1.Effects of narrative nursing on posttraumatic growth for patients with amputation
Qianjiao ZENG ; Chaoran CHEN ; Dongmiao LIU ; Shan HAN ; Jingjing LU ; Qiaomei CHENG
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2019;35(8):611-615
0bjective To explore the effects of narrative nursing on posttraumatic growth for patients with amputation. Methods From December 2016 to March 2018,a total of 62 hospitalized patients with amputation were randomly assigned into the control group and the intervention group by random number table.The control group received routine nursing,the intervention group received narrative nursing on the basis of control group.Two groups were evaluated by Posttraumatic Growth Inventory(PTGI) before and after intervention. Results Before intervention,the scores of reflections on life, personal strengths, new possibilities, relating to others, self-transformation and posttraumatic growth in the the control group were (19.87 ± 5.22), (7.90 ± 2.53), (8.83 ± 3.62), (9.73 ± 3.13), (10.63 ± 3.01), (56.97 ± 17.21) points, respectively. After intervention,the scores were (20.80±5.89), (8.80±2.17), (8.90±3.39), (10.27± 2.75), (11.07 ± 3.12), (59.83 ± 16.91) points, respectively, except new possibilities, the scores of each dimension and total scores of posttraumatic growth in the the control group were higher than before,the differences were statistically significant(t=3.00- 5.34, P<0.05).Before intervention,the scores of reflections on life, personal strengths, new possibilities, relating to others, self-transformation and posttraumatic growth in the the intervention group were (20.28±4.94), (8.17±2.58), (8.59±3.48), (9.55± 2.90), (11.07±2.83), (57.66±16.42) points, respectively. After intervention, the scores were (23.79±4.70), (10.10±2.17), (10.72±3.34), (11.69±2.22), (12.79±3.28),(69.10±14.92) points, respectively, the scores of each dimension and total scores of posttraumatic growth in the intervention group were statistically higher than those in the control group and before intervention,the differences were statistically significant (t=10.61-16.75, P<0.05). Conclusion Narrative nursing can effectively improve the level of posttraumatic growth and psychological state for patients with amputation.
2.A clinical study of single-agent gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus Oxaliplatin in untreated elderly advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer
Ming CHEN ; Dongmiao CHENG ; Zhaoding SU ; Ping LI
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2014;(7):994-996
Objective To investigate the effect of two chemotherapeutic regimens suitable for elderly ad -vanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods A total of 58 elderly advance nonsmall cell lung cancer pa-tients randomized into two group:single-agent group and combined group .Single-agent group received gemcitabine 1 000mg/m2 at Days 1 and 8 for a 21 day cycle.Combined group received gemcitabine 1 000mg/m2 at Days 1 and 8 in combination earboplatin AUC 5 at Day 2 for a 21 day cycle .All patients in the two groups received 3 cycles of chemotherapeutic regimens.Results Of the single-agent group,complete remission (CR) in 1 cases,partial remis-sion (PR) in 12 cases, the effective rate was 46.4%,and of the combined group,CR in 1 cases,PR in 13 cases,the effective rate was 50.0%,there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).Of the single-agent group,the median survival time was 9.7 months,1-and 2-year survival rates were 31.3%,12.5%,re-spectively,and of the combined group ,the median survival time was 10.1 months,1-and 2-year survival rates were 33.8%,15.6%,respectively,there were no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2 =1.743, 1.529,1.739,all P>0.05).The leutropenia and thrombocytopenia incidence of 3 to 4 grade in the combined group was 50.0%,46.4%,respectively,which were significantly higher than 28.6%and 18.0%in the single-agent group (χ2 =4.41,4.69,all P<0.05).Lung Cancer Symptom Scale scores showed:after the treatment,the anorexia,fatigue and pain scores of the single-agent group improved significantly compared with pre-treatment ( t =2.687,2.789, 2.603,all P<0.05),whereas no significant improvement in the combined group;After the treatment,three symptom scores of the single-agent group were significantly higher than those of the combined group (t=2.986,3.569,2.764, all P<0.05).Conclusion Single-agent gemeitabine regimen efficacy is comparable with that of combined regimen for elderly advanced NSCLC with less adverse effects .

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail