Nonunion of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF), predominantly affecting the elderly, can lead to intractable pain, vertebral collapse, progressive kyphotic deformity, and neurological impairment, significantly compromising patients′ quality of life. There exists considerable debate on diagnosis and management of OVF, encompassing key issues such as clinical diagnosis and staging criteria for nonunion, surgical indications and procedure selection, and postoperative rehabilitation planning. Currently, there lacks standardized clinical guideline and expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of OVF nonunion in China. To address this gap, Minimally Invasive Surgery Group of Chinese Orthopedic Association, Osteoporosis Committee of Chinese Association of Orthopedic Surgeons, Prevention and Rehabilitation Committee for Osteoporosis of Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine and Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Surgery Branch of China Association for Geriatric Care jointly organized domestic experts in spinal surgery, endocrinology, and rehabilitation to formulate the Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment for nonunion of osteoporotic vertebral fractures ( version 2025), based on existing literature and clinical experience and adhering to principles of scientific rigor and practicality. The guideline provided 13 evidence-based recommendations encompassing diagnosis and treatment of OVF nonunion, aiming to standardize its clinical management.

Nonunion of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF), predominantly affecting the elderly, can lead to intractable pain, vertebral collapse, progressive kyphotic deformity, and neurological impairment, significantly compromising patients′ quality of life. There exists considerable debate on diagnosis and management of OVF, encompassing key issues such as clinical diagnosis and staging criteria for nonunion, surgical indications and procedure selection, and postoperative rehabilitation planning. Currently, there lacks standardized clinical guideline and expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of OVF nonunion in China. To address this gap, Minimally Invasive Surgery Group of Chinese Orthopedic Association, Osteoporosis Committee of Chinese Association of Orthopedic Surgeons, Prevention and Rehabilitation Committee for Osteoporosis of Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine and Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Surgery Branch of China Association for Geriatric Care jointly organized domestic experts in spinal surgery, endocrinology, and rehabilitation to formulate the Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment for nonunion of osteoporotic vertebral fractures ( version 2025), based on existing literature and clinical experience and adhering to principles of scientific rigor and practicality. The guideline provided 13 evidence-based recommendations encompassing diagnosis and treatment of OVF nonunion, aiming to standardize its clinical management.

BACKGROUND:Some research has suggested that regulation of gut microbiota may influence the course of intervertebral disc degeneration.However,the causal relationship of gut microbiota on intervertebral disc degeneration is unknown.OBJECTIVE:To assess the potential causal relationship between gut microbiota and intervertebral disc degeneration using a Mendelian randomization method.METHODS:Genome-wide association analysis summary statistics for 473 gut microbiota and genome-wide association analysis summary data for intervertebral disc degeneration from the R11 of the FinnGen database(46 205 cases of intervertebral disc degeneration and 322 314 controls)from the most recent publicly available publication were applied.Inverse variance weighting,MR-Egger regression,weighted median,weighted modeling,and simple modeling were used to investigate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and intervertebral disc degeneration.Sensitivity analyses were used to test whether the results of Mendelian randomization analyses were reliable.Reverse Mendelian randomization was performed with all gut microbiota as the outcomes for effect analysis and sensitivity analysis.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)The results of the inverse variance weighting method of the forward Mendelian randomization method showed that the order Trichosporonaceae,the family UBA-6960,the family Anaerobes thermophilus,the family Salmonellaceae,the genus Pseudomonas tufts,the species Gordonella and the species Euclidia showed a positive correlation with intervertebral disc degeneration.The order Spirochaetes,the order Pseudomonas,the family Spirochaetaceae,the genus CAG-776,the genus Helicobacter,the species CAG-448 sp003150135,the species CAG-776 sp000438195,the species Brautella-A sp000285855 and the species Hanson's Brautella showed a negative correlation with intervertebral disc degeneration.(2)The results of reverse Mendelian randomization showed that intervertebral disc degeneration was positively correlated with the genus Bartonella rosea,the genus Geobacillus C,the species Escherichia fumigatus,the species Propionibacterium fumigatus,the species UBA-1777 sp900319835,the species Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the species Bacillus subtilis,while negatively correlated with the species Streptomyces mingoldii,the species Prevotella sp000434975,the species Brault's A sp000285855,the species CAG-194 sp002441865 and the species CAG-590 sp000431135.(3)No heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was found in the two-way sensitivity analysis.(4)The results described above indicate that the causal relationship between gut microbiota and intervertebral disc degeneration based on the Finnish database contributes to the exploration on new biomarkers for the early prediction and treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration in clinical practice.In addition,the establishment of a large database and the integration of medical data from multiple centers can be drawn upon in biomedical research in China to provide a solid foundation for studying the relationship between gut microbiota and intervertebral disc degeneration.We will strengthen communication and cooperation with research teams in other countries to jointly promote the research on the relationship between gut microbiota and diseases and contribute to the development of global medicine.

BACKGROUND:Some research has suggested that regulation of gut microbiota may influence the course of intervertebral disc degeneration.However,the causal relationship of gut microbiota on intervertebral disc degeneration is unknown.OBJECTIVE:To assess the potential causal relationship between gut microbiota and intervertebral disc degeneration using a Mendelian randomization method.METHODS:Genome-wide association analysis summary statistics for 473 gut microbiota and genome-wide association analysis summary data for intervertebral disc degeneration from the R11 of the FinnGen database(46 205 cases of intervertebral disc degeneration and 322 314 controls)from the most recent publicly available publication were applied.Inverse variance weighting,MR-Egger regression,weighted median,weighted modeling,and simple modeling were used to investigate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and intervertebral disc degeneration.Sensitivity analyses were used to test whether the results of Mendelian randomization analyses were reliable.Reverse Mendelian randomization was performed with all gut microbiota as the outcomes for effect analysis and sensitivity analysis.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)The results of the inverse variance weighting method of the forward Mendelian randomization method showed that the order Trichosporonaceae,the family UBA-6960,the family Anaerobes thermophilus,the family Salmonellaceae,the genus Pseudomonas tufts,the species Gordonella and the species Euclidia showed a positive correlation with intervertebral disc degeneration.The order Spirochaetes,the order Pseudomonas,the family Spirochaetaceae,the genus CAG-776,the genus Helicobacter,the species CAG-448 sp003150135,the species CAG-776 sp000438195,the species Brautella-A sp000285855 and the species Hanson's Brautella showed a negative correlation with intervertebral disc degeneration.(2)The results of reverse Mendelian randomization showed that intervertebral disc degeneration was positively correlated with the genus Bartonella rosea,the genus Geobacillus C,the species Escherichia fumigatus,the species Propionibacterium fumigatus,the species UBA-1777 sp900319835,the species Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the species Bacillus subtilis,while negatively correlated with the species Streptomyces mingoldii,the species Prevotella sp000434975,the species Brault's A sp000285855,the species CAG-194 sp002441865 and the species CAG-590 sp000431135.(3)No heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was found in the two-way sensitivity analysis.(4)The results described above indicate that the causal relationship between gut microbiota and intervertebral disc degeneration based on the Finnish database contributes to the exploration on new biomarkers for the early prediction and treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration in clinical practice.In addition,the establishment of a large database and the integration of medical data from multiple centers can be drawn upon in biomedical research in China to provide a solid foundation for studying the relationship between gut microbiota and intervertebral disc degeneration.We will strengthen communication and cooperation with research teams in other countries to jointly promote the research on the relationship between gut microbiota and diseases and contribute to the development of global medicine.

Diabetes is a common chronic non-infectious disease. Diabetic patients not only suffer from metabolic disorders, but are also prone to immune deficiencies and are at a higher risk of being infected with human papillomavirus (HPV). Many studies at home and abroad have shown that the HPV infection rate of patients with diabetes is higher than that of non-diabetic patients. Patients with diabetes can benefit from HPV vaccination, and the tolerance is good. HPV vaccination is recommended for diabetic patients. This article reviews the research on diabetes, HPV infection, and HPV vaccine, which will provide references for HPV vaccination in diabetic patients.

Purpose To investigate the protective effect and mechanism of A-485 on renal tubular injury in diabetic mice.Methods Eighteen male C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into three groups:Control group,diabetic kidney dis-ease(DKD)group and A-485 treatment group.The DKD mice model was established by feeding high-fat diet for 8 weeks and intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin for 5 days.Subsequent-ly,the A-485 treatment group was given A-485(10 mg/kg/day)by intraperitoneal injection every other day for 4 weeks.After treatment,the renal function,P300 enzyme activity and lipid deposition in renal tissue were measured.Western blot a-nalysis was performed to detect SREBP-1,FASN,ACC,ChREBP,P300,CBP,H3K18ac and H3K27ac protein levels.Results Compared with control mice,the levels of FBG,BUN,Scr and UAE were significantly increased in diabetic mice(FBG:2.52 times,BUN:2.89 times,Scr:2.13 times,UAE:4.21 times),while diabetic mice treatment with A-485 exhibi-ted a remarkable decrease on BUN,Scr and UAE(BUN:0.511 times,Scr:0.636 times,UAE:0.574 times,P＜0.01).The results of the transmission electron microscopy and oil red O stai-ning showed that A-485 treatment prevents lipid droplets forma-tion and up-regulation of SREBP-1,FASN,ACC and ChREBP in renal tubular cells of diabetic mice(SREBP-1:0.544 times,FASN:0.449 times,ACC:0.306 times,ChREBP:0.317 times,P＜0.01).Furthermore,A-485 intervention downregu-lated the enzyme activity of P300(0.546 times)and suppressed the expression of H3K18ac(0.337 times)and H3K27ac(0.308 times,P＜0.01).Conclusion A-485 can significant-ly improve renal lipid metabolic disorder in diabetic mice,which may be achieved by inhibiting p300-induced H3K18ac and H3K27ac.

Ankylosing spondylitis is an autoimmune disease with a high incidence rate in clinic. It is characterized by abnormal ossification and ankylosis of the spine and sacroiliac joints. With the further development of the disease, the quality of life of patients will eventually decline sharply. At present, there are many treatment methods that can be chosen, and early intervention and comprehensive treatment are key, including drug therapy, rehabilitation training, surgical treatment, etc. Although there are many treatment methods to choose from, its pathogenesis is not fully understood, and it is still a difficult point in clinical treatment. This article systematically reviews the literature on the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in recent years, providing reference for further optimizing comprehensive treatment strategies.

Objective:To explore the effect of behavioral habits on the recovery of spinal cord function in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after expansive open-door laminoplasty(ELAP).Methods:Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 183 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent ELAP at the Spinal Surgery Department of Jining Medical University Affiliated Hospital, from February 2019 to October 2022, with complete follow-up information. General clinical data of patients were collected. The patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery with the modified standard MacNab.The JOA score was used to evaluate the recovery of motor and sensory functions in patients before and 12 months after surgery. The recovery rate of spinal cord function was calculated based on the JOA score, and patients were divided into two groups: the group with good therapeutic effect ( n=143, recovery rate ≥ 50%) and the group with poor therapeutic effect ( n=40, recovery rate<50%). Data statistics were conducted using SPSS 20.0 software for chi-square test, rank sum test, t-test, and Logistic regression analysis. Results:There were significant differences in age ( t=-3.252, P<0.01), smoking ( χ2=21.503, P<0.01), body mass index(BMI) ( t=-5.885, P<0.01), hypertension ( χ2=20.263, P<0.01), coronary heart disease ( χ2=13.272, P<0.01), hospitalization time ( t=-2.278, P=0.02), desk and screen time ( t=-6.589, P<0.01), and frequency of rehabilitation exercise ( χ2=10.927, P<0.01) between the group with good therapeutic effect and the group with poor therapeutic effect. Further multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that smoking ( B=2.402, OR=11.046, 95% CI=2.334-52.285, P<0.05), high BMI ( B=0.341, OR=1.406, 95% CI=1.076-1.837, P<0.05), hypertension ( B=2.238, OR=9.370, 95% CI=2.153-40.790, P<0.05), long desk and screen time ( B=0.961, OR=2.613, 95% CI=1.540-4.435, P<0.05) and low frequency of rehabilitation exercise ( B=-1.039, OR=0.354, 95% CI=0.201-0.623, P<0.05) were risk factors for spinal cord function recovery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after ELAP( P<0.05). Conclusion:Smoking, high BMI, hypertension, long desk and screen time, and low frequency of rehabilitation exercise are not adverse to the recovery of neurological function in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after ELAP.

Objective:To assess the effect of Hood's technique on urinary continence in patients undergoing single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (spRARP).Methods:The clinical data of 53 patients who underwent spRARP performed by a single surgeon in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from June 2021 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 25 patients in the spRARP+ Hood group and 28 patients in the spRARP group. There were no statistically significant differences between the spRARP+ Hood group and the spRARP group in terms of patients′ age [(70.28±5.98) years vs. (60.89±6.86) years old], body mass index[(24.64±2.85) kg/m 2 vs. (24.59±3.17) kg/m 2], prostate weight [70.00 (40.69, 102.25) g vs. 73.50 (49.13, 94.50) g], total prostate specific antigen[8.62 (4.56, 15.26) ng/ml vs. 12.68 (6.99, 19.24) ng/ml], Gleason score [8 (7, 8) vs. 8 (7, 8)], age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (aCCI) [4 (3, 5) vs. 3 (3, 4)], and clinical stage [T 2a/T 2b/T 2c: 6/10/9 cases vs. 5/7/16 cases ] ( P>0.05). In the SpRARP + Hood group, the detrusor apron, tendon arch, pubic prostatic ligament, and dorsal vascular complex were completely preserved during the operation. In contrast, this was not the case for spRARP.Additionally, the incision size, bleeding volume, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, operation time, gastrointestinal function recovery time, total amount of drainage in the first three postoperative days, retention time of the drainage tube, postoperative hospitalization time, positive incision margins, recovery rate of urinary continence immediately after removal of the urinary catheter, and the recovery rate of urinary continence at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were compared between the two groups. Results:All 53 surgeries were successfully completed. The differences in incision length [4.0 (3.5, 4.0) cm vs. 4.0 (4.0, 4.0) cm], intraoperative bleeding [50 (40, 100) ml vs. 100 (50, 100) ml], and intraoperative transfusion rate [4.0% (1/25) vs. 17.8% (5/28)] were not statistically significant between the spRARP+ Hood group and the spRARP group ( P>0.05), and the difference in operative time [205.0 (167.5, 240.0) min vs. 242.5 (185.0, 300.0) min] was statistically significant( P<0.05).The recovery time of gastrointestinal function in the spRARP+ Hood group vs. the spRARP group [1.0 (1.0, 1.5) d vs. 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) d], total amount of drainage in the first 3 d postoperatively [150.00 (72.50, 261.00) ml vs. 230.00 (115.00, 417.50) ml], duration of drain retention [5.0 ( 4.0, 5.0) d vs. 5.0 (4.0, 6.8) d], postoperative hospital stay [5.0 (4.0, 7.5) d vs. 5.0 (3.3, 7.8) d], and margin positivity rate [4.0% (1/25) vs. 3.6% (1/28)] were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The postoperative Clavien-Dindo complication classification was grade I in both groups. The differences between the spRARP+ Hood group and the spRARP group in the rates of recovery of urinary continence immediately after the urinary catheter removal [56.0% (14/25) vs. 7.1% (2/28)] and one month after surgery [76.0% (19/25) vs. 28.5% (8/28)] were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The differences in the rates of recovery of urinary continence at 3 months after surgery [80.0% (20/25) vs. 67.8% (19/28)], at 6 months after surgery [88.0% (22/25) vs. 96.4% (27/28)], and biochemical recurrence at 6 months after surgery [4.0% (1/25) vs. 3.6% (1/28)] were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The outcomes of spRARP+ Hood in the treatment of localized prostate cancer were comparable to those of spRARP. However, spRARP+ Hood has better urinary continence immediately after removal of the urinary catheter and 1 month postoperatively.

