OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to estimate the cost of breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management in the Philippines. Specifically, it aims to identify the resource requirements and interventions related to breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management, measure resource volumes (number of units), learn to value resource items (unit costs), and determine the total cost of treatment per disease stage.

The study covered nine tertiary hospitals, seven of which were government hospitals and two were private hospitals, with all tertiary hospitals providing breast cancer services and accredited by Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC or PhilHealth) for the Z-Benefit Package. Interventions and services related to breast cancer included radiographic procedures, laboratory and imaging tests, chemotherapy drugs and medications, medical and surgical supplies, surgical rates (for breast surgery), accommodation, staff time and salary/professional fees, and other procedure fees. The study conducted in 2022, examined cost prices of breast cancer interventions and services from stage 1–3B.

Purposive and convenience sampling were used based on PhilHealth accreditation and willingness of hospitals to participate in the study. The study conducted a focus group discussion with oncologists, radiologists, anesthesiologists, and other health care providers to validate the clinical guideline used and to solicit inputs to the costing design, analysis framework, and tools for data collection. Data collection of financial cost information (charge price) was conducted using a set of costing matrices filled out by the various departments of the hospitals. Costs and median rates were calculated across hospitals on diagnostics and imaging tests, surgery costs of both public and private facilities, medical treatment, and radiotherapy.

Breast MRI, Breast Panel, and Chest CT Scan are the top 3 most expensive diagnostic procedures ranging from PhP 8,102.00 to PhP 9,800.00 per procedure. Surgical procedures for breast cancer at private hospitals and public hospitals showed huge differences in costs. The cost of a cycle of chemotherapy ranges from PhP 596.70 to PhP 3,700.00 per session, while the cost of targeted therapy can cost up to PhP 46,394.21 per session. A year of hormone therapy ranges from PhP 3,276.00 with the use of Tamoxifen, and up to PhP 68,284.00 with Goserelin. Aromatase inhibitors such as Anastrozole and Letrozole cost from PhP 18,000 to PhP 36,000, respectively. Multiple cycles depending on the diagnosis are prescribed per patient and used in combination with other chemotherapy medications or other therapies such as targeted therapy and hormone therapy are usually taken daily up to 5 to 10 years. Conventional radiotherapy can cost up to PhP 88,150.00 covering 28 sessions, CT simulation, and CT planning.

This cost study provides relevant information and better perspective on benefit development for the PHIC, policy development for Department of Health on where and how to focus their support for the patient’s financial preparedness to address medical and f inancial catastrophes.

PhilHealth needs to guide the health care providers of their costing method and to develop their own integrated, interoperable, and comprehensive cost data library.

It recommends that the government allocate budget and cover for screening and assessment for earlier stage diagnosis of patients and lower health expenditure costs on cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to estimate the cost of breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management in the Philippines. Specifically, it aims to identify the resource requirements and interventions related to breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management, measure resource volumes (number of units), learn to value resource items (unit costs), and determine the total cost of treatment per disease stage.

The study covered nine tertiary hospitals, seven of which were government hospitals and two were private hospitals, with all tertiary hospitals providing breast cancer services and accredited by Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC or PhilHealth) for the Z-Benefit Package. Interventions and services related to breast cancer included radiographic procedures, laboratory and imaging tests, chemotherapy drugs and medications, medical and surgical supplies, surgical rates (for breast surgery), accommodation, staff time and salary/professional fees, and other procedure fees. The study conducted in 2022, examined cost prices of breast cancer interventions and services from stage 1–3B.

Purposive and convenience sampling were used based on PhilHealth accreditation and willingness of hospitals to participate in the study. The study conducted a focus group discussion with oncologists, radiologists, anesthesiologists, and other health care providers to validate the clinical guideline used and to solicit inputs to the costing design, analysis framework, and tools for data collection. Data collection of financial cost information (charge price) was conducted using a set of costing matrices filled out by the various departments of the hospitals. Costs and median rates were calculated across hospitals on diagnostics and imaging tests, surgery costs of both public and private facilities, medical treatment, and radiotherapy.

Breast MRI, Breast Panel, and Chest CT Scan are the top 3 most expensive diagnostic procedures ranging from PhP 8,102.00 to PhP 9,800.00 per procedure. Surgical procedures for breast cancer at private hospitals and public hospitals showed huge differences in costs. The cost of a cycle of chemotherapy ranges from PhP 596.70 to PhP 3,700.00 per session, while the cost of targeted therapy can cost up to PhP 46,394.21 per session. A year of hormone therapy ranges from PhP 3,276.00 with the use of Tamoxifen, and up to PhP 68,284.00 with Goserelin. Aromatase inhibitors such as Anastrozole and Letrozole cost from PhP 18,000 to PhP 36,000, respectively. Multiple cycles depending on the diagnosis are prescribed per patient and used in combination with other chemotherapy medications or other therapies such as targeted therapy and hormone therapy are usually taken daily up to 5 to 10 years. Conventional radiotherapy can cost up to PhP 88,150.00 covering 28 sessions, CT simulation, and CT planning.

This cost study provides relevant information and better perspective on benefit development for the PHIC, policy development for Department of Health on where and how to focus their support for the patient’s financial preparedness to address medical and f inancial catastrophes.

PhilHealth needs to guide the health care providers of their costing method and to develop their own integrated, interoperable, and comprehensive cost data library.

It recommends that the government allocate budget and cover for screening and assessment for earlier stage diagnosis of patients and lower health expenditure costs on cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential apoptotic mechanisms of 3 Morchella extracts (Morchella conica, Morchella esculenta and Morchella delicosa) on breast and colon cancer cell lines using apoptotic biomarkers. METHODS: Human breast cell line (MCF-7) and colon cancer cell line (SW-480) were treated with methanol and ethanol extracts of 3 Morchella species with concentration ranging from 0.0625 to 2 mg/mL. After that their effects on gene expression of apoptosis related markers (pro-apoptotic markers including Bax, caspase-3, caspase-7, and caspase-9, and the antiapoptotic marker including Bcl-2) were determined using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: All Morchella extracts reduced breast and colon cancer cells proliferation at half inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of 0.02 ±0.01 to 0.68 ±0.30 mg/mL. As expected, all Morchella extracts significantly increased gene expressions of Bax, caspase-3, caspase-7, and caspase-9 and downregulated the gene expression of Bcl-2 in MCF-7 and SW-480 cell lines (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Morchella extracts demonstrated significant anti-proliferative activity against breast and colon cancer cell lines via an apoptosis induction mechanism. Anticancer activity of Morchella extracts and activation of apoptosis in breast and colon cancer cells suggest that it may be used to develop chemotherapeutic agents against cancer in future.
Humans ; Apoptosis/genetics* ; Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Cell Proliferation/drug effects* ; Plant Extracts/pharmacology* ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects* ; MCF-7 Cells ; Ascomycota/chemistry*

Breast cancer is one of the most common and fatal malignancies among women worldwide, and its treatment efficacy is often limited by drug resistance and the presence of undruggable targets. Traditional small-molecule drugs have difficulty effectively modulating certain critical targets such as transcription factors and non-coding RNAs, necessitating new therapeutic strategies. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) function by recruiting pathogenic proteins to the cellular ubiquitin-proteasome system, thereby inducing their specific degradation. In contrast, ribonuclease-targeting chimeras (RIBOTACs) utilize small-molecule ligands but bind to RNA and direct endogenous RNases to selectively degrade pathogenic RNA molecules. By employing a "degradation rather than inhibition" mechanism, targeting chimera technology broadens the druggable landscape and offers a novel precision therapeutic strategy for breast cancer, particularly for refractory and drug-resistant cases. This approach not only overcomes the limitations of traditional drugs, such as the absence of suitable binding sites or poor selectivity, but also reduces required dosages and potential adverse effects. Recent studies have preliminarily demonstrated the therapeutic potential of PROTACs and RIBOTACs in breast cancer, encompassing target design, mechanistic investigation, and preclinical as well as early clinical applications. Research into these technologies reveals their ability to tackle previously undruggable targets, thereby providing theoretical support for the development of safer and more effective precision therapies for breast cancer. In the future, with advances in drug delivery systems and clinical trials, PROTACs and RIBOTACs are expected to be used synergistically with immunotherapy and chemotherapy, offering breast cancer patients more promising comprehensive treatment options and potentially driving oncology toward broader intervention of undruggable targets.
Humans ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Female ; Proteolysis ; Ribonucleases/metabolism* ; Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods* ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of HOTAIR gene rs920778 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with breast cancer susceptibility and response to HER2-targeted therapy in a Chinese population. METHODS: TaqMan probe-based real-time quantitative PCR was used for genotyping of the rs920778 locus (chr12:54,376,218) in peripheral blood genomic DNA from 287 breast cancer patients and 260 healthy individuals from northern Anhui Province. The genotype (GG, GT and TT) and allele (G/T) distribution frequencies were compared between the two groups to evaluate their association with breast cancer risk. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between SNP at this locus and aggressive clinicopathological features (including tumor size, lymph node metastasis, ER/PR/HER2 status, and molecular subtypes) of breast cancer. For the HER2-positive subgroup, the association between rs920778 genotype and responses to dual-targeted therapy (trastuzumab [6 mg/kg q3w]+pertuzumab [420 mg q3w] + docetaxel [75 mg/m²]) was analyzed. The primary endpoints included pathological complete response rate (pCR), objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The TT genotype of rs920778 was associated with a significantly increased breast cancer susceptibility (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.09-2.19; P=0.017), an advanced tumor stage (P<0.001), lymph node metastasis (P<0.001), and the triple-negative subtype (P<0.001). In HER2-positive patients, TT genotype carriers had a markedly reduced objective response rate to dual HER2-targeted therapy (33.3% vs 89.3%, P=0.001) and a lower pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant therapy (P=0.018). CONCLUSIONS The TT genotype of HOTAIR rs920778 serves as an independent risk factor for breast cancer susceptibility and aggressive progression in Chinese population and may predict the resistance to HER2-targeted therapies, suggesting its potential as a prognostic biomarker for precision oncology.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Case-Control Studies ; China ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics* ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genotype ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Receptor, ErbB-2 ; RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics* ; East Asian People/genetics*

Rationale/Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is recommended for locally-advanced breast cancer (LABC) to improve resectability and provide in-vivo tumor response assessment. This study aimed to describe the clinical and pathologic tumor response of LABC patients after response-guided NAC. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 128 LABC patients who underwent NAC using sequential doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) – docetaxel (T) regimen at the Philippine General Hospital Breast Care Center. Clinical and pathologic response rates were analyzed according to clinicopathologic variables including tumor intrinsic subtype. Results: Objective clinical response (complete and partial) was observed in 88% (111/128) of patients with 11% (14/128) achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). The hormone receptor-negative/ Her2-enriched (HR-/Her2+) subtype had the highest pCR rate (23.5%) followed by triple negative subtype (HR-/Her2-) at 19%. The hormone receptor-positive/Her2-positive (HR+/Her2+) subtype had the lowest pCR (4.7%). Two patients with initial poor response to AC but had good response upon shifting to T achieved pCR. Twelve patients (9.4%) had poor response to AC and T chemotherapy. Patients who were pre-menopausal (p=0.04), had ductal histology (p=0.03), with a HR-/Her2- (p=0.002) or HR+/Her2+ subtype (p=0.03) had good response to AC. Intrinsic subtype was not significantly associated with treatment response in those who received docetaxel. There was strong association between the pathologic and clinical responses (Spearman’s Rho score 0.69, p-value <0.0001). Conclusion Clinical and pathologic response to NAC was highly dependent on tumor subtype. Clinical response was predictive of pathologic response. Response-guided NAC allowed direct and early evaluation of tumor treatment response that allowed for treatment modifications.
Breast Neoplasms ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Drug Therapy

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), a crucial component of the tumor microenvironment (TME), are closely associated to the growth, invasion, metastasis, and prognosis of breast cancer. Targeting TAMs is considered to be a potential new strategy for improving the therapeutic efficacy of breast cancer. TAMs interact with breast cancer cells and influence the development and progression of various breast cancer subtypes through multiple pathways, including the secretion of proteins, cytokines, chemokines, and exosomes. Anti-breast cancer drugs targeting TAMs and emerging therapies are continually being discovered. This article explores the effects and mechanisms of TAMs in different breast cancer subtypes, examines the anti-breast cancer effects of herbal extracts and their active ingredients targeting TAMs, and introduces new technologies such as nano-agents, gene therapy, and immunocellular therapy that target TAMs. These therapeutic strategies targeting TAMs may be critical in improving the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of breast cancer patients.
Humans ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology* ; Female ; Tumor-Associated Macrophages/drug effects* ; Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects* ; Animals ; Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the mechanism of induction of ferroptosis by brazilin in breast cancer cells. METHODS: Breast cancer 4T1 cells were divided into 6 groups: control, brazilin 1/2 half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀), IC₅₀, 2×IC₅₀, erastin (10 µg/mL) and capecitabine (10 µg/mL) groups. The effect of brazilin on the proliferation of 4T1 cells was detected by cell counting kit-8 assay, and the treatment dose of brazilin was screened. The effect of brazilin on the mitochondrial morphology of 4T1 cells, and the mitochondrial damage was evaluated under electron microscopy. The levels of Fe²⁺, reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH) and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) were estimated using various detection kits. The invasion and migration abilities of 4T1 cells were detected by scratch assay and transwell assay. The expressions levels of tumor protein p53, solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11), GPX4 and acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) proteins were quantified by Western blot assay. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the 10 (1/2 IC₅₀), 20 (IC₅₀) and 40 (2×IC₅₀) µg/mL brazilin, erastin, and capecitabine groups showed a significant decrease in the cell survival rate, invasion and migration abilities, GSH, SLC7A11 and GPX4 protein expression levels, and mitochondrial volume and ridge (P<0.05), and a significant increase in the mitochondria membrane density, Fe²⁺, ROS and MDA levels, and p53 and ACSL4 protein expression levels (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Brazilin actuated ferroptosis in breast cancer cells, and the underlying mechanism is mainly associated with the p53/SLC7A11/GPX4 signaling pathway.
Ferroptosis/drug effects* ; Phospholipid Hydroperoxide Glutathione Peroxidase/metabolism* ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Signal Transduction/drug effects* ; Female ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism* ; Amino Acid Transport System y+/metabolism* ; Humans ; Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism* ; Animals ; Mice ; Cell Proliferation/drug effects* ; Mitochondria/metabolism* ; Coenzyme A Ligases/metabolism* ; Cell Movement/drug effects* ; Benzopyrans

Objective To investigate the effects of paclitaxel and doxorubicin on the immune microenvironment of breast cancer in mice. Methods The CTR-DB database, a database for analysis of gene expression profiles and drug resistance characteristics related to tumor drug response, was used to analyze the effect of chemotherapeutic drugs on the immune microenvironment of breast cancer. Mouse models with breast cancer were established by in situ injection with 4T1 cells, a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. Then they were treated with doxorubicin and paclitaxel, respectively. The sizes of tumor were recorded and analyzed by growth curve. The number of different types of immune cells was analyzed using flow cytometry. The expressions of Ki67, S100 calcium binding protein A9 (S100A9) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) were detected by immunohistochemistry. The cell cycles of 4T1 cells in paclitaxel group and doxorubicin group were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results The results of CTR_Microarray_75 analysis showed that the immune scores, and the number of cytotoxic lymphocytes, B lineages, CD8⁺ T cells, dendritic cells (DCs), monocytic lineages and natural killer (NK) cells in chemotherapy-sensitive breast cancer were higher than those in chemotherapy-insensitive breast cancer. Through growth curve analysis in mice with breast cancer, we found that both paclitaxel and doxorubicin could inhibit the increase of the tumor sizes, and the paclitaxel showed a higher inhibitory effect. The results of cytometry displayed that both paclitaxel and doxorubicin could restrain the expression of Ki67 and increase the number of breast cancer cells in G2/M phase, and in the paclitaxel group, the expression of Ki67 was lower and the number of breast cancer cells in G2/M phase was larger. Paclitaxel and doxorubicin enhanced the infiltration of CD45⁺ immune cells but decreased the infiltration of neutrophils. Additionally, paclitaxel promoted the infiltration of CD3⁺CD4⁺ T helper cells, CD3⁺CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells and CD45⁺CD19⁺B cells, while doxorubicin increased the infiltration of CD4⁺CD25⁺ regulatory T cells (Tregs). The results of immunohistochemistry displayed that the paclitaxel significantly inhibited the expression of S100A9, while the doxorubicin significantly restrained the expression of MMP9. Conclusion Paclitaxel and doxorubicin can effectively inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells and change immune microenvironment of TNBC by regulating the different patterns of cell infiltration and the expression of different extracellular matrix components.
Animals ; Mice ; Humans ; Paclitaxel/pharmacology* ; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes ; Ki-67 Antigen ; Doxorubicin/pharmacology* ; Calgranulin B ; Tumor Microenvironment

BACKGROUND: As the efficacy of programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in curing breast cancer is still controversial, this meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer, which provides guidance for the clinical treatment. METHODS: Relevant studies published as of April 2022 in the various databases including EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were selected. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which control patients underwent chemotherapy alone and experimental group patients underwent combination chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment were included in this investigation. Investigations without complete information, researches from which information could not be extracted, duplicate articles, animal studies, review articles, and systematic reviews were excluded. STATA 15.1 was employed for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: In total, eight eligible studies were identified, revealing that combination chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment was linked to significant increases in progression-free survival (PFS) relative to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.99, P = 0.032) but not overall survival (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.80-1.06, P = 0.273). Pooled adverse event rates were also increased within the group of combination treatment relative to the chemotherapy group (risk ratio [RR] = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14, P = 0.002). Specifically, nausea rates were lesser within the group of combination treatment relative to the group of chemotherapy (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.92, P = 0.026). Subgroup analyses indicated that the PFS of patients who underwent combination atezolizumab or pembrolizumab and chemotherapy treatment were substantially longer than those of patients who underwent chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.89, P ≤0.001; HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The pooled results suggest that combination chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment approaches help prolong PFS in breast cancer patients, but have no statistically significant effect on overall survival (OS). Additionally, combination therapy can significantly improve complete response rate (CRR) compared with chemotherapy alone. However, combination therapy was associated with greater rates of adverse events.
Humans ; B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors* ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy*