BACKGROUND

In the Philippines and other developing countries, access to high-stability external fixators for traumainduced bone fracture management is limited, as modular external fixators, especially those with snap-on features, are manufactured overseas and are prohibitively expensive for most Filipino patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the biomechanical performance of a locally-developed modular external fixator prototype for tibial diaphyseal fractures in comparison to available external fixators, such as Roger Anderson and Hoffmann. This provides an initial evaluation for the use of the external fixator as an alternative in terms of its stability.

METHODS

Using axial compression testing compliant with the ASTM F1541-24 standards, the ultimate strength, yield strength, safe strength, and stiffness were measured across various fixator types and tightening mechanisms, with or without the aid of a wrench. Statistical tools such as the t-test assuming equal variances, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey-Kramer test with a 0.05 level of significance were used to determine any significant differences.

RESULTS

The mechanical performance of the external fixator prototype increased by a factor of 1.5 to 2.5 after the clamps were tightened with the wrench. However, when hand-tightened, it still performed sufficiently, showing a comparable mechanical performance with the Roger Anderson Fixator. In terms of the ultimate, safe, and yield strengths, it performed competitively in comparison with the Hoffmann system. However, there is a significant difference in stiffness between the prototype and the Hoffmann system.

CONCLUSION

The locally-developed external fixator was comparable biomechanically to the commercially available external fixators and the prototypes in different studies.

Evaluation Studies As Topic ; Developing Countries ; External Fixators ; Fractures, Bone ; Philippines ; Patients

Background and Objectives: Phantom and simulation models are valuable training tools for teaching and skill enhancement, yet high costs and limitations of commercial options drive the search for alternatives. This study evaluated the locally sourced phantom models developed for transvaginal and transabdominal gynecologic interventional ultrasound procedures, aiming to cater to the educational needs of OB-GYN ultrasound subspecialists. Methods: Four phantom models simulating biopsy and cyst aspiration/paracentesis through transvaginal and transabdominal approaches, were developed, and assessed by 37 ultrasound subspecialists in obstetrics and gynecology. The respondents, comprising 19 experienced and 18 with limited exposure to guided procedures, utilized an 11-item Likert-scored questionnaire to evaluate the models' acceptability and suitability for training. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Both experienced and less-experienced groups consistently assigned high scores, particularly highlighting the realistic ultrasound image and positioning of structures. The models proved effective in enhancing confidence and proficiency during simulation-based training for probe manipulation, aspiration, and biopsy procedures. While respondents identified concerns like durability and needle track marks, no significant differences emerged between the two groups in evaluating the model. Conclusions The overall evaluation of the developed phantom model was positive, showcasing its acceptability among end-users and suitability for training ultrasound-guided procedures in obstetrics and gynecology. The identified issues provide valuable insights for potential improvements in future iterations of the model.
Interventional Ultrasound