Objective:To assess the effect of Hood's technique on urinary continence in patients undergoing single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (spRARP).Methods:The clinical data of 53 patients who underwent spRARP performed by a single surgeon in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from June 2021 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 25 patients in the spRARP+ Hood group and 28 patients in the spRARP group. There were no statistically significant differences between the spRARP+ Hood group and the spRARP group in terms of patients′ age [(70.28±5.98) years vs. (60.89±6.86) years old], body mass index[(24.64±2.85) kg/m 2 vs. (24.59±3.17) kg/m 2], prostate weight [70.00 (40.69, 102.25) g vs. 73.50 (49.13, 94.50) g], total prostate specific antigen[8.62 (4.56, 15.26) ng/ml vs. 12.68 (6.99, 19.24) ng/ml], Gleason score [8 (7, 8) vs. 8 (7, 8)], age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (aCCI) [4 (3, 5) vs. 3 (3, 4)], and clinical stage [T 2a/T 2b/T 2c: 6/10/9 cases vs. 5/7/16 cases ] ( P>0.05). In the SpRARP + Hood group, the detrusor apron, tendon arch, pubic prostatic ligament, and dorsal vascular complex were completely preserved during the operation. In contrast, this was not the case for spRARP.Additionally, the incision size, bleeding volume, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, operation time, gastrointestinal function recovery time, total amount of drainage in the first three postoperative days, retention time of the drainage tube, postoperative hospitalization time, positive incision margins, recovery rate of urinary continence immediately after removal of the urinary catheter, and the recovery rate of urinary continence at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were compared between the two groups. Results:All 53 surgeries were successfully completed. The differences in incision length [4.0 (3.5, 4.0) cm vs. 4.0 (4.0, 4.0) cm], intraoperative bleeding [50 (40, 100) ml vs. 100 (50, 100) ml], and intraoperative transfusion rate [4.0% (1/25) vs. 17.8% (5/28)] were not statistically significant between the spRARP+ Hood group and the spRARP group ( P>0.05), and the difference in operative time [205.0 (167.5, 240.0) min vs. 242.5 (185.0, 300.0) min] was statistically significant( P<0.05).The recovery time of gastrointestinal function in the spRARP+ Hood group vs. the spRARP group [1.0 (1.0, 1.5) d vs. 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) d], total amount of drainage in the first 3 d postoperatively [150.00 (72.50, 261.00) ml vs. 230.00 (115.00, 417.50) ml], duration of drain retention [5.0 ( 4.0, 5.0) d vs. 5.0 (4.0, 6.8) d], postoperative hospital stay [5.0 (4.0, 7.5) d vs. 5.0 (3.3, 7.8) d], and margin positivity rate [4.0% (1/25) vs. 3.6% (1/28)] were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The postoperative Clavien-Dindo complication classification was grade I in both groups. The differences between the spRARP+ Hood group and the spRARP group in the rates of recovery of urinary continence immediately after the urinary catheter removal [56.0% (14/25) vs. 7.1% (2/28)] and one month after surgery [76.0% (19/25) vs. 28.5% (8/28)] were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The differences in the rates of recovery of urinary continence at 3 months after surgery [80.0% (20/25) vs. 67.8% (19/28)], at 6 months after surgery [88.0% (22/25) vs. 96.4% (27/28)], and biochemical recurrence at 6 months after surgery [4.0% (1/25) vs. 3.6% (1/28)] were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The outcomes of spRARP+ Hood in the treatment of localized prostate cancer were comparable to those of spRARP. However, spRARP+ Hood has better urinary continence immediately after removal of the urinary catheter and 1 month postoperatively.