1.Subacromial Steroid Injection Is Safe and Effective in Patients with Persistent Painful Stiffness after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: a Level III Retrospective Cohort Study in Korea
Ajay WANKHADE ; Hyeon Jang JEONG ; Young Ki MIN ; Ji Hyun YEO ; Je Kyun KIM ; Joo Han OH
The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine 2025;43(1):30-36
Purpose:
Persistent postoperative stiffness is a common complication after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).We hypothesized that a subacromial steroid injection (SAI) may improve the early outcomes in patients with persistent stiffness without increasing steroid-associated complications. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of SAI in patients with persistent stiffness 3 months after ARCR.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 300 ARCR cases performed between January 2012 and May 2014, in which repair integrity was confirmed at postoperative 3 months. Patients were divided into SAI and control groups. The SAI group received a single SAI (triamcinolone 40 mg and ropivacaine 52.5 mg) to address postoperative stiffness, with no additional SAI thereafter. The control group did not receive any injections until the final follow-up. Functional and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results:
The mean follow-up period was 18.1±4.7 months (range, 12.1–37.2 months), with no difference between groups (p=0.731). At the time of injection, the range of motion was significantly lower in the SAI (all p<0.001). However, functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups at 3 months after injection and the final follow-up (all p> 0.05). The healing failure rate at the final follow-up also did not differ between the SAI and control groups (14.9% vs. 13.2%, p=0.671).
Conclusion
This short-term follow-up study suggests that the administration of a single SAI to treat persistent stiffness at 3 months after ARCR may improve functional recovery without increasing the risk of healing failure.
2.CSF1R-Related Adult-Onset Leukoencephalopathy With Axonal Spheroids: A Case Series of Four Asian Indian Patients
Divyani GARG ; Abhishek VAINGANKAR ; Anu GUPTA ; Roopa RAJAN ; Ajay GARG ; Ayush AGARWAL ; Farsana MUSTAFA ; Divya M RADHAKRISHNAN ; Awadh Kishor PANDIT ; Venugopalan Y VISHNU ; Mamta Bhushan SINGH ; Rohit BHATIA ; Achal Kumar SRIVASTAVA
Journal of Movement Disorders 2025;18(2):170-174
Objective:
Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor-related leukoencephalopathy (CSF1R-L) is a rare adult-onset leukoencephalopathy. Reports of CSF1R-L patients from the Indian subcontinent remain limited. We aimed to report four patients with genetically confirmed CSF1R-L from four Asian Indian families and described their clinical, molecular, and radiological features.
Methods:
All patients underwent clinical examination, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and whole-exome sequencing to identify causative variants in the CSF1R gene. We also reviewed published reports of Indian patients with CSF1R-L.
Results:
The age at enrollment ranged from 34 to 40 years. The duration of symptoms ranged from 11 months to 2 years. The chief clinical phenotype in three patients was a rapidly evolving cognitive-behavioral syndrome combined with atypical parkinsonism, and asymmetrical spastic tetraparesis was observed in one patient. We identified four different variants (three missense variants and one in-frame deletion). Radiological findings revealed white matter involvement and diffusion restriction involving the subcortical white matter and pyramidal tracts.
Conclusion
We expand the literature on CSF1R-L patients from India by reporting four new cases.
4.CSF1R-Related Adult-Onset Leukoencephalopathy With Axonal Spheroids: A Case Series of Four Asian Indian Patients
Divyani GARG ; Abhishek VAINGANKAR ; Anu GUPTA ; Roopa RAJAN ; Ajay GARG ; Ayush AGARWAL ; Farsana MUSTAFA ; Divya M RADHAKRISHNAN ; Awadh Kishor PANDIT ; Venugopalan Y VISHNU ; Mamta Bhushan SINGH ; Rohit BHATIA ; Achal Kumar SRIVASTAVA
Journal of Movement Disorders 2025;18(2):170-174
Objective:
Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor-related leukoencephalopathy (CSF1R-L) is a rare adult-onset leukoencephalopathy. Reports of CSF1R-L patients from the Indian subcontinent remain limited. We aimed to report four patients with genetically confirmed CSF1R-L from four Asian Indian families and described their clinical, molecular, and radiological features.
Methods:
All patients underwent clinical examination, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and whole-exome sequencing to identify causative variants in the CSF1R gene. We also reviewed published reports of Indian patients with CSF1R-L.
Results:
The age at enrollment ranged from 34 to 40 years. The duration of symptoms ranged from 11 months to 2 years. The chief clinical phenotype in three patients was a rapidly evolving cognitive-behavioral syndrome combined with atypical parkinsonism, and asymmetrical spastic tetraparesis was observed in one patient. We identified four different variants (three missense variants and one in-frame deletion). Radiological findings revealed white matter involvement and diffusion restriction involving the subcortical white matter and pyramidal tracts.
Conclusion
We expand the literature on CSF1R-L patients from India by reporting four new cases.
6.CSF1R-Related Adult-Onset Leukoencephalopathy With Axonal Spheroids: A Case Series of Four Asian Indian Patients
Divyani GARG ; Abhishek VAINGANKAR ; Anu GUPTA ; Roopa RAJAN ; Ajay GARG ; Ayush AGARWAL ; Farsana MUSTAFA ; Divya M RADHAKRISHNAN ; Awadh Kishor PANDIT ; Venugopalan Y VISHNU ; Mamta Bhushan SINGH ; Rohit BHATIA ; Achal Kumar SRIVASTAVA
Journal of Movement Disorders 2025;18(2):170-174
Objective:
Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor-related leukoencephalopathy (CSF1R-L) is a rare adult-onset leukoencephalopathy. Reports of CSF1R-L patients from the Indian subcontinent remain limited. We aimed to report four patients with genetically confirmed CSF1R-L from four Asian Indian families and described their clinical, molecular, and radiological features.
Methods:
All patients underwent clinical examination, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and whole-exome sequencing to identify causative variants in the CSF1R gene. We also reviewed published reports of Indian patients with CSF1R-L.
Results:
The age at enrollment ranged from 34 to 40 years. The duration of symptoms ranged from 11 months to 2 years. The chief clinical phenotype in three patients was a rapidly evolving cognitive-behavioral syndrome combined with atypical parkinsonism, and asymmetrical spastic tetraparesis was observed in one patient. We identified four different variants (three missense variants and one in-frame deletion). Radiological findings revealed white matter involvement and diffusion restriction involving the subcortical white matter and pyramidal tracts.
Conclusion
We expand the literature on CSF1R-L patients from India by reporting four new cases.
8.Subacromial Steroid Injection Is Safe and Effective in Patients with Persistent Painful Stiffness after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: a Level III Retrospective Cohort Study in Korea
Ajay WANKHADE ; Hyeon Jang JEONG ; Young Ki MIN ; Ji Hyun YEO ; Je Kyun KIM ; Joo Han OH
The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine 2025;43(1):30-36
Purpose:
Persistent postoperative stiffness is a common complication after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).We hypothesized that a subacromial steroid injection (SAI) may improve the early outcomes in patients with persistent stiffness without increasing steroid-associated complications. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of SAI in patients with persistent stiffness 3 months after ARCR.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 300 ARCR cases performed between January 2012 and May 2014, in which repair integrity was confirmed at postoperative 3 months. Patients were divided into SAI and control groups. The SAI group received a single SAI (triamcinolone 40 mg and ropivacaine 52.5 mg) to address postoperative stiffness, with no additional SAI thereafter. The control group did not receive any injections until the final follow-up. Functional and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results:
The mean follow-up period was 18.1±4.7 months (range, 12.1–37.2 months), with no difference between groups (p=0.731). At the time of injection, the range of motion was significantly lower in the SAI (all p<0.001). However, functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups at 3 months after injection and the final follow-up (all p> 0.05). The healing failure rate at the final follow-up also did not differ between the SAI and control groups (14.9% vs. 13.2%, p=0.671).
Conclusion
This short-term follow-up study suggests that the administration of a single SAI to treat persistent stiffness at 3 months after ARCR may improve functional recovery without increasing the risk of healing failure.
9.Subacromial Steroid Injection Is Safe and Effective in Patients with Persistent Painful Stiffness after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: a Level III Retrospective Cohort Study in Korea
Ajay WANKHADE ; Hyeon Jang JEONG ; Young Ki MIN ; Ji Hyun YEO ; Je Kyun KIM ; Joo Han OH
The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine 2025;43(1):30-36
Purpose:
Persistent postoperative stiffness is a common complication after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).We hypothesized that a subacromial steroid injection (SAI) may improve the early outcomes in patients with persistent stiffness without increasing steroid-associated complications. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of SAI in patients with persistent stiffness 3 months after ARCR.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 300 ARCR cases performed between January 2012 and May 2014, in which repair integrity was confirmed at postoperative 3 months. Patients were divided into SAI and control groups. The SAI group received a single SAI (triamcinolone 40 mg and ropivacaine 52.5 mg) to address postoperative stiffness, with no additional SAI thereafter. The control group did not receive any injections until the final follow-up. Functional and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results:
The mean follow-up period was 18.1±4.7 months (range, 12.1–37.2 months), with no difference between groups (p=0.731). At the time of injection, the range of motion was significantly lower in the SAI (all p<0.001). However, functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups at 3 months after injection and the final follow-up (all p> 0.05). The healing failure rate at the final follow-up also did not differ between the SAI and control groups (14.9% vs. 13.2%, p=0.671).
Conclusion
This short-term follow-up study suggests that the administration of a single SAI to treat persistent stiffness at 3 months after ARCR may improve functional recovery without increasing the risk of healing failure.
10.Subacromial Steroid Injection Is Safe and Effective in Patients with Persistent Painful Stiffness after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: a Level III Retrospective Cohort Study in Korea
Ajay WANKHADE ; Hyeon Jang JEONG ; Young Ki MIN ; Ji Hyun YEO ; Je Kyun KIM ; Joo Han OH
The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine 2025;43(1):30-36
Purpose:
Persistent postoperative stiffness is a common complication after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).We hypothesized that a subacromial steroid injection (SAI) may improve the early outcomes in patients with persistent stiffness without increasing steroid-associated complications. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of SAI in patients with persistent stiffness 3 months after ARCR.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 300 ARCR cases performed between January 2012 and May 2014, in which repair integrity was confirmed at postoperative 3 months. Patients were divided into SAI and control groups. The SAI group received a single SAI (triamcinolone 40 mg and ropivacaine 52.5 mg) to address postoperative stiffness, with no additional SAI thereafter. The control group did not receive any injections until the final follow-up. Functional and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results:
The mean follow-up period was 18.1±4.7 months (range, 12.1–37.2 months), with no difference between groups (p=0.731). At the time of injection, the range of motion was significantly lower in the SAI (all p<0.001). However, functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups at 3 months after injection and the final follow-up (all p> 0.05). The healing failure rate at the final follow-up also did not differ between the SAI and control groups (14.9% vs. 13.2%, p=0.671).
Conclusion
This short-term follow-up study suggests that the administration of a single SAI to treat persistent stiffness at 3 months after ARCR may improve functional recovery without increasing the risk of healing failure.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail