Objective:To construct a Boston matrix-based management model for operational quality of hospital's equipment for diagnosis and treatment,so as to achieve management with comprehensive process for operational quality of them.Methods:Combining evaluation indicators of operational quality of equipment for diagnosis and treatment,the stability and safety were quantified to construct the management model for operational quality of the safety of hospital's equipment for diagnosis and treatment by using the Boston matrix.From January 2023 to January 2024,a total of 300 equipment for diagnosis and treatment in clinical use of JuYe County People's Hospital were enrolled.Using a random number table method,150 equipment adopted conventional management mode,while the other 150 equipment adopted the Boston matrix-based management model for operational quality of hospital's equipment for diagnosis and treatment(Boston matrix management mode)to conduct management.The standardization of test for equipment performance,management quality of operation,and multi-dimensional efficacy scores were compared between the two management modes.A self-designed questionnaire was adopted to investigate satisfactions of engineers,doctors,nurses,and patients for two kinds of management modes,who involved in using equipment.Results:In 150 tests for performance,which adopted Boston matrix-based management mode,the standardization degrees of environmental management,parameter settings,equipment operation and record feedback were respectively 94%,93.33%,92.67%and 92.67%,all of them were significantly higher than those of conventional management mode(x2=12.997,14.361,13.830,12.891,P<0.05).The scores of resource allocation,technical support,information infrastructure,and management performance for equipment were(92.36±3.57),(91.69±4.36),(92.54±3.69)and(93.54±4.36)points in Boston matrix management mode,respectively,and all of them were significantly higher than those in conventional management mode,and the differences were significant(t=18.673,12.439,12.377,12.509,P<0.05).The scores of utilization efficacy,maintenance efficacy,and repair efficacy in using equipment under Boston matrix management mode were all significantly higher than those in conventional management mode,and the differences were significant(t=13.149,12.344,12.864,P<0.05).Satisfaction scores from engineers for equipment,doctors,nurses,and patients for operation of equipment for diagnosis and treatment,which adopted Boston matrix management mode,were all higher than those of adopting conventional management mode,and the differences were significant(t=13.1504,16.064,11.139,13.605,P<0.05).Conclusion:The Boston matrix-based management model for operational quality of hospital's equipment for diagnosis and treatment can be used in the quantitative analysis of safety and stability of equipment,and realize safe management with comprehensive process for equipment,and enhance medical service quality,and improve utilization efficacy of equipment.

Objective:To construct a Boston matrix-based management model for operational quality of hospital's equipment for diagnosis and treatment,so as to achieve management with comprehensive process for operational quality of them.Methods:Combining evaluation indicators of operational quality of equipment for diagnosis and treatment,the stability and safety were quantified to construct the management model for operational quality of the safety of hospital's equipment for diagnosis and treatment by using the Boston matrix.From January 2023 to January 2024,a total of 300 equipment for diagnosis and treatment in clinical use of JuYe County People's Hospital were enrolled.Using a random number table method,150 equipment adopted conventional management mode,while the other 150 equipment adopted the Boston matrix-based management model for operational quality of hospital's equipment for diagnosis and treatment(Boston matrix management mode)to conduct management.The standardization of test for equipment performance,management quality of operation,and multi-dimensional efficacy scores were compared between the two management modes.A self-designed questionnaire was adopted to investigate satisfactions of engineers,doctors,nurses,and patients for two kinds of management modes,who involved in using equipment.Results:In 150 tests for performance,which adopted Boston matrix-based management mode,the standardization degrees of environmental management,parameter settings,equipment operation and record feedback were respectively 94%,93.33%,92.67%and 92.67%,all of them were significantly higher than those of conventional management mode(x2=12.997,14.361,13.830,12.891,P<0.05).The scores of resource allocation,technical support,information infrastructure,and management performance for equipment were(92.36±3.57),(91.69±4.36),(92.54±3.69)and(93.54±4.36)points in Boston matrix management mode,respectively,and all of them were significantly higher than those in conventional management mode,and the differences were significant(t=18.673,12.439,12.377,12.509,P<0.05).The scores of utilization efficacy,maintenance efficacy,and repair efficacy in using equipment under Boston matrix management mode were all significantly higher than those in conventional management mode,and the differences were significant(t=13.149,12.344,12.864,P<0.05).Satisfaction scores from engineers for equipment,doctors,nurses,and patients for operation of equipment for diagnosis and treatment,which adopted Boston matrix management mode,were all higher than those of adopting conventional management mode,and the differences were significant(t=13.1504,16.064,11.139,13.605,P<0.05).Conclusion:The Boston matrix-based management model for operational quality of hospital's equipment for diagnosis and treatment can be used in the quantitative analysis of safety and stability of equipment,and realize safe management with comprehensive process for equipment,and enhance medical service quality,and improve utilization efficacy of equipment.

BACKGROUND: Recently, with the increasing popularity of dental implant and orthognathic surgery, more and more people pay attention to the structure of mandibular canal and adjacent tissues. However, there are few reports addressing specimen measurements at home and abroad. OBJECTIVE: To measure the anatomical data of mandibular canal and adjacent tissue of mandible specimen to provide reliable reference data and anatomical evidence for alveolus surgery, tooth implantation, and orthognathic surgery. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: A controlled observation was performed at the Laboratory of Anatomy, Jilin Medical College between March 2007 and September 2007. MATERIALS: Twenty complete mandible specimens. METHODS: Sixteen adult, ex vivo mandibles with complete dentition and 4 edentulous mandibles were measured in every dental position of sagittal profile and posterior mental foramen in terms of molar, alveolar crest, and mandibular canal. Data were statistically analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mental foramen location, horizontal distance from anterior border of mental foramen to anterior border of mental canal, mandibular foramen location, distances from mandibular canal to molar root tip, lingual bone plate of mandible, inferior border of mandible, mandibular buccal bone plate, and alveolar ridge crest. RESULTS: Mandibular canal, located in the inferior region of the mandible body, ran towards the lingual side and was close to the inferior border of mandible and most close to the mandibular molar root tip. It turned towards posterolateral and buccal side in front of mental foramen and then passed through mental foramen. The distance of mandibular canal between edentulous mandible and alveolar ridge crest was obviously shortened. CONCLUSION: Multi-section observation and measurement of ex vivo mandible specimens provide precise, reliable evidence for preoperative design of orthognathic surgery, facilitate surgeons to better formulate surgical proposals, and prevent some complications, including intraoperative massive hemorrhage, interior alveolar nerve injury, mandibular angle fracture, and mental bone lateral wall perforation.