INTRODUCTION: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) among cancer survivors is a persistent and distressing psychosocial concern that affects recovery and quality of life. The prevalence of FCR in Singapore is unknown. This cross-sectional study was designed to examine FCR and identify factors associated with FCR in mixed-cancer survivors locally. METHODS: Cancer survivors in remission (n = 404) were assessed for: FCR using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI); emotional distress using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; and quality of life using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF. Clinical and severe/pathological FCR was determined based on the severity scale of FCRI, known as FCRI-Short Form. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to examine factors associated with FCR. RESULTS: The mean score on the FCRI was 59.5 ± 30.4. 43.6% of cancer survivors had clinical FCR and 32.1% had severe/pathological FCR. Younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.952, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.911-0.995, p < 0.05), higher educational status (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.15-5.65, p < 0.05) and higher levels of emotional distress (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.24, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with severe/pathological levels of FCR. CONCLUSION The present study is the first to determine levels of FCR among cancer survivors in Singapore. While the total FCR scores were similar to those of international studies, severe/pathological levels of FCR were found to be four times higher. These findings highlight a problem that is not widely recognised or acknowledged, but which deserves greater attention.

Background: Endotracheal tube cuff (ETTc) inflation pressure is usually not regarded as an important aspect during intubation. In this study, we compared measuring ETTc pressure and pilot balloon palpation method in causing post-operative airway complications. Methods: Two hundred and ninety-two surgical patients requiring intubation were recruited into this prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study. Group A patients had their ETTc initially inflated, checked by a cuff pressure gauge, recorded and then set to 25 cmH2O. Group B patients had their ETTc inflated using the pilot balloon palpation method. Patients were then followed up for post-operative sore throat, hoarseness and cough. Results: The overall incidence of post-operative sore throat was 39.0% versus 75.3% (P < 0.001), hoarseness 6.2% versus 15.1% (P < 0.05) and cough 7.5% versus 21.9% (P < 0.05) in Group A and B, respectively. Group A patients experienced a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of sore throat up to 24 h post-operatively (P < 0.001), hoarseness at the first hour (P = 0.004) and cough at first and 12 h post-operatively (P = 0.002). Conclusion: Adjusting the ETTc pressure to 25 cmH2O reduces post-operative sore throat, hoarseness and cough compared to pilot balloon palpation method.

Introduction: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents is a potentially life threatening complication of general anaesthesia especially in high risk patients undergoing emergency anaesthesia. Classically,ranitidine has been used to reduce gastric pH and volume. Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, is a newer generation proton pump inhibitor whose effect on gastric pH and volume in emergency surgeries has not been determined. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomised, double blind study to compare the effect of intravenous esomeprazole and ranitidine on gastric pH and volume in patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy. Following induction of anaesthesia, seventy patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II had their gastric contents aspirated via a nasogastric tube. They were then randomised to receive either intravenous esomeprazole 40 mg or intravenous ranitidine 50 mg. A second aspiration of gastric contents was done three hours later. The pH and volume of gastric contents of both aspirations were recorded. Results: Both intravenous esomeprazole and ranitidine significantly reduced the gastric fluid acidity (p=0.001) and volume (p=0.001). There were no significant differences measured between the two groups in terms of gastric fluid pH (p=0.86) and gastric fluid volume (p=0.14) after administration of study drugs. Conclusion Esomeprazole and ranitidine given intravenously were both comparable in reducing the volume and acidity of gastric secretions in patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy.