1.Evaluation of anorectal dynamics in children with tethered cord syndrome before and after surgery and its clinical significance.
Qian-Cheng XU ; Zhi-Peng SHEN ; Pei-Liang ZHANG ; Jing-Yi FENG ; Mi-Zu JIANG
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2025;27(5):563-567
OBJECTIVES:
To investigate the characteristics and clinical significance of anorectal manometry measurements in children with tethered cord syndrome (TCS) before and after surgery.
METHODS:
A retrospective study was conducted on 44 children with TCS treated at the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2022 to September 2023. These patients were divided into effective subgroup (n=34) and non-effective subgroup (n=10) based on postoperative symptom improvement. Additionally, 34 children with functional constipation were selected as a control group. Baseline data and manometry measurements were compared between the preoperative TCS group and the control group, as well as between the non-effective and effective subgroups.
RESULTS:
The TCS group had lower short contraction time and defecation relaxation rate compared to the control group (P<0.05), while defecation residual pressure and maximum rectal tolerable threshold were higher than the control group (P<0.05). The length of the anal canal in the high-pressure zone in the effective subgroup was greater postoperatively than preoperatively (P<0.05), and the initial rectal sensation threshold decreased postoperatively (P<0.05). The non-effective subgroup had lower preoperative maximum rectal expulsion pressure compared to the effective subgroup (P<0.05). Postoperative rectal anal inhibition reflex values in the effective subgroup were higher than those in the non-effective subgroup (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
There are some differences in anorectal dynamics between children with TCS and those with functional constipation. Maximum rectal expulsion pressure may be a key predictor of surgical outcomes. Surgery can alter certain defecation functions in some children.
Humans
;
Male
;
Anal Canal/physiopathology*
;
Female
;
Rectum/physiopathology*
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Manometry
;
Neural Tube Defects/physiopathology*
;
Infant
;
Defecation
;
Adolescent
;
Constipation/physiopathology*
;
Clinical Relevance
2.Standardized surgical procedure of proximally extended resection and sphincter-preserving surgery (Tianhe procedure®) for rectal cancer after radiotherapy (2025 version).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2025;28(7):707-716
Tianhe procedure® is a functional sphincter-preserving surgical approach developed for rectal cancer patients following radiotherapy. This technique involves extended proximal resection of the colon beyond the pelvic cavity, followed by anastomosis of the non-irradiated proximal colon to the distal rectum or anal canal. This strategy aims to reduce the incidence of anastomotic complications and postoperative bowel dysfunction. However, there is currently a lack of standardized practice guideline for implementing Tianhe procedure® in China. Therefore, the Chinese Radiation Intestinal Injury Research Group, the Colorectal Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, the Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and the Colorectal Cancer Committee of China Anti-cancer Association, and the Gastrointestinal Surgical Branch of Guangdong Medical Doctor Association, have jointly convened a panel of national experts to discuss and establish this standardized surgical procedure. This standard, based on the latest evidence from literature, research advancements, and expert experience, focuses on key aspects of the Tianhe procedure®, including its precise definition, indications, critical procedural steps, postoperative complications, and functional rehabilitation strategies. It aims to promote standardized implementation and broader clinical adoption of this innovative surgical technique.
Humans
;
Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy*
;
Anal Canal/surgery*
;
Anastomosis, Surgical/methods*
;
Organ Sparing Treatments/methods*
;
Rectum/surgery*
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods*
3.Expert consensus on modified Bacon procedure (2025 version).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2025;28(11):1211-1222
The modified Bacon procedure is a staged, sphincter-preserving surgical technique for low rectal tumors, which involves transanal or transabdominal division of the tumor, extraction of the specimen via the anus or abdomen, exteriorization and fixation of the proximal colon through the anus, followed by a second-stage resection of the exteriorized colon to restore intestinal continuity. This approach offers advantages such as a reduced risk of anastomotic leakage and operational safety. However, several clinical aspects lack consensus, including indications for the procedure, the optimal length of the exteriorized colon, methods of anal fixation, and the timing of the second-stage resection. To address these issues, the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, the Colorectal Cancer Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association, and the NOSES Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association jointly initiated a collaborative effort to convene experts in the field. Through discussions, 10 key clinical questions were identified, and based on a systematic review of relevant domestic and international clinical studies combined with expert opinions, 13 recommendations were formulated. These recommendations cover indications, contraindications, technical details, surgical complications, functional outcomes related to anal function, and oncological efficacy of the modified Bacon procedure. This consensus aims to provide guidance for the clinical practice of the modified Bacon procedure in China, thereby promoting its standardized and evidence-based implementation.
Humans
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Consensus
;
Anal Canal/surgery*
4.Analysis of the causes of long-standing pelvic anterior sacral space infection and discussion of management techniques.
Gang Cheng WANG ; Hong Le LI ; Yang LIU ; Xiang Hao GU ; Rui Xia LIU ; Rui FENG ; You Cai WANG ; Ying Jun LIU ; Guo Qiang ZHANG ; Zhi ZHANG ; Hong Li WANG ; Fang WANG ; Yan ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2023;45(3):273-278
Objective: To investigate the causes and management of long-term persistent pelvic presacral space infection. Methods: Clinical data of 10 patients with persistent presacral infection admitted to the Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2015 to October 2020 were collected. Different surgical approaches were used to treat the presacral infection according to the patients' initial surgical procedures. Results: Among the 10 patients, there were 2 cases of presacral recurrent infection due to rectal leak after radiotherapy for cervical cancer, 3 cases of presacral recurrent infection due to rectal leak after radiotherapy for rectal cancer Dixons, and 5 cases of presacral recurrent infection of sinus tract after adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer Miles. Of the 5 patients with leaky bowel, 4 had complete resection of the ruptured nonfunctional bowel and complete debridement of the presacral infection using an anterior transverse sacral incision with a large tipped omentum filling the presacral space; 1 had continuous drainage of the anal canal and complete debridement of the presacral infection using an anterior transverse sacral incision. 5 post-Miles patients all had debridement of the presacral infection using an anterior transverse sacral incision combined with an abdominal incision. The nine patients with healed presacral infection recovered from surgery in 26 to 210 days, with a median time of 55 days. Conclusions: Anterior sacral infections in patients with leaky gut are caused by residual bowel secretion of intestinal fluid into the anterior sacral space, and in post-Miles patients by residual anterior sacral foreign bodies. An anterior sacral caudal transverse arc incision combined with an abdominal incision is an effective surgical approach for complete debridement of anterior sacral recalcitrant infections.
Humans
;
Reinfection
;
Rectum/surgery*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Drainage
;
Anal Canal/surgery*
;
Pelvic Infection
5.Cross-sectional study of low anterior resection syndrome in patients who have survived more than 5 years after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.
Fan LIU ; Sen HOU ; Zhi Dong GAO ; Zhan Long SHEN ; Ying Jiang YE
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(3):283-289
Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients who had survived for more than 5 years after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer and to analyze its relationship with postoperative time. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. The study cohort comprised patients who had survived for at least 5 years (60 months) after undergoing sphincter- preserving radical resection of pathologically diagnosed rectal adenocarcinoma within 15 cm of the anal verge in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital from January 2005 to May 2016. Patients who had undergone local resection, had permanent stomas, recurrent intestinal infection, local recurrence, history of previous anorectal surgery, or long- term preoperative defecation disorders were excluded. A LARS questionnaire was administered by telephone interview, points being allocated for incontinence for flatus (0-7 points), incontinence for liquid stools (0-3 points), frequency of bowel movements (0-5 points), clustering of stools (0-11 points), and urgency (0-16 points). The patients were allocated to three groups based on these scores: no LARS (0-20 points), minor LARS (21-29 points), and major LARS (30-42 points). The prevalence of LARS and major LARS in patients who had survived more than 5 years after surgery, correlation between postoperative time and LARS score, and whether postoperative time was a risk factor for major LARS and LARS symptoms were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up time of the 160 patients who completed the telephone interview was 97 (60-193) months; 81 (50.6%) of them had LARS, comprising 34 (21.3%) with minor LARS and 47 (29.4%) with major LARS. Spearman correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between LARS score and postoperative time (correlation coefficient α=-0.016, P=0.832). Multivariate analysis identified anastomotic height (RR=0.850, P=0.022) and radiotherapy (RR=5.760, P<0.001) as independent risk factors for major LARS; whereas the postoperative time was not a significant risk factor (RR=1.003, P=0.598). The postoperative time was also not associated with LARS score rank and frequency of bowel movements, clustering, or urgency (P>0.05). However, the rates of incontinence for flatus (3/31, P=0.003) and incontinence for liquid stools (8/31, P=0.005) were lower in patients who had survived more than 10 years after surgery. Conclusions: Patients with rectal cancer who have survived more than 5 years after sphincter-preserving surgery still have a high prevalence of LARS. We found no evidence of major LARS symptoms resolving over time.
Humans
;
Rectal Neoplasms/pathology*
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Flatulence/complications*
;
Anal Canal/pathology*
;
Diarrhea
;
Quality of Life
6.Dong's extraordinary point needling technique combined with medication for postoperative complications of anal fistula: a randomized controlled trial.
Yan FU ; Yue XU ; Hai-Xia WU ; Shan-Shan WANG
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2023;43(8):916-920
OBJECTIVE:
To observe the effect of Dong's extraordinary point needling technique on postoperative complications of anal fistula.
METHODS:
A total of 241 patients undergoing anal fistula surgery were randomly divided into an observation group (121 cases, 3 cases dropped off) and a control group (120 cases, 2 cases dropped off). The patients in the control group were treated with intramuscular injection of compound diclofenac sodium injection and oral administration of tamsulosin hydrochloride sustained release capsules. In addition to the treatment in the control group, the patients in the observation group were treated with Daoma needling technique at the "Sanqi points" (Qimen point, Qijiao point, and Qizheng point) combined with Dongqi needling technique at "Sanhuang points" (sub-Tianhuang point, Dihuang point, Renhuang point), with each session lasting 30 min. The treatment in the two groups both started on the first day after surgery, and was given once daily for 14 consecutive days. Visual analog scale (VAS) score was compared between the two groups on postoperative day 1, 7, and 14; bladder residual urine volume, spontaneous voiding volume, and urinary catheterization frequency were assessed after treatment on postoperative day 1; and anorectal dynamic indexes (anal canal resting pressure, rectal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure of the anal canal, and minimum rectal sensory threshold) were evaluated before surgery and on postoperative day 4. Clinical efficacy was assessed in both groups one month after surgery.
RESULTS:
On postoperative day 7 and 14, the VAS scores of both groups were lower than those on postoperative day 1 (P<0.05), and the VAS scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The bladder residual urine volume and urinary catheterization frequency in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), while the spontaneous voiding volume was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). On postoperative day 4, the anal canal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure of the anal canal, and the minimum rectal sensory threshold were lower than preoperative values (P<0.05), while the rectal resting pressure was higher than preoperative value (P<0.05) in both groups. The anal canal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure of the anal canal, and minimum rectal sensory threshold were lower than those in the control group, and the rectal resting pressure was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The effective rate was 93.2% (110/118) in the observation group, which was higher than 84.7% (100/118) in the control group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Dong's extraordinary point needling technique could reduce postoperative pain, alleviate urinary retention, and improve defecation in patients undergoing anal fistula surgery.
Humans
;
Rectum
;
Rectal Fistula/surgery*
;
Anal Canal/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Anus Diseases
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Acupuncture Points
7.Chinese expert consensus on intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer (2023 edition).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(6):536-547
Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate sphincter-preserving surgical technique for low rectal cancer. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging, appropriate selection of surgical approaches and technique, standardized perioperative management, and postoperative rehabilitation are the keys to ensuring the oncological effect and functional preservation of ISR. To date, there is still a lack of standardized guidance on the clinical implementation of ISR in China. Therefore, based on the latest evidence from literature, expert experience, and the intervention situation in China, the Chinese Society of Colorectal Surgery, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts in colorectal surgery to discuss and produce "Chinese expert consensus on intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer (2023 edition)". This consensus focuses on definition, classification, related pelvic anatomy, operational techniques, postoperative complications, and long-term oncological and functional outcomes, and aims to guide the standardized clinical practice of ISR in the operation of low rectal cancer in China.
Humans
;
Laparoscopy/methods*
;
Consensus
;
Anal Canal/surgery*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
8.Standardized surgical procedure of conformal sphincter-preservation operation for low rectal cancer (2023 edition).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(10):907-914
Conformal sphincter-preservation operation (CSPO) is considered the effective surgical technique for preserving the sphincter in cases of low rectal cancer. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging, reasonable selection of surgical approaches and technique, standardized perioperative management, and postoperative rehabilitation are the keys to ensuring the oncological clearance and functional preservation of CSPO. However, there is currently a lack of standardized surgical procedure for implementing CSPO in China. Therefore, the Colorectal Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association,along with the Colorectal Cancer Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, gathered experts in colorectal surgery to discuss and establish this standardized surgical procedure of CSPO. This standard, based on the latest evidence from literature, expert experiences, and China national condition, focuses on the definition, classification, pelvic anatomy, surgical techniques, postoperative complications, and perioperative care of CSPO. It aims to guide the standardized clinical practice of CSPO in China.
Humans
;
Anal Canal/surgery*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Pelvis
;
Postoperative Complications
9.Chinese expert consensus on colonic and anorectal manometry (2023 edition).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(12):1095-1102
Colonic and anorectal manometry includes anorectal manometry and colonic manometry. Anorectal manometry is a common method to evaluate anorectal function, which can objectively reflect the pathological and physiological abnormalities of outlet obstructive constipation and fecal incontinence, as well as the impact of anorectal surgery on continence. Colonic manometry is a new type of colon motility detection method developed in recent years. It can record the peristalsis and contraction of the whole colon through a pressure measuring catheter, which helps physicians further evaluate various colonic diseases. However, various factors such as testing equipment, operating standards, and evaluation parameters are difficult to unify. There is no consensus on the operation and interpretation of colorectal anal pressure measurement. Under the guidance of the Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, in collaboration with Clinical Guidelines Committee, Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Anorectal motility disorders Committee , Colorectal Surgeons Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Colonic Branch of China international exchange and promotive association for medical and healthcare, Tianjin Union Medical Center is leading the organization of domestic experts in this field. Based on searching relevant literature and combining clinical experience at home and abroad, after multiple discussions, the "Chinese expert consensus on colonic and anorectal manometry" has been prepared. This consensus discusses the indications, contraindications, pre examination management and technical procedures, treatment of complications, and interpretation of examination reports for colonic and anorectal manometry , aiming to guide the standardized clinical practice of colonic and anorectal manometry.
Humans
;
Rectum
;
Consensus
;
Constipation
;
Anal Canal
;
Rectal Diseases
;
Fecal Incontinence
;
Manometry/methods*
;
Colorectal Neoplasms/complications*
10.Chinese expert consensus on the treatment of hemorrhoids by injection(2023 edition).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(12):1103-1111
Hemorrhoids is a common anorectal disease, usually occurring in middle-aged people aged 25-65 years old, clinical bleeding, swelling, prolapse, pain, itching and anal discomfort, and repeatedly attacks and aggravated gradually, seriously affecting the quality of life of patients. The treatment of hemorrhoids includes conservative, injection, ligation, and various surgical procedures. Injection therapy with a history of more than 150 years is simple to operate, easy to popularize and apply in grass-roots units, causes less intraoperative bleeding and fewer complications, and has reliable efficacy. As a result, it is favored by clinicians and patients. The injection treatment of hemorrhoids has been mentioned in various hemorrhoid treatment guidelines and consensus at home and abroad, but there is no special expert consensus for reference. Led by the Anorectal Physicians Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Colorectal Surgery Group of the Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, experts in related fields in China were invited to review the latest evidence-based medical evidence at home and abroad and conducted evidence quality assessment and recommendation strength classification according to the GRADE system. This paper attempts to make detailed recommendations on the types and application methods of the preparations commonly used in the injection treatment of hemorrhoids at home and abroad, and form the Chinese Expert Consensus on the Treatment of hemorrhoids by anal injection (2023 edition), aiming to guide the reasonable selection of drugs and dosage forms for hemorrhoidal injection treatment, and to provide reference for standardizing the use of different drugs and dosage forms, so as to improve the effectiveness and safety of clinical application of hemorrhoidal injection treatment.
Middle Aged
;
Humans
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Hemorrhoids/surgery*
;
Quality of Life
;
Consensus
;
Anal Canal
;
Ligation/methods*
;
Treatment Outcome

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail