BACKGROUND: Supporting the mental health of researchers is essential to maintaining human resources and advancing science. This study investigated the association between Japanese medical researchers' perceptions of research evaluation processes and their psychological well-being. METHODS: We performed a web-based self-administered questionnaire survey. The questionnaires were distributed to each academic society through the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences from December 2022 to January 2023. These questionnaires targeted medical researchers. Exposure was the medical researchers' perceptions of quantitative indicators for evaluating medical research and researchers. The outcome was psychological well-being, measured using the Japanese version of the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regressions were conducted to investigate the association between individual attitudes toward research evaluation and psychological well-being. Stratified analyses by research fields, i.e., clinical, basic, and social medicine, were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 3,139 valid responses were collected. After excluding 176 responses from research fields of other than clinical, basic, or social medicine, 2,963 researchers (2,185 male, 737 female, and 41 other) were analyzed. Prevalence of poor well-being (WHO-5 score <13) was 28.3% in the researchers. The highest number of medical researchers was in clinical medicine (n = 500) followed by basic medicine (n = 217) and social medicine (n = 121). Medical researchers who considered research funding slightly important/not important for researcher evaluation had poorer psychological well-being than those who considered it especially important (slightly important: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.71; not important: aOR 1.53, 95%CI 1.10-2.12). This tendency was stronger among basic medical researchers than clinical or social medical researchers. The research field significantly modified the relationship between research funding received and interaction with poor psychological well-being both additively (P = 0.030) and multiplicatively (P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS The discrepancy between medical researchers' attitudes toward research evaluation and the current state of research evaluation in their research community may worsen their psychological well-being. The influence of this discrepancy differs among clinical, basic, and social medicine. Appropriate evaluation of medical research and researchers in each field can facilitate improving their psychological well-being via the resolution of this discrepancy.
Humans ; Japan ; Female ; Male ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Adult ; Research Personnel/statistics & numerical data* ; Middle Aged ; Biomedical Research ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Mental Health ; Psychological Well-Being ; East Asian People

Objective：An efficient disaster relief service necessitates the documentation and dissemination of information acquired from disaster response-related activities. However, recording and summarizing information pertaining to rehabilitation support activities is time-consuming and a pressing concern；therefore, mark-sheet forms have been introduced to reduce the time required for this process. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether mark-sheet forms can facilitate a more accurate and rapid recording of information than conventional descriptive recording forms.Methods：Fifty physical therapists affiliated with the Osaka Physical Therapists Association with no history of performing disaster rehabilitation support activities were recruited. Participants were randomized into descriptive recording form and mark-sheet form groups. Individuals in both groups were instructed to document the information gathered by watching simulated videos of the rehabilitation support activities on their designated recording forms. A statistical analysis compared the accuracy and time required to record the data obtained from the 10 simulation videos between groups.Results：In all 10 scenarios, the recording time was significantly shorter (p＜0.05) for the mark-sheet form than descriptive recording form group. However, no discernible intergroup difference was observed in recorded content accuracy.Conclusion：The use of mark-sheet versus descriptive recording forms facilitated more rapid documentation of disaster rehabilitation support activities.

Objective：An efficient disaster relief service necessitates the documentation and dissemination of information acquired from disaster response-related activities. However, recording and summarizing information pertaining to rehabilitation support activities is time-consuming and a pressing concern；therefore, mark-sheet forms have been introduced to reduce the time required for this process. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether mark-sheet forms can facilitate a more accurate and rapid recording of information than conventional descriptive recording forms.Methods：Fifty physical therapists affiliated with the Osaka Physical Therapists Association with no history of performing disaster rehabilitation support activities were recruited. Participants were randomized into descriptive recording form and mark-sheet form groups. Individuals in both groups were instructed to document the information gathered by watching simulated videos of the rehabilitation support activities on their designated recording forms. A statistical analysis compared the accuracy and time required to record the data obtained from the 10 simulation videos between groups.Results：In all 10 scenarios, the recording time was significantly shorter (p＜0.05) for the mark-sheet form than descriptive recording form group. However, no discernible intergroup difference was observed in recorded content accuracy.Conclusion：The use of mark-sheet versus descriptive recording forms facilitated more rapid documentation of disaster rehabilitation support activities.

Methods: This study enrolled 60 patients who underwent corrective surgery and were followed up for >2 years postoperatively. AdIS was defined as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in patients who had no history of corrective surgery, had a primary thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve, and were ≥30 years old at the time of surgery. Results: The AdIS (n=23; mean age, 53.1 years) and de novo (n=37; mean age, 70.0 years) groups were significantly different in terms of the main thoracic and TL/L curves, sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, and thoracolumbar kyphosis preoperatively. The scores in the self-image domain of the SRS-22r (before surgery/2 years after surgery [PO2Y]) were 2.2/4.4 and 2.3/3.7 in the AdIS and de novo groups, respectively, and PO2Y was significantly different between the two groups (p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that AdIS was an independent factor associated with self-image at PO2Y (p=0.039). Conclusions AdIS, a spinal deformity pathology, was identified as a significant factor associated with the self-image domain of SRS-22r in patients who underwent corrective surgery. AdIS is not solely classified based on pathology but also differs in terms of the clinical aspect of self-image improvement following corrective surgery.

In this revision, we have attempted to align the Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education competency, "problem-solving ability based on specialized knowledge," with the "Standards of National Examination for Medical Practitioners." The major diseases and syndromes in "Essential Fundamentals" correspond to the basic diseases in Table 1 of the Core Curriculum, symptoms, physical and laboratory examinations, and treatment in "General Medicine" correspond to the items in Table 2 of the Core Curriculum, and the diseases in "Medical Theory" correspond to the diseases in PS-02 of the Core Curriculum. The validity of the diseases in the Core Curriculum was verified using the evaluation results of the examination level classification of the "Research for Revision of National Examination Criteria." Approximately 690 diseases were conclusively selected. This revision mentions the number of diseases in the Core Curriculum for the first time. Hopefully, this will lead to a deeper examination of diseases that should be studied in medical schools in the future.

The human gut microbiota changes under the influence of environmental and genetic factors, affecting human health. Extensive studies have revealed that the gut microbiome is closely associated with many non-intestinal diseases. Among these, the influence of the gut microbiome on cancer biology and the efficacy of cancer therapy has attracted much attention. Prostate cancer cells are affected by direct contact with the microbiota of local tissues and urine, and a relationship between prostate cancer cells and the gut microbiota has been suggested. In the human gut microbiota, bacterial composition differs depending on prostate cancer characteristics, such as histological grade and castration resistance. Moreover, the involvement of several intestinal bacteria in testosterone metabolism has been demonstrated, suggesting that they may affect prostate cancer progression and treatment through this mechanism. Basic research indicates that the gut microbiome also plays an important role in the underlying biology of prostate cancer through multiple mechanisms owing to the activity of microbial-derived metabolites and components. In this review, we describe the evidence surrounding the emerging relationship between the gut microbiome and prostate cancer, termed the “gut-prostate axis.”