BACKGROUND

The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increased risk of developing antimicrobial resistance due to the high utilization of antimicrobial agents. Since antimicrobial utilization is a crucial driver in the development of antimicrobial resistance, the need for antimicrobial use surveillance is crucial in identifying prescription patterns that would help provide proper interventions.

To determine the antibiotic use and prevalence of prescription quality indicators among COVID-19 patients admitted at a tertiary government hospital.

A retrospective cross-sectional survey was conducted to provide data on antibiotic use and the prevalence of prescription quality indicators among COVID-19 patients in a tertiary-level hospital from June 2021 to June 2022.

A total of 342 patient medical records were surveyed. The majority (119, 34.8%) of the patients were in the age group 41-60 years old and there were more male patients (52.34%) than female patients (47.66%). About 88.99% of the patients were considered to have community-acquired COVID-19 infections. Co-morbidities among patients were seen in more than half of the surveyed population (64%). These include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, chronic lung disease, and hematologic disorders.

Empiric antibiotic therapy was high at 88.88%, while definitive treatment with confirmed bacterial infection was only at 11.11%. The most frequently prescribed antibiotic therapies are azithromycin (250, 45.9%), ceftriaxone (188, 32.2%), and cefuroxime (58, 9.9%). Patterns of antibiotic use are attributed to the similarities of respiratory bacterial infections with COVID-19 cases.

Prescription quality indicators assessed in the study include documentation of indication for prescriptions, guideline compliance, collection of culture before antibiotic therapy, and stop/review documentation. Out of 583 antibiotic prescriptions, 464 (79.58%) were properly documented with an indication. Non-compliance to guidelines reached 39.11%, while the stop and review date documentation rate was 20.41%. The collection of culture before the start of antibiotic therapy was at 50.2%.

The results from the study highlighted the need for antimicrobial surveillance and stewardship efforts among COVID-19 and other viral infections.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Accurately diagnosing bacterial meningitis and ventriculitis in children is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and the lack of specificity in conventional CSF parameters. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) procalcitonin (PCT) is a promising diagnostic marker but studies on its utility in children are lacking. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of CSF procalcitonin for bacterial meningitis and ventriculitis in children and establish a clinically relevant cut-off level.

A total of 131 patients were included in the study, and the CSF PCT levels were measured in two groups. Group 1 comprised of patients with bacterial meningitis and ventriculitis (n=21), while Group 2 consisted of patients with tuberculous meningitis, fungal meningitis, viral encephalitis, autoimmune encephalitis, central nervous system (CNS) leukemia, and non-infectious or inflammatory CNS conditions (n=110).

CSF PCT demonstrated an area under the curve of 96.57% in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. With a cut-off of 0.19 ng/mL, it achieved high sensitivity (90.48%) and specificity (91.82%), making it an excellent test for distinguishing between bacterial meningitis and ventriculitis from control diseases.

CSF procalcitonin is highly effective in distinguishing pediatric bacterial meningitis and ventriculitis. Especially in clinical scenarios where the conventional laboratory tests are inconclusive, it can complement clinical assessment to diagnose CNS infections accurately and guide prudent antibiotic use.

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increased risk of developing antimicrobial resistance due to the high utilization of antimicrobial agents. Since antimicrobial utilization is a crucial driver in the development of antimicrobial resistance, the need for antimicrobial use surveillance is crucial in identifying prescription patterns that would help provide proper interventions.

To determine the antibiotic use and prevalence of prescription quality indicators among COVID-19 patients admitted at a tertiary government hospital.

A retrospective cross-sectional survey was conducted to provide data on antibiotic use and the prevalence of prescription quality indicators among COVID-19 patients in a tertiary-level hospital from June 2021 to June 2022.

A total of 342 patient medical records were surveyed. The majority (119, 34.8%) of the patients were in the age group 41-60 years old and there were more male patients (52.34%) than female patients (47.66%). About 88.99% of the patients were considered to have community-acquired COVID-19 infections. Co-morbidities among patients were seen in more than half of the surveyed population (64%). These include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, chronic lung disease, and hematologic disorders.

Empiric antibiotic therapy was high at 88.88%, while definitive treatment with confirmed bacterial infection was only at 11.11%. The most frequently prescribed antibiotic therapies are azithromycin (250, 45.9%), ceftriaxone (188, 32.2%), and cefuroxime (58, 9.9%). Patterns of antibiotic use are attributed to the similarities of respiratory bacterial infections with COVID-19 cases.

Prescription quality indicators assessed in the study include documentation of indication for prescriptions, guideline compliance, collection of culture before antibiotic therapy, and stop/review documentation. Out of 583 antibiotic prescriptions, 464 (79.58%) were properly documented with an indication. Non-compliance to guidelines reached 39.11%, while the stop and review date documentation rate was 20.41%. The collection of culture before the start of antibiotic therapy was at 50.2%.

The results from the study highlighted the need for antimicrobial surveillance and stewardship efforts among COVID-19 and other viral infections.

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical global health threat, with millions of deaths attributed to it annually. Antibiotic stewardship to combat AMR is the responsibility of all healthcare professionals. Despite evidence suggesting that it is unnecessary, dentists routinely prescribe prophylactic antibiotics following third molar (3M) surgeries. METHOD: This mixed-methods study examined the behavioural barriers influencing antibiotic prescribing practices within the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the National University Centre for Oral Health Singapore. This study used the capability, opportunity and motivation for behavioural change or COM-B framework to implement interventions targeting the behavioural barriers. RESULTS: Pre- and post-intervention data over 6 months showed a significant reduction in antibiotic prescriptions from 84.45% to 20.89%, following the implementation of COM-B strategies (P<0.001). Qualitative feedback from focus group discussions highlighted a positive shift in clinicians' attitudes towards antibiotic reduction, acknowledging the minimal infection risk associated with non-prescribing practices. Notably, complication rates remained stable throughout the study period, indicating no adverse effects from reduced antibiotic usage. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrated that the COM-B model can be successfully applied to modify deeply ingrained prescription habits, and underscored the effectiveness of a structured behavioural change intervention in enhancing compliance with antibiotic stewardship guidelines. The study advocates continuation of initiatives to sustain this positive trend and mitigate AMR in clinical practice.
Humans ; Molar, Third/surgery* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Singapore ; Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods* ; Practice Patterns, Dentists'/statistics & numerical data* ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Female ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Male ; Tooth Extraction ; Adult ; Focus Groups ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'

BACKGROUND: Owing to the high prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) in China, bismuth-containing quadruple therapies have been recommended for H. pylori eradication. This study compared the efficacy and safety of quadruple regimens containing vonoprazan vs . esomeprazole for H. pylori eradication in a patient population in China. METHODS: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. Patients with confirmed H. pylori infection were randomized 1:1 to receive quadruple therapy for 14 days: amoxicillin 1000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg after meals, bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg before meals, plus either vonoprazan 20 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg before meals, all twice daily. The primary outcome was the eradication rate of H. pylori , evaluated using a 13 C urea breath test at 4 weeks after treatment. The non-inferiority margin was at 10%. RESULTS: The study included 510 patients, 506 of whom completed the follow-up assessment. The primary analysis revealed eradication rates of 86.8% (210/242) and 86.7% (208/240) for vonoprazan and esomeprazole therapy, respectively (treatment difference: 0.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.95, 6.17; non-inferiority P  = 0.0009). Per-protocol analysis showed eradication rates of 87.4% for vonoprazan and 86.3% for esomeprazole (treatment difference: 1.2%; 95% CI: -5.03, 7.36; non-inferiority P  = 0.0004). Vonoprazan and esomeprazole were well tolerated, with similar safety profiles. CONCLUSION: Vonoprazan was found to be well-tolerated and non-inferior to esomeprazole for eradicating H. pylori in patients from China. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04198363.
Humans ; Esomeprazole/therapeutic use* ; Double-Blind Method ; Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Helicobacter pylori/pathogenicity* ; Pyrroles/therapeutic use* ; Sulfonamides/therapeutic use* ; Adult ; Clarithromycin/therapeutic use* ; Amoxicillin/therapeutic use* ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use* ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

BACKGROUND: The effect of the interval between previous Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication and rescue treatment on therapeutic outcomes remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between eradication rates and treatment interval durations in H. pylori infections. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted from December 2021 to February 2023 at six tertiary hospitals in Shandong, China. We recruited patients who were positive for H. pylori infection and required rescue treatment. Demographic information, previous times of eradication therapy, last eradication therapy date, and history of antibiotic use data were collected. The patients were divided into four groups based on the rescue treatment interval length: Group A, ≥4 weeks and ≤3 months; Group B, >3 and ≤6 months; Group C, >6 and ≤12 months; and Group D, >12 months. The primary outcome was the eradication rate of H. pylori . Drug compliance and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare eradication rates between groups. RESULTS: A total of 670 patients were enrolled in this study. The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were 88.3% (158/179) in Group A, 89.6% (120/134) in Group B, 89.1% (123/138) in Group C, and 87.7% (192/219) in Group D. The per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were 92.9% (156/168) in Group A, 94.5% (120/127) in Group B, 94.5% (121/128) in Group C, and 93.6% (190/203) in Group D. There was no statistically significant difference in the eradication rates between groups in either the ITT ( P = 0.949) or PP analysis ( P = 0.921). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of AEs ( P = 0.934) or drug compliance ( P = 0.849) between groups. CONCLUSION: The interval duration of rescue treatment had no significant effect on H. pylori eradication rates or the incidence of AEs. REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05173493.
Humans ; Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy* ; Helicobacter pylori/pathogenicity* ; Male ; Female ; Prospective Studies ; Middle Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects* ; Adult ; Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Antibiotic-resistant (AR) bacterial wound infections (WIs) impose major burdens on healthcare systems, exacerbated by ineffective therapies and stalled antibiotic development. Phage therapy and phage-derived enzymes have gained traction as potent alternatives, leveraging targeted bactericidal mechanisms to combat AR pathogens. In this review, we summarised the antimicrobial mechanisms of both phage therapy and phage-derived enzymes as antimicrobial therapy, and outlined recent advances in their use for in vitro , in vivo and clinical applications for WI management. In addition, we also highlights recent advancements in their development, driven by genetic engineering, chemical modifications, and artificial intelligence. Finally, we identified the potential barriers and challenges they may encounter in clinical practice and the corresponding strategies to address these issues. The entire review gives us a comprehensive understanding of the latest advances in phages and their derivative enzyme therapies for treating WIs, in the hope that research in this field will continue to improve and innovate, accelerating the transition from the laboratory to application at the bedside and ultimately improving the efficacy of treatment for AR bacterial WIs.
Humans ; Phage Therapy/methods* ; Wound Infection/drug therapy* ; Bacteriophages/enzymology* ; Enzyme Therapy/methods* ; Animals ; Bacterial Infections/therapy*

Child ; Humans ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology* ; Meningitis, Bacterial/therapy*

Humans ; Shock, Septic/diagnosis* ; Child ; Consensus ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use*

The use of antimicrobial agents is an important measure for the treatment of oral and maxillofacial space infection(OMSI). The irrational use of antimicrobials will not only affect the effect of disease treatment, but also leads to the occurrence of bacterial resistance. To standardize the rational use of antimicrobial agents in the treatment of OMSI, this consensus was developed based on the latest evidence-based medical research, incorporating extensive input from pharmaceutical and oral clinical experts, and refined through multiple rounds of discussion and revision. This consensus mainly reviews the anti-infective treatment regimen, common drug use methods, pharmaceutical monitoring, and treatment duration for OMSI. It aims to provide guidance for oral clinicians in the rational use of antimicrobial agents during the treatment of such infections.
Humans ; Consensus ; Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial