotherapy,as a new treatment strategy for those who cannot tolerate traditional chemotherapy.
4.Study of the prognostic value of neoadjuvant rectal scores for survival in locally advanced rectal cancer
Hailing HOU ; Haonan HAN ; Miao LIU ; Yanling YANG ; Liming XU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2025;34(2):144-150
Objective:To explore and verify the value of neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score in predicting the prognosis of patients with middle and low locally advanced rectal cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis of 207 patients with middle and low locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021 was performed. The neoadjuvant radiotherapy regimen was pelvic external irradiation of 45-50.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/f, 5 times per week and concurrent oral capecitabine chemotherapy on days 1-14 and 22-36 during radiotherapy. Total mesorectal excision (TME) was then performed. The NAR score was calculated based on the initial clinical stage and postoperative pathological stage, and divided into the low (<8), medium (8-16) and high (>16) layers, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in DFS and OS among different NAR score layers were compared using the log-rank test. Some patients received consolidation chemotherapy during the interval between concurrent radiotherapy-chemotherapy and surgery, even the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) model. Subgroup analysis was further used to verify the predictive value of the NAR score in the strengthened neoadjuvant therapy model.Results:The median follow-up of all patients was 46.0 months (range: 19.5-88.0 months), the 3-year DFS was 79.2%, and the 3-year OS was 87.4%. Univariate analysis found that the NAR score had a significant impact on the 3-year DFS and OS. The 3-year DFS of patients with low, medium, and high NAR scores were 90.3%, 86.1% and 58.7% ( P<0.001), and the 3-year OS were 94.4%, 91.7% and 74.6%, ( P<0.001), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the predictive value of the NAR score also applied to the strengthened neoadjuvant therapy model. The 3-year DFS of patients with low, medium, and high NAR scores were 86.9%, 83.8% and 68.3% ( P=0.044), and the 3-year OS were 92.9%, 90.7% and 85.4% ( P=0.029), respectively. Conclusion:The NAR score can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with middle and low locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, whether using neoadjuvant therapy or strengthened neoadjuvant therapy followed by TME surgery.
5.Real world research on prognosis and associated risk factors of postoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction
Haonan HAN ; Hailing HOU ; Baozhong ZHANG ; Jing WANG ; Yuanjie CAO ; Jinqiang YOU ; Zhongjie CHEN ; Jie CHEN ; Bailin ZHANG ; Li ZHU ; Xiangpan LI ; Ping WANG ; Liming XU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2025;34(5):453-460
Objective:To evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) and associated risk factors on the prognosis of patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) for breast cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1593 breast cancer patients who underwent PMBR at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital between January 2010 and October 2023. Patients were divided into an RT group ( n = 351) and a non-RT group ( n =1242) based on whether postoperative radiotherapy was administered. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of revision surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used for pairing. Continuous variables were compared between the two groups using the independent samples t-tests, while categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests, and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze survival influencing factors, and include propensity factors with P<0.2 in univariate analysis into multivariate analysis. Results:In the RT group, there were 3 deaths (0.9%) and 21 cases of disease progression (6.0%); in the non-RT group, 7 patients died (0.56%) and 40 experienced disease progression (3.22%). The median OS was 20.1 months (range: 0.1-164.9), and the median PFS was 19.5 months (range: 0.1-160.9). Pregnancy-associated breast cancer and higher N stage were identified as significant risk factors for OS, while neoadjuvant therapy, absence of adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, and higher T stage were significant risk factors affecting patients' PFS. Radiotherapy significantly reduced the survival risk for PMBR patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer or those receiving neoadjuvant therapy ( P=0.019, 0.027). Compared with other reconstruction methods, implant-based reconstruction was associated with a lower incidence of postmastectomy revision surgery(10.5% vs. 17.0%, P<0.001). Even after radiotherapy, the revision surgery incidence for implant-based reconstruction remained lower than that of other methods (12.2% vs. 14.2%, P=0.591). Compared with other reconstruction types, expander-based reconstruction was associated with an increased incidence of revision surgery (31.9% vs. 10.9%, P<0.001). Conclusions:Postmastectomy radiotherapy can reduce survival risk in PMBR patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer or who received neoadjuvant therapy, showing positive effects on OS and PFS in high-risk patients. Pregnancy, higher T/N stage, and specific treatment strategies are critical factors influencing the prognosis of PMBR patients. Implant-based reconstruction is associated with a lower incidence of revision surgery, which remains low even after RT, whereas expander-based reconstruction may increase the long-term risk of revision surgery.
6.Retrospective study on the treatment of chemotherapy intolerance B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children with Blinatumomab
Min HE ; Xinyu HE ; Hailing LIU ; Ding DING ; Man XU ; Guoli LIAN ; Zhigang LIU
Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine 2025;32(10):743-747
Objective:To assess the safety and efficacy of Blinatumomab in treating children with acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia(B-ALL).Methods:The clinical data of 10 B-ALL children who were admitted to the Department of Pediatrics,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from May 2022 to April 2024 and treated with Blinatumomab were analyzed retrospectively.Results:All the 10 cases had a complete remission of bone marrow and all minimal residual disease(MRD)were negative. Serious adverse events were reported after chemotherapy,including intracranial venous sinus thrombosis with acute cerebral infarction,acute pancreatitis,paralytic ileus,syndrome of abnormal secretion of antidiuretic hormone,severe pneumonia,liver injury,sepsis(β-lactamase resistant Escherichia coli,Pseudomonas aeruginosa),oral mucositis,persistent agranulocytosis with bloodstream infection. All patients interrupted chemotherapy and received Blinatumomab injections for 14 days. During treatment,there was hematological toxicity,which resulted in grade 3-4 neutropenia in 5 cases within the first 7 days. Transient low-grade fever was observed in 4 cases of non-hematological toxicity during days 1-3 of treatment. One patient experienced a headache on the 7th day of treatment,which worsened on the 14th day,but it improved with mannitol treatment. Mild liver injury was present in 3 cases. Interleukin-6 reached a peak of 71.86 pg/mL on the second day of treatment in one case,whereas it was normal in others. All patients were found to be free of cytokine release syndrome. T lymphocyte count increased in 5 patients after 14 days of Blinatumomab treatment,but B lymphocyte count and serum immunoglobulin levels declined in 10 patients. Hypogammaglobulinemia was observed in 3 of these patients. The median follow-up time was 7.8(3.0-24.0)months. All patients achieved MRD-negative complete remission and 6-month overall survival rate and progression-free survival were both 100%.Conclusion:Children with B-ALL can benefit from using Blinatumomab,which is safer than conventional chemotherapy,as a new treatment strategy for those who cannot tolerate traditional chemotherapy.
7.Research progress of big language models in critical care nursing
Xu LI ; Huiting XU ; Zhiang SUN ; Jingjing HE ; Pin YU ; Hailing JU
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2025;31(15):2090-2094
This paper reviews the current application status of big language model in nursing, the needs for information technology development in critical care nursing, the current application status of and future development direction of big language model in critical care nursing, as well as the risks and challenges faced, with a view to providing a reference for promoting the application of big language model in critical care nursing.
8.Study of the prognostic value of neoadjuvant rectal scores for survival in locally advanced rectal cancer
Hailing HOU ; Haonan HAN ; Miao LIU ; Yanling YANG ; Liming XU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2025;34(2):144-150
Objective:To explore and verify the value of neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score in predicting the prognosis of patients with middle and low locally advanced rectal cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis of 207 patients with middle and low locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021 was performed. The neoadjuvant radiotherapy regimen was pelvic external irradiation of 45-50.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/f, 5 times per week and concurrent oral capecitabine chemotherapy on days 1-14 and 22-36 during radiotherapy. Total mesorectal excision (TME) was then performed. The NAR score was calculated based on the initial clinical stage and postoperative pathological stage, and divided into the low (<8), medium (8-16) and high (>16) layers, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in DFS and OS among different NAR score layers were compared using the log-rank test. Some patients received consolidation chemotherapy during the interval between concurrent radiotherapy-chemotherapy and surgery, even the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) model. Subgroup analysis was further used to verify the predictive value of the NAR score in the strengthened neoadjuvant therapy model.Results:The median follow-up of all patients was 46.0 months (range: 19.5-88.0 months), the 3-year DFS was 79.2%, and the 3-year OS was 87.4%. Univariate analysis found that the NAR score had a significant impact on the 3-year DFS and OS. The 3-year DFS of patients with low, medium, and high NAR scores were 90.3%, 86.1% and 58.7% ( P<0.001), and the 3-year OS were 94.4%, 91.7% and 74.6%, ( P<0.001), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the predictive value of the NAR score also applied to the strengthened neoadjuvant therapy model. The 3-year DFS of patients with low, medium, and high NAR scores were 86.9%, 83.8% and 68.3% ( P=0.044), and the 3-year OS were 92.9%, 90.7% and 85.4% ( P=0.029), respectively. Conclusion:The NAR score can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with middle and low locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, whether using neoadjuvant therapy or strengthened neoadjuvant therapy followed by TME surgery.
9.Real world research on prognosis and associated risk factors of postoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction
Haonan HAN ; Hailing HOU ; Baozhong ZHANG ; Jing WANG ; Yuanjie CAO ; Jinqiang YOU ; Zhongjie CHEN ; Jie CHEN ; Bailin ZHANG ; Li ZHU ; Xiangpan LI ; Ping WANG ; Liming XU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2025;34(5):453-460
Objective:To evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) and associated risk factors on the prognosis of patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) for breast cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1593 breast cancer patients who underwent PMBR at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital between January 2010 and October 2023. Patients were divided into an RT group ( n = 351) and a non-RT group ( n =1242) based on whether postoperative radiotherapy was administered. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of revision surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used for pairing. Continuous variables were compared between the two groups using the independent samples t-tests, while categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests, and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze survival influencing factors, and include propensity factors with P<0.2 in univariate analysis into multivariate analysis. Results:In the RT group, there were 3 deaths (0.9%) and 21 cases of disease progression (6.0%); in the non-RT group, 7 patients died (0.56%) and 40 experienced disease progression (3.22%). The median OS was 20.1 months (range: 0.1-164.9), and the median PFS was 19.5 months (range: 0.1-160.9). Pregnancy-associated breast cancer and higher N stage were identified as significant risk factors for OS, while neoadjuvant therapy, absence of adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, and higher T stage were significant risk factors affecting patients' PFS. Radiotherapy significantly reduced the survival risk for PMBR patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer or those receiving neoadjuvant therapy ( P=0.019, 0.027). Compared with other reconstruction methods, implant-based reconstruction was associated with a lower incidence of postmastectomy revision surgery(10.5% vs. 17.0%, P<0.001). Even after radiotherapy, the revision surgery incidence for implant-based reconstruction remained lower than that of other methods (12.2% vs. 14.2%, P=0.591). Compared with other reconstruction types, expander-based reconstruction was associated with an increased incidence of revision surgery (31.9% vs. 10.9%, P<0.001). Conclusions:Postmastectomy radiotherapy can reduce survival risk in PMBR patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer or who received neoadjuvant therapy, showing positive effects on OS and PFS in high-risk patients. Pregnancy, higher T/N stage, and specific treatment strategies are critical factors influencing the prognosis of PMBR patients. Implant-based reconstruction is associated with a lower incidence of revision surgery, which remains low even after RT, whereas expander-based reconstruction may increase the long-term risk of revision surgery.
10.Levels and clinical significance of serum miR-651 and miR-630 in patients with cervical cancer
Yongzhen ZHANG ; Shanshan WANG ; Hailing ZHAO ; Liwei XU
The Journal of Practical Medicine 2024;40(2):158-162
Objective To investigate the levels and clinical significance of serum microRNA(miR)-651 and miR-630 in patients with cervical cancer.Methods From June 2017 to May 2020,108 cervical cancer patients accepted by our hospital were collected as the cervical cancer group.Meantime,100 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN)patients treated in our hospital were regarded as the CIN group,and 110 healthy individuals who underwent physical examination were regarded as the control group.Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR(qRT-PCR)was applied to detect serum levels of miR-651 and miR-630,while analyzing the relationship between serum miR-651 and miR-630 as well as clinical features and prognosis of patients.Results The serum levels of miR-651 and miR-630 in the cervical cancer group and CIN group were obviously lower than those in the control group(P<0.05),while the serum levels of miR-651 and miR-630 in the cervical cancer group were obviously lower than those in the CIN group(P<0.05).The expression levels of serum miR-651 and miR-630 were positively corre-lated(r = 0.542,P<0.05).The serum levels of miR-651 and miR-630 were related to HPV infection,differentia-tion,lymph node metastasis,and FIGO staging(P<0.05).The overall survival rate of patients with low levels of miR-651 and miR-630 was lower than that of patients with high levels.Cox regression analysis showed that,HPV infection,degree of differentiation,lymph node metastasis,FIGO staging,miR-651,and miR-630 were all influ-encing factors for the prognosis of cervical cancer patients(P<0.05).Conclusion The serum levels of miR-651 and miR-630 in cervical cancer patients decrease,which are related to HPV infection,differentiation,lymph node metastasis,FIGO staging,and prognosis.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail