Objective:To develop and validate a perioperative oral care protocol for patients undergoing oral vestibular approach endoscopic thyroid cancer radical surgery, providing practical guidance for clinical nursing.Methods:The protocol was constructed through literature analysis and Delphi expert consultation. A prospective non-randomized controlled study was conducted using convenience sampling, enrolling 60 patients who underwent oral vestibular approach endoscopic thyroid cancer radical surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University Thyroid Center between August 2023 and May 2024. Participants were divided into control group (from August to December, 2023) and experimental group (from January to May, 2024) based on admission dates with 30 cases in each group. The control group received routine care, while the experimental group received the developed oral care protocolin on the basis of the control group. Postoperative pain scores, mouth-opening difficulties, and oral cleanliness were compared on days 1, 3, and 7 after surgery.Results:The final protocol comprised 7 first-level indicators (team collaboration, health education, preoperative oral assessment, preoperative management, intraoperative management, postoperative management, and discharge follow-up), 17 second-level indicators, and 49 third-level indicators. The control group had 4 males and 26 females, with an age of (29.57 ± 5.34) years; the experimental group had 6 males and 24 females, with an age of (29.87 ± 6.25) years. On postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, the pain scores were 3.87 ± 1.01, 3.30 ± 0.92, and 2.53 ± 0.68 in the control group and 3.20 ± 0.87, 2.10 ± 0.76, and 1.50 ± 0.51 in the experimental group, respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t = 2.89, 5.12, 6.34, all P<0.05). For mouth-opening difficulties, the control group had 6, 13, and 15 patients with grade I on postoperativedays 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 10, 20, and 25 patients with gradeⅠ. The control group had 20, 14, and 14 patients with gradeⅡonpostoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 17, 10, and 5 patients with gradeⅡ. The control group had 4, 3, and 1 patients with grade Ⅲ on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 3, 0, and 0 patients with grade Ⅲ. There were 0 cases in both groups with grade Ⅳ. The differences between the two groups on postoperative days 3, and 7 were statistically significant ( χ2 = 10.45, 18.67, both P<0.05). For oral cleanliness, the control group had 3, 4, and 5 patients with excellent cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 11, 16, and 19 patients with excellent cleanliness. The control group had 20, 22, and 23 patients with good cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 18, 13, and 10 patients with good cleanliness. The control group had 7 (23.33%), 4 (13.33%), and 2 (6.67%) patients with poor cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 1 (3.33%), 1 (3.33%), and 1 (3.33%) patients with poor cleanliness. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( χ2 = 9.19, 11.32, 16.68, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The developed perioperative oral care protocol is scientifically sound, feasible, and practical. Following the intervention, significant decreases in pain scores, alleviation of trismus symptoms, and marked improvements in oral cleanliness were observed in patients compared to pre-intervention assessments, and worth further clinical application.

Objective:To develop and validate a perioperative oral care protocol for patients undergoing oral vestibular approach endoscopic thyroid cancer radical surgery, providing practical guidance for clinical nursing.Methods:The protocol was constructed through literature analysis and Delphi expert consultation. A prospective non-randomized controlled study was conducted using convenience sampling, enrolling 60 patients who underwent oral vestibular approach endoscopic thyroid cancer radical surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University Thyroid Center between August 2023 and May 2024. Participants were divided into control group (from August to December, 2023) and experimental group (from January to May, 2024) based on admission dates with 30 cases in each group. The control group received routine care, while the experimental group received the developed oral care protocolin on the basis of the control group. Postoperative pain scores, mouth-opening difficulties, and oral cleanliness were compared on days 1, 3, and 7 after surgery.Results:The final protocol comprised 7 first-level indicators (team collaboration, health education, preoperative oral assessment, preoperative management, intraoperative management, postoperative management, and discharge follow-up), 17 second-level indicators, and 49 third-level indicators. The control group had 4 males and 26 females, with an age of (29.57 ± 5.34) years; the experimental group had 6 males and 24 females, with an age of (29.87 ± 6.25) years. On postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, the pain scores were 3.87 ± 1.01, 3.30 ± 0.92, and 2.53 ± 0.68 in the control group and 3.20 ± 0.87, 2.10 ± 0.76, and 1.50 ± 0.51 in the experimental group, respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t = 2.89, 5.12, 6.34, all P<0.05). For mouth-opening difficulties, the control group had 6, 13, and 15 patients with grade I on postoperativedays 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 10, 20, and 25 patients with gradeⅠ. The control group had 20, 14, and 14 patients with gradeⅡonpostoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 17, 10, and 5 patients with gradeⅡ. The control group had 4, 3, and 1 patients with grade Ⅲ on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 3, 0, and 0 patients with grade Ⅲ. There were 0 cases in both groups with grade Ⅳ. The differences between the two groups on postoperative days 3, and 7 were statistically significant ( χ2 = 10.45, 18.67, both P<0.05). For oral cleanliness, the control group had 3, 4, and 5 patients with excellent cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 11, 16, and 19 patients with excellent cleanliness. The control group had 20, 22, and 23 patients with good cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 18, 13, and 10 patients with good cleanliness. The control group had 7 (23.33%), 4 (13.33%), and 2 (6.67%) patients with poor cleanliness on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, respectively, while the experimental group had 1 (3.33%), 1 (3.33%), and 1 (3.33%) patients with poor cleanliness. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( χ2 = 9.19, 11.32, 16.68, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The developed perioperative oral care protocol is scientifically sound, feasible, and practical. Following the intervention, significant decreases in pain scores, alleviation of trismus symptoms, and marked improvements in oral cleanliness were observed in patients compared to pre-intervention assessments, and worth further clinical application.

Objective:To study the life characteristics and related risk factors of patients with depression in Shandong Province.Methods:Based on the 2015 mental epidemiological survey database in Shandong Province,a total of 832 patients with depression,807 high-risk individuals with depression,and 819 low-risk individuals were diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,Fourth Edition(DSM-Ⅳ)and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-Ⅳ-TR Axis I Disorders,Research Version(SCID-I/P).In 2020,SCID-I/P was used for re diagnosis,and the General Health Questionnaire(GHQ-12),Simple Quality of Life question-naire,Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI),Childhood Trauma Questionnaire(CTQ),Social Support Rating Scale(SSRS),Global Pain Scale(GPS),Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA),Simplified Coping Style Question-naire(SCSQ)were used for evaluation.Compare changes in the quality of life of depression patients and construct a risk factor model.Results:Patients with depression had lower scores on the simple quality of life questionnaire at baseline and at retest after 5 years than those in the high-and low-risk groups,those in remission of depression had higher scores on the simple quality of life questionnaire at baseline and at retest after 5 years than those in non-re-mission,and those with new-onset disorder in the high-and low-risk groups had lower scores on the simple quality of life questionnaire at baseline and at retest after 5 years than those with no-onset disorder(Ps＜0.001).Depres-sion diagnosis and PSQI scale scores at baseline negatively predicted at retest after 5 years(β=-0.06,-0.15),while coping style tendencies at baseline positively predicted(β=0.06).The simple quality of life questionnaire at baseline negatively predicted depression diagnosis at retest after 5 years,GHQ-12 scores at retest after 5 years,and PSQI scale scores at retest after 5 years(β=-0.11,-0.17,-0.09),while the simple quality of life question-naire at baseline positively predicted coping style tendencies at retest after 5 years(β=0.13).Depression diagnosis at retest after 5 years,GHQ-12 scores at retest after 5 years,PSQI scale scores at retest after 5 years,coping style tendencies at retest after 5 years,SSRS scale scores,CTQ scale scores,GPS scale scores,and the simple quality of life questionnaire at baseline all influenced the simple quality of life questionnaire at retest after 5 years through ei-ther direct or indirect pathways.Conclusion:It suggest that the quality of life is lower in patients with depression than in the general population.Depression diagnosis,sleep,mental health,pain,social support,childhood trauma and coping are direct and indirect risk factors affecting life.

Objective: To investigate the influence of maternal age on the health status of pregnant women and the pregnant outcomes. Methods: Data obtained from "Beijing perinatal health management registration system" was analyzed, 263 157 pregnant women with age information were included from October 1st, 2015 to September 30th, 2016, in which 43 594 women delivered at the age of 35 or above (advanced age) . According to the age of maternal age, there were 5 groups. (1) Proper age: 219 563 (83.43%, 219 563/263 157) cases of the age of 18-34 years, including 122 735 cases (46.64%, 122 735/263 157) in the ≤29 years old group and 96 828 cases (36.79%, 96 828/263 157) in 30-34 years old group. (2) Advanced age: there were 43 594 cases (16.57%, 43 594/263 157) ≥35 years old, including 37 395 cases (14.21%, 37 395/263 157) in the 35-39 years old group, 5 790 cases (2.20%, 5 790/263 157) in the 40-44 years old group and 409 cases (0.16%, 409/263 157) in the ≥45 years old group. The trend-based chi-square test and logistic regression were used to analyze the effects of different age groups on maternal complications and pregnant outcomes. Results: (1) The total incidence of high risk pregnancy (HRP) : in advanced age women, the incidence of HRP was 67.83% (29 571/43 594) which was 56.73% (124 550/219 563) in proper age women, the difference was statistically significant (χ²=1 848.91, P<0.000) . In advanced age women, the incidence of severe HRP was 7.64% (3 329/43 594) which was 6.18% (13 571/219 563) in proper age women, the difference was statistically significant (χ²=128.211, P<0.000) . In advanced age women, the incidence of very severe HRP was 1.76% (769/43 594) which was 0.84% (1 838/219 563) in proper age women, the difference was statistically significant (χ²=318.58, P<0.000) . (2) Comparison of the incidence of HRP in 5 groups:the total incidence of HRP increased through the following age group ≤29 years, 30-34 years, 35-39 years, 40-44 years, ≥45 years (53.28%, 61.09%, 67.41%、70.09%, 74.57% respectively) , the difference was statistically significant (linear by linear χ²=3 165.72, P<0.000) . The incidence of very severe HPR increased (0.66%, 1.06%, 1.66%, 2.35%, 2.93% respectively) , the difference was statistically significant (linear by linear χ²=218.31, P<0.000) . The incidence of severe HPR increased (5.77%, 6.70%, 7.48%, 8.34%, 11.49% respectively) , the difference was statistically significant (linear by linear χ²=422.20, P<0.000) . The incidence of general HPR increased (46.84%, 53.34%, 58.26%, 59.40%, 60.15% respectively) , the difference was statistically significant (linear by linear χ²=1 947.51, P<0.000) . (3) As the maternal age group increased, the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes increased (5.54%, 6.85%, 8.77%, 9.90%, 18.09%, linear by linear χ²=674.57, P<0.000) . The incidence of perinatal death, premature birth and low birth weight also presented the above trends (perinatal death: linear by linear χ²=34.79, P<0.000; premature birth: linear by linear χ²=692.87, P<0.000; low birth weight: linear by linear χ²=379.20, P<0.000) . (4) Logistic regression analysis with the assisted reproductive technology and multiple pregnancy considered showed the same trend (P<0.000) . Conclusion The maternal age has an impact on the maternal health status and pregnancy outcomes, and the risk of various types of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes increase with the maternal age group, antenatal care and management should be emphasized in women with advanced maternal age, especially for women ≥40 years old.

Objective To study the effect and toxicity of COX-2 selective inhibitor, celecoxib, plus doxetaxel + epirubicin regimen for LABC as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods 59 women with LABC staged ⅡB～ⅢB were allotted and randomly divided into 2 groups: the control group consisted of 29 patients and with the dosage: doxetaxel (75 mg/m2, d1), epirubicin(75 mg/m2, d1) every 3 weeks; the experiment group consisted of 30 patients and with the dosage: doxetaxel (75 mg/m2, d1), epirubicin(75 mg/m2, d1) and celeeoxib (40Omg, twice daily, d1～21) every 3 weeks. After 2 cycles, the efficacy and toxicity of each group were evaluated. Results The control group achieved an overall response rate (RR) of 72.41%(21/29), and consisted of clinical complete remission (cCR) 2 cases, partial remission (PR) 19 cases, stable disease (SD) 8 cases; the experiment group achieved a RR of 80.00 %(24/30), and consisted of eCR 3 cases, PR 21 cases, SD 6 cases. Both of the group had no pathological complete remission (pCR) and progressive disease (PD) case, and the difference of RR between 2 groups showed no statistical signifieance(χ2=0.469, P=0.493). There was no difference of the diameter of tumor between 2 groups before neoadjuvant ehemotherapy(t=0.569, P= 0.570), but showed statistieal significance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t=7.300, P=0.000). Incidence of myalgia and arthralgia of the experiment group was lower than that of control group and had statistical significance (P=0.013). Conclusion Doxetaxel plus epirubiein regimen is effective for LABC with tolerable toxicity. Celeeoxib can enhance the effect and reduce the incidence of myalgia and arthralgia.