Objectives: Depression is a frequent complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between low social support and risk for depression in people with type 2 diabetes through a meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, ProQuest, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for English-language articles published up to 2021. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated using a random-effect model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated by using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics. The risk of publication bias was estimated using a funnel plot, the Egger test, and the Begg test. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were used to assess the quality of evidence and the risk of bias. Results: Eleven studies were included in this meta-analysis, containing a total of 3151 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The pooled analysis showed that people with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had low social support had twice as high a risk of depression as those with high social support (aOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.70; p<0.001). A random-effect model was used because the heterogeneity was high (I2= 87%). Conclusions Low social support was found to increase the risk of depression among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Further investigation into factors that may moderate this relationship is required.

Nutritional problems are issues that affect individuals or communities as a result of poor diets that lack essential nutrients. At the age of fifteen months, nearly one-third of children in developing countries are malnourished, with the majority of them being the proportion of children with height for age below standard derivations (stunting), the proportion of children with weight for height below standard derivations (wasting), and underweight. This was a quantitative study with a cross-sectional approach. This research was conducted in eight local-public health centers in the Special Region of Yogyakarta in December 2018 until February 2019. The population of this research was children under the age of seven with the total sample of 383 children. This research was analyzed using univariate and bivariate analysis. Univariate analysis was used to determine the frequency, mean value, variation, and percentage distributions, which are expressed in n and percent. Bivariate analysis was used to determine the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The statistical test used was a different proportion test with Chi-Square, CI (95%), and level of significance. The bivariate analysis result showed that the lack-family-support children under theage of five had the higher risk of experiencing underweight 0.04, stunting 0.28 and wasting 0.30. In addition, the children under the age of five who had lack of family-health worker cadre partnership had the higher risk of being underweight 0.36, stunting 0.43, and wasting 0.42. In conclusion, the nutritional status of the children under the age of five (underweight, stunting, and wasting) was indirectly affected by the variable of family support and family-health worker cadre partnership.

The cases of morbidity and mortality of babies and toddlers are continue to occur because of negligence of the mothers in providing complete basic immunization to their babies. This study is a cross-sectional study that was conducted to identify the predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors that influence full basic immunization coverage. The study was performed on mothers who had 9-12 months old child spread in 22 villages, purposively selected through from 22 community health centers in Bangkalan District, Madura Island. 200 mothers were selected as the study's respondents. The data were collected through questionnaires and from the book of "Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak" (KIA). The result of the study was obtained using logistic regression statistical test and it showed that the factors that influenced of full basic immunization coverage in Bangkalan District, Madura Island, were family income as predisposing factor (OR=2.26; 95% CI= 1.14 to 4.51; p= 0.020); health facility as enabling factor (OR=3.03; 95% CI= 1.59 to 5.80; p= 0.001); and community leader support as reinforcing factor (OR=2.56; 95% CI= 1.33 to 4.92; p= 0.005).