Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of subxiphoid robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SRATS) and intercostal robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (IRATS) in the treatment of anterior mediastinal tumors. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with anterior mediastinal tumors who underwent robot-assisted surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, from May 2020 to July 2022. According to the surgical approach, patients were divided into an SRATS group and an IRATS group. Perioperative data were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 87 patients were included. There were 41 patients in the SRATS group [23 males, 18 females; mean age, (44.51±11.28) years] and 46 patients in the IRATS group [21 males, 25 females; mean age, (46.67±8.76) years]. Compared with the IRATS group, the SRATS group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss [(24.41±6.67) mL vs. (37.93±9.23) mL, P<0.001], shorter postoperative drainage duration [(1.73±0.59) days vs. (2.54±0.50) days, P<0.001], lower postoperative drainage volume [(94.46±34.08) mLvs. (116.72±24.90) mL, P=0.001], lower visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores on postoperative day 1 [(3.66±0.76) points vs. (4.15±0.84) points, P=0.005] and day 3 [(2.41±0.59) points vs. (2.89±0.82) points, P=0.003], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(4.12±0.81) days vs. (4.98±1.02) days, P<0.001], and lower hospitalization costs [(4.51±0.65) ten thousand yuan vs. (4.86±0.68) ten thousand yuan, P=0.020]. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in operative time or incidence of postoperative complications (P>0.05). Conclusion Both SRATS and IRATS are safe and effective for the treatment of anterior mediastinal tumors. However, SRATS is less invasive and more conducive to enhanced postoperative recovery.

Background/Aims: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a primary malignant neoplasm with an extremely poor prognosis. While combined chemoradiotherapy has been demonstrated to delay CCA progression to a certain extent, the absence of specific molecular biomarkers or targets significantly hinders the diagnosis and treatment of CCA. Methods: Through cross-analysis of proteomics and ADMA modificationomics, we identified DDX1 overexpressed in CCA with elevated R602-ADMA modifications. HPLC-MS/MS identified PRMT1 as the methyltransferase and USP10 as the deubiquitinating enzyme for DDX1. Immunofluorescence and nuclear-cytoplasmic partitioning experiments confirmed DDX1’s nuclear localization. GO and KEGG analyses clarify the biological functions of DDX1 in response to hypoxia. RNA-seq transcriptomics analyzed key pathways influenced by DDX1. A hydrodynamic in situ CCA mouse model was established to validate the chemopreventive effects of the PRMT1-specific inhibitor GSK715 on CCA development. Results: DDX1 promotes CCA progression both in vivo and in vitro and can be inhibited by GSK715. Mechanistically, PRMT1 mediates ADMA modification at position R602 of DDX1. This modification promotes DDX1 nuclear localization by recruiting USP10 to deubiquitinate DDX1, while simultaneously inhibiting PRMT1 degradation. DDX1 promotes the transcription of PRMT1 and USP10 by binding to the mRNA 3’UTR region, establishing a positive feedback regulatory pathway. This mechanism promotes the occurrence and development of CCA and can serve as a target for the inhibitor GSK715 to suppress CCA progression. Conclusions Our study identified DDX1-R602-ADMA modification as a novel ADMA modification in CCA. It further confirmed its pivotal role in CCA progression. Targeting the USP10-PRMT1-DDX1 axis may represent a significant therapeutic approach for CCA.

