Background and Aims:Reconstructing huge abdominal wall defects after abdominal wall tumor resection is a significant challenge for surgeons.Here,we summarize the experience of our team in repairing these defects using an anterolateral thigh chimeric perforator flap combined with artificial materials,within a multidisciplinary collaborative framework,aiming to provide a reference for other practitioners.Methods:The clinicopathologic data of 7 patients who underwent primary reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects after malignant tumor resection,using an anterolateral thigh chimeric perforator flap combined with artificial materials,at Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,between October 2019 and April 2024,were retrospectively analyzed.The clinical outcomes were evaluated.Results:All 7 patients successfully underwent both tumor resection and primary abdominal wall reconstruction without surgery-related mortality.The wound in all patients healed in one stage,with no severe complications such as surgical site infections or flap necrosis.During a follow-up period of 6 to 54 months,2 patients experienced tumor recurrence,one of whom died(exact cause unknown),while the other continued anti-tumor treatment.The remaining 5 patients were alive without recurrence.One patient developed abdominal wall bulging,but no obvious incisional hernia occurred in any of the patients.Conclusion:The use of an anterolateral thigh chimeric perforator flap combined with artificial materials for repairing large abdominal wall defects after abdominal tumor resection can achieve satisfactory therapeutic outcomes.This approach is a feasible and safe method for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of open anterior myofascial repair surgery on abdominal wall incision hernia.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 188 patients who underwent open anterior myofascial repair surgery on abdo-minal wall incision hernia at three medical centers, including Xiangya Hospital of Central South University et al, from December 2016 to December 2024 were collected. There were 85 males and 103 females, aged (62±12)years. Of the 188 patients, 55 cases had large incisional hernia and 133 cases had non-large incisional hernia. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative conditions; (2) postopera-tive conditions; (3) follow-up. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the nonparametic test. Results:(1) Intra-operative conditions. The operation time of the 55 patients with large incisional hernia was (145±40)minutes, and the volume of intraoperative blood loss was 40.0(22.5,55.0)mL, cases with fascial defect located in the central anterior abdominal wall, the superolateral quadrant, the inferolateral quadrant were 26, 7, 22, the fascial defect area was 140(99,169)cm2, cases used with self-fixating mesh and flat mesh were 29, 26. The above indicators of the 133 patients with non-large incisional hernia were (124±34)minutes, 35.0(30.0,45.0)mL, 47, 26, 60, 25(12,40)cm2, 67, 66, respectively. There were significant differences in operation time and fascial defect area between patients with large incisional hernia and non-large incisional hernia ( t=-3.651, Z=-10.339, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss, defect quadrant distribution, and mesh type ( Z=-0.501, χ2=2.692, 0.086, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative conditions. Of the 55 patients with large incisional hernia, 7 cases developed postoperative seroma, including 5 cases combined with concomitant surgical-site infection, and 4 additional cases developed with surgical-site infection. Of the 133 patients with non-large incisional hernia, 15 cases developed postoperative seroma, including 3 cases combined with concomitant surgical-site infection. There was a significant difference in surgical-site infection between patients with large incisional hernia and non-large incisional hernia ( χ2=10.707, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in postoperative seroma ( χ2=0.079, P>0.05). The duration of postoperative hospital stay was 7(6, 9)days for the 55 patients with large incisional hernia and 5(4, 6)days for the 133 patients with non-large incisional hernia, showing a significant difference between them ( Z=-6.292, P<0.05). (3) Follow-up. All 188 patients were followed up for 43(range, 29-67)months. During the follow-up, 9 patients experienced hernia recurrence, including 7 patients with large incisional hernia and 2 patients with non-large incisional hernia. For the 7 patients of large incisional hernia with hernia recurrence, 4 cases underwent reoperation and 3 cases received conservative treatment. All 2 patients of non-large incisional hernia with hernia recurrence received conservative treatment. There was no significant difference in hernia recurrence between patients with large incisional hernia and non-large incisional hernia ( χ2=8.432, P<0.05). Results of chronic pain score at postoperative 3 month showed that among 55 patients with large incisional hernia, 40 cases had mild pain, 7 cases had moderate pain, and 8 cases had severe pain. Among 133 patients with non-large incisional hernia, the above indicators were 102, 28, and 3, respectively. There was no significant difference in chronic pain score at postoperative 3 month between patients with large incisional hernia and non-large incisional hernia ( Z=-0.968, P>0.05). Conclusions:Open anterior myofascial repair surgery can be used for the treatment of abdominal wall incision hernia. Compared with non-large incisional hernia, patients with large incisional hernia have longer operation time, are more prone to surgical-site infection, have longer postoperative hospital stay, and are more likely to experience hernia recurrence.

Background and Aims:Early-onset extensive emphysematous pancreatitis(EP)is a rare but highly lethal subtype of infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN),characterized by abrupt onset and rapid deterioration.This study aimed to investigate its clinical characteristics,microbiological spectrum,treatment approaches,and outcomes to provide evidence for early identification and timely intervention.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 305 IPN patients treated at Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,from January 2010 to October 2023.Eight patients who developed gas accumulation involving≥50%of pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis within two weeks of onset were defined as early-onset extensive EP.Their clinical data were compared with those of ordinary IPN patients.Results:Early-onset extensive EP accounted for 2.6%of all IPN cases.The early-onset extensive EP group had significantly higher mortality and multiple organ failure rates compared with the ordinary IPN group(75.0%vs.24.6%and 75.0%vs.34.7%,respectively;both P<0.05).A total of 15 microbial isolates were identified from early-onset extensive EP patients,predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae(62.5%)and Escherichia coli(37.5%).The infection rate of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae(CRE)was markedly higher in the EP group than in the ordinary IPN group(75.0%vs.31.1%,P=0.015).Most patients were treated using a step-up approach based on percutaneous catheter drainage,with no significant difference in treatment strategy between the two groups(P=0.625).Conclusion:Early-onset extensive EP represents a rare and fulminant subtype of IPN with extremely poor outcomes.Klebsiella pneumoniae and CRE are the predominant pathogens.Early radiological evaluation and timely intervention are crucial for improving prognosis in these patients.

Background and Aims:Reconstructing huge abdominal wall defects after abdominal wall tumor resection is a significant challenge for surgeons.Here,we summarize the experience of our team in repairing these defects using an anterolateral thigh chimeric perforator flap combined with artificial materials,within a multidisciplinary collaborative framework,aiming to provide a reference for other practitioners.Methods:The clinicopathologic data of 7 patients who underwent primary reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects after malignant tumor resection,using an anterolateral thigh chimeric perforator flap combined with artificial materials,at Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,between October 2019 and April 2024,were retrospectively analyzed.The clinical outcomes were evaluated.Results:All 7 patients successfully underwent both tumor resection and primary abdominal wall reconstruction without surgery-related mortality.The wound in all patients healed in one stage,with no severe complications such as surgical site infections or flap necrosis.During a follow-up period of 6 to 54 months,2 patients experienced tumor recurrence,one of whom died(exact cause unknown),while the other continued anti-tumor treatment.The remaining 5 patients were alive without recurrence.One patient developed abdominal wall bulging,but no obvious incisional hernia occurred in any of the patients.Conclusion:The use of an anterolateral thigh chimeric perforator flap combined with artificial materials for repairing large abdominal wall defects after abdominal tumor resection can achieve satisfactory therapeutic outcomes.This approach is a feasible and safe method for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Background and Aims:Early-onset extensive emphysematous pancreatitis(EP)is a rare but highly lethal subtype of infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN),characterized by abrupt onset and rapid deterioration.This study aimed to investigate its clinical characteristics,microbiological spectrum,treatment approaches,and outcomes to provide evidence for early identification and timely intervention.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 305 IPN patients treated at Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,from January 2010 to October 2023.Eight patients who developed gas accumulation involving≥50%of pancreatic or peripancreatic necrosis within two weeks of onset were defined as early-onset extensive EP.Their clinical data were compared with those of ordinary IPN patients.Results:Early-onset extensive EP accounted for 2.6%of all IPN cases.The early-onset extensive EP group had significantly higher mortality and multiple organ failure rates compared with the ordinary IPN group(75.0%vs.24.6%and 75.0%vs.34.7%,respectively;both P<0.05).A total of 15 microbial isolates were identified from early-onset extensive EP patients,predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae(62.5%)and Escherichia coli(37.5%).The infection rate of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae(CRE)was markedly higher in the EP group than in the ordinary IPN group(75.0%vs.31.1%,P=0.015).Most patients were treated using a step-up approach based on percutaneous catheter drainage,with no significant difference in treatment strategy between the two groups(P=0.625).Conclusion:Early-onset extensive EP represents a rare and fulminant subtype of IPN with extremely poor outcomes.Klebsiella pneumoniae and CRE are the predominant pathogens.Early radiological evaluation and timely intervention are crucial for improving prognosis in these patients.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of open anterior myofascial repair surgery on abdominal wall incision hernia.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 188 patients who underwent open anterior myofascial repair surgery on abdo-minal wall incision hernia at three medical centers, including Xiangya Hospital of Central South University et al, from December 2016 to December 2024 were collected. There were 85 males and 103 females, aged (62±12)years. Of the 188 patients, 55 cases had large incisional hernia and 133 cases had non-large incisional hernia. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative conditions; (2) postopera-tive conditions; (3) follow-up. Comparison of measurement data with normal distribution between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Comparison of measurement data with skewed distribution between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Comparison of count data between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the nonparametic test. Results:(1) Intra-operative conditions. The operation time of the 55 patients with large incisional hernia was (145±40)minutes, and the volume of intraoperative blood loss was 40.0(22.5,55.0)mL, cases with fascial defect located in the central anterior abdominal wall, the superolateral quadrant, the inferolateral quadrant were 26, 7, 22, the fascial defect area was 140(99,169)cm2, cases used with self-fixating mesh and flat mesh were 29, 26. The above indicators of the 133 patients with non-large incisional hernia were (124±34)minutes, 35.0(30.0,45.0)mL, 47, 26, 60, 25(12,40)cm2, 67, 66, respectively. There were significant differences in operation time and fascial defect area between patients with large incisional hernia and non-large incisional hernia ( t=-3.651, Z=-10.339, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss, defect quadrant distribution, and mesh type ( Z=-0.501, χ2=2.692, 0.086, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative conditions. Of the 55 patients with large incisional hernia, 7 cases developed postoperative seroma, including 5 cases combined with concomitant surgical-site infection, and 4 additional cases developed with surgical-site infection. Of the 133 patients with non-large incisional hernia, 15 cases developed postoperative seroma, including 3 cases combined with concomitant surgical-site infection. There was a significant difference in surgical-site infection between patients with large incisional hernia and non-large incisional hernia ( χ2=10.707, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in postoperative seroma ( χ2=0.079, P>0.05). The duration of postoperative hospital stay was 7(6, 9)days for the 55 patients with large incisional hernia and 5(4, 6)days for the 133 patients with non-large incisional hernia, showing a significant difference between them ( Z=-6.292, P<0.05). (3) Follow-up. All 188 patients were followed up for 43(range, 29-67)months. During the follow-up, 9 patients experienced hernia recurrence, including 7 patients with large incisional hernia and 2 patients with non-large incisional hernia. For the 7 patients of large incisional hernia with hernia recurrence, 4 cases underwent reoperation and 3 cases received conservative treatment. All 2 patients of non-large incisional hernia with hernia recurrence received conservative treatment. There was no significant difference in hernia recurrence between patients with large incisional hernia and non-large incisional hernia ( χ2=8.432, P<0.05). Results of chronic pain score at postoperative 3 month showed that among 55 patients with large incisional hernia, 40 cases had mild pain, 7 cases had moderate pain, and 8 cases had severe pain. Among 133 patients with non-large incisional hernia, the above indicators were 102, 28, and 3, respectively. There was no significant difference in chronic pain score at postoperative 3 month between patients with large incisional hernia and non-large incisional hernia ( Z=-0.968, P>0.05). Conclusions:Open anterior myofascial repair surgery can be used for the treatment of abdominal wall incision hernia. Compared with non-large incisional hernia, patients with large incisional hernia have longer operation time, are more prone to surgical-site infection, have longer postoperative hospital stay, and are more likely to experience hernia recurrence.

Peripancreatic infection secondary to acute pancreatitis, also known as infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN), is one of the most serious complications of acute pancreatitis. In recent years, with the continuous advancement of endoscopic and surgical therapeutic concepts and technologies, the complication rate and mortality of IPN have significantly decreased and entered a plateau period. Early diagnosis of IPN and targeted interventions are expected to become a breakthrough for further improving its prognosis.

Severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)is a rapid onset and complex acute digestive system emergency,often accompanied by severe local and systemic complications,leading to a high mortality rate.In recent years,with the continuous update of treatment concepts,especially the advancement of endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical techniques,the prognosis of SAP patients has significantly improved.However,in clinical practice,particularly in the early stages of the disease,there are still widespread issues of non-standard and imprecise diagnostic and therapeutic practices,which are important factors contributing to the occurrence of severe complications in the later stages of the disease and a major reason for the poor prognosis of SAP patients.In light of this,this article systematically reviews high-quality literature from recent years and combines the latest clinical research findings from the authors'team to summarize advancements in early precise diagnosis and treatment of SAP,providing new evidence for standardized treatment of SAP,which will undoubtedly help further improve the overall treatment outcomes for SAP.

Background and Aims:Accurate early pathogen diagnosis is a breakthrough for improving the prognosis of infectious pancreatic necrosis(IPN)patients.However,there is currently a lack of efficient methods for early identification of IPN in clinical settings.This study was performed to assess the application value of next-generation sequencing technology based on metagenomic capture(MetaCAP)in the pathogen diagnosis of IPN. Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 29 patients suspected of having acute necrotizing pancreatitis at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between January and July 2024.Blood samples were tested using MetaCAP and conventional pathogen culture.The results of peritoneal fluid pathogen culture were used as the gold standard to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the two methods. Results:Due to three cases lacking peritoneal fluid culture results,a total of 26 cases were included in the final analysis.The overall mortality rate was 23.1％(6/26).During hospitalization,9 cases(34.6％)were diagnosed with IPN.The sensitivity and negative predictive value of MetaCAP for diagnosing IPN were significantly higher than those of conventional pathogen culture(77.8％vs.11.1％,P=0.031;86.7％vs.65.2％,P=0.032),while the differences in specificity(76.5％vs.88.2％,P=0.689)and positive predictive value(63.6％vs.33.3％,P=0.347)between the two methods were not statistically significant.The average detection time for MetaCAP was 33(20-49)h,while microbial culture took 125(45-142)h,with a significant difference(P＜0.001).The average cost for blood MetaCAP testing was 2 500 yuan per case,but it accounted for only 1.19％of the average hospitalization cost. Conclusion:MetaCAP has significant value in the early pathogen diagnosis of IPN,with a shorter detection time,good testing efficacy,and health-economic value,demonstrating a promising clinical application prospect.

Stoma reversal surgery is usually performed 3 to 6 months after a temporary stoma creation to restore intestinal continuity.The high incidence of stoma site incisional hernia(SSIH)after stoma closure is a significant concern,as the development of SSIH not only increases psychological and financial burdens on patients but also significantly raises medical risks and societal costs.Therefore,reducing the incidence of SSIH is of great practical importance.The fundamental strategy is to accurately identify high-risk patients based on known risk factors,which include:female sex,age ≥ 68 years,colostomy,BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2,malignancy,emergency surgery,existing parastomal hernia,concurrent midline incisional hernia,and postoperative wound complications,and to implement preventive measures in advance.Given that the abdominal wall defect caused by the stoma resembles the condition of bowel herniation in incisional hernias,applying the principles of incisional hernia repair during stoma reversal surgery-particularly for high-risk patients-can be beneficial.This involves the prophylactic use of a mesh during abdominal closure to reinforce the abdominal wall,which may help prevent the occurrence of incisional hernia without increasing the risk of surgical site infections or other adverse events.However,there is still debate over the optimal type of mesh to use during stoma reversal.In summary,stoma reversal incisions differ from standard abdominal incisions,and employing hernia repair principles for their closure may be a crucial strategy in preventing the development of SSIH.