Introduction: Diabetic retinopathy (DRP) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes, affecting approximately 30% of patients with type 2 diabetes and over half of those with type 1 diabetes. It remains a leading cause of preventable blindness among adults worldwide. Early stages are frequently asymptomatic, making regular diabetic eye screening essential to detect sight-threatening changes before irreversible vision loss occurs. In Malaysia, where diabetes prevalence has reached 15.6% among adults (NHMS 2023), the effective implementation of annual retinal screening is crucial. Malaysian National Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend an annual retinal screening among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. This clinical audit evaluated adherence to DRP screening. Methodology: A retrospective clinical audit was conducted at Pusat Perubatan Angkatan Tentera (PPAT), Kem Sungai Besi, to evaluate compliance with national DR screening standards among adults with T2DM. Thirty eligible patient records were reviewed. Three key indicators were assessed: (1) documentation of visual acuity at diagnosis, (2) annual fundoscopy, and (3) referral for fundus photography within the preceding 12 months. Performance was benchmarked against the 80% standard. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: The median age group was 55–59 years, with equal gender distribution. Screening adherence was substantially below target: visual acuity assessment at diagnosis, 23.3%; annual fundoscopy, 26.7%; and fundus imaging referral, 36.7%. All screening indicators were below the recommended standard. Conclusion This audit reveals a significant implementation gap between national guidelines and routine practice. Structured workflow integration and documentation reinforcement strategies need to be emphasized. Additional measures include strengthening patient education and reinforcing guideline-based practice through regular CME sessions. However, a re-audit has not yet been conducted at the time of clinical audit reporting. An ongoing evaluation will be essential to determine the effectiveness and sustainability of these interventions in reducing preventable diabetic vision loss at PPAT Sungai Besi.
Humans ; iabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Diabetic Retinopathy ; Clinical Audit

Objective: The natural history of asymptomatic (silent) gallstones has been inadequately studied. Existing information derives from studies based on oral cholecystography or relatively small sample sizes. We planned a retrospective cohort study in subjects with gallstones to determine conversion rates from asymptomatic to symptomatic. Methods: We extracted data from computerised databases of one government hospital and two private clinics in Malaysia. Files were scrutinised to ensure that criteria for asymptomatic gallstones were fulfilled. Patients were called on telephone, further questioned to confirm that the gallstones at detection were truly asymptomatic, and asked about symptoms that were consistent with previously defined criteria for biliary colic. Appropriate ethical clearances were taken. Results: 213 (112 males) patients fulfilled the criteria for asymptomatic gallstones and could be contacted. 23 (10.8%) developed pain after an average follow up interval of 4.02 years (range 0.1-11 years). Conversion rates from asymptomatic to symptomatic gallstones were high in the first two years of follow up, averaging 4.03±0.965 per year. Over time the conversion rates slowed, and by year 10 the annual conversion rate averaged only 1.38±0.29. Conversion rates were much higher for females compared to males (F:M hazard ratio 3.23, SE 1.54, p>z 0.014). The lifetime risks for conversion approached 6.15% for males, and 22.1% for females. Conclusion: In conclusion, asymptomatic gallstones are much more likely to convert to symptomatic in females than in males. Males in whom asymptomatic stones are discovered should be advised conservative treatment. Surgery may be preferable to conservative management if the subject is a young female.