Tumor drug resistance is an important problem in the failure of chemotherapy and targeted drug therapy, which is a complex process involving chromatin remodeling. SWI/SNF is one of the most studied ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes in tumorigenesis, which plays an important role in the coordination of chromatin structural stability, gene expression, and post-translation modification. However, its mechanism in tumor drug resistance has not been systematically combed. SWI/SNF can be divided into 3 types according to its subunit composition: BAF, PBAF, and ncBAF. These 3 subtypes all contain two mutually exclusive ATPase catalytic subunits (SMARCA2 or SMARCA4), core subunits (SMARCC1 and SMARCD1), and regulatory subunits (ARID1A, PBRM1, and ACTB, etc.), which can control gene expression by regulating chromatin structure. The change of SWI/SNF complex subunits is one of the important factors of tumor drug resistance and progress. SMARCA4 and ARID1A are the most widely studied subunits in tumor drug resistance. Low expression of SMARCA4 can lead to the deletion of the transcription inhibitor of the BCL2L1 gene in mantle cell lymphoma, which will result in transcription up-regulation and significant resistance to the combination therapy of ibrutinib and venetoclax. Low expression of SMARCA4 and high expression of SMARCA2 can activate the FGFR1-pERK1/2 signaling pathway in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma cells, which induces the overexpression of anti-apoptosis gene BCL2 and results in carboplatin resistance. SMARCA4 deletion can up-regulate epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by activating YAP1 gene expression in triple-negative breast cancer. It can also reduce the expression of Ca²⁺ channel IP3R3 in ovarian and lung cancer, resulting in the transfer of Ca²⁺ needed to induce apoptosis from endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria damage. Thus, these two tumors are resistant to cisplatin. It has been found that verteporfin can overcome the drug resistance induced by SMARCA4 deletion. However, this inhibitor has not been applied in clinical practice. Therefore, it is a promising research direction to develop SWI/SNF ATPase targeted drugs with high oral bioavailability to treat patients with tumor resistance induced by low expression or deletion of SMARCA4. ARID1A deletion can activate the expression of ANXA1 protein in HER2+ breast cancer cells or down-regulate the expression of progesterone receptor B protein in endometrial cancer cells. The drug resistance of these two tumor cells to trastuzumab or progesterone is induced by activating AKT pathway. ARID1A deletion in ovarian cancer can increase the expression of MRP2 protein and make it resistant to carboplatin and paclitaxel. ARID1A deletion also can up-regulate the phosphorylation levels of EGFR, ErbB2, and RAF1 oncogene proteins.The ErbB and VEGF pathway are activated and EMT is increased. As a result, lung adenocarcinoma is resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Although great progress has been made in the research on the mechanism of SWI/SNF complex inducing tumor drug resistance, most of the research is still at the protein level. It is necessary to comprehensively and deeply explore the detailed mechanism of drug resistance from gene, transcription, protein, and metabolite levels by using multi-omics techniques, which can provide sufficient theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of poor tumor prognosis caused by mutation or abnormal expression of SWI/SNF subunits in clinical practice.

With continuous advancements in the concepts of minimally invasive surgery,pancreatic surgery is gradually undergoing a transformative shift toward minimally invasive approaches.Compared with traditional open surgeries,minimally invasive procedures offer advantages such as reduced trauma,faster recovery,and fewer complications.However,due to the complex anatomical structure of the pancreas and the technical difficulties of surgical procedures,the widespread adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery still faces numerous technical challenges.Currently,laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD)is primarily performed in large,specialized centers with experienced teams and well-established systems.Given the high technical complexity and associated risks,reducing intraoperative risks and minimizing postoperative complications remain key focuses and major challenges in current research.This review is focused on intraoperative risk control and postoperative complication management in complex minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.We conducted a comprehensive review of recent advances in China and abroad,covering the latest progress in preoperative assessment,intraoperative procedures,complication prevention,quality management,and technological innovation.Furthermore,we discussed potential development directions in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery,including technical refinement,discipline development,procedural standardization,and multi-center collaboration.Our goal is to promote a continued progress toward more standardized,personalized,and intelligent surgical practices—ultimately benefiting a broader population of patients with pancreatic diseases.

Pancreatic cancer is characterized by an insidious onset,high invasiveness,and poor response to treatment.Radical resection remains the only potentially curative approach currently available.However,approximately 80%of patients are already in the locally advanced or metastatic stage at initial diagnosis and have missed the opportunity for radical surgery.In recent years,with the development of novel drugs and updates to chemotherapy regimens,significant progress has been made in improving the efficacy of conversion therapy.Conversion therapy aims to transform initially unresectable tumors,such as locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer,into a resectable state through systemic therapies(including chemotherapy,targeted therapy,immunotherapy,etc.)combined with localized treatments(such as radiotherapy,interventional therapy,etc.).This approach reduces tumor volume and eliminates micrometastases,thereby improving surgical resection rates and patient survival outcomes.However,considerable controversy remains regarding surgical treatment after conversion therapy for pancreatic cancer.This article provides an overview of conversion therapy regimens and treatment cycles,methods for evaluating therapeutic efficacy post-conversion therapy,the resection rates,and treatment outcomes of surgery following conversion therapy.The key technical points of post-conversion therapy surgery,including R0 resection,venous management,arterial resection and reconstruction,and the management of periarterial divestment,are highlighted.The learning curve for arterial resection and reconstruction is also discussed.Additionally,the potential applications of minimally invasive techniques(such as laparoscopy and robotics)are highlighted.The integration of biomarkers,imaging,and artificial intelligence holds promise for optimizing individualized decision-making.Multidisciplinary collaboration,the comprehensive competence of the surgical team,and the mastery and refinement of surgical skills are also critical factors that influence resectability and therapeutic outcomes after conversion therapy.

Objective To study physicians'use of Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support System(AI-CDSS)and its influencing factors in primary and secondary hospitals in China.Methods 443 physicians in prima-ry and secondary hospitals were surveyed by questionnaire.Univariate Chi-square test and logistic regression analy-sis were used to explore the influencing factors of doctors'use of Al-CDSS.Results Through univariate analysis,the effects of job title,working years,major,performance expectation,social influence,technical anxiety and indi-vidual innovation on use behavior were statistically significant(P＜0.05).logistic regression analysis showed that in terms of working years,1 year or less,2 to 5 years,6 to 10 years,11 to 15 years,16 to 20 years and conve-nience were generally protective factors for physicians to use AI-CDSS,while attending physician,surgical direc-tion,non-existence of social influence,average social influence and personal innovation were generally risk factors.The differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion Physicians'use of AI-CDSS is influenced by their working years and social influences.It is necessary to improve the cognition of physicians with long working years on AI-CDSS,give play to the radiation driving role of the surrounding environment,and pay attention to the cultivation of personal innovation.

Objective To observe the ultrasonic manifestations of abdominal pregnancy.Methods Ultrasonic and clinical data of 18 pregnant woman with abdominal pregnancy diagnosed by operation and pathology were retrospectively analyzed.Results Among 15 cases in first trimester,no preoperative ultrasonic diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy was obtained.Ultrasound showed no gestational sac in uterine cavity but mass in pelvic cavity,which located in the adnexal region in 8 cases,in the front and the post of uterus each in 2 cases,while in the adnexal region and the front of uterus in 1 case,in the post of the cervix in 1 case,and closed to uterine wall in 1 case,without obvious tubal echo around mass in all 15 cases.There were 2 cases of abdominal pregnancy in the second trimester,which were first diagnosed with ultrasound at 13+6 weeks and 21 weeks,with gestational sac located on the left side of uterus and behind the uterus,respectively.One case of abdominal pregnancy in the third trimester was first diagnosed with ultrasound at 35 4 weeks,with gestational sac located on the right side of uterus.Ultrasonic manifestations of the above three cases all showed gestational sac located outside the uterus without myometrium wrapping around the gestational sac nor placenta implanted in uterus,while echoes of fluid accumulation were detected around fetus.The ultrasonic diagnosis rate of abdominal pregnancy was 16.67％(3/18).Conclusion In the first trimester,if the ectopic pregnancy mass was large or the gestational sac located adjacent to the cervix,anterior or posterior to uterus and on the uterine wall,also no fallopian tube-like echo around the mass,the possibility of abdominal pregnancy should be considered.Ultrasonic manifestations of abdominal pregnancy in the second and third trimester present as gestational sac outside uterine cavity without wrapping uterine muscle layer around,no placenta implantation in uterine cavity,as well as echoes of fluid accumulation around fetus.Transabdominal combined with transvaginal ultrasound could improve diagnostic rate of abdominal pregnancy.