Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has become an indispensable component of the modern care continuum for lung cancer. Substantial evidence confirms its definitive value in improving perioperative outcomes, mitigating treatment-related side effects, and enhancing quality of life in patients with advanced disease. However, a significant "implementation gap" exists between its proven clinical benefits and widespread application, primarily characterized by the lack of standardized protocols, uncertainty in optimal timing, and low patient adherence. Bridging this gap requires a dual-driven approach: harnessing technological innovations such as telerehabilitation, wearable devices, and artificial intelligence to enhance accessibility and personalization, alongside optimizing care models through multidisciplinary team collaboration. This review systematically analyzes the evidence, implementation barriers, and innovative pathways for PR in lung cancer care, aiming to catalyze its transition from an ancillary option to a core standard of care, and envisions a new paradigm of personalized PR that is patient-centered, data-driven, and technologically integrated.

Objective: To develop a prediction model for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) risk among the elderly, so as to provide a tool for MCI early screening. Methods : From July 2022 to September 2024, a multi-stage stratified random cluster sampling method was used to recruit permanent residents aged ≥65 years from the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region as study participants. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, nutritional status, body composition indices, bone mineral density, and handgrip strength were collected through questionnaires and physical examinations. Sarcopenia was defined based on appendicular skeletal muscle index and handgrip strength. MCI was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination, with adjustments for educational level. Participants were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7∶3 ratio. LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression models were employed to screen for predictors and construct an MCI risk prediction model. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 1 641 participants were surveyed, including 755 males (46.01%) and 886 females (53.99%). The majority of participants were aged 65-<75 years, comprising 1 154 individuals (70.32%). MCI was detected in 517 participants, corresponding to a detection rate of 31.51%. Resultsfrom LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that residence (rural, OR = 2.323, 95% CI: 1.682-3.210), age (75-<85 years, OR = 1.405, 95% CI: 1.019-1.937; ≥85 years, OR = 3.655, 95% CI: 1.696-7.875), educational level (primary school, OR = 0.341, 95% CI: 0.247-0.472; junior high school, OR = 0.255, 95% CI: 0.160-0.408; high school, OR = 0.286, 95% CI: 0.154-0.531; bachelor's degree or above, OR = 0.120, 95% CI: 0.041-0.351), history of alcohol consumption (yes, OR = 3.216, 95% CI: 2.164-4.779), risk of malnutrition (yes, OR = 1.464, 95% CI: 1.064-2.014), sarcopenia (yes, OR = 3.197, 95% CI: 2.332-4.385), and waist-to-hip ratio (abnormal, OR = 1.540, 95% CI: 1.159-2.048) were identified as predictive factors for MCI among the elderly. In the training set, the area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.788, 0.719, and 0.712, respectively. In the validation set, the corresponding values were 0.784, 0.913, and 0.542, respectively. DCA demonstrated that the model provided a higher clinical net benefit for predicting MCI risk when the risk threshold probability ranged from 0.124 to 0.764. Conclusion The prediction model developed in this study demonstrates good discriminative ability and clinical utility, indicating its substantial value for predicting the MCI risk among the elderly.

Driven by the widespread adoption of minimally invasive thoracic surgical techniques and the deepening integration of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, evidence-based perioperative airway management has emerged as a pivotal determinant of surgical safety, pulmonary functional recovery, and long-term prognosis. Currently, substantial regional disparities in thoracic surgical expertise persist across China, manifesting as heterogeneity in preoperative assessment standardization, inconsistent airway preparation strategies, divergent approaches to complication prevention, and limited penetration of advanced anesthetic technologies. To promote the standardization of clinical practices in this domain among hospitals at all levels, a multidisciplinary expert consortium has initiated the development of the Chinese Guidelines for Perioperative Airway Management in Thoracic Surgery (2026 edition). This protocol systematically delineates the methodological framework and structural blueprint underpinning the guideline’s formulation. Compared to the 2020 edition, the updated guideline places specific emphasis on refining stratified criteria for preoperative cardiopulmonary reserve assessment, establishing standardized management pathways for non-intubated spontaneous-ventilation techniques, formulating individualized multimodal perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation regimens, and defining precise intervention workflows for persistent postoperative cough. Collectively, these measures aim to further reduce the baseline incidence of perioperative pulmonary complications and to provide robust support for the clinical translation of enhanced recovery principles within the field of thoracic surgery.

Patients with lung cancer experience a heavy symptom burden during the perioperative period, which seriously affects their recovery and quality of life. Traditional symptom management models rely mainly on scheduled ward rounds during hospitalization and outpatient follow-up after discharge. However, they have limitations such as delayed symptom recognition, lack of post-discharge monitoring, and non-quantitative symptom assessment, which often lead to delayed interventions and low patient satisfaction. In recent years, the symptom management model based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) has been increasingly valued in clinical practice. Existing high-level evidence from both domestic and international studies indicates that, through proactive monitoring, real-time alerts, and remote interventions, this model enables dynamic and continuous symptom management and helps improve patient recovery and healthcare experience. As a supplement to routine medical care, the ePRO-based symptom management model aims to enhance the quality of care rather than replace existing medical processes. To promote the standardized application of this model in perioperative lung cancer care, this consensus integrates domestic and international evidence. After multiple rounds of voting by more than 50 experts, it formulates 12 consensus statements covering the three core components, symptom monitoring, alerting, and intervention, to provide scientific and practical recommendations for clinical practice.

In recent years, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has significantly reshaped the therapeutic landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy) can significantly improve pathological response rates and has also demonstrated survival benefits when utilized within a comprehensive treatment regimen in combination with surgery. However, the tumor microenvironment remodeling induced by immunotherapy and immune-related adverse events present new challenges for surgical treatment strategies. This article addresses key issues in the surgical management of NSCLC in the context of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, focusing on three phases: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative, to explore the impact of immunotherapy on the selection of the time to surgery (TTS) and the optimal TTS, whether immunotherapy increases the difficulty and complexity of surgery, and whether immunotherapy affects the risk of perioperative complications. The aim is to provide guidance for surgical decision-making in clinical practice and to establish a foundation for future research directions.

The ultimate goal of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is to achieve risk-free and pain-free care. It is necessary in establishing perioperative comfort-oriented wards for medical technology advancement and economic development. This article discusses the clinical practices of comfort-oriented wards at the Lung Cancer Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University and focuses on the following aspects: concept, framework, and team-building; current clinical application status, challenges, and implementation strategies; analysis of related construction models and plans; and clinical outcomes and future prospects. This work aims to promote a shift in the ERAS evaluation system toward a patient-centered concept and the application of comfort-oriented wards.

Objective To compare the analgesic effects and adverse reactions between intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Methods From August 2022 to January 2023, 180 patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into two groups: ICNB group (n=90) and PCIA group (n=90). The postoperative pain degree (VAS), location, nature; adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, and dizziness; and other clinical symptoms were analyzed. Results The most common site of postoperative pain in both groups was surgical incision, and the nature of pain was distending pain. At 12 and 24 h after the operation, the pain degree in the ICNB group (1.10±0.91, 3.12±1.29) was markedly lower than that in PCIA group (1.44±0.86, 4.32±1.30, P=0.010, P<0.001). The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness in the ICNB group (5.56%, 23.33%) was noticeably lower than that in the PCIA group (35.56%, 51.11%, P<0.001, P<0.001). Total hospitalization expense in the ICNB group (41 043.16±10 885.63 yuan) was significantly lower than that in PCIA group (45 283.99±11 036.36 yuan, P=0.010). Conclusion The analgesic effect of intercostal nerve block is better than that of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump in patients with lung cancer after minimally invasive surgery, and the incidence of adverse reactions is low.

Perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation may effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and improve the quality of life of lung cancer patients and its clinical application value in lung cancer patients has been widely recognized.However,there is still no international consensus or guideline for pulmonary rehabilitation regi-men,lacking standardized criteria when pulmonary rehabilitation applied in perioperative clinical practice for lung cancer.The consensus provides implementation regimen and process of pulmonary rehabilitation,aiming to promote the reasonable and standardized application of perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation training in clinical practice,sequentially enable patients to maximize benefits from the rehabilitation.

Background::The incidence rate of lung cancer in women has significantly increased over the past decade, and previous evidence has indicated a significant relationship between the elevated levels of sex hormones and the risk of lung cancer. Therefore, we hypothesized that female hormone-related cancer (FHRC) patients, including breast, endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer patients, may experience a higher risk of developing subsequent lung cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to identify the risk of lung cancer among FHRC patients compared to the general population.Methods::The PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases were searched up to May 11, 2022. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to identify the risk of subsequent lung cancer after FHRC. Subgroup analyses based on the follow-up time and tumor type were also conducted.Results::A total of 58 retrospective cohort studies involving 4,360,723 FHRC participants were included. The pooled results demonstrated that FHRC patients had a significantly increased risk of developing subsequent primary lung cancer (SIR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.48-1.76, P <0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed an obvious trend of increasing lung cancer risk over time (SIRs for <5 years, ≥5 years, ≥10 years, ≥20 years, and ≥30 years after FHRC: 1.32, 1.59, 1.57, 1.68, and 1.95, respectively). In addition, subgroup analysis stratified by tumor type indicated an increased risk of developing subsequent lung cancer after breast (SIR = 1.25, P <0.001), endometrial (SIR = 1.40, P = 0.019), cervical (SIR = 2.56, P <0.001), and ovarian cancer (SIR = 1.50, P = 0.010). Conclusion::FHRC patients are more likely to develop lung cancer than the general population. Furthermore, the increased risk of subsequent primary lung cancer is more obvious with a longer survival time and is observed in all types of hormone-related cancer.Registration::International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols: No. INPLASY202270044; https://inplasy.com/

Although multidisciplinary team(MDT)diagnosis and treatment model can improve the quality of life and survival prognosis of the patients,why does it not reach the expected goal of the MDT diagnosis and treatment model?The main reason is that the diagnosis and treatment mode of MDT in lung cancer lags behind the progress of various treatment methods.By analyzing the latest research results of MDT diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer at home and abroad,com-bined with the experience of MDT diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer in the Lung Cancer Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University,this article will discuss and summarize the progress and future direction of MDT in lung cancer from the following aspects:(1)The connotation and extension of MDT diagnosis and treatment mode of lung cancer need to be changed and adapted to new methods of diagnosis and treatment;(2)The clinical decision making in the diagnosis and treat-ment of MDT in lung cancer should be transformed from"multidisciplinary consultation(MDC)"to"MDT";(3)The diag-nosis and treatment process of MDT in lung cancer should shift from"fire brigade mode"to"firewall mode",and finally imple-ment"individualized whole-process management mode";(4)The path of MDT diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer should be changed from"temporary convening mode"to"single disease center system mode of lung cancer".