INTRODUCTION

Administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation is recommended to pregnant women at risk of preterm delivery to decrease the risk of respiratory distress syndrome, intra-ventricular hemorrhage and neonatal death. However, it may worsen glycemic profile primarily in those with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

To determine the effects of ACS on maternal glycemia in Filipino women with GDM and to analyze the factors associated with insulin use or increased insulin requirement.

A retrospective study of the medical records of Filipino women with GDM who were admitted and received ACS treatment (betamethasone) between 24- and 36-weeks age of gestation (AOG) for fetal lung maturity from 2017-2019. Clinical characteristics (age, parity, completed ACS dose, AOG at ACS administration and mode of delivery) and glycemic control were retrieved and compared before and after ACS treatment. Data collection began the day or on the day before steroids were given and continued until discharge or delivery.

Included were 42 pregnant women with GDM. Of these, 28 women with GDM were treated by diet alone (Group A) while 14 women with GDM were started on insulin in addition to diet (Group B). After betamethasone therapy was initiated, only three (Group A1; n=3/28) patients had good glycemic control with diet alone and the rest were given insulin treatment (Group A2; n=25/28). In this subpopulation of Group A2, insulin requirement within 24 hours after ACS was at 0.3 units per kg of body weight. There was a steady increase with maximum requirement observed on day 4 and decreased thereafter to 0.33 units per kg of body weight on day 5. For GDM women in Group B, only three maintained their insulin dose (Group B1; n=3/14) while 11 (Group B2; n=11/14) women with GDM previously on insulin, required further increase in insulin from day 1-2 reaching 140% increase in insulin dose on day 2. Thereafter, there was a gradual decrease of insulin dose almost returning to initial dose on day 5.

Insulin initiation was observed among GDM diet-controlled mothers (Group A) who were given ACS therapy at ≥31 weeks age of gestation. Age, parity, family history of diabetes and mode of delivery did not have significant effects on insulin use nor increased insulin requirement. Fasting capillary glucose (FCG) and one-hour post-prandial capillary glucose (PPCG) were elevated within 24 hours after administration of corticosteroid (betamethasone) in 60%-70% of our population. The FCG values remained elevated on day 2-3 in about 70% of patients. While the first hour PPCG was elevated in 85% of patients on day 2 and remained elevated in 70% of women on day 3-4, it reached 53% on day 5. Insulin requirement among Group B2 reached to 140% increase in insulin dose on day 2 followed by a gradual decrease of insulin dose almost returning to initial dose on day 5.

ACS administration caused maternal hyperglycemia in Filipino women with GDM during the first 24 hours and lasting up to five days. Both fasting glucose and post-prandial glucose were elevated, hence intensified monitoring of maternal glucose levels and temporary addition or increase of insulin doses may be necessary. The timing (≥31 weeks AOG) of administration of ACS on GDM women was associated with subsequent insulin initiation but only on patients initially controlled on diet alone.

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may increase fetal abdominal fat mass, but its correlation with fetal abdominal circumference (AC) is inconsistent. This study compares third trimester fetal AC between adult pregnant patients with and without GDM, and between those managed with diet modification alone versus insulin therapy.

This retrospective cohort study involved 354 Filipino adult pregnant patients at The Medical City admitted for delivery from January 2016 to May 2022. This included 180 patients with GDM, and 174 patients without GDM. One hundred sixteen (116) of the GDM patients were diet-managed, and 64 were insulin-requiring. Participants underwent third trimester fetal AC ultrasound and 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24 to 28 weeks of gestation. The third trimester fetal AC, fetal outcomes and maternal outcomes between patient groups were analyzed using Stata 15.0.

The GDM group had higher rates of cesarean section delivery (70% vs 46.55%, pCONCLUSION

Third trimester fetal AC is significantly larger in women with GDM compared to non-GDM women, regardless of management method. Monitoring fetal AC during the third trimester is important for prenatal care in GDM pregnancies.

Pregnancy ; Female ; Humans ; Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis* ; Retrospective Studies ; Prognosis ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Maternal Age

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the maternal and fetal effects of hyperglycemia, and to compare the clinical outcomes between pregnant teenagers and adult women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

This was a retrospective cohort study among pregnant women who tested positive for GDM by 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Data was collected from the 1st of January 2015 to the 31st of December 2019. Maternal and fetal outcomes and the factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes among teenage women and adult women with GDM were studied.

A total of 254 charts of women with GDM were reviewed. Overall, adverse maternal outcomes were found in 94.12% and 90% of teenage and adults, respectively; and were almost more likely among primigravida (OR=3.984, CI=1.32-12, p=0.014). The study also showed less probability of having adverse maternal outcomes among multipara and grand multipara women (OR=0.2545, CI=0.08-0.79, P=0.018 and OR=0.1091, CI=0.03-0.45, p=0.002) respectively. Adverse neonatal outcomes were more likely among women who had prior delivery of macrosomic baby (OR=21.9091, CI=1.28-3.73, P=0.033). No adverse fetal outcome records were seen among teenage mothers, while adult women had 5.45% incidence.

Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly higher in the teenage GDM population compared to adult GDM. However, diagnosing and managing GDM among these groups would be beneficial considering their life expectancy and the need for a lifelong preventive program to avoid future development of Type 2 DM (T2DM) and its complications.

Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication with adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. Currently, there are only a few validated tools available that address knowledge in GDM. Recognition of the inconsistencies will provide for an effective learning program to achieve optimal results. This study aimed at validating the “Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire” (GDMKQ). Methodology: A cross-sectional validation study on GDMKQ among 51 GDM patients aged at least 18 years was conducted in the outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital. Excluded were those with pre-existing diabetes. The questionnaire was submitted for peer review for translation to Filipino and back-translation. Concurrent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire were undertaken as part of the validation process. Descriptive analysis was used for data elaboration by using SPSS v23. Results: The Filipino version of GDMKQ demonstrated sensible content and face validity. As measured, respondents obtained higher total and domain scores with better knowledge levels of GDM compared to its English version. An overall adequate knowledge was observed among those married and college subgroup as compared to single women and those with secondary level of education. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated at 0.632 using the Kuder-Richardson 20. The test-retest scores using the Filipino-translated questionnaire has a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.853 with moderate to good level of agreement with each other, and Cohen’s kappa of 0.564 with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.828. Conclusion The Filipino-translated version of GDMKQ is a valid screening tool that assesses a patient’s knowledge of gestational diabetes. Identifying the level of their understanding will enable clinicians to develop an individualized, effective learning program to improve pregnancy outcomes.
Diabetes, Gestational ; Knowledge ; Surveys and Questionnaires

Introduction: Patient education is integral in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a common pregnancy complication that may cause adverse perinatal outcomes. This study evaluated the effect of diabetes education on the knowledge and attitude among patients with GDM, comparing pre- vs post-diabetes session scores and determining pregnancy outcomes. Methodology: A one-group pre-test and post-test experimental design study was conducted on 75 patients after one- session diabetes counseling using the Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Questionnaire (GDMKQ) and the third version of the Diabetes Attitude Scale (DAS-3). Results: Of the 75 subjects, 84% exhibited adequate knowledge of diabetes. Post-education, a significant increase in the total scores was seen among those less than 35 years of age (p-value: 0.003), both employed and unemployed (p-value: 0.0.026, 0.047, respectively), with a secondary level of education (p-value: 0.014) and multigravid (p-value: 0.015). An overall median positive attitude score of 3.6 was documented. For neonatal outcomes, no adverse events existed. For maternal outcomes, 17.9% had elevated fasting blood glucose while 7.1% had elevated 2-hour post-glucose tolerance test. Conclusion Diabetes education improves patient’s knowledge but not their attitude. Hence, improvement in attitude interventions should be incorporated into the current diabetes education program.
Diabetes, Gestational ; Knowledge ; Attitude

Objective: To determine the efficacy of metformin and insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methodology: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were retrieved from the databases. All references cited in the articles were also searched by hand to identify additional publications. Studies included were limited to trials on metformin and insulin in the management of GDM in singleton pregnancies. Four RCTs were analyzed in the study. The risk of bias was assessed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Cochrane Collaboration’s tool (Rob 2). Random effects meta-analysis was carried out to pool the data. All analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.3.5 (2014). Results: Meta-analysis of four RCT involving 807 participants (405 were treated with metformin and 402 were treated with insulin) shows that there was no significant difference between metformin and insulin in achieving glycemic control as to fasting blood sugar (FBS), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), and glycosylated hemoglobin, mean difference (MD) −0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] −2.77–1.91; P = 0.72), MD −2.13 (95% CI −5.16–0.90, P = 0.17), MD −0.09 (95% CI −0.20–0.02, P = 0.10), respectively. For maternal outcomes, there was a statistically significant 69% decreased risk of hypoglycemia in the metformin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.31, 95% CI 0.20–0.49; P < 0.001). There was no difference in terms of risk of preterm birth (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.75–1.64, P = 0.60); hypertensive disorders (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.71–1.60, P = 0.77); polyhydramnios (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.51–2.14, P = 0.91); and risk of cesarean delivery (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75–1.08, P = 0.27). For neonatal outcomes, there was statistically significant 34% reduction on the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.94; P = 0.02) in the metformin group. There was no statistical difference in terms of mean birthweight (MD − 81.34, 95% CI −181.69–19.02, P = 0.11). Metformin has decreased the risk of newborns weighing more than 4000 g, babies with birthweight >90th percentile by 27% (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.28–1.90, P = 0.52), and 20% (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54–1.18,P = 0.26), respectively, but these were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in terms of risk of birthweight <10th percentile (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.60–2.31, P = 0.65); APGAR <7 (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65–2.08, P = 0.60), birth trauma (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.23–2.58, P = 0.67), and jaundice requiring phototherapy RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.66–1.65, P = 0.85). Neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.64–1.23, P = 0.48), respiratory distress syndrome (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.36–1.50, P = 0.39), transient tachypnea (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.27–2.19, P = 0.63), and any congenital anomaly (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.20–1.67, P = 0.31) were decreased in the metformin group but was not statistically significant. Conclusion There was no significant difference between metformin and insulin in achieving glycemic control as to FBS and PPBG among patients with GDM. There was a statistically significant reduction in the risk of maternal and neonatal hypoglycemia in the use of metformin.
Diabetes, Gestational ; Glycemic Control ; Insulin ; Metformin

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the effectiveness of myoinositol (MI) supplementation in the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among high-risk patients. Materials and Methods: Comprehensive and systemic online searches were performed on PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, and Cochrane. Cross-referencing from related articles was also done. Only studies published in English were included in the study. We selected all randomized controlled trials on MI and singleton pregnant women with high risk for GDM. Data Collection and Analysis: Five randomized controlled trials were evaluated by two independent reviewers. For each comparison, the quality of evidence was assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Cochrane Collaboration tool. Review Manager 5.3 was used to generate the risk of bias evaluation and the analysis of the results. Main Results: The present study identified five randomized controlled trials involving 871 participants. The comparison of the studies showed a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of GDM in MI supplementation versus the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19–0.53, P = 0.0001, Z = 4.36) by 68%. Similarly, there is a greater reduction in the incidence of fetal macrosomia among patients in the MI group than the controlled group (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07–0.78; P = 0.02, Z = 2.36) by 78%. However, there was no difference in terms of incidence of gestational hypertension (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.19–2.01; P = 0.42, Z = −0.81), cesarean section (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.65–1.22; P = 0.47, Z = 0.72), and neonatal hypoglycemia (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.01–8.80; P = 0.53, Z = 0.63) outcomes. Conclusion MI supplementation taken at 4 g daily would decrease the incidence of GDM and fetal macrosomia. There was no statistically significant reduction in the risk of gestational hypertension, cesarean section, and neonatal hypoglycemia in the supplementation of MI.
Cesarean section ; fetal macrosomia ; gestational diabetes mellitus ; gestational hypertension ; myoinositol ; neonatal hypoglycemia

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with an increased risk of suffering diverse adverse pregnancy outcomes, threating maternal and child health seriously, with an increasing incidence rate year by year. However, the exact cause of GDM is still unknown. Prospective cohort studies obtain data through follow-up, which is helpful to clarify the causal relationship, so as to draw more accurate and reliable conclusions. In recent years, numerous prospective cohort studies on the GDM have emerged. This article elaborates along the occurrence and development process of GDM, in order to provide useful reference for the establishment of relevant high-quality prospective cohort studies in China.
Pregnancy ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology* ; Prospective Studies ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Incidence ; China/epidemiology* ; Risk Factors

Objective: To investigate the association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preterm birth subtypes. Methods: Based on the cohort of pregnant women in Anqing Prefectural Hospital, the pregnant women who received prenatal screening in the first or second trimesters were recruited into baseline cohorts; and followed up for them was conducted until delivery, and the information about their pregnancy status and outcomes were obtained through electronic medical record system and questionnaire surveys. The log-binomial regression model was used to explore the association between GDM and preterm birth [iatrogenic preterm birth, spontaneous preterm birth (preterm premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor)]. For multiple confounding factors, the propensity score correction model was used to compute the adjusted association. Results: Among the 2 031 pregnant women with a singleton delivery, the incidence of GDM and preterm birth were 10.0% (204 cases) and 4.4% (90 cases) respectively. The proportions of iatrogenic preterm birth and spontaneous preterm birth in the GDM group (n=204) were 1.5% and 5.9% respectively, while the proportions in non-GDM group (n=1 827) were 0.9% and 3.2% respectively, and the difference in the proportion of spontaneous preterm birth between the two groups was significant (P=0.048). Subtypes of spontaneous preterm were further analyzed, and the results showed that the proportions of preterm premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor in the GDM group were 4.9% and 1.0% respectively, while the proportions in the non-GDM group were 2.1% and 1.1% respectively. It showed that the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes in GDM pregnant women was 2.34 times (aRR=2.34, 95%CI: 1.16-4.69) higher than that in non-GDM pregnant women. Conclusions: Our results showed that GDM might increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes. No significant increase in the proportion of preterm labor in pregnant women with GDM was found.
Infant, Newborn ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Humans ; Premature Birth ; Diabetes, Gestational ; Obstetric Labor, Premature ; Hospitals ; Iatrogenic Disease